include ../_util-fns

:marked
  Dependency Injection is a powerful pattern for managing code dependencies. 
  In this cookbook we will explore many of the features of Dependency Injection (DI) in Angular.
  
<a id="toc"></a>
:marked
  ## Table of contents

  [Application-wide dependencies](#app-wide-dependencies)

  [External module configuration](#external-module-configuration)

  [*@Injectable* and nested service dependencies](#nested-dependencies)

  [Limit service scope to a component subtree](#service-scope)

  [Multiple service instances (sandboxing)](#multiple-service-instances)

  [Qualify dependency lookup with *@Optional* and *@Host*](#qualify-dependency-lookup)

  [Inject the component's DOM element](#component-element)

  [Define dependencies with providers](#providers)
  * [The *provide* function](#provide)
  * [useValue - the *value provider*](#usevalue)
  * [useClass - the *class provider*](#useclass)
  * [useExisting - the *alias provider*](#useexisting)
  * [useFactory - the *factory provider*](#usefactory)  

  [Provider token alternatives](#tokens)
  * [class-interface](#class-interface)
  * [OpaqueToken](#opaque-token)
  
  [Inject into a derived class](#di-inheritance)
  
  [Find a parent component by injection](#find-parent)
    * [Find parent with a known component type](#known-parent)
    * [Cannot find a parent by its base class](#base-parent)
    * [Find a parent by its class-interface](#class-interface-parent)
    * [Find a parent in a tree of parents (*@SkipSelf*)](#parent-tree)
    * [A *provideParent* helper function](#provideparent)
  
  [Break circularities with a forward class reference (*forwardRef*)](#forwardref)
  
:marked
   **See the [live example](/resources/live-examples/cb-dependency-injection/ts/plnkr.html)**
   of the code supporting this cookbook.        
   
.l-main-section

<a id="app-wide-dependencies"></a>
:marked
  ## Application-wide dependencies   
  Register providers for dependencies used throughout the application in the root application component, `AppComponent`.
  
  In the following example, we import and register several services 
  (the `LoggerService`, `UserContext`, and the `UserService`)
  in the `@Component` metadata `providers` array.

+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/app.component.ts','import-services','app/app.component.ts (excerpt)')(format='.') 
:marked
  All of these services are implemented as classes. 
  Service classes can act as their own providers which is why listing them in the `providers` array
  is all the registration we need.
.l-sub-section
  :marked
    A *provider* is something that can create or deliver a service.
    Angular creates a service instance from a class provider by "new-ing" it.
    Learn more about providers [below](#providers).
:marked
  Now that we've registered these services, 
  Angular can inject them into the constructor of *any* component or service, *anywhere* in the application.
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/hero-bios.component.ts','ctor','app/hero-bios.component.ts (component constructor injection)')(format='.') 

+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/user-context.service.ts','ctor','app/user-context.service.ts (service constructor injection)')(format='.')    
    
<a id="external-module-configuration"></a>
.l-main-section
:marked
  ## External module configuration
  We can register _certain_ module providers when bootstrapping rather than in the root application component. 
  
  We'd do this when we expect to select or configure external modules that support our application
  but (a) aren't conceptually part of the application and (b) that we could change later without
  altering the essential logic of the application.
  
  For example, we might configure the Component Router with different 
  [location strategies](../guide/router.html#location-strategy)  based on environmental factors. 
  The choice of location strategy doesn't matter to the application itself.
  
  We could sneak in a fake HTTP backend with sample data during development rather than 
  allow http calls to a remote server (that might not yet exist). 
  We'll switch to the real backend in production. 
  The application shouldn't know or care one way or the other.
  
  See both examples in the following `main.ts`
  where we list their service providers in an array in the second parameter of the `bootstrap` method.
  
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/main.ts','bootstrap','app/main.ts')(format='.') 

a(id="injectable")
a(id="nested-dependencies")
.l-main-section
:marked
  ## *@Injectable* and nested service dependencies
  The consumer of an injected service does not know how to create that service.
  It shouldn't care.
  It's the dependency injection's job to create and cache that service.
  
  Sometimes a service depends on other services ... which may depend on yet other services.
  Resolving these nested dependencies in the correct order is also the framework's job.
  At each step, the consumer of dependencies simply declares what it requires in its constructor and the framework takes over.
  
  For example, we inject both the `LoggerService` and the `UserContext` in the `AppComponent`. 
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/app.component.ts','ctor','app/app.component.ts')(format='.') 

:marked
  The `UserContext` in turn has dependencies on both the `LoggerService` (again) and 
  a `UserService` that gathers information about a particular user.
  
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/user-context.service.ts','injectables','user-context.service.ts (injection)')(format='.')

:marked
 When Angular creates an`AppComponent`, the dependency injection framework creates an instance of the `LoggerService` and 
 starts to create the `UserContextService`.
 The `UserContextService` needs the `LoggerService`, which the framework already has, and the `UserService`, which it has yet to create. 
 The `UserService` has no dependencies so the dependency injection framework can just `new` one into existence.
 
 The beauty of dependency injection is that the author of `AppComponent` didn't care about any of this. 
 The author simply declared what was needed in the constructor (`LoggerService` and `UserContextService`) and the framework did the rest.
 
 Once all the dependencies are in place, the `AppComponent` displays the user information:
  
figure.image-display
  img(src="/resources/images/cookbooks/dependency-injection/logged-in-user.png" alt="Logged In User")
:marked
  ### *@Injectable()*
  Notice the `@Injectable()`decorator on the `UserContextService` class. 
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/user-context.service.ts','injectable','user-context.service.ts (@Injectable)')(format='.')
:marked
  That decorator makes it possible for Angular to identify the types of its two dependencies, `LoggerService` and `UserService`.
  
  Technically, the `@Injectable()`decorator is only _required_ for a service class that has _its own dependencies_.
  The `LoggerService` doesn't depend on anything. The logger would work if we omitted `@Injectable()`
  and the generated code would be slightly smaller. 
  
  But the service would break the moment we gave it a dependency and we'd have to go back and
  and add `@Injectable()` to fix it. We add `@Injectable()` from the start for the sake of consistency and to avoid future pain.

.alert.is-helpful
  :marked
    Although we recommend applying `@Injectable` to all service classes, do not feel bound by it.
    Some developers prefer to add it only where needed and that's a reasonable policy too.

.l-sub-section
  :marked
    The `AppComponent` class had two dependencies as well but no `@Injectable()`.
    It didn't need `@Injectable()` because that component class has the `@Component` decorator.
    In Angular with TypeScript, a *single* decorator &mdash; *any* decorator &mdash; is sufficient to identify dependency types.


<a id="service-scope"></a>
.l-main-section
:marked
  ## Limit service scope to a component subtree
  
  All injected service dependencies are singletons meaning that, 
  for a given dependency injector ("injector"), there is only one instance of service. 
  
  But an Angular application has multiple dependency injectors, arranged in a tree hierarchy that parallels the component tree.
  So a particular service can be *provided* (and created) at any component level and multiple times
  if provided in multiple components.
  
  By default, a service dependency provided in one component is visible to all of its child components and 
  Angular injects the same service instance into all child components that ask for that service.
  
  Accordingly, dependencies provided in the root `AppComponent` can be injected into *any* component *anywhere* in the application.
  
  That isn't always desireable. 
  Sometimes we want to restrict service availability to a particular region of the application.
  
  We can limit the scope of an injected service to a *branch* of the application hierarchy
  by providing that service *at the sub-root component for that branch*.
  Here we provide the `HeroService` to the `HeroesBaseComponent` by listing it in the `providers` array:
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/sorted-heroes.component.ts','injection','app/sorted-heroes.component.ts (HeroesBaseComponent excerpt)')
:marked
  When Angular creates the `HeroesBaseComponent`, it also creates a new instance of `HeroService` 
  that is visible only to the component and its children (if any).
  
  We could also provide the `HeroService` to a *different* component elsewhere in the application. 
  That would result in a *different* instance of the service, living in a *different* injector.
.l-sub-section
  :marked
    We examples of such scoped `HeroService` singletons appear throughout the accompanying sample code, 
    including the `HeroBiosComponent`, `HeroOfTheMonthComponent`, and `HeroesBaseComponent`. 
    Each of these components has its own `HeroService` instance managing its own independent collection of heroes.

.l-main-section
.alert.is-helpful
  :marked
    ### Take a break!
    This much Dependency Injection knowledge may be all that many Angular developers
    ever need to build their applications. It doesn't always have to be more complicated.
    
<a id="multiple-service-instances"></a>
.l-main-section
:marked
  ## Multiple service instances (sandboxing)
  
  Sometimes we want multiple instances of a service at *the same level of the component hierarchy*.
  
  A good example is a service that holds state for its companion component instance. 
  We need a separate instance of the service for each component.
  Each service has its own work-state, isolated from the service-and-state of a different component.
  We call this *sandboxing* because each service and component instance has its own sandbox to play in.
  
  <a id="hero-bios-component"></a>
  Imagine a `HeroBiosComponent` that presents three instances of the `HeroBioComponent`. 
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/hero-bios.component.ts','simple','ap/hero-bios.component.ts')
:marked
  Each `HeroBioComponent` can edit a single hero's biography. 
  A `HeroBioComponent` relies on a `HeroCacheService` to fetch, cache, and perform other persistence operations on that hero.
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/hero-cache.service.ts','service','app/hero-cache.service.ts')  
:marked
  Clearly the three instances of the `HeroBioComponent` can't share the same `HeroCacheService`. 
  They'd be competing with each other to determine which hero to cache.
  
  Each `HeroBioComponent` gets its *own* `HeroCacheService` instance 
  by listing the `HeroCacheService` in its metadata `providers` array.
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/hero-bio.component.ts','component','app/hero-bio.component.ts')  
:marked
  The parent `HeroBiosComponent` binds a value to the `heroId`.
  The `ngOnInit` pass that `id` to the service which fetches and caches the hero. 
  The getter for the `hero` property pulls the cached hero from the service.
  And the template displays this data-bound property.
  
  Find this example in [live code](/resources/live-examples/cb-dependency-injection/ts/plnkr.html)
  and confirm that the three `HeroBioComponent` instances have their own cached hero data. 
figure.image-display
  img(src="/resources/images/cookbooks/dependency-injection/hero-bios.png" alt="Bios")    
  
a(id="optional")
a(id="qualify-dependency-lookup")
.l-main-section
:marked
  ## Qualify dependency lookup with *@Optional* and *@Host*
  We learned that dependencies can be registered at any level in the component hierarchy. 
  
  When a component requests a dependency, Angular starts with that component's injector and walks up the injector tree 
  until it finds the first suitable provider.  Angular throws an error if it can't find the dependency during that walk. 
   
  We *want* this behavior most of the time. 
  But sometimes we need to limit the search and/or accommodate a missing dependency.
  We can modify Angular's search behavior with the `@Host` and `@Optional` qualifying decorators,
  used individually or together.
  
  The `@Optional` decorator tells Angular to continue when it can't find the dependency. 
  Angular sets the injection parameter to `null` instead.
  
  The `@Host` decorator stops the upward search at the *host component*. 
  
  The host component is typically the component requesting the dependency. 
  But when this component is projected into a *parent* component, that parent component becomes the host.
  We look at this second, more interesting case in our next example.
  
  ### Demonstration
  The `HeroBiosAndContactsComponent` is a revision of the `HeroBiosComponent` that we looked at [above](#hero-bios-component).
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/hero-bios.component.ts','hero-bios-and-contacts','app/hero-bios.component.ts (HeroBiosAndContactsComponent)')
:marked
  Focus on the template:
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/hero-bios.component.ts','template')(format='.')
:marked
  We've inserted a `<hero-contact>` element between the `<hero-bio>` tags.
  Angular *projects* (*transcludes*) the corresponding `HeroContactComponent` into the `HeroBioComponent` view, 
  placing it in the `<ng-content>` slot of the `HeroBioComponent` template:
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/hero-bio.component.ts','template','app/hero-bio.component.ts (template)')(format='.')
:marked
  It looks like this, with the heroe's telephone number from `HeroContactComponent` projected above the hero description:
figure.image-display
  img(src="/resources/images/cookbooks/dependency-injection/hero-bio-and-content.png" alt="bio and contact")    
:marked
  Here's the `HeroContactComponent` which demonstrates the qualifying decorators that we're talking about in this section:
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/hero-contact.component.ts','component','app/hero-contact.component.ts')
:marked
  Focus on the constructor parameters
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/hero-contact.component.ts','ctor-params','app/hero-contact.component.ts')(format='.')
:marked
  The `@Host()` function decorating the  `heroCache` property ensures that 
  we get a reference to the cache service from the parent `HeroBioComponent`.
  Angular throws if the parent lacks that service, even if a component higher in the component tree happens to have that service.
  
  A second `@Host()` function decorates the `loggerService` property.
  We know the only `LoggerService` instance in the app is provided at the `AppComponent` level.
  The host `HeroBioComponent` doesn't have its own `LoggerService` provider.
  
  Angular would throw an error if we hadn't also decorated the property with the `@Optional()` function.
  Thanks to `@Optional()`, Angular sets the `loggerService` to null and the rest of the component adapts.
  
.l-sub-section
  :marked
    We'll come back to the `elementRef` property shortly.
:marked
  Here's the `HeroBiosAndContactsComponent` in action.
figure.image-display
  img(src="/resources/images/cookbooks/dependency-injection/hero-bios-and-contacts.png" alt="Bios with contact into")
:marked
  If we comment out the `@Host()` decorator, Angular now walks up the injector ancestor tree 
  until it finds the logger at the `AppComponent` level. The logger logic kicks in and the hero display updates
  with the gratuituous "!!!", indicating that the logger was found.
figure.image-display
  img(src="/resources/images/cookbooks/dependency-injection/hero-bio-contact-no-host.png" alt="Without @Host") 
:marked
  On the other hand, if we restore the `@Host()` decorator and comment out `@Optional`, 
  the application fails for lack of the required logger at the host component level.
  <br>
  `EXCEPTION: No provider for LoggerService! (HeroContactComponent -> LoggerService)`

<a id="component-element"></a>
:marked
  ## Inject the component's element
  
  On occasion we might need to access a component's corresponding DOM element. 
  Although we strive to avoid it, many visual effects and 3rd party tools (such as jQuery)
  require DOM access. 
  
  To illustrate, we've written a simplified version of the `HighlightDirective` from 
  the [Attribute Directives](../guide/attribute-directives.html) chapter.
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/highlight.directive.ts','','app/highlight.directive.ts')
:marked
  The directive sets the background to a highlight color when the user mouses over the
  DOM element to which it is applied.
  
  Angular set the constructor's `el` parameter to the injected `ElementRef` which is 
  a wrapper around that DOM element. 
  Its `nativeElement` property exposes the DOM element for the directive to manipulate.
  
  The sample code applies the directive's `myHighlight` attribute to two `<div>` tags, 
  first without a value (yielding the default color) and then with an assigned color value.
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/app.component.html','highlight','app/app.component.html (highlight)')(format='.')
:marked
  The following image shows the effect of mousing over the `<hero-bios-and-contacts>` tag.
figure.image-display
  img(src="/resources/images/cookbooks/dependency-injection/highlight.png" alt="Highlighted bios")
:marked

<a id="providers"></a>
.l-main-section
:marked
  ## Define dependencies with providers
  
  In this section we learn to write providers that deliver dependent services.
  
  ### Background
  We get a service from a dependency injector by giving it a ***token***. 
  
  We usually let Angular handle this transaction for us by specifying a constructor parameter and its type.
  The parameter type serves as the injector lookup *token*. 
  Angular passes this token to the injector and assigns the result to the parameter.
  Here's a typical example:

+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/hero-bios.component.ts','ctor','app/hero-bios.component.ts (component constructor injection)')(format='.') 
:marked
  Angular asks the injector for the service associated with the `LoggerService` and
  and assigns the returned value to the `logger` parameter.
  
  Where did the injector get that value?
  It may already have that value in its internal container. 
  It it doesn't, it may be able to make one with the help of a ***provider***.
  A *provider* is a recipe for delivering a service associated with a *token*.
.l-sub-section
  :marked
    If the injector doesn't have a provider for the requested *token*, it delegates the request 
    to its parent injector, where the process repeats until there are no more injectors. 
    If the search is futile, the injector throws an error ... unless the request was [optional](#optional).
    
    Let's return our attention to providers themselves.
:marked
  A new injector has no providers.
  Angular initializes the injectors it creates with some providers it cares about.
  We have to register our _own_ application providers manually, 
  usually in the `providers` array of the `Component` or `Directive` metadata:
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/app.component.ts','providers','app/app.component.ts (providers)') 
:marked
  ### Defining providers
  
  The simple class provider is the most typical by far.
  We mention the class in the `providers` array and we're done.
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/hero-bios.component.ts','class-provider','app/hero-bios.component.ts (class provider)')(format='.') 
:marked
  It's that simple because the most common injected service is an instance of a class.
  But not every dependency can be satisfied by creating a new instance of a class.
  We need other ways to deliver dependency values and that means we need other ways to specify a provider.
  
  The `HeroOfTheMonthComponent` example demonstrates many of the alternatives and why we need them. 
  
figure.image-display
  img(src="/resources/images/cookbooks/dependency-injection/hero-of-month.png" alt="Hero of the month" width="300px")
:marked
  It's visually simple: a few properties and the output of a logger. The code behind it gives us plenty to talk about.
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/hero-of-the-month.component.ts','hero-of-the-month','hero-of-the-month.component.ts')   

.l-main-section
a(id='provide')
:marked
  #### The *provide* function
  
  The imported Angular `provide` function creates an instance of 
  the Angular [Provider](../api/core/Provider-class.html) class.
  
  The `provide` function takes a *token* and a *definition object*.
  The *token* is usually a class but [it doesn't have to be](#tokens).
  
  The *definition* object has one main property, (e.g. `useValue`) that indicates how the provider 
  should create or return the provided value.

.l-main-section
a(id='usevalue')
:marked
  #### useValue - the *value provider*
  
  Set the `useValue` property to a ***fixed value*** that the provider can return as the dependency object.
  
  Use this technique to provide *runtime configuration constants* such as web-site base addresses and feature flags.
  We often use a *value provider* in a unit test to replace a production service with a fake or mock.
  
  The `HeroOfTheMonthComponent` example has two *value providers*.
  The first provides an instance of the `Hero` class; 
  the second specifies a literal string resource:
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/hero-of-the-month.component.ts','use-value')(format='.')   
:marked
  The `Hero` provider token is a class which makes sense because the value is a `Hero`
  and the consumer of the injected hero would want the type information.
  
  The `TITLE` provider token is *not a class*.
  It's a special kind of provider lookup key called an [OpaqueToken](#opaquetoken).
  We often use an `OpaqueToken` when the dependency is a simple value like a string, a number, or a function.
  
  The value of a *value provider* must be defined *now*. We can't create the value later. 
  Obviously the title string literal is immediately available. 
  The `someHero` variable in this example was set earlier in the file:
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/hero-of-the-month.component.ts','some-hero')
:marked
  The other providers create their values *lazily* when they're needed for injection.

.l-main-section
a(id='useclass')
:marked
  #### useClass - the *class provider*
  
  The `useClass` provider creates and returns new instance of the specified class.
  
  Use this technique to ***substitute an alternative implementation*** for a common or default class.
  The alternative could implement a different strategy, extend the default class,
  or fake the behavior of the real class in a test case.
  
  We see two examples in the `HeroOfTheMonthComponent`:
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/hero-of-the-month.component.ts','use-class')(format='.')   
:marked
  The first provider is the *de-sugared*, expanded form of the most typical case in which the
  class to be created (`HeroService`) is also the provider's injection token. 
  We wrote it in this long form to de-mystify the preferred short form.
  
  The second provider substitutes the `DateLoggerService` for the `LoggerService`.
  The `LoggerService` is already registered at the `AppComponent` level.
  When _this component_ requests the `LoggerService`, it receives the `DateLoggerService` instead.
.l-sub-section
  :marked
    This component and its tree of child components receive the `DateLoggerService` instance.
    Components outside the tree continue to receive the original `LoggerService` instance.
:marked
  The `DateLoggerService` inherits from `LoggerService`; it appends the current date/time to each message:  
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/date-logger.service.ts','date-logger-service','app/date-logger.service.ts')(format='.')   

.l-main-section
a(id='useexisting')
:marked
  #### useExisting - the *alias provider*
  
  The `useExisting` provider maps one token to another. 
  In effect, the first token is an ***alias*** for the service associated with second token,
  creating ***two ways to access the same service object***.
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/hero-of-the-month.component.ts','use-existing')
:marked
  Narrowing an API through an aliasing interface is _one_ important use case for this technique.
  We're aliasing for that very purpose here.
  Imagine that the `LoggerService` had a large API (it's actually only three methods and a property).
  We want to shrink that API surface to just the two members exposed by the `MinimalLogger` [*class-interface*](#class-interface):

+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/date-logger.service.ts','minimal-logger','app/date-logger.service.ts (MinimalLogger)')(format='.')   
:marked
  The constructor's `logger` parameter is typed as `MinimalLogger` so only its two members are visible in TypeScript:
figure.image-display
  img(src="/resources/images/cookbooks/dependency-injection/minimal-logger-intellisense.png" alt="MinimalLogger restricted API")
:marked
  Angular actually sets the `logger` parameter to the injector's full version of the `LoggerService` 
  which happens to be the `DateLoggerService` thanks to the override provider registered previously via `useClass`.
  The following image, which displays the logging date, confirms the point:
figure.image-display
  img(src="/resources/images/cookbooks/dependency-injection/date-logger-entry.png" alt="DateLoggerService entry" width="300px")

.l-main-section
a(id='usefactory')
:marked
  #### useFactory - the *factory provider*
  
  The `useFactory` provider creates a dependency object by calling a factory function
  as seen in this example.
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/hero-of-the-month.component.ts','use-factory')
:marked
  Use this technique to ***create a dependency object*** 
  with a factory function whose inputs are some ***combination of injected services and local state***.
  
  The *dependency object* doesn't have to be a class instance. It could be anything.
  In this example, the *dependency object* is a string of the names of the runners-up
  to the "Hero of the Month" contest.

  The local state is the number `2`, the number of runners-up this component should show.
  We execute `runnersUpFactory` immediately with `2`. 
  
  The `runnersUpFactory` itself isn't the provider factory function.
  The true provider factory function is the function that `runnersUpFactory` returns.
  
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/runners-up.ts','factory-synopsis','runners-up.ts (excerpt)')(format='.')   
:marked
  That returned function takes a winning `Hero` and a `HeroService` as arguments.
  
  Angular supplies these arguments from injected values identified by 
  the two *tokens* in the `deps` array. 
  The two `deps` values are *tokens* that the injector uses
  to provide these factory function dependencies.
  
  After some undisclosed work, the function returns the string of names 
  and Angular injects it into the `runnersUp` parameter of the `HeroOfTheMonthComponent`.
  
.l-sub-section
  :marked
    The function retrieves candidate heroes from the `HeroService`, 
    takes `2` of them to be the runners-up, and returns their concatenated names.
    Look at the [live example](/resources/live-examples/cb-dependency-injection/ts/plnkr.html)
    for the full source code.


a(id="tokens")
.l-main-section
:marked
  ## Provider token alternatives: the *class-interface* and *OpaqueToken*

  Angular dependency injection is easiest when the provider *token* is a class
  that is also the type of the returned dependency object (what we usually call the *service*).
  
  But the token doesn't have to be a class and even when it is a class,
  it doesn't have to be the same type as the returned object.
  That's the subject of our next section. 
  
  <a id="class-interface"></a>
  ### class-interface
  In the previous *Hero of the Month* example, we used the `MinimalLogger` class
  as the token for a provider of a `LoggerService`.
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/hero-of-the-month.component.ts','use-existing')
:marked
  The `MinimalLogger` is an abstract class. 
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/date-logger.service.ts','minimal-logger')(format='.')   
:marked
  We usually inherit from an abstract class.
  But `LoggerService` doesn't inherit from `MinimalLogger`. *No class* inherits from it.
  Instead, we use it like an interface.
  
  Look again at the declaration for `DateLoggerService`
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/date-logger.service.ts','date-logger-service-signature')(format='.')   
:marked
  `DateLoggerService` inherits (extends) from `LoggerService`, not `MinimalLogger`.
  The `DateLoggerService` *implements* `MinimalLogger` as if `MinimalLogger` were an *interface*.
  
  We call a class used in this way a ***class-interface***.
  The key benefit of a *class-interface* is that we can get the strong-typing of an interface
  and we can ***use it as a provider token*** in the same manner as a normal class.
  
  A ***class-interface*** should define *only* the members that its consumers are allowed to call.
  Such a narrowing interface helps decouple the concrete class from its consumers.
  The `MinimalLogger` defines just two of the `LoggerClass` members.

.l-sub-section
  :marked
    #### Why *MinimalLogger* is a class and not an interface
    We can't use an interface as a provider token because 
    interfaces are not JavaScript objects. 
    They exist only in the TypeScript design space. 
    They disappear after the code is transpiled to JavaScript.
    
    A provider token must be a real JavaScript object of some kind: 
    a function, an object, a string ... a class.
    
    Using a class as an interface gives us the characteristics of an interface in a JavaScript object.
    
    The minimize memory cost, the class should have *no implementation*. 
    The `MinimalLogger` transpiles to this unoptimized, pre-minified JavaScript:
  +makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/date-logger.service.ts','minimal-logger-transpiled')(format='.')
  :marked
     It never grows larger no matter how many members we add *as long as they are typed but not implemented*.

a(id='opaque-token')
:marked
  ### OpaqueToken
  
  Dependency objects can be simple values like dates, numbers and strings or 
  shapeless objects like arrays and functions.
  
  Such objects don't have application interfaces and therefore aren't well represented by a class.
  They're better represented by a token that is both unique and symbolic, 
  a JavaScript object that has a friendly name but won't conflict with 
  another token that happens to have the same name.
  
  The `OpaqueToken` has these characteristics.
  We encountered them twice in the *Hero of the Month* example, 
  in the *title* value provider and in the *runnersUp* factory provider.
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/hero-of-the-month.component.ts','provide-opaque-token')(format='.')   
:marked
  We created the `TITLE` token like this:
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/hero-of-the-month.component.ts','opaque-token')(format='.')   

  
a(id="di-inheritance")
.l-main-section
:marked
  ## Inject into a derived class
  We must take care when writing a component that inherits from another component.
  If the base component has injected dependencies, 
  we must re-provide and re-inject them in the derived class
  and then pass them down to the base class through the constructor.
  
  In this contrived example, `SortedHeroesComponent` inherits from `HeroesBaseComponent` 
  to display a *sorted* list of heroes.
  
figure.image-display
  img(src="/resources/images/cookbooks/dependency-injection/sorted-heroes.png" alt="Sorted Heroes")
:marked
  The `HeroesBaseComponent` could stand on its own.
  It demands its own instance of the `HeroService` to get heroes
  and displays them in the order they arrive from the database.
  
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/sorted-heroes.component.ts','heroes-base','app/sorted-heroes.component.ts (HeroesBaseComponent)') 
.l-sub-section
  :marked
    We strongly prefer simple constructors. They should do little more than initialize variables.
    This rule makes the component safe to construct under test without fear that it will do something dramatic like talk to the server.
    That's why we call the `HeroService` from within the `ngOnInit` rather than the constructor.
    
    We explain the mysterious `afterGetHeroes` below.
:marked
  Users want to see the heroes in alphabetical order.
  Rather than modify the original component, we sub-class it and create a
  `SortedHeroesComponent` that sorts the heroes before presenting them.
  The `SortedHeroesComponent` lets the base class fetch the heroes.
  (we said it was contrived).
  
  Unfortunately, Angular cannot inject the `HeroService` directly into the base class.
  We must provide the `HeroService` again for *this* component, 
  then pass it down to the base class inside the constructor.
    
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/sorted-heroes.component.ts','sorted-heroes','app/sorted-heroes.component.ts (SortedHeroesComponent)') 
:marked
  Now take note of the `afterGetHeroes` method. 
  Our first instinct was to create an `ngOnInit` method in `SortedHeroesComponent` and do the sorting there.
  But Angular calls the *derived* class's `ngOnInit` *before* calling the base class's `ngOnInit` 
  so we'd be sorting the heroes array *before they arrived*. That produces a nasty error.
  
  Overriding the base class's `afterGetHeroes` method solves the problem
  
  These complications argue for *avoiding component inheritance*. 

a(id="find-parent")
.l-main-section
:marked
  ## Find a parent component by injection
  
  Application components often need to share information.
  We prefer the more loosely coupled techniques such as data binding and service sharing.
  But sometimes it makes sense for one component to have a direct reference to another component
  perhaps to access values or call methods on that component.
   
  Obtaining a component reference is a bit tricky in Angular.
  Although an Angular application is a tree of components,
  there is no public API for inspecting and traversing that tree. 
  
  There is an API for acquiring a child reference
  (checkout `Query`, `QueryList`, `ViewChildren`, and `ContentChildren`).
  
  There is no public API for acquiring a parent reference.
  But because every component instance is added to an injector's container,
  we can use Angular dependency injection to reach a parent component.
  
  This section describes some techniques for doing that.
  
  <a id="known-parent"></a>
  ### Find a parent component of known type
  
  We use standard class injection to acquire a parent component whose type we know.
  
  In the following example, the parent `AlexComponent` has several children including a `CathyComponent`:
a(id='alex')
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/parent-finder.component.ts','alex-1','parent-finder.component.ts (AlexComponent v.1)')(format='.')
:marked
  *Cathy* reports whether or not she has access to *Alex*
  after injecting an `AlexComponent` into her constructor:
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/parent-finder.component.ts','cathy','parent-finder.component.ts (CathyComponent)')(format='.')
:marked
  We added the [@Optional](#optional) qualifier for safety but
  the [live example](/resources/live-examples/cb-dependency-injection/ts/plnkr.html)
  confirms that the `alex` parameter is set.

  <a id="base-parent"></a>
  ### Cannot find a parent by its base class
  
  What if we do *not* know the concrete parent component class?
  
  A re-usable component might be a child of multiple components.
  Imagine a component for rendering breaking news about a financial instrument.
  For sound (cough) business reasons, this news component makes frequent calls 
  directly into its parent instrument as changing market data stream by.
  
  The app probably defines more than a dozen financial instrument components.
  If we're lucky, they all implement the same base class
  whose API our `NewsComponent` understands.
  
.l-sub-section
  :marked
    Looking for components that implement an interface would be better.
    That's not possible because TypeScript interfaces disappear from the transpiled JavaScript
    which doesn't support interfaces. There's no artifact we could look for.
:marked
  We're not claiming this is good design. 
  We are asking *can a component inject its parent via the parent's base class*?
  
  The sample's `CraigComponent` explores this question. [Looking back](#alex) 
  we see that the `Alex` component *extends* (*inherits*) from a class named `Base`.
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/parent-finder.component.ts','alex-class-signature','parent-finder.component.ts (Alex class signature)')(format='.')
:marked
  The `CraigComponent` tries to inject `Base` into its `alex` constructor parameter and reports if it succeeded.
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/parent-finder.component.ts','craig','parent-finder.component.ts (CraigComponent)')(format='.')
:marked
  Unfortunately, this does not work. 
  The [live example](/resources/live-examples/cb-dependency-injection/ts/plnkr.html)
  confirms that the `alex` parameter is null.
  *We cannot inject a parent by its base class.*
  
  <a id="class-interface-parent"></a>
  ### Find a parent by its class-interface
  
  We can find a parent component with a [class-interface](#class-interface).

  The parent must cooperate by providing an *alias* to itself in the name of a *class-interface* token. 

  Recall that Angular always adds a component instance to its own injector; 
  that's why we could inject *Alex* into *Carol* [earlier](#known-parent).

  We write an [*alias provider*](#useexisting) &mdash; a `provide` function with a `useExisting` definition &mdash;
  that creates an *alternative* way to inject the same component instance
  and add that provider to the `providers` array of the `@Component` metadata for the `AlexComponent`:
a(id="alex-providers")
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/parent-finder.component.ts','alex-providers','parent-finder.component.ts (AlexComponent providers)')(format='.')
:marked
  [Parent](#parent-token) is the provider's *class-interface* token. 
  The [*forwardRef*](#forwardref) breaks the circular reference we just created by having the `AlexComponent` refer to itself.

  *Carol*, the third of *Alex*'s child components, injects the parent into its `parent` parameter, the same way we've done it before:
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/parent-finder.component.ts','carol-class','parent-finder.component.ts (CarolComponent class)')(format='.')
:marked
  Here's *Alex* and family in action:
figure.image-display
  img(src="/resources/images/cookbooks/dependency-injection/alex.png" alt="Alex in action")
  
a(id="parent-tree")
:marked
  ### Find the parent in a tree of parents
  
  Imagine one branch of a component hierarchy: *Alice* -> *Barry* -> *Carol*. 
  Both *Alice* and *Barry* implement the `Parent` *class-interface*.
  
  *Barry* is the problem. He needs to reach his parent, *Alice*, and also be a parent to *Carol*.
  That means he must both *inject* the `Parent` *class-interface* to get *Alice* and
  *provide* a `Parent` to satisfy *Carol*.
  
  Here's *Barry*:
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/parent-finder.component.ts','barry','parent-finder.component.ts (BarryComponent)')(format='.')
:marked
  *Barry*'s `providers` array looks just like [*Alex*'s](#alex-providers).
  If we're going to keep writing [*alias providers*](#useexisting) like this we should create a [helper function](#provideparent).
  
  For now, focus on *Barry*'s constructor:
+makeTabs(
  'cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/parent-finder.component.ts, cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/parent-finder.component.ts',
  'barry-ctor, carol-ctor',
  'Barry\'s constructor, Carol\'s constructor')(format='.')
:marked
:marked
  It's identical to *Carol*'s constructor except for the additional `@SkipSelf` decorator.
  
  `@SkipSelf` is essential for two reasons:
   
  1. It tell the injector to start its search for a `Parent` dependency in a component *above* itself,
  which *is* what parent means.
  
  2. Angular throws a cyclic dependency error if we omit the `@SkipSelf` decorator.
  
    `Cannot instantiate cyclic dependency! (BethComponent -> Parent -> BethComponent)`

  Here's *Alice*, *Barry* and family in action:

figure.image-display
  img(src="/resources/images/cookbooks/dependency-injection/alice.png" alt="Alice in action")
  
a(id="parent-token")
:marked
  ### The *Parent* class-interface
  We [learned earlier](#class-interface) that a *class-interface* is an abstract class used as an interface rather than as a base class.

  Our example defines a `Parent` *class-interface* .
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/parent-finder.component.ts','parent','parent-finder.component.ts (Parent class-interface)')(format='.')
:marked
  The `Parent` *class-interface* defines a `name` property with a type declaration but *no implementation*., 
  The `name` property is the only member of a parent component that a child component can call.
  Such a narrowing interface helps decouple the child component class from its parent components.
  
  A component that could serve as a parent *should* implement the *class-interface* as the `AliceComponent` does:
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/parent-finder.component.ts','alice-class-signature','parent-finder.component.ts (AliceComponent class signature)')(format='.')
:marked
  Doing so adds clarity to the code.  But it's not technically necessary. 
  Although the `AlexComponent` has a `name` property (as required by its `Base` class) 
  its class signature doesn't mention `Parent`:
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/parent-finder.component.ts','alex-class-signature','parent-finder.component.ts (AlexComponent class signature)')(format='.')
.l-sub-section
  :marked
    The `AlexComponent` *should* implement `Parent` as a matter of proper style. 
    It doesn't in this example *only* to demonstrate that the code will compile and run without the interface 
    
a(id="provideparent")
:marked
  ### A *provideParent* helper function
  
  Writing variations of the same parent *alias provider* gets old quickly, 
  especially this awful mouthful with a [*forwardRef*](#forwardref):
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/parent-finder.component.ts','alex-providers')(format='.')
:marked
  We can extract that logic into a helper function like this:
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/parent-finder.component.ts','provide-the-parent')(format='.')
:marked
  Now we can add a simpler, more meaningful parent provider to our components:
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/parent-finder.component.ts','alice-providers')(format='.')
:marked
  We can do better. The current version of the helper function can only alias the `Parent` *class-interface*.
  Our application might have a variety of parent types, each with its own *class-interface* token.
  
  Here's a revised version that defaults to `parent` but also accepts an optional second parameter for a different parent *class-interface*.
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/parent-finder.component.ts','provide-parent')(format='.')
:marked
  And here's how we could use it with a different parent type:
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/parent-finder.component.ts','beth-providers')(format='.')
:marked

a(id="forwardref")
.l-main-section
:marked
  ## Break circularities with a forward class reference (*forwardRef*)
  
  The order of class declaration matters in TypeScript.
  We can't refer directly to a class until it's been defined.
  
  This isn't usually a problem, especially if we adhere to the recommended *one class per file* rule.
  But sometimes circular references are unavoidable. 
  We're in a bind when class 'A refers to class 'B' and 'B' refers to 'A'.
  One of them has to be defined first. 
  
  The Angular `forwardRef` function creates an *indirect* reference that Angular can resolve later.
  
  The *Parent Finder* sample is full of circular class references that are impossible to break.
  
  In the [*Alex/Cathy* example](#known-parent) above:
  
  * the `AlexComponent` lists the `CathyComponent` in its component metadata `directives` array
  so it can display *Cathy* in its template.
  
  * the `CathyComponent` constructor injects the parent `AlexComponent` which means that the `alex` parameter
  of its constructor has the `AlexComponent` type.
  
  *Alex* refers to *Cathy* and *Cathy* refers to *Alex*. We're stuck. We must define one of them first. 
  
  We defined *Alex* first and built its `C_DIRECTIVES` array with a forward reference to *Cathy*: 
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/parent-finder.component.ts','C_DIRECTIVES','parent-finder.component.ts (C_DIRECTIVES)')(format='.')
:marked
.l-sub-section
  :marked
    Defining *Alex* and *Cathy* in separate files won't help. 
    *Alex* would have to import *Cathy* and *Cathy* would have to import *Alex*.
    
    We *had* to define *Alex* first because, 
    while we can add `forwardRef(CathyComponent)` to *Alex*'s `directives` array,
    we can't write `public alex: forwardRef(AlexComponent))` in *Cathy*'s constructor. 
:marked
  We face a similar dilemma when a class makes *a reference to itself*
  as does the `AlexComponent` in its `providers` array. 
  The `providers` array is a property of the `@Component` decorator function which must
  appear *above* the class definition.
  
  Again we break the circularity with `forwardRef`:
+makeExample('cb-dependency-injection/ts/app/parent-finder.component.ts','alex-providers','parent-finder.component.ts (AlexComponent providers)')(format='.')
:marked
