Currently, would-be binding attributes that are missing binding names
are not parsed as bindings, and fall through as regular attributes. In
some cases, this can lead to a runtime error; trying to assign `#` as a
DOM attribute in an element like in `<div #></div>` fails because `#` is
not a valid attribute name.
Attributes composed of binding prefixes but not defining a binding
should be considered invalid, as this almost certainly indicates an
unintentional elision of a binding by the developer. This commit
introduces error reporting for attributes with a binding name prefix but
no actual binding name.
Closes https://github.com/angular/vscode-ng-language-service/issues/293.
PR Close#34595
Expressions in an inline template binding are improperly recorded as
spaning an offset calculated from the start of the template binding
attribute key, whereas they should be calculated from the start of the
attribute value, which contains the actual binding AST.
PR Close#31813
This commit moves nested i18n section detection to an earlier stage where we convert HTML AST to Ivy AST. This also gives a chance to produce better diagnistic message for nested i18n sections, that also includes a file name and location.
PR Close#33583
If an <ng-template> contains a structural directive (for example *ngIf), Ngtsc generates extra template function with 1 template instruction call. When <ng-template> tag also contains i18n attribute on it, we generate i18nStart and i18nEnd instructions around it, which is unnecessary and breaking runtime. This commit adds a logic to make sure we do not generate i18n instructions in case only `template` is present.
PR Close#32623
Template AST nodes for (bound) attributes, variables and references will
now retain a reference to the source span of their value, which allows
for more accurate type check diagnostics.
PR Close#30181
Currently, template expressions and statements have their location
recorded relative to the HTML element they are in, with no handle to
absolute location in a source file except for a line/column location.
However, the line/column location is also not entirely accurate, as it
points an entire semantic expression, and not necessarily the start of
an expression recorded by the expression parser.
To support record of the source code expressions originate from, add a
new `sourceSpan` field to `ASTWithSource` that records the absolute byte
offset of an expression within a source code.
Implement part 2 of [refactoring template parsing for
stability](https://hackmd.io/@X3ECPVy-RCuVfba-pnvIpw/BkDUxaW84/%2FMA1oxh6jRXqSmZBcLfYdyw?type=book).
PR Close#31391
The content projection mechanism is static, in that it only looks at the static
template nodes before directives are matched and change detection is run.
When you have a selector-based content projection the selection is based
on nodes that are available in the template.
For example:
```
<ng-content selector="[some-attr]"></ng-content>
```
would match
```
<div some-attr="..."></div>
```
If you have an inline-template in your projected nodes. For example:
```
<div *ngIf="..." some-attr="..."></div>
```
This gets pre-parsed and converted to a canonical form.
For example:
```
<ng-template [ngIf]="...">
<div some-attr=".."></div>
</ng-template>
```
Note that only structural attributes (e.g. `*ngIf`) stay with the `<ng-template>`
node. The other attributes move to the contained element inside the template.
When this happens in ivy, the ng-template content is removed
from the component template function and is compiled into its own
template function. But this means that the information about the
attributes that were on the content are lost and the projection
selection mechanism is unable to match the original
`<div *ngIf="..." some-attr>`.
This commit adds support for this in ivy. Attributes are separated into three
groups (Bindings, Templates and "other"). For inline-templates the Bindings
and "other" types are hoisted back from the contained node to the `template()`
instruction, so that they can be used in content projection matching.
PR Close#29041
Angular supports using <style> and <link> tags inline in component
templates, but previously such tags were not implemented within the ngtsc
compiler. This commit introduces that support.
FW-1069 #resolve
PR Close#28997
During build time we remap particular property bindings, because their names don't match their attribute equivalents (e.g. the property for the `for` attribute is called `htmlFor`). This breaks down if the particular element has an input that has the same name, because the property gets mapped to something invalid.
The following changes address the issue by mapping the name during runtime, because that's when directives are resolved and we know all of the inputs that are associated with a particular element.
PR Close#28765
Prior to this change presence of HTML comments inside <ng-content> caused compiler to throw an error that <ng-content> is not empty. Now HTML comments are not considered as a meaningful content, thus no error is thrown. This behavior is now aligned in Ivy/VE.
PR Close#28849
When template bindings are being parsed the event handlers
were receiving a source span that included the whole attribute.
Now they get a span that is focussed on the handler itself.
PR Close#28055
Prior to this change we performed prop and attr name validation at compile time, which failed in case a given prop/attr is an input to a Directive (thus should not be a subject to this check). Since Directive matching in Ivy happens at runtime, the corresponding checks are now moved to runtime as well.
PR Close#28054
Prior to this change, we were unable to match directives using `ng-template` tags (for example the following selector would not work even though there might be some <ng-template>s in a template: `ng-template[directiveA]`. As a result, that broke some components that relies on such selectors to work. In order to resolve the problem, we now pass tag name to the `template` instruction (where we passed `null` before) and this tag name is used for matching at runtime. This update should also help support projecting containers, because the tag name is required to properly match such elements.
PR Close#27636
Prior to this change `projectDef` instructions were placed to root templates only, thus the necessary information (selectors) in nested templates was missing. This update adds the logic to insert `projectDef` instructions to all templates where <ng-content> is present.
PR Close#27384
A long time ago Angular used to support both those attribute notations:
- `*attr='binding'`
- `template=`attr: binding`
Because the last notation has been dropped we can refactor the binding parsing.
Source maps will benefit from that as no `attr:` prefix is added artificialy any
more.
PR Close#23460
