264 lines
		
	
	
		
			14 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Plaintext
		
	
	
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			264 lines
		
	
	
		
			14 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Plaintext
		
	
	
	
	
	
| block includes
 | ||
|   include ../_util-fns
 | ||
| :marked
 | ||
|   Web application security has many aspects. This chapter describes Angular's built in
 | ||
|   protections against common web application vulnerabilities and attacks, such as Cross Site
 | ||
|   Scripting Attacks. It does not cover application level security, such as authentication (_Who is
 | ||
|   this user?_) or authorization (_What can this user do?_).
 | ||
| 
 | ||
|   The [Open Web Application Security Project (OWASP)](https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Category:OWASP_Guide_Project)
 | ||
|   has further information on the attacks and mitigations described below.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| .l-main-section
 | ||
| :marked
 | ||
|   # Table Of Contents
 | ||
| 
 | ||
|   * [Reporting Vulnerabilities](#report-issues)
 | ||
|   * [Best Practices](#best-practices)
 | ||
|   * [Preventing Cross-Site Scripting (XSS)](#xss)
 | ||
|   * [Trusting Safe Values](#bypass-security-apis)
 | ||
|   * [HTTP-level Vulnerabilities](#http)
 | ||
|   * [Auditing Angular Applications](#code-review)
 | ||
| 
 | ||
|   Try the <live-example></live-example> of the code shown in this chapter.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| .l-main-section
 | ||
| h2#report-issues Reporting Vulnerabilities
 | ||
| :marked
 | ||
|   Email us at [security@angular.io](mailto:security@angular.io) to report vulnerabilities in
 | ||
|   Angular itself.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
|   For further details on how Google handles security issues please refer to [Google's security
 | ||
|   philosophy](https://www.google.com/about/appsecurity/).
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| .l-main-section
 | ||
| h2#best-practices Best Practices
 | ||
| :marked
 | ||
|   * **Keep current with the latest Angular library releases.**
 | ||
|   We regularly update our Angular libraries and these updates may fix security defects discovered in
 | ||
|   previous version. Check the Angular [change
 | ||
|   log](https://github.com/angular/angular/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md) for security-related updates.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
|   * **Don't modify your copy of Angular.**
 | ||
|   Private, customized versions of Angular tend to fall behind the current version and may neglect
 | ||
|   important security fixes and enhancements. Instead, share your Angular improvements with the
 | ||
|   community and make a pull request.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
|   * **Avoid Angular APIs marked in the documentation as “[_Security Risk_](#bypass-security-apis)”.**
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| .l-main-section
 | ||
| h2#xss Preventing Cross-Site Scripting (XSS)
 | ||
| :marked
 | ||
|   [Cross-Site Scripting (XSS)](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cross-site_scripting) enables attackers
 | ||
|   to inject malicious code into web pages. Such code can then, for example, steal user's data (in
 | ||
|   particular their login data), or perform actions impersonating the user. This is one of the most
 | ||
|   common attacks on the web.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
|   To block XSS attacks, we must prevent malicious code from entering the DOM. For example, if an
 | ||
|   attacker can trick us into inserting a `<script>` tag in the DOM, they can run arbitrary code on
 | ||
|   our website. The attack is not limited to `<script>` tags - many elements and properties in the
 | ||
|   DOM allow code execution, for example `<img onerror="...">`, `<a href="javascript:...">`. If
 | ||
|   attacker controlled data enters the DOM, we have to expect security vulnerabilities.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
|   ### Angular’s Cross-site Scripting Security Model
 | ||
| 
 | ||
|   To systematically block XSS bugs, Angular treats all values as untrusted by default. When a value
 | ||
|   is inserted into the DOM from a template, via property, attribute, style, or class binding, or via
 | ||
|   interpolation, Angular will sanitize and escape untrusted values.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
|   **Angular templates are the same as executable code**: HTML, attributes, and binding expressions
 | ||
|   (but not the values bound!) in templates are trusted to be safe. That means applications must
 | ||
|   prevent potentially attacker controlled values from ever making it into the source code of a
 | ||
|   template. Never generate template source code by concatenating user input and templates! Using
 | ||
|   the [offline template compiler](#offline-template-compiler) is an effective way to prevent these
 | ||
|   vulnerabilities, also known as template injection.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
|   ### Sanitization and security contexts
 | ||
| 
 | ||
|   Sanitization inspects an untrusted value and turns it into a value that is safe to insert into
 | ||
|   the DOM. In many cases, values do not get changed by this at all. Sanitization depends on context:
 | ||
|   a value that is harmless in CSS is potentially dangerous in a URL.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
|   Angular defines four security contexts: HTML, style, URL, and resource URL.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
|   * HTML is used when interpreting a value as HTML, e.g., when binding to `innerHtml`
 | ||
|   * Style is used when binding CSS into the `style` property
 | ||
|   * URL is used for URL properties such as `<a href>`
 | ||
|   * Resource URLs are URLs that will be loaded and executed as code, e.g., in `<script src>`
 | ||
| 
 | ||
|   Angular sanitizes untrusted values for the first three items; sanitizing resource URLs is not
 | ||
|   possible as they contain arbitrary code. In development mode, Angular prints a console warning
 | ||
|   when it has to change a value during sanitization.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
|   ### Sanitization example
 | ||
| 
 | ||
|   The template below binds the value of `htmlSnippet`, once by interpolating it into an element's
 | ||
|   content, and once by binding it to the `innerHTML` property of an element.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| +makeExample('app/inner-html-binding.component.html')
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| :marked
 | ||
|   Interpolated content is always escaped - the HTML is not interpreted, and the browser displays
 | ||
|   angle brackets in the elements text content.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
|   For the HTML to be interpreted, we must bind to an HTML property, such as `innerHTML`. But binding
 | ||
|   a potentially attacker controlled value into `innerHTML` would normally cause an XSS
 | ||
|   vulnerability. For example, code contained in a `<script>` tag would be executed.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| +makeExcerpt('app/inner-html-binding.component.ts ()', 'inner-html-controller')
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| :marked
 | ||
|   Angular recognizes the value as unsafe, and automatically sanitizes it. It removes the `<script>`
 | ||
|   tag but keeps safe content, such as the text content of the `<script>` tag, or the `<b>` element.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| figure.image-display
 | ||
|     img(src='/resources/images/devguide/security/binding-inner-html.png'
 | ||
|         alt='A screenshot showing interpolated and bound HTML values')
 | ||
| :marked
 | ||
|   ### Avoid direct use of the DOM APIs
 | ||
| 
 | ||
|   The built-in browser DOM APIs do not automatically protect you from security vulnerabilities.
 | ||
|   For example, `document`, the node available through `ElementRef`, and many third party APIs
 | ||
|   contain unsafe methods. Avoid directly interacting with the DOM, and instead use Angular
 | ||
|   templates where possible.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
|   ### Content Security Policy
 | ||
| 
 | ||
|   A [Content Security Policy (CSP)](http://www.html5rocks.com/en/tutorials/security/content-security-policy/) is a defense-in-depth
 | ||
|   technique to prevent XSS. To enable CSP, configure your web server to return an appropriate
 | ||
|   `Content-Security-Policy` HTTP header.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
|   <a id="offline-template-compiler"></a>
 | ||
|   ### Use the Offline Template Compiler
 | ||
| 
 | ||
|   The offline template compiler prevents a whole class of vulnerabilities called template injection,
 | ||
|   and also greatly improves application performance. Use the offline template compiler in production
 | ||
|   deployments. Do not dynamically generate templates. Angular trusts template code, so generating
 | ||
|   templates, in particular containing user data, circumvents Angular's built-in protections. See the
 | ||
|   [Dynamic Forms Cookbook](../cookbook/dynamic-form.html) on how to dynamically construct forms in a
 | ||
|   safe way.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
|   ### Server side XSS protection
 | ||
| 
 | ||
|   HTML constructed on the server is vulnerable to injection attacks. Injecting template code into an
 | ||
|   Angular application is the same as injecting executable code into the
 | ||
|   application; it gives the attacker full control over the application. To prevent this, make sure
 | ||
|   to use a templating language that automatically escapes values to prevent XSS vulnerabilities on
 | ||
|   the server. Do not generate Angular templates on the server side using a templating language, this
 | ||
|   carries a high risk of introducing template injection vulnerabilities.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| .l-main-section
 | ||
| h2#bypass-security-apis Trusting Safe Values
 | ||
| :marked
 | ||
|   Sometimes applications genuinely need to include executable code, display an `<iframe>` from some
 | ||
|   URL, or construct potentially dangerous URLs. To prevent automatic sanitization in this situation,
 | ||
|   you can tell Angular that you inspected a value, checked how it is generated, and made sure it is
 | ||
|   always secure. But **be careful**! If you trust a value that can be malicious, you will likely
 | ||
|   introduce a security vulnerability into your application. If in doubt, find a professional
 | ||
|   security reviewer.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
|   You can mark a value as trusted by injecting `DomSanitizer`, and calling one of the
 | ||
|   following methods.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
|   * `bypassSecurityTrustHtml`
 | ||
|   * `bypassSecurityTrustScript`
 | ||
|   * `bypassSecurityTrustStyle`
 | ||
|   * `bypassSecurityTrustUrl`
 | ||
|   * `bypassSecurityTrustResourceUrl`
 | ||
| 
 | ||
|   Remember, whether a value is safe depends on context, so you need to choose the right context for
 | ||
|   your intended use of the value. Imagine the following template needs to bind a URL to a
 | ||
|   `javascript:alert(...)` call.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| +makeExcerpt('app/bypass-security.component.html ()', 'dangerous-url')
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| :marked
 | ||
|   Normally, Angular automatically sanitizes the URL, disables the dangerous code and,
 | ||
|   in development mode, logs this action to the console. To prevent
 | ||
|   this, we can mark the URL value as a trusted URL using the `bypassSecurityTrustUrl` call:
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| +makeExcerpt('app/bypass-security.component.ts ()', 'trust-url')
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| figure.image-display
 | ||
|     img(src='/resources/images/devguide/security/bypass-security-component.png'
 | ||
|         alt='A screenshot showing an alert box created from a trusted URL')
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| :marked
 | ||
|   If we need to convert user input into a trusted value, it can be convenient to do so in a
 | ||
|   controller method. The template below allows users to enter a YouTube video ID, and load the
 | ||
|   corresponding video in an `<iframe>`. The `<iframe src>` attribute is a resource URL security
 | ||
|   context, because an untrusted source can, e.g., smuggle in file downloads that unsuspecting users
 | ||
|   would execute. So we call a method on the controller to construct a trusted video URL, which
 | ||
|   Angular then allows binding into `<iframe src>`.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| +makeExcerpt('app/bypass-security.component.html ()', 'iframe-videoid')
 | ||
| +makeExcerpt('app/bypass-security.component.ts ()', 'trust-video-url')
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| .l-main-section
 | ||
| h2#http HTTP-level Vulnerabilities
 | ||
| :marked
 | ||
|   Angular has built in support to help prevent two common HTTP vulnerabilities, Cross-site Request
 | ||
|   Forgery (XSRF) and Cross-site Script Inclusion (XSSI). Both of these must be primarily mitigated
 | ||
|   on the server side, but Angular ships helpers to make integration on the client side easier.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| h3#xsrf Cross-site Request Forgery (XSRF)
 | ||
| :marked
 | ||
|   In a Cross-site Request Forgery (XSRF or CSRF), an attacker tricks the user into visiting a
 | ||
|   _different_ page, and has them, e.g., submit a form that sends a request to your application's
 | ||
|   web server. If the user is logged into your application, the browser will send authentication
 | ||
|   cookies, and the attacker could — for example — cause a bank transfer in the user's name with
 | ||
|   the right request.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
|   To prevent this, your application must ensure that user requests originate in your own
 | ||
|   application, not on a different site. A common technique is that the server sends a randomly
 | ||
|   generated authentication token in a cookie, often with the name `XSRF-TOKEN`. Cookies can only
 | ||
|   be read by the website on which they are set, so only your own application can read this token. On
 | ||
|   each API request, the server then validates the client by checking that the token is sent back,
 | ||
|   usually in an HTTP header called `X-XSRF-TOKEN`.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
|   The Angular `http` client has built-in support for this technique. The default
 | ||
|   `CookieXSRFStrategy` looks for a cookie called `XSRF-TOKEN` and sets an HTTP request header named
 | ||
|   `X-XSRF-TOKEN` with the value of that cookie on every request. The server must set the
 | ||
|   `XSRF-TOKEN` cookie, and validate the response header for each state modifying request.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
|   XSRF tokens should be unique per user and session, have a large random value generated by a
 | ||
|   cryptographically secure random number generator, and expire.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
|   Angular applications can customize cookie and header names by binding their own
 | ||
|   `CookieXSRFStrategy` value, or implement an entirely custom `XSRFStrategy` by providing a custom
 | ||
|   binding for that type, by adding either of the following to your providers list:
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| code-example(language="typescript").
 | ||
|   { provide: XSRFStrategy, useValue: new CookieXSRFStrategy('myCookieName', 'My-Header-Name')}
 | ||
|   { provide: XSRFStrategy, useClass: MyXSRFStrategy}
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| :marked
 | ||
|   Learn about Cross Site Request Forgery (XSRF) at the Open Web Application Security Project (OWASP)
 | ||
|   [here](https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Cross-Site_Request_Forgery_%28CSRF%29) and
 | ||
|   [here](https://www.owasp.org/index.php/CSRF_Prevention_Cheat_Sheet). This [Stanford University
 | ||
|   paper](https://seclab.stanford.edu/websec/csrf/csrf.pdf) is also a rich source of detail.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| h3#xssi Cross-site Script Inclusion (XSSI)
 | ||
| :marked
 | ||
|   Cross-site Script Inclusion, also known as JSON vulnerability, can allow an attacker's website to
 | ||
|   read data from a JSON API. The attack works on older browser by overriding native JavaScript
 | ||
|   object constructors, and then including an API URL using a `<script>` tag.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
|   This attack is only successful if the returned JSON is executable as JavaScript. Servers can
 | ||
|   prevent it by prefixing all JSON responses to make them non-executable, by convention using the
 | ||
|   well-known string `")]}',\n"`.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
|   Angular's `Http` library recognizes this convention and automatically strips the string
 | ||
|   `")]}',\n"` from all responses before further parsing.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
|   Learn more in the XSSI section of this [Google web security blog
 | ||
|   post](https://security.googleblog.com/2011/05/website-security-for-webmasters.html)
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| .l-main-section
 | ||
| h2#code-review Auditing Angular Applications
 | ||
| :marked
 | ||
|   Angular applications should follow the same security principles as regular web applications, and
 | ||
|   should be audited as such. Angular specific APIs that should be audited in a security review,
 | ||
|   such as the [_bypassSecurityTrust_](#bypass-security-apis) APIs, are marked in the documentation
 | ||
|   as security sensitive.
 |