Since non-flat module formats (esm2015, esm5) have different structure
than their flat counterparts (and since we are operating on JS files
inside `node_modules/`, we need to configure TS to include deeply nested
JS files (by specifying a sufficiently high `maxNodeModuleJsDepth`).
Remains to be determined if this has any (noticeable) performance
implications.
PR Close#25406
In some code formats (e.g. ES5) methods can actually be function
expressions. For example:
```js
function MyClass() {}
// this static method is declared as a function expression
MyClass.staticMethod = function() { ... };
```
PR Close#25406
ngtsc's static resolver can evaluate function calls where parameters
have default values. In TypeScript code these default values live on the
function definition, but in ES5 code the default values are represented
by statements in the function body.
A new ReflectionHost method getDefinitionOfFunction() abstracts over
this difference, and allows the static reflector to more accurately
evaluate ES5 code.
PR Close#25406
A small bug caused base factory variable statements for @Component to
not be emitted properly. At the same time as this is fixed, those
statements are now emitted as const.
PR Close#25425
When @angular/core is compiled by ngtsc, a factory file is generated
for ApplicationModule, that is currently invalid because r3_symbols
does not export NgModuleFactory. This change fixes that issue and
ensures the generated ngfactory file for @angular/core is valid.
PR Close#25392
When generating the 'directives:' property of ngComponentDef, ngtsc
needs to be conscious of declaration order. If a directive being
written into the array is declarated after the component currently
being compiled, then the entire directives array needs to be wrapped
in a closure.
This commit fixes ngtsc to pay attention to such ordering issues
within directives arrays.
PR Close#25392
This commit creates an API for factory functions which allows them
to be inherited from one another. To do so, it differentiates between
the factory function as a wrapper for a constructor and the factory
function in ngInjectableDefs which is determined by a default
provider.
The new form is:
factory: (t?) => new (t || SomeType)(inject(Dep1), inject(Dep2))
The 't' parameter allows for constructor inheritance. A subclass with
no declared constructor inherits its constructor from the superclass.
With the 't' parameter, a subclass can call the superclass' factory
function and use it to create an instance of the subclass.
For @Injectables with configured providers, the factory function is
of the form:
factory: (t?) => t ? constructorInject(t) : provider();
where constructorInject(t) creates an instance of 't' using the
naturally declared constructor of the type, and where provider()
creates an instance of the base type using the special declared
provider on @Injectable.
PR Close#25392
Previously, ngtsc used a new ConstantPool for each decorator
compilation. This could result in collisions between constants in the
top-level scope.
Now, ngtsc uses a single ConstantPool for each source file being
compiled, and merges the constant statements into the file after the
import section.
PR Close#25392
The performCompilation() is always called with an undefined oldProgram option (even in watch mode).
This was regression introduced in: 957be960d2
Partial fix, discovered in: #21361
PR Close#21364
Inside of a nested template, an attempt to generate code for a banana-
in-a-box expression would cause a crash in the _AstToIrVisitor, as it
was not handling the case where a write would be generated to a local
variable.
This change supports such a mode of operation.
PR Close#25321
before:
```
Expected to find features 'import * as i0 from "@angular/core";
import { Directive, Input } from '@angular/core';
```
after:
```
Failed to find "template" after "...Component_Factory() { return new
MyComponent(); }," in:
'import * as i0 from "@angular/core";
import { Directive, Input } from '@angular/core';```
```
PR Close#25291
To match the View Engine behavior.
We should make this configurable so that the node injector is tree shaken when
directives do not need to be published.
PR Close#25291
Previously the compiler compliance tests ran and built test code with
real dependencies on @angular/core and @angular/common. This meant that
any changes to the compiler would result in long rebuild processes
for tests to rerun.
This change removes those dependencies and causes test code to be built
against the fake_core stub of @angular/core that the ngtsc tests use.
This change also removes the dependency on @angular/common entirely, as
locality means it's possible to reference *ngIf without needing to link
to an implementation.
PR Close#25248
Existing bootstrap code in the wild depends on the existence of
.ngfactory files, which Ivy does not need. This commit adds the
capability in ngtsc to generate .ngfactory files which bridge
existing bootstrap code with Ivy.
This is an initial step. Remaining work includes complying with
the compiler option to specify a generated file directory, as well
as presumably testing in g3.
PR Close#25176
Before this change bound properties would not be used when matching directives
at runtime.
That is `<ng-template [ngIf]=cond>...</ng-template>` would not trigger the
`ngIf` directive.
PR Close#25272
The optional property on `ts.CompilerHost` is called `realpath` (lower
case), not `realPath` (lower camel case).
It is not clear to me what the impact of this is, but the author's
intent was clearly to override `realpath`.
PR Close#25023
Update XMB placeholders(<ph>) to include the original value on top of an
example. Placeholders can by definition have one example(<ex>) tag and a
text node. The text node is used by TC as the "original" value from the
placeholder, while the example should represent a dummy value.
For example: <ph name="PET"><ex>Gopher</ex>{{ petName }}</ph>.
This change makes sure that we have the original text, but it *DOES NOT*
make sure that the example is correct. The example has the same wrong
behavior of showing the interpolation text rather than a useful
example.
No breaking changes, but tools that depend on the previous behavior and
don't consider the full XMB definition may fail to parse the XMB.
Fixes b/72565847
PR Close#25079
In some code formats (e.g. ES5) methods can actually be function
expressions. For example:
```js
function MyClass() {}
// this static method is declared as a function expression
MyClass.staticMethod = function() { ... };
```
PR Close#24897
George Kalpakas
Pete Bacon Darwin
Alex Rickabaugh
Marc Laval
Pawel Kozlowski
Kara Erickson
Miško Hevery
Greg Magolan
Ben Lesh
Alex Eagle
Ádám Lippai
Victor Berchet
Martin Probst
Carlos Ortiz Garcia