Merge pull request #1339 from hapifhir/2023-07-gg-r5-invariants
fix issue checking invariant expressions in R5
This commit is contained in:
commit
1384b143d9
|
@ -485,6 +485,7 @@ public class StructureDefinitionValidator extends BaseValidator {
|
|||
String source = invariant.getNamedChildValue("source");
|
||||
if (warning(errors, "2023-06-19", IssueType.INFORMATIONAL, stack, !Utilities.noString(key), I18nConstants.ED_INVARIANT_NO_KEY)) {
|
||||
if (hint(errors, "2023-06-19", IssueType.INFORMATIONAL, stack, !Utilities.noString(expression) || VersionUtilities.isR5Plus(context.getVersion()), I18nConstants.ED_INVARIANT_NO_EXPRESSION, key)) { // not for R5 - there's an invariant
|
||||
if (!Utilities.noString(expression)) {
|
||||
if (invariantMap.containsKey(key)) {
|
||||
// it's legal - and common - for a list of elemnts to contain the same invariant more than once, but it's not valid if it's not always the same
|
||||
ok = rule(errors, "2023-06-19", IssueType.INVALID, stack, expression.equals(invariantMap.get(key)) || "ele-1".equals(key), I18nConstants.ED_INVARIANT_EXPRESSION_CONFLICT, key, expression, invariantMap.get(key));
|
||||
|
@ -504,6 +505,7 @@ public class StructureDefinitionValidator extends BaseValidator {
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
return ok;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue