Fix problem when profiling a base type that supports both Reference and canonical
This commit is contained in:
parent
91de165e2c
commit
8c494278f4
|
@ -2396,29 +2396,31 @@ public class ProfileUtilities extends TranslatingUtilities {
|
|||
CommaSeparatedStringBuilder b = new CommaSeparatedStringBuilder();
|
||||
String t = ts.getWorkingCode();
|
||||
for (TypeRefComponent td : base.getType()) {;
|
||||
boolean matchType = false;
|
||||
String tt = td.getWorkingCode();
|
||||
b.append(tt);
|
||||
if (td.hasCode() && (tt.equals(t))) {
|
||||
ok = true;
|
||||
matchType = true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (!ok) {
|
||||
if (!matchType) {
|
||||
StructureDefinition sdt = context.fetchTypeDefinition(tt);
|
||||
if (sdt != null && (sdt.getAbstract() || sdt.getKind() == StructureDefinitionKind.LOGICAL)) {
|
||||
StructureDefinition sdb = context.fetchTypeDefinition(t);
|
||||
while (sdb != null && !ok) {
|
||||
ok = sdb.getType().equals(sdt.getType());
|
||||
while (sdb != null && !matchType) {
|
||||
matchType = sdb.getType().equals(sdt.getType());
|
||||
sdb = context.fetchResource(StructureDefinition.class, sdb.getBaseDefinition(), sdb);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
// work around for old badly generated SDs
|
||||
if (DONT_DO_THIS && Utilities.existsInList(tt, "Extension", "uri", "string", "Element")) {
|
||||
ok = true;
|
||||
matchType = true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (DONT_DO_THIS && Utilities.existsInList(tt, "Resource","DomainResource") && pkp.isResource(t)) {
|
||||
ok = true;
|
||||
matchType = true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (ok && ts.hasTargetProfile()) {
|
||||
if (matchType) {
|
||||
if (ts.hasTargetProfile()) {
|
||||
// check that any derived target has a reference chain back to one of the base target profiles
|
||||
for (UriType u : ts.getTargetProfile()) {
|
||||
String url = u.getValue();
|
||||
|
@ -2427,7 +2429,7 @@ public class ProfileUtilities extends TranslatingUtilities {
|
|||
StructureDefinition sd = context.fetchResource(StructureDefinition.class, url);
|
||||
if (sd == null) {
|
||||
if (messages != null) {
|
||||
messages.add(new ValidationMessage(Source.InstanceValidator, IssueType.BUSINESSRULE, purl+"#"+derived.getPath(), "Cannot check whether the target profile "+url+" is valid constraint on the base because it is not known", IssueSeverity.WARNING));
|
||||
messages.add(new ValidationMessage(Source.InstanceValidator, IssueType.BUSINESSRULE, purl + "#" + derived.getPath(), "Cannot check whether the target profile " + url + " is valid constraint on the base because it is not known", IssueSeverity.WARNING));
|
||||
}
|
||||
url = null;
|
||||
tgtOk = true; // suppress error message
|
||||
|
@ -2436,14 +2438,19 @@ public class ProfileUtilities extends TranslatingUtilities {
|
|||
tgtOk = td.hasTargetProfile(url);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (!tgtOk) {
|
||||
if (tgtOk)
|
||||
ok = true;
|
||||
else {
|
||||
if (messages == null) {
|
||||
throw new FHIRException(context.formatMessage(I18nConstants.ERROR_AT__THE_TARGET_PROFILE__IS_NOT__VALID_CONSTRAINT_ON_THE_BASE_, purl, derived.getPath(), url, td.getTargetProfile()));
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
messages.add(new ValidationMessage(Source.InstanceValidator, IssueType.BUSINESSRULE, derived.getPath(), "The target profile "+u.getValue()+" is not a valid constraint on the base ("+td.getTargetProfile()+") at "+derived.getPath(), IssueSeverity.ERROR));
|
||||
messages.add(new ValidationMessage(Source.InstanceValidator, IssueType.BUSINESSRULE, derived.getPath(), "The target profile " + u.getValue() + " is not a valid constraint on the base (" + td.getTargetProfile() + ") at " + derived.getPath(), IssueSeverity.ERROR));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
ok = true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (!ok) {
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue