Currently when analyzing the metadata of a directive, we bundle together the bindings from `host`
and the `HostBinding` and `HostListener` together. This can become a problem later on in the
compilation pipeline, because we try to evaluate the value of the binding, causing something like
`@HostBinding('class.foo') public true = 1;` to be treated the same as
`host: {'[class.foo]': 'true'}`.
While looking into the issue, I noticed another one that is closely related: we weren't treating
quoted property names correctly. E.g. `@HostBinding('class.foo') public "foo-bar" = 1;` was being
interpreted as `classProp('foo', ctx.foo - ctx.bar)` due to the same issue where property names
were being evaluated.
These changes resolve both of the issues by treating all `HostBinding` instance as if they're
reading the property from `this`. E.g. the `@HostBinding('class.foo') public true = 1;` from above
is now being treated as `host: {'[class.foo]': 'this.true'}` which further down the pipeline becomes
`classProp('foo', ctx.true)`. This doesn't have any payload size implications for existing code,
because we've always been prefixing implicit property reads with `ctx.`. If the property doesn't
have an identifier that can be read using dotted access, we convert it to a quoted one (e.g.
`classProp('foo', ctx['is-foo']))`.
Fixes#40220.
Fixes#40230.
Fixes#18698.
PR Close#40233
104546569e