This fixes a collision between #30639 and #30543 where the latter added
usages of @ViewChild without the static flag present, but the former
made the flag required.
PR Close#30666
This commit makes the static flag on @ViewChild and @ContentChild required.
BREAKING CHANGE:
In Angular version 8, it's required that all @ViewChild and @ContentChild
queries have a 'static' flag specifying whether the query is 'static' or
'dynamic'. The compiler previously sorted queries automatically, but in
8.0 developers are required to explicitly specify which behavior is wanted.
This is a temporary requirement as part of a migration; see
https://angular.io/guide/static-query-migration for more details.
@ViewChildren and @ContentChildren queries are always dynamic, and so are
unaffected.
PR Close#30639
This patch in the second runtime change which refactors how styling
bindings work in Angular. This patch refactors how map-based
`[style]` and `[class]` bindings work using a new algorithm which
is faster and less complex than the former one.
This patch is a follow-up to an earlier refactor which enabled
support for prop-based `[style.name]` and `[class.name]`
bindings (see f03475cac8).
PR Close#30543
This is a new feature of the Ivy TestBed.
A common user pattern is to test one component with another. This is
commonly done by creating a `TestFixture` component which exercises the
main component under test.
This pattern is more difficult if the component under test is declared in an
NgModule but not exported. In this case, overriding the module is necessary.
In g3 (and View Engine), it's possible to use an NgSummary to override the
recompilation of a component, and depend on its AOT compiled factory. The
way this is implemented, however, specifying a summary for a module
effectively overrides much of the TestBed's other behavior. For example, the
following is legal:
```typescript
TestBed.configureTestingModule({
declarations: [FooCmp, TestFixture],
imports: [FooModule],
aotSummaries: [FooModuleNgSummary],
});
```
Here, `FooCmp` is declared in both the testing module and in the imported
`FooModule`. However, because the summary is provided, `FooCmp` is not
compiled within the context of the testing module, but _is_ made available
for `TestFixture` to use, even if it wasn't originally exported from
`FooModule`.
This pattern breaks in Ivy - because summaries are a no-op, this amounts
to a true double declaration of `FooCmp` which raises an error.
Fixing this in user code is possible, but is difficult to do in an
automated or backwards compatible way. An alternative solution is
implemented in this PR.
This PR attempts to capture the user intent of the following previously
unsupported configuration:
```typescript
TestBed.configureTestingModule({
declarations: [FooCmp, TestFixture],
imports: [FooModule],
});
```
Note that this is the same as the configuration above in Ivy, as the
`aotSummaries` value provided has no effect.
The user intent here is interpreted as follows:
1) `FooCmp` is a pre-existing component that's being used in the test
(via import of `FooModule`). It may or may not be exported by this
module.
2) `FooCmp` should be part of the testing module's scope. That is, it
should be visible to `TestFixture`. This is because it's listed in
`declarations`.
This feature effectively makes the `TestBed` testing module special. It's
able to declare components without compiling them, if they're already
compiled (or configured to be compiled) in the imports. And crucially, the
behavior matches the first example with the summary, making Ivy backwards
compatible with View Engine for tests that use summaries.
PR Close#30578
Depending on which placeholders the translation uses, there are some legitimate cases where we might not use all placeholder replacements in `i18nPostprocess`. For example if some of the placeholders of the original messages have been removed in the translation.
FW-1312 #resolve
PR Close#30632
Prior to this change a component was considered unresolved (i.e. having dynamic resources that should be loaded, like external template or stylesheets) even if template override was provided as an empty string (for example, via TestBed.overrideTemplateUsingTestingModule call). This commit fixes the condition that previously treated empty string as an absent template value.
PR Close#30602
With Ivy, injecting a `ViewContainerRef` for a `<ng-container>` element
results in two comments generated in the DOM. One comment as host
element for the `ElementContainer` and one for the generated `LContainer`
which is needed for the created `ViewContainerRef`.
This is problematic as developers expect the same anchor element for
the `LContainer` and the `ElementContainer` in order to be able to move
the host element of `<ng-container>` without leaving the actual
`LContainer` anchor element at the original location.
This worked differently in View Engine and various applications might
depend on the behavior where the `ViewContainerRef` shares the anchor
comment node with the host comment node of the `<ng-container>`. For
example `CdkTable` from `@angular/cdk` moves around the host element of
a `<ng-container>` and also expects embedded views to be inserted next
to the moved `<ng-container>` host element.
See: f8be5329f8/src/cdk/table/table.ts (L999-L1016)
Resolves FW-1341
PR Close#30611
Prior to this change we processed binding expression (including bindings with pipes) in i18n attributes before we generate update instruction. As a result, slot offsets for pipeBind instructions were calculated incorrectly. Now we perform binding expression processing when we generate "update block" instructions, so offsets are calculated correctly.
PR Close#30573
There is an encoding issue with using delta `Δ`, where the browser will attempt to detect the file encoding if the character set is not explicitly declared on a `<script/>` tag, and Chrome will find the `Δ` character and decide it is window-1252 encoding, which misinterprets the `Δ` character to be some other character that is not a valid JS identifier character
So back to the frog eyes we go.
```
__
/ɵɵ\
( -- ) - I am ineffable. I am forever.
_/ \_
/ \ / \
== == ==
```
PR Close#30546
Moves all manual render3 view_container_ref tests that use property
bindings to acceptance tests with TestBed.
Two issues surfaced and refer to a difference between Ivy and View
engine:
* Multi-slot projection is not working with Ivy: FW-1331
* ViewContainerRef throws if index is invalid while View Engine clamped index: FW-1330
PR Close#30488
This is the first refactor PR designed to change how styling bindings
(i.e. `[style]` and `[class]`) behave in Ivy. Instead of having a heavy
element-by-element context be generated for each element, this new
refactor aims to use a single context for each `tNode` element that is
examined and iterated over when styling values are to be applied to the
element.
This patch brings this new functionality to prop-based bindings such as
`[style.prop]` and `[class.name]`.
PR Close#30469
Moves most of the tests from `render3/integration_spec` into `acceptance`. Note that there are still a handful of tests left in render3, because we don't have a way of moving all of them to go through `TestBed` since they either have r3-specific assertions or we don't have access to the same APIs as the raw instructions.
PR Close#30461
Ports render3 onDestroy tests over to be acceptance tests. Removes old render3 tests if possible.
Note the onlyInIvy test for one area where Ivy has a different behavior than ViewEngine
PR Close#30445
- Adds inheritance tests for many combinations of directive, component and bare class inheritance
- Adds tests that are failing in ivy, but should work, marks them with `xit` and a TODO.
- Removes render3 unit tests that cover the same things.
PR Close#30442
In View Engine, we would simply ignore host style bindings on template nodes. In Ivy,
we are throwing a "Cannot read length of undefined" error instead. For backwards
compatibility, we should also ignore these bindings rather than blowing up.
PR Close#30498
In View engine it is possible to instantiate a service that that has no
`@Injectable` decorator as long as it satisfies one of:
1) It has no dependencies and so a constructor with no parameters.
This is already supported in Ivy.
2) It has no constructor of its own and sub-classes a service which has
dependencies but has its own `@Injectable` decorator. This second
scenario was broken in Ivy.
In Ivy, previous to this commit, if a class to be instantiated did not have
its own `@Injectable` decorator and did not provide a constructor of
its own, then it would be created using `new` with no arguments -
i.e. falling back to the first scenario.
After this commit Ivy correctly uses the `ngInjectableDef` inherited
from the super-class to provide the `factory` for instantiating the
sub-class.
FW-1314
PR Close#30388
- Moves template ref tests from render3 unit tests to acceptance tests.
- Marks tests testing ivy specific changes as `onlyInIvy`.
- Deletes old render3 unit tests that are no longer necessary
PR Close#30443
Preserve compatibility with rollup_bundle rule.
Add missing npm dependencies, which are now enforced by the strict_deps plugin in tsc_wrapped
PR Close#30370
Moves most of the r3 change detection tests into `acceptance`. Notes:
* A handful of tests weren't migrated, because they were testing an API that isn't exposed publicly yet.
* The `should throw if bindings in children of current view have changed` and `should NOT throw if bindings in ancestors of current view have changed` tests were removed, because there's not nice way of hitting the same code path with `TestBed` and doing the same assertion as with the raw instructions. I'm open to ideas on how we could do them.
* There were a few tests that assert that the `innerHTML` looks in a particular way. I've switched them to use `textContent`, because Ivy and ViewEngine produce slightly different DOM. The tests were only checking whether the text has changed anyway.
PR Close#30425
Moves all manual render3 property binding tests to
TestBed acceptance tests. Unfortunately three property
binding tests could not be migrated as these rely on
manual Ivy template code that is not supported within
TestBed. These can be revisited as discussed in the
framework team meeting.
PR Close#30426
Moves all manual render3 tests which are located within the
`renderer_factory_spec.ts` file to acceptance tests. A few tests
that use Ivy-specific logic which is not replicable with `TestBed`
remain in the render3 folder (e.g. using `renderTemplate`)
Additionally migrated tests that assert the lifecycles of the
renderer_factory are set to *ivy only* as the lifecycle seems
to be different in Ivy. Tracked with: FW-1320
PR Close#30435
Currently in Ivy `NgModule` registration happens when the class is declared, however this is inconsistent with ViewEngine and requires extra generated code. These changes remove the generated code for `registerModuleFactory`, pass the id through to the `ngModuleDef` and do the module registration inside `NgModuleFactory.create`.
This PR resolves FW-1285.
PR Close#30244
Ben Lesh
Alex Rickabaugh
Matias Niemelä
Olivier Combe
Kara Erickson
Misko Hevery
Andrew Kushnir
Paul Gschwendtner
Pawel Kozlowski
Kristiyan Kostadinov
Filipe Silva
Pete Bacon Darwin
cexbrayat
Alex Eagle