264 lines
14 KiB
Plaintext
264 lines
14 KiB
Plaintext
block includes
|
||
include ../_util-fns
|
||
:marked
|
||
Web application security has many aspects. This chapter describes Angular's built in
|
||
protections against common web application vulnerabilities and attacks, such as Cross Site
|
||
Scripting Attacks. It does not cover application level security, such as authentication (_Who is
|
||
this user?_) or authorization (_What can this user do?_).
|
||
|
||
The [Open Web Application Security Project (OWASP)](https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Category:OWASP_Guide_Project)
|
||
has further information on the attacks and mitigations described below.
|
||
|
||
.l-main-section
|
||
:marked
|
||
# Table Of Contents
|
||
|
||
* [Reporting Vulnerabilities](#report-issues)
|
||
* [Best Practices](#best-practices)
|
||
* [Preventing Cross-Site Scripting (XSS)](#xss)
|
||
* [Trusting Safe Values](#bypass-security-apis)
|
||
* [HTTP-level Vulnerabilities](#http)
|
||
* [Auditing Angular Applications](#code-review)
|
||
|
||
p Try the #[+liveExampleLink2()] of the code shown in this chapter.
|
||
|
||
.l-main-section
|
||
h2#report-issues Reporting Vulnerabilities
|
||
:marked
|
||
Email us at [security@angular.io](mailto:security@angular.io) to report vulnerabilities in
|
||
Angular itself.
|
||
|
||
For further details on how Google handles security issues please refer to [Google's security
|
||
philosophy](https://www.google.com/about/appsecurity/).
|
||
|
||
.l-main-section
|
||
h2#best-practices Best Practices
|
||
:marked
|
||
* **Keep current with the latest Angular library releases.**
|
||
We regularly update our Angular libraries and these updates may fix security defects discovered in
|
||
previous version. Check the Angular [change
|
||
log](https://github.com/angular/angular/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md) for security-related updates.
|
||
|
||
* **Don't modify your copy of Angular.**
|
||
Private, customized versions of Angular tend to fall behind the current version and may neglect
|
||
important security fixes and enhancements. Instead, share your Angular improvements with the
|
||
community and make a pull request.
|
||
|
||
* **Avoid Angular APIs marked in the documentation as “[_Security Risk_](#bypass-security-apis)”.**
|
||
|
||
.l-main-section
|
||
h2#xss Preventing Cross-Site Scripting (XSS)
|
||
:marked
|
||
[Cross-Site Scripting (XSS)](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cross-site_scripting) enables attackers
|
||
to inject malicious code into web pages. Such code can then, for example, steal user's data (in
|
||
particular their login data), or perform actions impersonating the user. This is one of the most
|
||
common attacks on the web.
|
||
|
||
To block XSS attacks, we must prevent malicious code from entering the DOM. For example, if an
|
||
attacker can trick us into inserting a `<script>` tag in the DOM, they can run arbitrary code on
|
||
our website. The attack is not limited to `<script>` tags - many elements and properties in the
|
||
DOM allow code execution, for example `<img onerror="...">`, `<a href="javascript:...">`. If
|
||
attacker controlled data enters the DOM, we have to expect security vulnerabilities.
|
||
|
||
### Angular’s Cross-site Scripting Security Model
|
||
|
||
To systematically block XSS bugs, Angular treats all values as untrusted by default. When a value
|
||
is inserted into the DOM from a template, via property, attribute, style, or class binding, or via
|
||
interpolation, Angular will sanitize and escape untrusted values.
|
||
|
||
**Angular templates are the same as executable code**: HTML, attributes, and binding expressions
|
||
(but not the values bound!) in templates are trusted to be safe. That means applications must
|
||
prevent potentially attacker controlled values from ever making it into the source code of a
|
||
template. Never generate template source code by concatenating user input and templates! Using
|
||
the [offline template compiler](#offline-template-compiler) is an effective way to prevent these
|
||
vulnerabilities, also known as template injection.
|
||
|
||
### Sanitization and security contexts
|
||
|
||
Sanitization inspects an untrusted value and turns it into a value that is safe to insert into
|
||
the DOM. In many cases, values do not get changed by this at all. Sanitization depends on context:
|
||
a value that is harmless in CSS is potentially dangerous in a URL.
|
||
|
||
Angular defines four security contexts: HTML, style, URL, and resource URL.
|
||
|
||
* HTML is used when interpreting a value as HTML, e.g., when binding to `innerHtml`
|
||
* Style is used when binding CSS into the `style` property
|
||
* URL is used for URL properties such as `<a href>`
|
||
* Resource URLs are URLs that will be loaded and executed as code, e.g., in `<script src>`
|
||
|
||
Angular sanitizes untrusted values for the first three items; sanitizing resource URLs is not
|
||
possible as they contain arbitrary code. In development mode, Angular prints a console warning
|
||
when it has to change a value during sanitization.
|
||
|
||
### Sanitization example
|
||
|
||
The template below binds the value of `htmlSnippet`, once by interpolating it into an element's
|
||
content, and once by binding it to the `innerHTML` property of an element.
|
||
|
||
+makeExample('app/inner-html-binding.component.html')
|
||
|
||
:marked
|
||
Interpolated content is always escaped - the HTML is not interpreted, and the browser displays
|
||
angle brackets in the elements text content.
|
||
|
||
For the HTML to be interpreted, we must bind to an HTML property, such as `innerHTML`. But binding
|
||
a potentially attacker controlled value into `innerHTML` would normally cause an XSS
|
||
vulnerability. For example, code contained in a `<script>` tag would be executed.
|
||
|
||
+makeExcerpt('app/inner-html-binding.component.ts ()', 'inner-html-controller')
|
||
|
||
:marked
|
||
Angular recognizes the value as unsafe, and automatically sanitizes it. It removes the `<script>`
|
||
tag but keeps safe content, such as the text content of the `<script>` tag, or the `<b>` element.
|
||
|
||
figure.image-display
|
||
img(src='/resources/images/devguide/security/binding-inner-html.png'
|
||
alt='A screenshot showing interpolated and bound HTML values')
|
||
:marked
|
||
### Avoid direct use of the DOM APIs
|
||
|
||
The built-in browser DOM APIs do not automatically protect you from security vulnerabilities.
|
||
For example, `document`, the node available through `ElementRef`, and many third party APIs
|
||
contain unsafe methods. Avoid directly interacting with the DOM, and instead use Angular
|
||
templates where possible.
|
||
|
||
### Content Security Policy
|
||
|
||
A [Content Security Policy (CSP)](http://www.html5rocks.com/en/tutorials/security/content-security-policy/) is a defense-in-depth
|
||
technique to prevent XSS. To enable CSP, configure your web server to return an appropriate
|
||
`Content-Security-Policy` HTTP header.
|
||
|
||
<a id="offline-template-compiler"></a>
|
||
### Use the Offline Template Compiler
|
||
|
||
The offline template compiler prevents a whole class of vulnerabilities called template injection,
|
||
and also greatly improves application performance. Use the offline template compiler in production
|
||
deployments. Do not dynamically generate templates. Angular trusts template code, so generating
|
||
templates, in particular containing user data, circumvents Angular's built-in protections. See the
|
||
[Dynamic Forms Cookbook](../cookbook/dynamic-form.html) on how to dynamically construct forms in a
|
||
safe way.
|
||
|
||
### Server side XSS protection
|
||
|
||
HTML constructed on the server is vulnerable to injection attacks. Injecting template code into an
|
||
Angular application is the same as injecting executable code into the
|
||
application; it gives the attacker full control over the application. To prevent this, make sure
|
||
to use a templating language that automatically escapes values to prevent XSS vulnerabilities on
|
||
the server. Do not generate Angular templates on the server side using a templating language, this
|
||
carries a high risk of introducing template injection vulnerabilities.
|
||
|
||
.l-main-section
|
||
h2#bypass-security-apis Trusting Safe Values
|
||
:marked
|
||
Sometimes applications genuinely need to include executable code, display an `<iframe>` from some
|
||
URL, or construct potentially dangerous URLs. To prevent automatic sanitization in this situation,
|
||
you can tell Angular that you inspected a value, checked how it is generated, and made sure it is
|
||
always secure. But **be careful**! If you trust a value that can be malicious, you will likely
|
||
introduce a security vulnerability into your application. If in doubt, find a professional
|
||
security reviewer.
|
||
|
||
You can mark a value as trusted by injecting `DomSanitizationService`, and calling one of the
|
||
following methods.
|
||
|
||
* `bypassSecurityTrustHtml`
|
||
* `bypassSecurityTrustScript`
|
||
* `bypassSecurityTrustStyle`
|
||
* `bypassSecurityTrustUrl`
|
||
* `bypassSecurityTrustResourceUrl`
|
||
|
||
Remember, whether a value is safe depends on context, so you need to choose the right context for
|
||
your intended use of the value. Imagine the following template needs to bind a URL to a
|
||
`javascript:alert(...)` call.
|
||
|
||
+makeExcerpt('app/bypass-security.component.html ()', 'dangerous-url')
|
||
|
||
:marked
|
||
Normally, Angular automatically sanitizes the URL, disables the dangerous code and,
|
||
in development mode, logs this action to the console. To prevent
|
||
this, we can mark the URL value as a trusted URL using the `bypassSecurityTrustUrl` call:
|
||
|
||
+makeExcerpt('app/bypass-security.component.ts ()', 'trust-url')
|
||
|
||
figure.image-display
|
||
img(src='/resources/images/devguide/security/bypass-security-component.png'
|
||
alt='A screenshot showing an alert box created from a trusted URL')
|
||
|
||
:marked
|
||
If we need to convert user input into a trusted value, it can be convenient to do so in a
|
||
controller method. The template below allows users to enter a YouTube video ID, and load the
|
||
corresponding video in an `<iframe>`. The `<iframe src>` attribute is a resource URL security
|
||
context, because an untrusted source can, e.g., smuggle in file downloads that unsuspecting users
|
||
would execute. So we call a method on the controller to construct a trusted video URL, which
|
||
Angular then allows binding into `<iframe src>`.
|
||
|
||
+makeExcerpt('app/bypass-security.component.html ()', 'iframe-videoid')
|
||
+makeExcerpt('app/bypass-security.component.ts ()', 'trust-video-url')
|
||
|
||
.l-main-section
|
||
h2#http HTTP-level Vulnerabilities
|
||
:marked
|
||
Angular has built in support to help prevent two common HTTP vulnerabilities, Cross-site Request
|
||
Forgery (XSRF) and Cross-site Script Inclusion (XSSI). Both of these must be primarily mitigated
|
||
on the server side, but Angular ships helpers to make integration on the client side easier.
|
||
|
||
h3#xsrf Cross-site Request Forgery (XSRF)
|
||
:marked
|
||
In a Cross-site Request Forgery (XSRF or CSRF), an attacker tricks the user into visiting a
|
||
_different_ page, and has them, e.g., submit a form that sends a request to your application's
|
||
web server. If the user is logged into your application, the browser will send authentication
|
||
cookies, and the attacker could — for example — cause a bank transfer in the user's name with
|
||
the right request.
|
||
|
||
To prevent this, your application must ensure that user requests originate in your own
|
||
application, not on a different site. A common technique is that the server sends a randomly
|
||
generated authentication token in a cookie, often with the name `XSRF-TOKEN`. Cookies can only
|
||
be read by the website on which they are set, so only your own application can read this token. On
|
||
each API request, the server then validates the client by checking that the token is sent back,
|
||
usually in an HTTP header called `X-XSRF-TOKEN`.
|
||
|
||
The Angular `http` client has built-in support for this technique. The default
|
||
`CookieXSRFStrategy` looks for a cookie called `XSRF-TOKEN` and sets an HTTP request header named
|
||
`X-XSRF-TOKEN` with the value of that cookie on every request. The server must set the
|
||
`XSRF-TOKEN` cookie, and validate the response header for each state modifying request.
|
||
|
||
XSRF tokens should be unique per user and session, have a large random value generated by a
|
||
cryptographically secure random number generator, and expire.
|
||
|
||
Angular applications can customize cookie and header names by binding their own
|
||
`CookieXSRFStrategy` value, or implement an entirely custom `XSRFStrategy` by providing a custom
|
||
binding for that type, by adding either of the following to your providers list:
|
||
|
||
code-example(language="typescript").
|
||
{ provide: XSRFStrategy, useValue: new CookieXSRFStrategy('myCookieName', 'My-Header-Name')}
|
||
{ provide: XSRFStrategy, useClass: MyXSRFStrategy}
|
||
|
||
:marked
|
||
Learn about Cross Site Request Forgery (XSRF) at the Open Web Application Security Project (OWASP)
|
||
[here](https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Cross-Site_Request_Forgery_%28CSRF%29) and
|
||
[here](https://www.owasp.org/index.php/CSRF_Prevention_Cheat_Sheet). This [Stanford University
|
||
paper](https://seclab.stanford.edu/websec/csrf/csrf.pdf) is also a rich source of detail.
|
||
|
||
h3#xssi Cross-site Script Inclusion (XSSI)
|
||
:marked
|
||
Cross-site Script Inclusion, also known as JSON vulnerability, can allow an attacker's website to
|
||
read data from a JSON API. The attack works on older browser by overriding native JavaScript
|
||
object constructors, and then including an API URL using a `<script>` tag.
|
||
|
||
This attack is only successful if the returned JSON is executable as JavaScript. Servers can
|
||
prevent it by prefixing all JSON responses to make them non-executable, by convention using the
|
||
well-known string `")]}',\n"`.
|
||
|
||
Angular's `Http` library recognizes this convention and automatically strips the string
|
||
`")]}',\n"` from all responses before further parsing.
|
||
|
||
Learn more in the XSSI section of this [Google web security blog
|
||
post](https://security.googleblog.com/2011/05/website-security-for-webmasters.html)
|
||
|
||
.l-main-section
|
||
h2#code-review Auditing Angular Applications
|
||
:marked
|
||
Angular applications should follow the same security principles as regular web applications, and
|
||
should be audited as such. Angular specific APIs that should be audited in a security review,
|
||
such as the [_bypassSecurityTrust_](#bypass-security-apis) APIs, are marked in the documentation
|
||
as security sensitive.
|