diff --git a/LOINC_NOTES.txt b/LOINC_NOTES.txt
index e5930368ab7..83ffb09561f 100644
--- a/LOINC_NOTES.txt
+++ b/LOINC_NOTES.txt
@@ -8,54 +8,31 @@ TODO:
 Comments for Loinc:
 
 Overall
-- ValueSet and ConceptMap resources have a spot for copyright and
-  contact information. Are there official values for these?
+- ValueSet and ConceptMap resources have a spot for copyright and contact information. Are there official values for these?
 
 Answer Lists
-- Per the notes, there is no way in FHIR currently to map answer lists to
-  codes based on context. For this reason, I am ignoring any entries in
-  LoincAnswerListLink_Beta_1.csv where the "ApplicableContext" context is
-  not empty. Is this correct?
+- Per the notes, there is no way in FHIR currently to map answer lists to codes based on context. For this reason, I am ignoring any entries in LoincAnswerListLink_Beta_1.csv where the "ApplicableContext" context is not empty. Is this correct?
 
 Parts
-- Only parts with a status of "ACTIVE" are being imported, any others are
-  ignored.
-- The PartTypeName (e.g. "ADJUSTMENT") is ignored as there is no corresponding
-  property in loinc.xml
-- PartDisplayName is not mapped
-- Part links are not currently processed (it's not clear to me how to model
-  these in FHIR, as CodeSystem.hierarchyMeaning has to be only one of 'is-a'
-  or 'part-of' and presumably the 'is-a' relationship is more important.
+- Only parts with a status of "ACTIVE" are being imported, any others are ignored. Does this make sense?
+- The PartTypeName (e.g. "ADJUSTMENT") is ignored as there is no corresponding property in loinc.xml
+- PartDisplayName does not have an obvious mapping to FHIR
+- Part links are not currently processed (it's not clear to me how to model these in FHIR, as CodeSystem.hierarchyMeaning has to be only one of 'is-a' or 'part-of' and presumably the 'is-a' relationship is more important.
 
 Part Mappings
-- I have made LOINC the source and SCT the target for the mappings in the
-  ConceptMap resource. Does this seem like the appropriate orientation?
-- A canonical URI should be defined for the LOINC->SCT mapping ConceptMap
-  resource. I have hardcoded "http://loinc.org/loinc-to-snomed" for now, but
-  we should discuss what is appropriate.
+- I have made LOINC the source and SCT the target for the mappings in the ConceptMap resource. Does this seem like the appropriate orientation?
+- A canonical URI should be defined for the LOINC->SCT mapping ConceptMap resource. I have hardcoded "http://loinc.org/loinc-to-snomed" for now, but we should discuss what is appropriate.
 
 RSNA Playbook
-- A canonical URI should be defined for the "all RSNA playbook codes" ValueSet.
-  I have hardcoded "http://loinc.org/rsna-codes" for now but we should discuss
-  what is appropriate.
+- A canonical URI should be defined for the "all RSNA playbook codes" ValueSet. I have hardcoded "http://loinc.org/rsna-codes" for now but we should discuss what is appropriate.
 - A name for the "RSNA Playbook" ValueSet is needed.
-- Just to confirm, the "all RSNA playbook codes" ValueSet should contain the
-  loinc codes (e.g. "17787-3") and not the part codes (e.g. "LP199995-4")?
-- A codesystem URI for radlex RID and RPID codes is needed (currently
-  "http://rid" and "http://rpid" are used as placeholders since I'm assuming
-  these exist somewhere.
-- For mappings from loinc part codes to RadLex RIDs, are the codes considered
-  equivalent (or would they be wider/narrower). They look equivalent to me.
+- Just to confirm, the "all RSNA playbook codes" ValueSet should contain the loinc codes (e.g. "17787-3") and not the part codes (e.g. "LP199995-4")?
+- A codesystem URI for radlex RID and RPID codes is needed (currently "http://rid" and "http://rpid" are used as placeholders since I'm assuming these exist somewhere.
+- For mappings from loinc part codes to RadLex RIDs, are the codes considered equivalent (or would they be wider/narrower). They look equivalent to me.
 
 Document Ontology
-- Per the SOW, "A value set containing terms in the LOINC Document Ontology
-  will be created". Just to confirm, entries in this ValueSet are therefore
-  LOINC terms (such as "11488-4 / Consultation Note") as opposed to part
-  codes?
-- Need to define a URI for the document ontology ValueSet. Currently I am
-  using "http://loinc.org/document-ontology-codes"
+- Per the SOW, "A value set containing terms in the LOINC Document Ontology will be created". Just to confirm, entries in this ValueSet are therefore LOINC terms (such as "11488-4 / Consultation Note") as opposed to part codes?
+- Need to define a URI for the document ontology ValueSet. Currently I am using "http://loinc.org/document-ontology-codes"
 
 Top 2000
-- Need to define a URI for both ValueSets. Currently I am using
-  "http://loinc.org/top-2000-lab-results-us" and
-  "http://loinc.org/top-2000-lab-results-si"
+- Need to define a URI for both ValueSets. Currently I am using "http://loinc.org/top-2000-lab-results-us" and "http://loinc.org/top-2000-lab-results-si"