Changes relevant to improving the rendering of artifact intros. Specifically:
- ensure that when validating codes against value sets, the valid coding is actually returned - strip out the new extensions we add for FMM - improve the rendering of Quantity and Range. (The former was horrid and the latter wasn't as nice as it could be.)
This commit is contained in:
parent
8706b3c4a4
commit
86c3609288
|
@ -2087,6 +2087,8 @@ public class ProfileUtilities extends TranslatingUtilities {
|
|||
|
||||
private void removeStatusExtensions(ElementDefinition outcome) {
|
||||
outcome.removeExtension(ToolingExtensions.EXT_FMM_LEVEL);
|
||||
outcome.removeExtension(ToolingExtensions.EXT_FMM_SUPPORT);
|
||||
outcome.removeExtension(ToolingExtensions.EXT_FMM_DERIVED);
|
||||
outcome.removeExtension(ToolingExtensions.EXT_STANDARDS_STATUS);
|
||||
outcome.removeExtension(ToolingExtensions.EXT_NORMATIVE_VERSION);
|
||||
outcome.removeExtension(ToolingExtensions.EXT_WORKGROUP);
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1139,9 +1139,11 @@ public class DataRenderer extends Renderer {
|
|||
protected String displayQuantity(Quantity q) {
|
||||
StringBuilder s = new StringBuilder();
|
||||
|
||||
s.append("(system = '").append(TerminologyRenderer.describeSystem(q.getSystem()))
|
||||
.append("' code ").append(q.getCode())
|
||||
.append(" = '").append(lookupCode(q.getSystem(), null, q.getCode())).append("')");
|
||||
s.append(q.hasValue() ? q.getValue() : "?");
|
||||
if (q.hasUnit())
|
||||
s.append(" ").append(q.getUnit());
|
||||
else if (q.hasCode())
|
||||
s.append(" ").append(q.getCode());
|
||||
|
||||
return s.toString();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -1166,18 +1168,20 @@ public class DataRenderer extends Renderer {
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public String displayRange(Range q) {
|
||||
if (!q.hasLow() && !q.hasHigh())
|
||||
return "?";
|
||||
|
||||
StringBuilder b = new StringBuilder();
|
||||
if (q.hasLow())
|
||||
b.append(q.getLow().getValue().toString());
|
||||
else
|
||||
b.append("?");
|
||||
b.append("-");
|
||||
if (q.hasHigh())
|
||||
b.append(q.getHigh().getValue().toString());
|
||||
else
|
||||
b.append("?");
|
||||
if (q.getLow().hasUnit())
|
||||
b.append(" "+q.getLow().getUnit());
|
||||
|
||||
boolean sameUnits = (q.getLow().hasUnit() && q.getHigh().hasUnit() && q.getLow().getUnit().equals(q.getHigh().getUnit()))
|
||||
|| (q.getLow().hasCode() && q.getHigh().hasCode() && q.getLow().getCode().equals(q.getHigh().getCode()));
|
||||
String low = "?";
|
||||
if (q.hasLow() && q.getLow().hasValue())
|
||||
low = sameUnits ? q.getLow().getValue().toString() : displayQuantity(q.getLow());
|
||||
String high = displayQuantity(q.getHigh());
|
||||
if (high.isEmpty())
|
||||
high = "?";
|
||||
b.append(low).append("\u00A0 to \u00A0").append(high);
|
||||
return b.toString();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -142,6 +142,7 @@ public class ValueSetCheckerSimple extends ValueSetWorker implements ValueSetChe
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
Coding foundCoding = null;
|
||||
if (valueset != null && options.getValueSetMode() != ValueSetMode.NO_MEMBERSHIP_CHECK) {
|
||||
Boolean result = false;
|
||||
for (Coding c : code.getCoding()) {
|
||||
|
@ -150,6 +151,7 @@ public class ValueSetCheckerSimple extends ValueSetWorker implements ValueSetChe
|
|||
result = null;
|
||||
} else if (ok) {
|
||||
result = true;
|
||||
foundCoding = c;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (result == null) {
|
||||
|
@ -163,7 +165,9 @@ public class ValueSetCheckerSimple extends ValueSetWorker implements ValueSetChe
|
|||
} else if (warnings.size() > 0) {
|
||||
return new ValidationResult(IssueSeverity.WARNING, warnings.toString());
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
return new ValidationResult(IssueSeverity.INFORMATION, null);
|
||||
ConceptDefinitionComponent cd = new ConceptDefinitionComponent(foundCoding.getCode());
|
||||
cd.setDisplay(foundCoding.getDisplay());
|
||||
return new ValidationResult(foundCoding.getSystem(), cd);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue