` tags,
first without a value (yielding the default color) and then with an assigned color value.
下面的代码把指令的`myHighlight`属性(Attribute)填加到两个`
`标签里，一个没有赋值，一个赋值了颜色。
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/app.component.html','highlight','app/app.component.html (highlight)')(format='.')
:marked
The following image shows the effect of mousing over the `
` tag.
下图显示了鼠标移到``标签的效果：
figure.image-display
img(src="/resources/images/cookbooks/dependency-injection/highlight.png" alt="Highlighted bios")
:marked
.l-main-section
:marked
## Define dependencies with providers
## 使用供应商来定义依赖
In this section we learn to write providers that deliver dependent services.
在这个部分，我们学习如何编写供应商来提供被依赖的服务。
### Background
### 背景知识
We get a service from a dependency injector by giving it a ***token***.
我们通过给依赖注入器提供***令牌***来获取服务。
We usually let Angular handle this transaction for us by specifying a constructor parameter and its type.
The parameter type serves as the injector lookup *token*.
Angular passes this token to the injector and assigns the result to the parameter.
Here's a typical example:
我们通常在构造函数里面，为参数指定类型，让Angular来处理依赖注入。该参数类型就是依赖注入器所需的*令牌*。
Angular把该令牌传给注入器，然后把得到的结果赋给参数。下面是一个典型的例子：
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/hero-bios.component.ts','ctor','app/hero-bios.component.ts (组件构造器注入)')(format='.')
:marked
Angular asks the injector for the service associated with the `LoggerService` and
and assigns the returned value to the `logger` parameter.
Angular向注入器请求与`LoggerService`对应的服务，并将返回值赋给`logger`参数。
Where did the injector get that value?
It may already have that value in its internal container.
If it doesn't, it may be able to make one with the help of a ***provider***.
A *provider* is a recipe for delivering a service associated with a *token*.
注入器从哪儿得到的依赖？
它可能在自己内部容器里已经有该依赖了。
如果它没有，也能在***供应商***的帮助下新建一个。
*供应商*就是一个用于交付服务的配方，它被关联到一个令牌。
.l-sub-section
:marked
If the injector doesn't have a provider for the requested *token*, it delegates the request
to its parent injector, where the process repeats until there are no more injectors.
If the search is futile, the injector throws an error ... unless the request was [optional](#optional).
如果注入器无法根据令牌在自己内部找到对应的供应商，它便将请求移交给它的父级注入器，这个过程不断重复，直到没有更多注入器为止。
如果没找到，注入器就抛出一个错误...除非这个请求是[可选的](#optional)。
Let's return our attention to providers themselves.
让我们把注意力转回到供应商。
:marked
A new injector has no providers.
新建的注入器中没有供应商。
Angular initializes the injectors it creates with some providers it cares about.
We have to register our _own_ application providers manually,
usually in the `providers` array of the `Component` or `Directive` metadata:
Angular会使用一些自带的供应商来初始化这些注入器。我们必须自行注册属于_自己_的供应商，通常用`组件`或者`指令`元数据中的`providers`数组进行注册。
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/app.component.ts','providers','app/app.component.ts (供应商)')
:marked
### Defining providers
### 定义供应商
The simple class provider is the most typical by far.
We mention the class in the `providers` array and we're done.
简单的类供应商是最典型的例子。我们只要在`providers`数值里面提到该类就可以了。
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/hero-bios.component.ts','class-provider','app/hero-bios.component.ts (类供应商)')(format='.')
:marked
It's that simple because the most common injected service is an instance of a class.
But not every dependency can be satisfied by creating a new instance of a class.
We need other ways to deliver dependency values and that means we need other ways to specify a provider.
注册类供应商之所以这么简单，是因为最常见的可注入服务就是一个类的实例。
但是，并不是所有的依赖都只要创建一个类的新实例就可以交付了。我们还需要其它的交付方式，这意味着我们也需要其它方式来指定供应商。
The `HeroOfTheMonthComponent` example demonstrates many of the alternatives and why we need them.
`HeroOfTheMonthComponent`例子示范了一些备选方案，展示了我们为什么需要它们。
figure.image-display
img(src="/resources/images/cookbooks/dependency-injection/hero-of-month.png" alt="Hero of the month" width="300px")
:marked
It's visually simple: a few properties and the output of a logger. The code behind it gives us plenty to talk about.
它看起来很简单：一些属性和一个日志输出。但代码的背后有很多可讨论的地方。
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/hero-of-the-month.component.ts','hero-of-the-month','hero-of-the-month.component.ts')
.l-main-section
a(id='provide')
:marked
#### The *provide* function
#### *provide*函数
The imported Angular `provide` function creates an instance of
the Angular [Provider](../api/core/Provider-class.html) class.
被导入的Angular `provide`函数新建一个Angular [Provider](../api/core/Provider-class.html)类的实例。
The `provide` function takes a *token* and a *definition object*.
The *token* is usually a class but [it doesn't have to be](#tokens).
该`provide`函数需要一个*令牌*和一个*定义对象*。该*令牌*通常是一个类，但[并非一定是](#tokens)
The *definition* object has one main property, (e.g. `useValue`) that indicates how the provider
should create or return the provided value.
该*定义*对象有一个主属性（即`userValue`)，用来标识该供应商会如何新建和返回依赖。
.l-main-section
a(id='usevalue')
:marked
#### useValue - the *value provider*
#### useValue - *值-供应商*
Set the `useValue` property to a ***fixed value*** that the provider can return as the dependency object.
把一个***固定的值**，也就是该供应商可以将其作为依赖对象返回的值，赋给`userValue`属性。
Use this technique to provide *runtime configuration constants* such as web-site base addresses and feature flags.
We often use a *value provider* in a unit test to replace a production service with a fake or mock.
使用该技巧来进行*运行期常量设置*，比如网站的基础地址和功能标志等。
我们通常在单元测试中使用*值-供应商*，用一个假的或模仿的（服务）来取代一个生产环境的服务。
The `HeroOfTheMonthComponent` example has two *value providers*.
The first provides an instance of the `Hero` class;
the second specifies a literal string resource:
`HeroOfTheMonthComponent`例子有两个*值-供应商*。
第一个提供了一个`Hero`类的实例；第二个指定了一个字符串资源：
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/hero-of-the-month.component.ts','use-value')(format='.')
:marked
The `Hero` provider token is a class which makes sense because the value is a `Hero`
and the consumer of the injected hero would want the type information.
`Hero`供应商的令牌是一个类，这很合理，因为它提供的结果是一个`Hero`实例，并且被注入该英雄的消费者也需要知道它类型信息。
The `TITLE` provider token is *not a class*.
It's a special kind of provider lookup key called an [OpaqueToken](#opaquetoken).
We often use an `OpaqueToken` when the dependency is a simple value like a string, a number, or a function.
`TITLE` 供应商的令牌*不是一个类*。它是一个特别类型的供应商查询键，名叫[OpaqueToken](#opaquetoken).
The value of a *value provider* must be defined *now*. We can't create the value later.
Obviously the title string literal is immediately available.
The `someHero` variable in this example was set earlier in the file:
一个*值-供应商*的值必须要*立即*定义。我们不能事后再定义它的值。很显然，标题字符串是立刻可用的。
该例中的`someHero`变量是以前在下面这个文件中定义的：
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/hero-of-the-month.component.ts','some-hero')
:marked
The other providers create their values *lazily* when they're needed for injection.
其它供应商只在需要注入它们的时候才创建并*延迟加载*它们的值。
.l-main-section
a(id='useclass')
:marked
#### useClass - the *class provider*
#### useClass - *类-供应商*
The `useClass` provider creates and returns new instance of the specified class.
`userClass`供应商创建并返回一个指定类的新实例。
Use this technique to ***substitute an alternative implementation*** for a common or default class.
The alternative could implement a different strategy, extend the default class,
or fake the behavior of the real class in a test case.
使用该技术来为公共或默认类***提供候选实现***。该候选项能实现一个不同的策略，比如拓展默认类或者在测试的时候假冒真实类。
We see two examples in the `HeroOfTheMonthComponent`:
请看下面`HeroOfTheMonthComponent`里的两个例子：
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/hero-of-the-month.component.ts','use-class')(format='.')
:marked
The first provider is the *de-sugared*, expanded form of the most typical case in which the
class to be created (`HeroService`) is also the provider's injection token.
We wrote it in this long form to de-mystify the preferred short form.
第一个供应商是*展开了语法糖的*，是一个典型情况的展开。一般来说，被新建的类(`HeroService`)同时也是该供应商的注入令牌。
我们这里用完整形态来编写它，来反衬我们更喜欢的缩写形式。
The second provider substitutes the `DateLoggerService` for the `LoggerService`.
The `LoggerService` is already registered at the `AppComponent` level.
When _this component_ requests the `LoggerService`, it receives the `DateLoggerService` instead.
第二个供应商使用`DateLoggerService`来满足`LoggerService`。该`LoggerService`在`AppComponent`级别已经被注册。当_这个组件_要求`LoggerService`的时候，它得到的却是`DateLoggerService`服务。
.l-sub-section
:marked
This component and its tree of child components receive the `DateLoggerService` instance.
Components outside the tree continue to receive the original `LoggerService` instance.
这个组件及其子组件会得到`DateLoggerService`实例。这个组件树之外的组件得到的仍是`LoggerService`实例。
:marked
The `DateLoggerService` inherits from `LoggerService`; it appends the current date/time to each message:
`DateLoggerService`从`LoggerService`继承；它把当前的日期/时间附加到每条信息上。
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/date-logger.service.ts','date-logger-service','app/date-logger.service.ts')(format='.')
.l-main-section
a(id='useexisting')
:marked
#### useExisting - the *alias provider*
#### useExisting - *别名-供应商*
The `useExisting` provider maps one token to another.
In effect, the first token is an ***alias*** for the service associated with second token,
creating ***two ways to access the same service object***.
使用`useExisting`，供应商可以把一个令牌映射到另一个令牌上。实际上，第一个令牌是第二个令牌所对应的服务的一个***别名***，创造了***访问同一个服务对象的两种方法***。
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/hero-of-the-month.component.ts','use-existing')
:marked
Narrowing an API through an aliasing interface is _one_ important use case for this technique.
We're aliasing for that very purpose here.
Imagine that the `LoggerService` had a large API (it's actually only three methods and a property).
We want to shrink that API surface to just the two members exposed by the `MinimalLogger` [*class-interface*](#class-interface):
通过使用别名接口来把一个API变窄，是_一个_很重要的该技巧的使用例子。我们在这里就是为了这个目的使用的别名。
想象一下如果`LoggerService`有个很大的API接口(虽然它其实只有三个方法，一个属性)，我们通过使用`MinimalLogger`[*类-接口*](#class-interface)别名，就能成功的把这个API接口缩小到只暴露两个成员：
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/date-logger.service.ts','minimal-logger','app/date-logger.service.ts (MinimalLogger)')(format='.')
:marked
The constructor's `logger` parameter is typed as `MinimalLogger` so only its two members are visible in TypeScript:
构造函数的`logger`参数是一个`MinimalLogger`类型，所有在TypeScript里面，它只有两个成员可见：
figure.image-display
img(src="/resources/images/cookbooks/dependency-injection/minimal-logger-intellisense.png" alt="MinimalLogger受限API")
:marked
Angular actually sets the `logger` parameter to the injector's full version of the `LoggerService`
which happens to be the `DateLoggerService` thanks to the override provider registered previously via `useClass`.
The following image, which displays the logging date, confirms the point:
实际上，Angular确实想把`logger`参数设置为注入器里`LoggerService`的完整版本。只是在之前的供应商注册里使用了`useClass`，
所以该完整版本被`DateLoggerService`取代了。
在下面的图片中，显示了日志日期，可以确认这一点：
figure.image-display
img(src="/resources/images/cookbooks/dependency-injection/date-logger-entry.png" alt="DateLoggerService entry" width="300px")
.l-main-section
a(id='usefactory')
:marked
#### useFactory - the *factory provider*
#### useFactory - *工厂-供应商*
The `useFactory` provider creates a dependency object by calling a factory function
as seen in this example.
`useFactory` 供应商通过调用工厂函数来新建一个依赖对象，如下例所示。
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/hero-of-the-month.component.ts','use-factory')
:marked
Use this technique to ***create a dependency object***
with a factory function whose inputs are some ***combination of injected services and local state***.
使用这项技术，可以用包含了一些***依赖服务和本地状态***输入的工厂函数来***建立一个依赖对象***。
The *dependency object* doesn't have to be a class instance. It could be anything.
In this example, the *dependency object* is a string of the names of the runners-up
to the "Hero of the Month" contest.
该*依赖对象*不一定是一个类实例。它可以是任何东西。在这个例子里，*依赖对象*是一个字符串，代表了**本月英雄**比赛的亚军的名字。
The local state is the number `2`, the number of runners-up this component should show.
We execute `runnersUpFactory` immediately with `2`.
本地状态是数字`2`，该组件应该显示的亚军的个数。我们立刻用`2`来执行`runnersUpFactory`。
The `runnersUpFactory` itself isn't the provider factory function.
The true provider factory function is the function that `runnersUpFactory` returns.
`runnersUpFactory`自身不是供应商工厂函数。真正的供应商工厂函数是`runnersUpFactory`返回的函数。
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/runners-up.ts','factory-synopsis','runners-up.ts (excerpt)')(format='.')
:marked
That returned function takes a winning `Hero` and a `HeroService` as arguments.
这个返回的函数需要一个`Hero`和一个`HeroService`参数。
Angular supplies these arguments from injected values identified by
the two *tokens* in the `deps` array.
The two `deps` values are *tokens* that the injector uses
to provide these factory function dependencies.
Angular通过使用`deps`数组中的两个*令牌*，来识别注入的值，用来提供这些参数。这两个`deps`值是供注入器使用的*令牌*，用来提供工厂函数的依赖。
After some undisclosed work, the function returns the string of names
and Angular injects it into the `runnersUp` parameter of the `HeroOfTheMonthComponent`.
一些内部工作后，这个函数返回名字字符串，Angular将其注入到`HeroOfTheMonthComponent`组件的`runnersUp`参数里。
.l-sub-section
:marked
The function retrieves candidate heroes from the `HeroService`,
takes `2` of them to be the runners-up, and returns their concatenated names.
Look at the [live example](/resources/live-examples/cb-dependency-injection/ts/plnkr.html)
for the full source code.
该函数从`HeroService`获取英雄参赛者，从中取`2`个作为亚军，并把他们的名字拼接起来。请到[在线例子](/resources/live-examples/cb-dependency-injection/ts/plnkr.html)查看全部原代码。
.l-main-section
:marked
## Define providers with object literals
## 使用对象文本定义供应商
:marked
In the previous section we learned to use the `provide` method to customize how dependencies are created.
Instead of calling the `provide` function, we can configure providers with _object literals_.
It's a slightly more concise syntax and we don't have to import the `provide` function.
Here's a set of providers that we saw earlier, re-written with object literals.
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/hero-of-the-month-literals.component.ts','providers-using-object-literals')(format='.')
a(id="tokens")
.l-main-section
:marked
## Provider token alternatives: the *class-interface* and *OpaqueToken*
## 可选供应商令牌：*类-接口*和*OpaqueToken*
Angular dependency injection is easiest when the provider *token* is a class
that is also the type of the returned dependency object (what we usually call the *service*).
Angular依赖注入当*令牌*是类的时候是最简单的，该类同时也是返回的依赖对象的类型（我们通常直接称之为*服务*）。
But the token doesn't have to be a class and even when it is a class,
it doesn't have to be the same type as the returned object.
That's the subject of our next section.
但令牌不一定都是类，就算它是一个类，它也不一定都返回类型相同的对象。这是我们下一节的主题。
### class-interface
### 类-接口
In the previous *Hero of the Month* example, we used the `MinimalLogger` class
as the token for a provider of a `LoggerService`.
在前面的*每月英雄*的例子中，我们用了`MinimalLogger`类作为`LoggerService` 供应商的令牌。
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/hero-of-the-month.component.ts','use-existing')
:marked
The `MinimalLogger` is an abstract class.
该`MinimalLogger`是一个抽象类。
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/date-logger.service.ts','minimal-logger')(format='.')
:marked
We usually inherit from an abstract class.
But `LoggerService` doesn't inherit from `MinimalLogger`. *No class* inherits from it.
Instead, we use it like an interface.
我们通常从一个抽象类继承。但`LoggerService`并不继承`MinimalLogger`。*没有类*会继承它。我们只把它当接口来使用。
Look again at the declaration for `DateLoggerService`
请再看下`DateLoggerService`的声明
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/date-logger.service.ts','date-logger-service-signature')(format='.')
:marked
`DateLoggerService` inherits (extends) from `LoggerService`, not `MinimalLogger`.
The `DateLoggerService` *implements* `MinimalLogger` as if `MinimalLogger` were an *interface*.
`DateLoggerService`继承（扩展）了`LoggerService`，而不是`MinimalLogger`。该`DateLoggerService`*实现了*`MinimalLogger`，就像`MinimalLogger`是一个接口一样。
We call a class used in this way a ***class-interface***.
The key benefit of a *class-interface* is that we can get the strong-typing of an interface
and we can ***use it as a provider token*** in the same manner as a normal class.
我们称这种用法的类叫做*类-接口*。它关键的好处是：给我们提供了接口的强类型，同时，我们能像正常类一样***把它当做供应商令牌使用***。
A ***class-interface*** should define *only* the members that its consumers are allowed to call.
Such a narrowing interface helps decouple the concrete class from its consumers.
The `MinimalLogger` defines just two of the `LoggerClass` members.
***类-接口***应该*只*定义它的消费者允许调用的成员。窄的接口有助于我们解耦该类的具体实现和它的消费者。
该`MinimalLogger`只定义了两个`LoggerClass`的成员。
.l-sub-section
:marked
#### Why *MinimalLogger* is a class and not an interface
#### 为什么*MinimalLogger*是一个类而不是一个接口
We can't use an interface as a provider token because
interfaces are not JavaScript objects.
They exist only in the TypeScript design space.
They disappear after the code is transpiled to JavaScript.
我们不能把接口当做供应商的令牌，因为接口不是有效的JavaScript对象。
它们只存在在TypeScript的设计空间里。它们会在被编译为JavaScript之后消失。
A provider token must be a real JavaScript object of some kind:
a function, an object, a string ... a class.
一个供应商令牌必须是一个真实的JavaScript对象，比如：一个函数，一个对象，一个字符串 ...一个类。
Using a class as an interface gives us the characteristics of an interface in a JavaScript object.
把类当做接口使用，可以为我们在一个JavaScript对象上提供类似于接口的特性。
The minimize memory cost, the class should have *no implementation*.
The `MinimalLogger` transpiles to this unoptimized, pre-minified JavaScript:
为了节省内存占用，该类应该***没有具体的实现***。`MinimalLogger`会被转译成下面这段没有优化过的，尚未最小化的JavaScript：
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/date-logger.service.ts','minimal-logger-transpiled')(format='.')
:marked
It never grows larger no matter how many members we add *as long as they are typed but not implemented*.
***只要我们不实现它***，不管我们添加多少成员，它永远不会增长大小。
a(id='opaque-token')
:marked
### OpaqueToken
### OpaqueToken
Dependency objects can be simple values like dates, numbers and strings or
shapeless objects like arrays and functions.
依赖对象可以是一个简单的值，比如日期，数字和字符串，或者一个无形的对象，比如数组和函数。
Such objects don't have application interfaces and therefore aren't well represented by a class.
They're better represented by a token that is both unique and symbolic,
a JavaScript object that has a friendly name but won't conflict with
another token that happens to have the same name.
这样的对象没有应用程序接口，所以不能用一个类来表示。更适合表示它们的是：唯一的和符号性的令牌，一个JavaScript对象，拥有一个友好的名字，但不会与其它的同名令牌发生冲突。
The `OpaqueToken` has these characteristics.
We encountered them twice in the *Hero of the Month* example,
in the *title* value provider and in the *runnersUp* factory provider.
`OpaqueToken`具有这些特征。我们在*Hero of the Month*例子中遇见它们两次，一个是*title*的值，一个是*runnersUp* 工厂供应商。
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/hero-of-the-month.component.ts','provide-opaque-token')(format='.')
:marked
We created the `TITLE` token like this:
我们这样创建`TITLE`令牌：
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/hero-of-the-month.component.ts','opaque-token')(format='.')
a(id="di-inheritance")
.l-main-section
:marked
## Inject into a derived class
## 注入到一个派生类
We must take care when writing a component that inherits from another component.
If the base component has injected dependencies,
we must re-provide and re-inject them in the derived class
and then pass them down to the base class through the constructor.
当编写一个继承自另一个组件的组件时，我们要格外小心。如果基础组件有依赖注入，我们必须要在派生类中重新提供和重新注入它们，并将它们通过构造函数传给基类。
In this contrived example, `SortedHeroesComponent` inherits from `HeroesBaseComponent`
to display a *sorted* list of heroes.
在这个生造的例子里，`SortedHeroesComponent`继承自`HeroesBaseComponent`，显示一个*被排序*的英雄列表。
figure.image-display
img(src="/resources/images/cookbooks/dependency-injection/sorted-heroes.png" alt="Sorted Heroes")
:marked
The `HeroesBaseComponent` could stand on its own.
It demands its own instance of the `HeroService` to get heroes
and displays them in the order they arrive from the database.
`HeroesBaseComponent`能自己独立运行。它在自己的实例里要求`HeroService`，用来得到英雄，并将它们按照数据库返回的顺序显示出来。
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/sorted-heroes.component.ts','heroes-base','app/sorted-heroes.component.ts (HeroesBaseComponent)')
.l-sub-section
:marked
We strongly prefer simple constructors. They should do little more than initialize variables.
This rule makes the component safe to construct under test without fear that it will do something dramatic like talk to the server.
That's why we call the `HeroService` from within the `ngOnInit` rather than the constructor.
我们强烈推荐简单的构造函数。它们应该***只***用来初始化变量。这个规则会帮助我们在测试环境中放心的构造组件，以免在构造它们时，无意做了一些非常戏剧化的动作（比如连接服务）。
这就是为什么我们要在`ngOnInit`里面调用`HeroService`，而不是在构造函数中。
We explain the mysterious `afterGetHeroes` below.
我们在下面解释这个神秘的`afterGetHeroes`。
:marked
Users want to see the heroes in alphabetical order.
Rather than modify the original component, we sub-class it and create a
`SortedHeroesComponent` that sorts the heroes before presenting them.
The `SortedHeroesComponent` lets the base class fetch the heroes.
(we said it was contrived).
用户希望看到英雄按字母顺序排序。与其修改原始的组件，不如派生它，新建`SortedHeroesComponent`，以便展示英雄之前进行排序。
`SortedHeroesComponent`让基类来获取英雄。（我们说过这是生造的，仅用来解释这种机制）。
Unfortunately, Angular cannot inject the `HeroService` directly into the base class.
We must provide the `HeroService` again for *this* component,
then pass it down to the base class inside the constructor.
可惜，Angular不能直接在基类里直接注入`HeroService`。我们必须在*这个*组件里再次提供`HeroService`，然后通过构造函数传给基类。
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/sorted-heroes.component.ts','sorted-heroes','app/sorted-heroes.component.ts (SortedHeroesComponent)')
:marked
Now take note of the `afterGetHeroes` method.
Our first instinct was to create an `ngOnInit` method in `SortedHeroesComponent` and do the sorting there.
But Angular calls the *derived* class's `ngOnInit` *before* calling the base class's `ngOnInit`
so we'd be sorting the heroes array *before they arrived*. That produces a nasty error.
现在，请注意`_afterGetHeroes`方法。
我们第一反应是在`SortedHeroesComponent`组件里面建一个`ngOnInit`方法来做排序。但是Angular会先调用*派生*类的`ngOnInit`，后调用基类的`ngOnInit`，
所以我们可能在*英雄到达之前*就开始排序。这就产生了一个讨厌的错误。
Overriding the base class's `afterGetHeroes` method solves the problem
覆盖基类的`afterGetHeroes`方法可以解决这个问题。
These complications argue for *avoiding component inheritance*.
分析上面的这些复杂性是为了强调*避免使用组件继承*这一点。
a(id="find-parent")
.l-main-section
:marked
## Find a parent component by injection
## 通过注入来找到一个父组件
Application components often need to share information.
We prefer the more loosely coupled techniques such as data binding and service sharing.
But sometimes it makes sense for one component to have a direct reference to another component
perhaps to access values or call methods on that component.
应用程序组件经常需要共享信息。我们喜欢更加松耦合的技术，比如数据绑定和服务共享。
但有时候组件确实需要拥有另一个组件的引用，用来访问该组件的属性值或者调用它的方法。
Obtaining a component reference is a bit tricky in Angular.
Although an Angular application is a tree of components,
there is no public API for inspecting and traversing that tree.
在Angular里，获取一个组件的引用比较复杂。虽然Angular应用程序是一个组件树，但它没有公开的API来在该树中巡查和穿梭。
There is an API for acquiring a child reference
(checkout `Query`, `QueryList`, `ViewChildren`, and `ContentChildren`).
有一个API可以获取子级的引用（请看`Query`, `QueryList`, `ViewChildren`,和`ContentChildren`)。
There is no public API for acquiring a parent reference.
But because every component instance is added to an injector's container,
we can use Angular dependency injection to reach a parent component.
但没有公开的API来获取父组件的引用。但是因为每个组件的实例都被加到了依赖注入器的容器中，我们可以使用Angular依赖注入来找到父组件。
This section describes some techniques for doing that.
本章节描述了这项技术。
### Find a parent component of known type
### 找到已知类型的父组件
We use standard class injection to acquire a parent component whose type we know.
我们使用标准的类注入来获取已知类型的父组件。
In the following example, the parent `AlexComponent` has several children including a `CathyComponent`:
在下面的例子中，父组件`AlexComponent`有几个子组件，包括`CathyComponent`:
a(id='alex')
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/parent-finder.component.ts','alex-1','parent-finder.component.ts (AlexComponent v.1)')(format='.')
:marked
*Cathy* reports whether or not she has access to *Alex*
after injecting an `AlexComponent` into her constructor:
在注入*AlexComponent`进来后，*Cathy*报告它是否对*Alex*有访问权：
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/parent-finder.component.ts','cathy','parent-finder.component.ts (CathyComponent)')(format='.')
:marked
We added the [@Optional](#optional) qualifier for safety but
the [live example](/resources/live-examples/cb-dependency-injection/ts/plnkr.html)
confirms that the `alex` parameter is set.
安全起见，我们添加了[@Optional](#optional)装饰器，但是[在线例子](/resources/live-examples/cb-dependency-injection/ts/plnkr.html)显示`alex`参数确实被设置了。
### Cannot find a parent by its base class
### 无法通过它的基类找到一个父级
What if we do *not* know the concrete parent component class?
如果我们*不*知道具体的父组件类名怎么办？
A re-usable component might be a child of multiple components.
Imagine a component for rendering breaking news about a financial instrument.
For sound (cough) business reasons, this news component makes frequent calls
directly into its parent instrument as changing market data stream by.
一个可复用的组件可能是多个组件的子级。想象一个用来渲染金融工具头条新闻的组件。为了合理（咳咳）的商业理由，该新闻组件在实时变化的市场数据流过时，要频繁的直接调用其父级工具。
The app probably defines more than a dozen financial instrument components.
If we're lucky, they all implement the same base class
whose API our `NewsComponent` understands.
该应用程序可能有多于一打的金融工具组件。如果幸运，它们可能会从同一个基类派生，其API是我们的`NewsComponent`组件所能理解的。
.l-sub-section
:marked
Looking for components that implement an interface would be better.
That's not possible because TypeScript interfaces disappear from the transpiled JavaScript
which doesn't support interfaces. There's no artifact we could look for.
更好的方式是通过接口来寻找实现了它的组件。但这是不可能的，因为TypeScript的接口在编译成JavaScript以后就消失了，JavaScript不支持接口。我们没有东西可查。
:marked
We're not claiming this is good design.
We are asking *can a component inject its parent via the parent's base class*?
这并不是好的设计。我们的问题是*一个组件是否能通过它父组件的基类来注入它的父组件呢*？
The sample's `CraigComponent` explores this question. [Looking back](#alex)
we see that the `Alex` component *extends* (*inherits*) from a class named `Base`.
`CraigComponent`例子探究了这个问题。[往回看Alex]{#alex}，我们看到`Alex`组件*扩展*（*派生*）自一个叫`Base`的类。
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/parent-finder.component.ts','alex-class-signature','parent-finder.component.ts (Alex class signature)')(format='.')
:marked
The `CraigComponent` tries to inject `Base` into its `alex` constructor parameter and reports if it succeeded.
`CraigComponent`试图把`Base`注入到到它的`alex`构造函数参数，来报告是否成功。
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/parent-finder.component.ts','craig','parent-finder.component.ts (CraigComponent)')(format='.')
:marked
Unfortunately, this does not work.
The [live example](/resources/live-examples/cb-dependency-injection/ts/plnkr.html)
confirms that the `alex` parameter is null.
*We cannot inject a parent by its base class.*
可惜这样不行。[在线例子](/resources/live-examples/cb-dependency-injection/ts/plnkr.html)显示`alex`参数是null。
*我们不能通过基类注入父组件*。
### Find a parent by its class-interface
### 通过类-接口找到父组件
We can find a parent component with a [class-interface](#class-interface).
我们可以通过[类-接口](#class-interface)找到一个父组件。
The parent must cooperate by providing an *alias* to itself in the name of a *class-interface* token.
该父组件必须通过提供一个与*类-接口*令牌同名的*别名*来与之合作。
Recall that Angular always adds a component instance to its own injector;
that's why we could inject *Alex* into *Carol* [earlier](#known-parent).
请记住Angular总是从它自己的注入器添加一个组件实例；这就是为什么在[之前](#known-parent)我们可以*Alex*注入到*Carol*。
We write an [*alias provider*](#useexisting) — a `provide` function with a `useExisting` definition —
that creates an *alternative* way to inject the same component instance
and add that provider to the `providers` array of the `@Component` metadata for the `AlexComponent`:
我们编写一个[*别名供应商*](#useexisting) &mdash；一个拥有`useExisting`定义的`provide`函数 —
它新建一个*备选的*方式来注入同一个组件实例，并把这个供应商添加到`AlexComponent`的`@Component`元数据里的`providers`数组。
a(id="alex-providers")
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/parent-finder.component.ts','alex-providers','parent-finder.component.ts (AlexComponent providers)')(format='.')
:marked
[Parent](#parent-token) is the provider's *class-interface* token.
The [*forwardRef*](#forwardref) breaks the circular reference we just created by having the `AlexComponent` refer to itself.
[Parent](#parent-token)是该供应商的*类-接口*令牌。`AlexComponent`引用了自身，造成循环引用，我们使用[*forwardRef*](#forwardRef)打破了该循环。
*Carol*, the third of *Alex*'s child components, injects the parent into its `parent` parameter, the same way we've done it before:
*Carol*，*Alex*的第三个子组件，把父级注入到了自己的`parent`参数，和我们之前做的一样：
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/parent-finder.component.ts','carol-class','parent-finder.component.ts (CarolComponent class)')(format='.')
:marked
Here's *Alex* and family in action:
下面是*Alex*和其家庭的运行结果：
figure.image-display
img(src="/resources/images/cookbooks/dependency-injection/alex.png" alt="Alex in action")
a(id="parent-tree")
:marked
### Find the parent in a tree of parents
### 通过父级树找到父组件
Imagine one branch of a component hierarchy: *Alice* -> *Barry* -> *Carol*.
Both *Alice* and *Barry* implement the `Parent` *class-interface*.
想象组件树中的一个分支为：*Alice* -> *Barry* -> *Carol*。
*Alice*和*Barry*都实现了这个`Parent`*类-接口*。
*Barry* is the problem. He needs to reach his parent, *Alice*, and also be a parent to *Carol*.
That means he must both *inject* the `Parent` *class-interface* to get *Alice* and
*provide* a `Parent` to satisfy *Carol*.
*Barry*是个问题。他需要访问它的父组件*Alice*，但同时它也是*Carol*的父组件。这个意味着它必须同时*注入*`Parent`*类-接口*来获取*Alice*，和*提供*一个`Parent`来满足*Carol*。
Here's *Barry*:
下面是*Barry*的代码：
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/parent-finder.component.ts','barry','parent-finder.component.ts (BarryComponent)')(format='.')
:marked
*Barry*'s `providers` array looks just like [*Alex*'s](#alex-providers).
If we're going to keep writing [*alias providers*](#useexisting) like this we should create a [helper function](#provideparent).
*Barry*的`providers`数组看起来很像[*Alex*的那个]（#alex-providers).
如果我们准备一直像这样编写[*别名供应商*](#useexisting)的话，我们应该建立一个[帮助函数](#provideparent)。
For now, focus on *Barry*'s constructor:
眼下，请注意*Barry*的构造函数：
+makeTabs(
'cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/parent-finder.component.ts, cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/parent-finder.component.ts',
'barry-ctor, carol-ctor',
'Barry\'s constructor, Carol\'s constructor')(format='.')
:marked
:marked
It's identical to *Carol*'s constructor except for the additional `@SkipSelf` decorator.
除添加了一个额外的`@SkipSelf`外，它和*Carol*的构造函数一样。
`@SkipSelf` is essential for two reasons:
添加`@SkipSelf`主要是出于两个原因：
1. It tell the injector to start its search for a `Parent` dependency in a component *above* itself,
which *is* what parent means.
1. 它告诉注入器从一个在自己*上一级*的组件开始搜索一个`Parent`依赖。
2. Angular throws a cyclic dependency error if we omit the `@SkipSelf` decorator.
2. 如果我们没写`@SkipSelf`装饰器的话，Angular就会抛出一个循环依赖错误。
`Cannot instantiate cyclic dependency! (BethComponent -> Parent -> BethComponent)`
`不能创建循环依赖实例！(BethComponent -> Parent -> BethComponent)`
Here's *Alice*, *Barry* and family in action:
这里是*Alice*，*Barry*和该家庭的代码：
figure.image-display
img(src="/resources/images/cookbooks/dependency-injection/alice.png" alt="Alice in action")
a(id="parent-token")
:marked
### The *Parent* class-interface
### *Parent*类-接口
We [learned earlier](#class-interface) that a *class-interface* is an abstract class used as an interface rather than as a base class.
我们[以前学过](#class-interface)：*类-接口*是一个抽象类，被当成一个接口使用，而非基类。
Our example defines a `Parent` *class-interface* .
我们的例子定义了一个`Parent`*类-接口*。
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/parent-finder.component.ts','parent','parent-finder.component.ts (Parent class-interface)')(format='.')
:marked
The `Parent` *class-interface* defines a `name` property with a type declaration but *no implementation*.,
The `name` property is the only member of a parent component that a child component can call.
Such a narrowing interface helps decouple the child component class from its parent components.
该`Parent`*类-接口*定义了`Name`属性，它有类型声明，但是*没有实现*，该`name`是该父级的所有子组件们唯一能调用的属性。
这种“窄接口”有助于解耦子组件类和它的父组件。
A component that could serve as a parent *should* implement the *class-interface* as the `AliceComponent` does:
一个能用做父级的组件*应该*实现*类-接口*，和下面的`AliceComponent`的做法一样：
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/parent-finder.component.ts','alice-class-signature','parent-finder.component.ts (AliceComponent class signature)')(format='.')
:marked
Doing so adds clarity to the code. But it's not technically necessary.
Although the `AlexComponent` has a `name` property (as required by its `Base` class)
its class signature doesn't mention `Parent`:
这样做可以提升代码的清晰度。但在技术上，这并不是必须的。虽然`AlexComponent`有一个`name`属性(来自`Base`类的要求)，但它的类签名并不需要提及`Parent`。
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/parent-finder.component.ts','alex-class-signature','parent-finder.component.ts (AlexComponent class signature)')(format='.')
.l-sub-section
:marked
The `AlexComponent` *should* implement `Parent` as a matter of proper style.
It doesn't in this example *only* to demonstrate that the code will compile and run without the interface
为了正确的代码风格，该`AlexComponent`*应该*实现`Parent`。在这个例子里它没有这样，只是为了演示在没有该接口的情况下，该代码仍会被正确编译并运行。
a(id="provideparent")
:marked
### A *provideParent* helper function
### *provideParent*助手函数
Writing variations of the same parent *alias provider* gets old quickly,
especially this awful mouthful with a [*forwardRef*](#forwardref):
编写父组件相同的各种*别名供应商*很快就会变得啰嗦，在用[*forwardRef](#forwardRef)的时候尤其绕口：
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/parent-finder.component.ts','alex-providers')(format='.')
:marked
We can extract that logic into a helper function like this:
我们可以像这样把该逻辑抽取到一个助手函数里：
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/parent-finder.component.ts','provide-the-parent')(format='.')
:marked
Now we can add a simpler, more meaningful parent provider to our components:
现在就可以为我们的组件添加一个更简单、直观的父级供应商了：
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/parent-finder.component.ts','alice-providers')(format='.')
:marked
We can do better. The current version of the helper function can only alias the `Parent` *class-interface*.
Our application might have a variety of parent types, each with its own *class-interface* token.
我们可以做得更好。当前版本的助手函数只能为`Parent`*类-接口*提供别名。我们的应用程序可能有很多类型的父组件，每个父组件有自己的*类-接口*令牌。
Here's a revised version that defaults to `parent` but also accepts an optional second parameter for a different parent *class-interface*.
下面是一个修改版本，默认接受一个`Parent`，但同时接受一个可选的第二参数，可以用来指定一个不同的父级*类-接口*。
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/parent-finder.component.ts','provide-parent')(format='.')
:marked
And here's how we could use it with a different parent type:
下面的代码演示了我们要如何使它添加一个不同类型的父级：
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/parent-finder.component.ts','beth-providers')(format='.')
:marked
a(id="forwardref")
.l-main-section
:marked
## Break circularities with a forward class reference (*forwardRef*)
## 使用一个前向引用(*forwardRef*)来打破循环
The order of class declaration matters in TypeScript.
We can't refer directly to a class until it's been defined.
在TypeScript里面，类声明的顺序是很重要的。如果一个类尚未定义，我们就不能引用它。
This isn't usually a problem, especially if we adhere to the recommended *one class per file* rule.
But sometimes circular references are unavoidable.
We're in a bind when class 'A refers to class 'B' and 'B' refers to 'A'.
One of them has to be defined first.
这通常不是一个问题，特别是当我们遵循*一个文件一个类*规则的时候。
但是有时候循环引用可能不能避免。当一个类*A引用类B*，同时'B'引用'A'的时候，我们就陷入困境了：它们中间的某一个必须要先定义。
The Angular `forwardRef` function creates an *indirect* reference that Angular can resolve later.
Angular的`forwardRef`函数建立一个*间接地*引用，Angular可以随后解析。
The *Parent Finder* sample is full of circular class references that are impossible to break.
这个*父组件查找器*例子里，到处都是我们无法打破的类循环引用。
In the [*Alex/Cathy* example](#known-parent) above:
在上面的[*Alex/Cathy*例子](#known-parent)中：
* the `AlexComponent` lists the `CathyComponent` in its component metadata `directives` array
so it can display *Cathy* in its template.
* `AlexComponent`在它的组件元数据`Directives`数值里面列出`CathyComponent`，这样它可以在自己的模板中显示*Cathy*。
* the `CathyComponent` constructor injects the parent `AlexComponent` which means that the `alex` parameter
of its constructor has the `AlexComponent` type.
* `CathyComponent`的构造函数注入父级`AlexComponent`，这样的话，构造函数参数`alex`是`AlexComponent`类型。
*Alex* refers to *Cathy* and *Cathy* refers to *Alex*. We're stuck. We must define one of them first.
*Alex* 引用了*Cathy*，同时，*Cathy*引用了*Alex*。我们被卡住了。我们必须要先定义它们中的一个。
We defined *Alex* first and built its `C_DIRECTIVES` array with a forward reference to *Cathy*:
我们先定义了*Alex*，然后使用*Cathy*的前向引用来创建`C_DIRECTIVES`数列：
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/parent-finder.component.ts','C_DIRECTIVES','parent-finder.component.ts (C_DIRECTIVES)')(format='.')
:marked
.l-sub-section
:marked
Defining *Alex* and *Cathy* in separate files won't help.
*Alex* would have to import *Cathy* and *Cathy* would have to import *Alex*.
即使在单独的文件里面定义*Alex*和*Cathy*也没用，因为*Alex*必须导入*Cathy*，而*Cathy*又必须导入*Alex*。
We *had* to define *Alex* first because,
while we can add `forwardRef(CathyComponent)` to *Alex*'s `directives` array,
we can't write `public alex: forwardRef(AlexComponent))` in *Cathy*'s constructor.
我们*只能*先定义*Alex*，因为我们可以添加`forwardRef(CathyComponent)`到*Alex*的`Directives`数组里面，但是我们不能在*Cathy*的构造函数里面使用`public alex: forwardRef(AlexComponent))`。
:marked
We face a similar dilemma when a class makes *a reference to itself*
as does the `AlexComponent` in its `providers` array.
The `providers` array is a property of the `@Component` decorator function which must
appear *above* the class definition.
当一个类*需要引用自身*的时候，我们面临同样的窘境，就像在`AlexComponent`的`provdiers`数组中遇到的困境一样。
该`providers`数组是一个`@Component`装饰器函数的一个属性，它必须在类定义*之前*出现。
Again we break the circularity with `forwardRef`:
我们再次使用`forwardRef`来打破该循环：
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/parent-finder.component.ts','alex-providers','parent-finder.component.ts (AlexComponent providers)')(format='.')
:marked