When using `createEmbeddedView` after the creation of an ICU expression, the nodes for the current selected case were not reprojected (only the anchor comment node was moved to the new location).
Now we reproject correctly all the child nodes of an ICU expression when an anchor comment node is projected.
FW-1372 #resolve
PR Close#30979
Currently in Ivy we throw when attempting to destroy a `ComponentRef` that has been destroyed, however in ViewEngine we didn't which can cause some tests to break. These changes remove the error to match ViewEngine.
These changes resolve FW-1379.
PR Close#31022
To provide some context: The implicit receiver is part of the
parsed Angular template AST. Any property reads in bindings,
interpolations etc. read from a given object (usually the component
instance). In that case there is an _implicit_ receiver which can also
be specified explicitly by just using `this`.
e.g.
```html
<ng-template>{{this.myProperty}}</ng-template>
```
This works as expected in Ivy and View Engine, but breaks in case the
implicit receiver is not used for property reads. For example:
```html
<my-dir [myFn]="greetFn.bind(this)"></my-dir>
```
In that case the `this` will not be properly translated into the generated
template function code because the Ivy compiler currently always treats
the `ctx` variable as the implicit receiver. This is **not correct** and breaks
compatibility with View Engine. Rather we need to ensure that we retrieve
the root context for the standalone implicit receiver similar to how it works
for property reads (as seen in the example above with `this.myProperty`)
Note that this requires some small changes to the `expression_converter`
because we only want to generate the `eenextContent()` instruction if the
implicit receiver is _actually_ used/needed. View Engine determines if that is the case by recursively walking through the converted output AST and
checking for usages of the `o.variable('_co')` variable ([see here][ve_check]). This would work too for Ivy, but involves most likely more code duplication
since templates are isolated in different functions and it another pass
through the output AST for every template expression.
[ve_check]: 0d6c9d36a1/packages/compiler/src/view_compiler/view_compiler.ts (L206-L208)
Resolves FW-1366.
PR Close#30897
17d87d4e10 has been created before the changes
to the `@ViewChild` and `@ContentChild` decorators. Meaning that it still uses the queries
without the `static` flag. This results in failures in `master` because #30625 has been merged.
PR Close#30967
`TView.firstChild` was defined as the first node with index 0, but when we use runtime i18n then the instruction `i18nStart` can be the one with index 0 and the first node will be index 1 or more.
With this fix we set `TView.firstChild` when we see the first node with index 0 or later if `TView.firstChild` is still null.
FW-1367 #resolve
PR Close#30920
This work is being done ahead of changes to how view insertion is done in Ivy in accordance with [this design document](https://hackmd.io/Ae3W_2pOQlKouu9YNy1t6A?view).
The idea is to make sure we have acceptance tests ahead of that change.
PR Close#30625
The `renderStringify` function shows up pretty high in the CPU profiling.
Turns out that this function contained unnecessary `typeof` check for
function types - the check only makes sense / is used in error messages.
The PR also alligns how ivy and view engine stringify functions used in
interpolations.
PR Close#30838
A directive input that doesn't use a binding is triggered during the creation phase. But this was only executed at the first template pass, and not on subsequent ones.
Now only the creation of the update instruction is executed on the first template pass, anything else is executed every time a template is created.
FW-1361 #resolve
PR Close#30870
When translated content was projected, all of the content was reappended, even the placeholders that had been removed in the translation.
To avoid that we added a new flag on `TNode` that specifies that a node is detached, in which case it should be ignored by the projection.
FW-1319 #resolve
PR Close#30783
Added a new syntax for projections (`¤` will represent `ng-content` nodes) so that we can treat them specifically.
When we enter an i18n block with the instruction `i18nStart`, a new `delayProjection` variable is set to true to prevent the instruction `projection` from projecting the nodes. Once we reach the `i18nEnd` instruction and encounter a projection in the translation we will project its nodes.
If a projection was removed from a translation, then its nodes won't be projected at all.
The variable `delayProjection` is restored to `false` at the end of `i18nEnd` so that it doesn't stop projections outside of i18n blocks.
FW-1261 #resolve
PR Close#30782
We used to ignore empty strings for optimization purposes, but it turns out that empty strings are also valid values for ICU cases and we shouldn't ignore those.
FW-1290 #resolve
PR Close#30846
Projecting bare ICU expressions failed because we would assume that component's content nodes would be projected later and doing so at that point would be wasteful. But ICU nodes are handled independently and should be inserted immediately because they will be ignored by projections.
FW-1348 #resolve
PR Close#30696
With View engine it was possible to declare multiple projection
definitions and to programmatically project nodes into the slots.
e.g.
```html
<ng-content></ng-content>
<ng-content></ng-content>
```
Using `ViewContainerRef#createComponent` allowed projecting
nodes into one of the projection defs (through index)
This no longer works with Ivy as the `projectionDef` instruction only
retrieves a list of selectors instead of also retrieving entries for
reserved projection slots which appear when using the default
selector multiple times (as seen above).
In order to fix this issue, the Ivy compiler now passes all
projection slots to the `projectionDef` instruction. Meaning that
there can be multiple projection slots with the same wildcard
selector. This allows multi-slot projection as seen in the
example above, and it also allows us to match the multi-slot node
projection order from View Engine (to avoid breaking changes).
It basically ensures that Ivy fully matches the View Engine behavior
except of a very small edge case that has already been discussed
in FW-886 (with the conclusion of working as intended).
Read more here: https://hackmd.io/s/Sy2kQlgTE
PR Close#30561
Currently with Ivy, `ModuleWithProvider` providers are processed in order
of declaration in the `NgModule` imports. This technically makes makes
sense but is a potential breaking change as `ModuleWithProvider` providers
are processed after all imported modules in View Engine.
In order to keep the behavior of View Engine, the `r3_injector` is updated
to no longer process `ModuleWithProvider` providers egarly.
Resolves FW-1349
PR Close#30688
Due to sanitization being stored as a temp/global value between
instructions, unit tests randomly failed because one test failed
to clean up its temporary value. This patch fixes this issue.
Changed runtime i18n to define attributes with bindings, or matching directive inputs/outputs as element properties as we are supposed to do in Angular.
This PR fixes the issue where directive inputs wouldn't be trigged.
FW-1315 #resolve
PR Close#30402
Plural ICU expressions depend on the locale (different languages have different plural forms). Until now the locale was hard coded as `en-US`.
For compatibility reasons, if you use ivy with AOT and bootstrap your app with `bootstrapModule` then the `LOCALE_ID` token will be set automatically for ivy, which is then used to get the correct plural form.
If you use JIT, you need to define the `LOCALE_ID` provider on the module that you bootstrap.
For `TestBed` you can use either `configureTestingModule` or `overrideProvider` to define that provider.
If you don't use the compat mode and start your app with `renderComponent` you need to call `ɵsetLocaleId` manually to define the `LOCALE_ID` before bootstrap. We expect this to change once we start adding the new i18n APIs, so don't rely on this function (there's a reason why it's a private export).
PR Close#29249
This patch is one of the final patches to refactor the styling algorithm
to be more efficient, performant and less complex.
This patch enables sanitization support for map-based and prop-based
style bindings.
PR Close#30667
This fixes a collision between #30639 and #30543 where the latter added
usages of @ViewChild without the static flag present, but the former
made the flag required.
PR Close#30666
This patch in the second runtime change which refactors how styling
bindings work in Angular. This patch refactors how map-based
`[style]` and `[class]` bindings work using a new algorithm which
is faster and less complex than the former one.
This patch is a follow-up to an earlier refactor which enabled
support for prop-based `[style.name]` and `[class.name]`
bindings (see f03475cac8).
PR Close#30543
Depending on which placeholders the translation uses, there are some legitimate cases where we might not use all placeholder replacements in `i18nPostprocess`. For example if some of the placeholders of the original messages have been removed in the translation.
FW-1312 #resolve
PR Close#30632
With Ivy, injecting a `ViewContainerRef` for a `<ng-container>` element
results in two comments generated in the DOM. One comment as host
element for the `ElementContainer` and one for the generated `LContainer`
which is needed for the created `ViewContainerRef`.
This is problematic as developers expect the same anchor element for
the `LContainer` and the `ElementContainer` in order to be able to move
the host element of `<ng-container>` without leaving the actual
`LContainer` anchor element at the original location.
This worked differently in View Engine and various applications might
depend on the behavior where the `ViewContainerRef` shares the anchor
comment node with the host comment node of the `<ng-container>`. For
example `CdkTable` from `@angular/cdk` moves around the host element of
a `<ng-container>` and also expects embedded views to be inserted next
to the moved `<ng-container>` host element.
See: f8be5329f8/src/cdk/table/table.ts (L999-L1016)
Resolves FW-1341
PR Close#30611
Prior to this change we processed binding expression (including bindings with pipes) in i18n attributes before we generate update instruction. As a result, slot offsets for pipeBind instructions were calculated incorrectly. Now we perform binding expression processing when we generate "update block" instructions, so offsets are calculated correctly.
PR Close#30573
Moves all manual render3 view_container_ref tests that use property
bindings to acceptance tests with TestBed.
Two issues surfaced and refer to a difference between Ivy and View
engine:
* Multi-slot projection is not working with Ivy: FW-1331
* ViewContainerRef throws if index is invalid while View Engine clamped index: FW-1330
PR Close#30488
This is the first refactor PR designed to change how styling bindings
(i.e. `[style]` and `[class]`) behave in Ivy. Instead of having a heavy
element-by-element context be generated for each element, this new
refactor aims to use a single context for each `tNode` element that is
examined and iterated over when styling values are to be applied to the
element.
This patch brings this new functionality to prop-based bindings such as
`[style.prop]` and `[class.name]`.
PR Close#30469
Moves most of the tests from `render3/integration_spec` into `acceptance`. Note that there are still a handful of tests left in render3, because we don't have a way of moving all of them to go through `TestBed` since they either have r3-specific assertions or we don't have access to the same APIs as the raw instructions.
PR Close#30461
Ports render3 onDestroy tests over to be acceptance tests. Removes old render3 tests if possible.
Note the onlyInIvy test for one area where Ivy has a different behavior than ViewEngine
PR Close#30445
- Adds inheritance tests for many combinations of directive, component and bare class inheritance
- Adds tests that are failing in ivy, but should work, marks them with `xit` and a TODO.
- Removes render3 unit tests that cover the same things.
PR Close#30442
In View Engine, we would simply ignore host style bindings on template nodes. In Ivy,
we are throwing a "Cannot read length of undefined" error instead. For backwards
compatibility, we should also ignore these bindings rather than blowing up.
PR Close#30498
In View engine it is possible to instantiate a service that that has no
`@Injectable` decorator as long as it satisfies one of:
1) It has no dependencies and so a constructor with no parameters.
This is already supported in Ivy.
2) It has no constructor of its own and sub-classes a service which has
dependencies but has its own `@Injectable` decorator. This second
scenario was broken in Ivy.
In Ivy, previous to this commit, if a class to be instantiated did not have
its own `@Injectable` decorator and did not provide a constructor of
its own, then it would be created using `new` with no arguments -
i.e. falling back to the first scenario.
After this commit Ivy correctly uses the `ngInjectableDef` inherited
from the super-class to provide the `factory` for instantiating the
sub-class.
FW-1314
PR Close#30388
- Moves template ref tests from render3 unit tests to acceptance tests.
- Marks tests testing ivy specific changes as `onlyInIvy`.
- Deletes old render3 unit tests that are no longer necessary
PR Close#30443
Preserve compatibility with rollup_bundle rule.
Add missing npm dependencies, which are now enforced by the strict_deps plugin in tsc_wrapped
PR Close#30370
Olivier Combe
crisbeto
Paul Gschwendtner
Ben Lesh
Pawel Kozlowski
Miško Hevery
Matias Niemelä
Alex Rickabaugh
Kara Erickson
Andrew Kushnir
Pete Bacon Darwin
cexbrayat
Alex Eagle