angular-docs-cn/tools/public_api_guard/forms/forms.d.ts

531 lines
19 KiB
TypeScript
Raw Normal View History

export declare abstract class AbstractControl {
asyncValidator: AsyncValidatorFn | null;
readonly dirty: boolean;
readonly disabled: boolean;
readonly enabled: boolean;
readonly errors: ValidationErrors | null;
readonly invalid: boolean;
readonly parent: FormGroup | FormArray;
readonly pending: boolean;
readonly pristine: boolean;
readonly root: AbstractControl;
readonly status: string;
readonly statusChanges: Observable<any>;
readonly touched: boolean;
readonly untouched: boolean;
readonly updateOn: FormHooks;
readonly valid: boolean;
validator: ValidatorFn | null;
readonly value: any;
readonly valueChanges: Observable<any>;
constructor(validator: ValidatorFn | null, asyncValidator: AsyncValidatorFn | null);
clearAsyncValidators(): void;
clearValidators(): void;
disable(opts?: {
onlySelf?: boolean;
emitEvent?: boolean;
}): void;
enable(opts?: {
onlySelf?: boolean;
emitEvent?: boolean;
}): void;
get(path: Array<string | number> | string): AbstractControl | null;
getError(errorCode: string, path?: string[]): any;
hasError(errorCode: string, path?: string[]): boolean;
markAsDirty(opts?: {
onlySelf?: boolean;
}): void;
markAsPending(opts?: {
onlySelf?: boolean;
emitEvent?: boolean;
}): void;
markAsPristine(opts?: {
onlySelf?: boolean;
}): void;
markAsTouched(opts?: {
onlySelf?: boolean;
}): void;
markAsUntouched(opts?: {
onlySelf?: boolean;
}): void;
abstract patchValue(value: any, options?: Object): void;
abstract reset(value?: any, options?: Object): void;
setAsyncValidators(newValidator: AsyncValidatorFn | AsyncValidatorFn[] | null): void;
setErrors(errors: ValidationErrors | null, opts?: {
emitEvent?: boolean;
}): void;
setParent(parent: FormGroup | FormArray): void;
setValidators(newValidator: ValidatorFn | ValidatorFn[] | null): void;
abstract setValue(value: any, options?: Object): void;
updateValueAndValidity(opts?: {
onlySelf?: boolean;
emitEvent?: boolean;
}): void;
}
export declare abstract class AbstractControlDirective {
abstract readonly control: AbstractControl | null;
readonly dirty: boolean | null;
readonly disabled: boolean | null;
readonly enabled: boolean | null;
readonly errors: ValidationErrors | null;
readonly invalid: boolean | null;
readonly path: string[] | null;
readonly pending: boolean | null;
readonly pristine: boolean | null;
readonly status: string | null;
readonly statusChanges: Observable<any> | null;
readonly touched: boolean | null;
readonly untouched: boolean | null;
readonly valid: boolean | null;
readonly value: any;
readonly valueChanges: Observable<any> | null;
getError(errorCode: string, path?: string[]): any;
hasError(errorCode: string, path?: string[]): boolean;
reset(value?: any): void;
}
/** @experimental */
export interface AbstractControlOptions {
asyncValidators?: AsyncValidatorFn | AsyncValidatorFn[] | null;
updateOn?: 'change' | 'blur' | 'submit';
validators?: ValidatorFn | ValidatorFn[] | null;
}
export declare class AbstractFormGroupDirective extends ControlContainer implements OnInit, OnDestroy {
readonly asyncValidator: AsyncValidatorFn | null;
readonly control: FormGroup;
readonly formDirective: Form | null;
readonly path: string[];
readonly validator: ValidatorFn | null;
ngOnDestroy(): void;
ngOnInit(): void;
}
/** @experimental */
export interface AsyncValidator extends Validator {
validate(c: AbstractControl): Promise<ValidationErrors | null> | Observable<ValidationErrors | null>;
}
export interface AsyncValidatorFn {
(c: AbstractControl): Promise<ValidationErrors | null> | Observable<ValidationErrors | null>;
}
export declare class CheckboxControlValueAccessor implements ControlValueAccessor {
onChange: (_: any) => void;
onTouched: () => void;
constructor(_renderer: Renderer2, _elementRef: ElementRef);
registerOnChange(fn: (_: any) => {}): void;
registerOnTouched(fn: () => {}): void;
setDisabledState(isDisabled: boolean): void;
writeValue(value: any): void;
}
/** @experimental */
export declare class CheckboxRequiredValidator extends RequiredValidator {
validate(c: AbstractControl): ValidationErrors | null;
}
fix(forms): make composition event buffering configurable (#15256) This commit fixes a regression where `ngModel` no longer syncs letter by letter on Android devices, and instead syncs at the end of every word. This broke when we introduced buffering of IME events so IMEs like Pinyin keyboards or Katakana keyboards wouldn't display composition strings. Unfortunately, iOS devices and Android devices have opposite event behavior. Whereas iOS devices fire composition events for IME keyboards only, Android fires composition events for Latin-language keyboards. For this reason, languages like English don't work as expected on Android if we always buffer. So to support both platforms, composition string buffering will only be turned on by default for non-Android devices. However, we have also added a `COMPOSITION_BUFFER_MODE` token to make this configurable by the application. In some cases, apps might might still want to receive intermediate values. For example, some inputs begin searching based on Latin letters before a character selection is made. As a provider, this is fairly flexible. If you want to turn composition buffering off, simply provide the token at the top level: ```ts providers: [ {provide: COMPOSITION_BUFFER_MODE, useValue: false} ] ``` Or, if you want to change the mode based on locale or platform, you can use a factory: ```ts import {shouldUseBuffering} from 'my/lib'; .... providers: [ {provide: COMPOSITION_BUFFER_MODE, useFactory: shouldUseBuffering} ] ``` Closes #15079. PR Close #15256
2017-03-20 20:38:33 -04:00
/** @experimental */
export declare const COMPOSITION_BUFFER_MODE: InjectionToken<boolean>;
export declare abstract class ControlContainer extends AbstractControlDirective {
readonly formDirective: Form | null;
name: string;
readonly path: string[] | null;
}
export interface ControlValueAccessor {
registerOnChange(fn: any): void;
registerOnTouched(fn: any): void;
setDisabledState?(isDisabled: boolean): void;
writeValue(obj: any): void;
}
export declare class DefaultValueAccessor implements ControlValueAccessor {
onChange: (_: any) => void;
onTouched: () => void;
constructor(_renderer: Renderer2, _elementRef: ElementRef, _compositionMode: boolean);
registerOnChange(fn: (_: any) => void): void;
registerOnTouched(fn: () => void): void;
setDisabledState(isDisabled: boolean): void;
writeValue(value: any): void;
}
/** @experimental */
export declare class EmailValidator implements Validator {
email: boolean | string;
registerOnValidatorChange(fn: () => void): void;
validate(c: AbstractControl): ValidationErrors | null;
}
export interface Form {
addControl(dir: NgControl): void;
addFormGroup(dir: AbstractFormGroupDirective): void;
getControl(dir: NgControl): FormControl;
getFormGroup(dir: AbstractFormGroupDirective): FormGroup;
removeControl(dir: NgControl): void;
removeFormGroup(dir: AbstractFormGroupDirective): void;
updateModel(dir: NgControl, value: any): void;
}
export declare class FormArray extends AbstractControl {
controls: AbstractControl[];
readonly length: number;
constructor(controls: AbstractControl[], validatorOrOpts?: ValidatorFn | ValidatorFn[] | AbstractControlOptions | null, asyncValidator?: AsyncValidatorFn | AsyncValidatorFn[] | null);
at(index: number): AbstractControl;
getRawValue(): any[];
insert(index: number, control: AbstractControl): void;
patchValue(value: any[], options?: {
onlySelf?: boolean;
emitEvent?: boolean;
}): void;
push(control: AbstractControl): void;
removeAt(index: number): void;
reset(value?: any, options?: {
onlySelf?: boolean;
emitEvent?: boolean;
}): void;
setControl(index: number, control: AbstractControl): void;
setValue(value: any[], options?: {
onlySelf?: boolean;
emitEvent?: boolean;
}): void;
}
export declare class FormArrayName extends ControlContainer implements OnInit, OnDestroy {
readonly asyncValidator: AsyncValidatorFn | null;
readonly control: FormArray;
readonly formDirective: FormGroupDirective | null;
name: string;
readonly path: string[];
readonly validator: ValidatorFn | null;
constructor(parent: ControlContainer, validators: any[], asyncValidators: any[]);
ngOnDestroy(): void;
ngOnInit(): void;
}
export declare class FormBuilder {
array(controlsConfig: any[], validator?: ValidatorFn | ValidatorFn[] | null, asyncValidator?: AsyncValidatorFn | AsyncValidatorFn[] | null): FormArray;
control(formState: any, validator?: ValidatorFn | ValidatorFn[] | null, asyncValidator?: AsyncValidatorFn | AsyncValidatorFn[] | null): FormControl;
group(controlsConfig: {
[key: string]: any;
}, extra?: {
[key: string]: any;
} | null): FormGroup;
}
export declare class FormControl extends AbstractControl {
constructor(formState?: any, validatorOrOpts?: ValidatorFn | ValidatorFn[] | AbstractControlOptions | null, asyncValidator?: AsyncValidatorFn | AsyncValidatorFn[] | null);
patchValue(value: any, options?: {
onlySelf?: boolean;
emitEvent?: boolean;
emitModelToViewChange?: boolean;
emitViewToModelChange?: boolean;
}): void;
registerOnChange(fn: Function): void;
registerOnDisabledChange(fn: (isDisabled: boolean) => void): void;
reset(formState?: any, options?: {
onlySelf?: boolean;
emitEvent?: boolean;
}): void;
setValue(value: any, options?: {
onlySelf?: boolean;
emitEvent?: boolean;
emitModelToViewChange?: boolean;
emitViewToModelChange?: boolean;
}): void;
}
export declare class FormControlDirective extends NgControl implements OnChanges {
readonly asyncValidator: AsyncValidatorFn | null;
readonly control: FormControl;
form: FormControl;
isDisabled: boolean;
refactor(forms): deprecate ngModel usage on same field as formControl (#22633) Support for using the `ngModel` input property and `ngModelChange` event with reactive form directives has been deprecated in Angular v6 and will be removed in Angular v7. Now deprecated: ```html <input [formControl]="control" [(ngModel)]="value"> ``` ```ts this.value = 'some value'; ``` This has been deprecated for a few reasons. First, developers have found this pattern confusing. It seems like the actual `ngModel` directive is being used, but in fact it's an input/output property named `ngModel` on the reactive form directive that simply approximates (some of) its behavior. Specifically, it allows getting/setting the value and intercepting value events. However, some of `ngModel`'s other features - like delaying updates with`ngModelOptions` or exporting the directive - simply don't work, which has understandably caused some confusion. In addition, this pattern mixes template-driven and reactive forms strategies, which we generally don't recommend because it doesn't take advantage of the full benefits of either strategy. Setting the value in the template violates the template-agnostic principles behind reactive forms, whereas adding a FormControl/FormGroup layer in the class removes the convenience of defining forms in the template. To update your code before v7, you'll want to decide whether to stick with reactive form directives (and get/set values using reactive forms patterns) or switch over to template-driven directives. After (choice 1 - use reactive forms): ```html <input [formControl]="control"> ``` ```ts this.control.setValue('some value'); ``` After (choice 2 - use template-driven forms): ```html <input [(ngModel)]="value"> ``` ```ts this.value = 'some value'; ``` You can also choose to silence this warning by providing a config for `ReactiveFormsModule` at import time: ```ts imports: [ ReactiveFormsModule.withConfig({warnOnNgModelWithFormControl: 'never'}); ] ``` Alternatively, you can choose to surface a separate warning for each instance of this pattern with a config value of `"always"`. This may help to track down where in the code the pattern is being used as the code is being updated. Note: `warnOnNgModelWithFormControl` is set up as deprecated so that it can be removed in v7 when it is no longer needed. This will not display properly in API docs yet because dgeni doesn't yet support deprecating properties in object literals, but we have an open issue to resolve the discrepancy here: https://github.com/angular/angular/issues/22640. PR Close #22633
2018-03-07 12:46:10 -05:00
/** @deprecated */ model: any;
readonly path: string[];
refactor(forms): deprecate ngModel usage on same field as formControl (#22633) Support for using the `ngModel` input property and `ngModelChange` event with reactive form directives has been deprecated in Angular v6 and will be removed in Angular v7. Now deprecated: ```html <input [formControl]="control" [(ngModel)]="value"> ``` ```ts this.value = 'some value'; ``` This has been deprecated for a few reasons. First, developers have found this pattern confusing. It seems like the actual `ngModel` directive is being used, but in fact it's an input/output property named `ngModel` on the reactive form directive that simply approximates (some of) its behavior. Specifically, it allows getting/setting the value and intercepting value events. However, some of `ngModel`'s other features - like delaying updates with`ngModelOptions` or exporting the directive - simply don't work, which has understandably caused some confusion. In addition, this pattern mixes template-driven and reactive forms strategies, which we generally don't recommend because it doesn't take advantage of the full benefits of either strategy. Setting the value in the template violates the template-agnostic principles behind reactive forms, whereas adding a FormControl/FormGroup layer in the class removes the convenience of defining forms in the template. To update your code before v7, you'll want to decide whether to stick with reactive form directives (and get/set values using reactive forms patterns) or switch over to template-driven directives. After (choice 1 - use reactive forms): ```html <input [formControl]="control"> ``` ```ts this.control.setValue('some value'); ``` After (choice 2 - use template-driven forms): ```html <input [(ngModel)]="value"> ``` ```ts this.value = 'some value'; ``` You can also choose to silence this warning by providing a config for `ReactiveFormsModule` at import time: ```ts imports: [ ReactiveFormsModule.withConfig({warnOnNgModelWithFormControl: 'never'}); ] ``` Alternatively, you can choose to surface a separate warning for each instance of this pattern with a config value of `"always"`. This may help to track down where in the code the pattern is being used as the code is being updated. Note: `warnOnNgModelWithFormControl` is set up as deprecated so that it can be removed in v7 when it is no longer needed. This will not display properly in API docs yet because dgeni doesn't yet support deprecating properties in object literals, but we have an open issue to resolve the discrepancy here: https://github.com/angular/angular/issues/22640. PR Close #22633
2018-03-07 12:46:10 -05:00
/** @deprecated */ update: EventEmitter<{}>;
readonly validator: ValidatorFn | null;
viewModel: any;
refactor(forms): deprecate ngModel usage on same field as formControl (#22633) Support for using the `ngModel` input property and `ngModelChange` event with reactive form directives has been deprecated in Angular v6 and will be removed in Angular v7. Now deprecated: ```html <input [formControl]="control" [(ngModel)]="value"> ``` ```ts this.value = 'some value'; ``` This has been deprecated for a few reasons. First, developers have found this pattern confusing. It seems like the actual `ngModel` directive is being used, but in fact it's an input/output property named `ngModel` on the reactive form directive that simply approximates (some of) its behavior. Specifically, it allows getting/setting the value and intercepting value events. However, some of `ngModel`'s other features - like delaying updates with`ngModelOptions` or exporting the directive - simply don't work, which has understandably caused some confusion. In addition, this pattern mixes template-driven and reactive forms strategies, which we generally don't recommend because it doesn't take advantage of the full benefits of either strategy. Setting the value in the template violates the template-agnostic principles behind reactive forms, whereas adding a FormControl/FormGroup layer in the class removes the convenience of defining forms in the template. To update your code before v7, you'll want to decide whether to stick with reactive form directives (and get/set values using reactive forms patterns) or switch over to template-driven directives. After (choice 1 - use reactive forms): ```html <input [formControl]="control"> ``` ```ts this.control.setValue('some value'); ``` After (choice 2 - use template-driven forms): ```html <input [(ngModel)]="value"> ``` ```ts this.value = 'some value'; ``` You can also choose to silence this warning by providing a config for `ReactiveFormsModule` at import time: ```ts imports: [ ReactiveFormsModule.withConfig({warnOnNgModelWithFormControl: 'never'}); ] ``` Alternatively, you can choose to surface a separate warning for each instance of this pattern with a config value of `"always"`. This may help to track down where in the code the pattern is being used as the code is being updated. Note: `warnOnNgModelWithFormControl` is set up as deprecated so that it can be removed in v7 when it is no longer needed. This will not display properly in API docs yet because dgeni doesn't yet support deprecating properties in object literals, but we have an open issue to resolve the discrepancy here: https://github.com/angular/angular/issues/22640. PR Close #22633
2018-03-07 12:46:10 -05:00
constructor(validators: Array<Validator | ValidatorFn>, asyncValidators: Array<AsyncValidator | AsyncValidatorFn>, valueAccessors: ControlValueAccessor[], _ngModelWarningConfig: string | null);
ngOnChanges(changes: SimpleChanges): void;
viewToModelUpdate(newValue: any): void;
}
export declare class FormControlName extends NgControl implements OnChanges, OnDestroy {
readonly asyncValidator: AsyncValidatorFn;
readonly control: FormControl;
readonly formDirective: any;
isDisabled: boolean;
refactor(forms): deprecate ngModel usage on same field as formControl (#22633) Support for using the `ngModel` input property and `ngModelChange` event with reactive form directives has been deprecated in Angular v6 and will be removed in Angular v7. Now deprecated: ```html <input [formControl]="control" [(ngModel)]="value"> ``` ```ts this.value = 'some value'; ``` This has been deprecated for a few reasons. First, developers have found this pattern confusing. It seems like the actual `ngModel` directive is being used, but in fact it's an input/output property named `ngModel` on the reactive form directive that simply approximates (some of) its behavior. Specifically, it allows getting/setting the value and intercepting value events. However, some of `ngModel`'s other features - like delaying updates with`ngModelOptions` or exporting the directive - simply don't work, which has understandably caused some confusion. In addition, this pattern mixes template-driven and reactive forms strategies, which we generally don't recommend because it doesn't take advantage of the full benefits of either strategy. Setting the value in the template violates the template-agnostic principles behind reactive forms, whereas adding a FormControl/FormGroup layer in the class removes the convenience of defining forms in the template. To update your code before v7, you'll want to decide whether to stick with reactive form directives (and get/set values using reactive forms patterns) or switch over to template-driven directives. After (choice 1 - use reactive forms): ```html <input [formControl]="control"> ``` ```ts this.control.setValue('some value'); ``` After (choice 2 - use template-driven forms): ```html <input [(ngModel)]="value"> ``` ```ts this.value = 'some value'; ``` You can also choose to silence this warning by providing a config for `ReactiveFormsModule` at import time: ```ts imports: [ ReactiveFormsModule.withConfig({warnOnNgModelWithFormControl: 'never'}); ] ``` Alternatively, you can choose to surface a separate warning for each instance of this pattern with a config value of `"always"`. This may help to track down where in the code the pattern is being used as the code is being updated. Note: `warnOnNgModelWithFormControl` is set up as deprecated so that it can be removed in v7 when it is no longer needed. This will not display properly in API docs yet because dgeni doesn't yet support deprecating properties in object literals, but we have an open issue to resolve the discrepancy here: https://github.com/angular/angular/issues/22640. PR Close #22633
2018-03-07 12:46:10 -05:00
/** @deprecated */ model: any;
name: string;
readonly path: string[];
refactor(forms): deprecate ngModel usage on same field as formControl (#22633) Support for using the `ngModel` input property and `ngModelChange` event with reactive form directives has been deprecated in Angular v6 and will be removed in Angular v7. Now deprecated: ```html <input [formControl]="control" [(ngModel)]="value"> ``` ```ts this.value = 'some value'; ``` This has been deprecated for a few reasons. First, developers have found this pattern confusing. It seems like the actual `ngModel` directive is being used, but in fact it's an input/output property named `ngModel` on the reactive form directive that simply approximates (some of) its behavior. Specifically, it allows getting/setting the value and intercepting value events. However, some of `ngModel`'s other features - like delaying updates with`ngModelOptions` or exporting the directive - simply don't work, which has understandably caused some confusion. In addition, this pattern mixes template-driven and reactive forms strategies, which we generally don't recommend because it doesn't take advantage of the full benefits of either strategy. Setting the value in the template violates the template-agnostic principles behind reactive forms, whereas adding a FormControl/FormGroup layer in the class removes the convenience of defining forms in the template. To update your code before v7, you'll want to decide whether to stick with reactive form directives (and get/set values using reactive forms patterns) or switch over to template-driven directives. After (choice 1 - use reactive forms): ```html <input [formControl]="control"> ``` ```ts this.control.setValue('some value'); ``` After (choice 2 - use template-driven forms): ```html <input [(ngModel)]="value"> ``` ```ts this.value = 'some value'; ``` You can also choose to silence this warning by providing a config for `ReactiveFormsModule` at import time: ```ts imports: [ ReactiveFormsModule.withConfig({warnOnNgModelWithFormControl: 'never'}); ] ``` Alternatively, you can choose to surface a separate warning for each instance of this pattern with a config value of `"always"`. This may help to track down where in the code the pattern is being used as the code is being updated. Note: `warnOnNgModelWithFormControl` is set up as deprecated so that it can be removed in v7 when it is no longer needed. This will not display properly in API docs yet because dgeni doesn't yet support deprecating properties in object literals, but we have an open issue to resolve the discrepancy here: https://github.com/angular/angular/issues/22640. PR Close #22633
2018-03-07 12:46:10 -05:00
/** @deprecated */ update: EventEmitter<{}>;
readonly validator: ValidatorFn | null;
refactor(forms): deprecate ngModel usage on same field as formControl (#22633) Support for using the `ngModel` input property and `ngModelChange` event with reactive form directives has been deprecated in Angular v6 and will be removed in Angular v7. Now deprecated: ```html <input [formControl]="control" [(ngModel)]="value"> ``` ```ts this.value = 'some value'; ``` This has been deprecated for a few reasons. First, developers have found this pattern confusing. It seems like the actual `ngModel` directive is being used, but in fact it's an input/output property named `ngModel` on the reactive form directive that simply approximates (some of) its behavior. Specifically, it allows getting/setting the value and intercepting value events. However, some of `ngModel`'s other features - like delaying updates with`ngModelOptions` or exporting the directive - simply don't work, which has understandably caused some confusion. In addition, this pattern mixes template-driven and reactive forms strategies, which we generally don't recommend because it doesn't take advantage of the full benefits of either strategy. Setting the value in the template violates the template-agnostic principles behind reactive forms, whereas adding a FormControl/FormGroup layer in the class removes the convenience of defining forms in the template. To update your code before v7, you'll want to decide whether to stick with reactive form directives (and get/set values using reactive forms patterns) or switch over to template-driven directives. After (choice 1 - use reactive forms): ```html <input [formControl]="control"> ``` ```ts this.control.setValue('some value'); ``` After (choice 2 - use template-driven forms): ```html <input [(ngModel)]="value"> ``` ```ts this.value = 'some value'; ``` You can also choose to silence this warning by providing a config for `ReactiveFormsModule` at import time: ```ts imports: [ ReactiveFormsModule.withConfig({warnOnNgModelWithFormControl: 'never'}); ] ``` Alternatively, you can choose to surface a separate warning for each instance of this pattern with a config value of `"always"`. This may help to track down where in the code the pattern is being used as the code is being updated. Note: `warnOnNgModelWithFormControl` is set up as deprecated so that it can be removed in v7 when it is no longer needed. This will not display properly in API docs yet because dgeni doesn't yet support deprecating properties in object literals, but we have an open issue to resolve the discrepancy here: https://github.com/angular/angular/issues/22640. PR Close #22633
2018-03-07 12:46:10 -05:00
constructor(parent: ControlContainer, validators: Array<Validator | ValidatorFn>, asyncValidators: Array<AsyncValidator | AsyncValidatorFn>, valueAccessors: ControlValueAccessor[], _ngModelWarningConfig: string | null);
ngOnChanges(changes: SimpleChanges): void;
ngOnDestroy(): void;
viewToModelUpdate(newValue: any): void;
}
export declare class FormGroup extends AbstractControl {
controls: {
[key: string]: AbstractControl;
};
constructor(controls: {
[key: string]: AbstractControl;
}, validatorOrOpts?: ValidatorFn | ValidatorFn[] | AbstractControlOptions | null, asyncValidator?: AsyncValidatorFn | AsyncValidatorFn[] | null);
addControl(name: string, control: AbstractControl): void;
contains(controlName: string): boolean;
getRawValue(): any;
patchValue(value: {
[key: string]: any;
}, options?: {
onlySelf?: boolean;
emitEvent?: boolean;
}): void;
registerControl(name: string, control: AbstractControl): AbstractControl;
removeControl(name: string): void;
reset(value?: any, options?: {
onlySelf?: boolean;
emitEvent?: boolean;
}): void;
setControl(name: string, control: AbstractControl): void;
setValue(value: {
[key: string]: any;
}, options?: {
onlySelf?: boolean;
emitEvent?: boolean;
}): void;
}
export declare class FormGroupDirective extends ControlContainer implements Form, OnChanges {
readonly control: FormGroup;
directives: FormControlName[];
form: FormGroup;
readonly formDirective: Form;
ngSubmit: EventEmitter<{}>;
readonly path: string[];
readonly submitted: boolean;
constructor(_validators: any[], _asyncValidators: any[]);
addControl(dir: FormControlName): FormControl;
addFormArray(dir: FormArrayName): void;
addFormGroup(dir: FormGroupName): void;
getControl(dir: FormControlName): FormControl;
getFormArray(dir: FormArrayName): FormArray;
getFormGroup(dir: FormGroupName): FormGroup;
ngOnChanges(changes: SimpleChanges): void;
onReset(): void;
onSubmit($event: Event): boolean;
removeControl(dir: FormControlName): void;
removeFormArray(dir: FormArrayName): void;
removeFormGroup(dir: FormGroupName): void;
resetForm(value?: any): void;
updateModel(dir: FormControlName, value: any): void;
}
export declare class FormGroupName extends AbstractFormGroupDirective implements OnInit, OnDestroy {
name: string;
constructor(parent: ControlContainer, validators: any[], asyncValidators: any[]);
}
feat(forms): add modules for forms and deprecatedForms (#9859) Closes #9732 BREAKING CHANGE: We have removed the deprecated form directives from the built-in platform directive list, so apps are not required to package forms with their app. This also makes forms friendly to offline compilation. Instead, we have exposed three modules: OLD API: - `DeprecatedFormsModule` NEW API: - `FormsModule` - `ReactiveFormsModule` If you provide one of these modules, the default forms directives and providers from that module will be available to you app-wide. Note: You can provide both the `FormsModule` and the `ReactiveFormsModule` together if you like, but they are fully-functional separately. **Before:** ```ts import {disableDeprecatedForms, provideForms} from @angular/forms; bootstrap(App, [ disableDeprecatedForms(), provideForms() ]); ``` **After:** ```ts import {DeprecatedFormsModule} from @angular/common; bootstrap(App, {modules: [DeprecatedFormsModule] }); ``` -OR- ```ts import {FormsModule} from @angular/forms; bootstrap(App, {modules: [FormsModule] }); ``` -OR- ```ts import {ReactiveFormsModule} from @angular/forms; bootstrap(App, {modules: [ReactiveFormsModule] }); ``` You can also choose not to provide any forms module and run your app without forms. Or you can choose not to provide any forms module *and* provide form directives at will. This will allow you to use the deprecatedForms API for some components and not others. ``` import {FORM_DIRECTIVES, FORM_PROVIDERS} from @angular/forms; @Component({ selector: some-comp, directives: [FORM_DIRECTIVES], providers: [FORM_PROVIDERS] }) class SomeComp ```
2016-07-07 14:32:51 -04:00
export declare class FormsModule {
static withConfig(opts: { warnOnDeprecatedNgFormSelector?: 'never' | 'once' | 'always';
}): ModuleWithProviders<FormsModule>;
feat(forms): add modules for forms and deprecatedForms (#9859) Closes #9732 BREAKING CHANGE: We have removed the deprecated form directives from the built-in platform directive list, so apps are not required to package forms with their app. This also makes forms friendly to offline compilation. Instead, we have exposed three modules: OLD API: - `DeprecatedFormsModule` NEW API: - `FormsModule` - `ReactiveFormsModule` If you provide one of these modules, the default forms directives and providers from that module will be available to you app-wide. Note: You can provide both the `FormsModule` and the `ReactiveFormsModule` together if you like, but they are fully-functional separately. **Before:** ```ts import {disableDeprecatedForms, provideForms} from @angular/forms; bootstrap(App, [ disableDeprecatedForms(), provideForms() ]); ``` **After:** ```ts import {DeprecatedFormsModule} from @angular/common; bootstrap(App, {modules: [DeprecatedFormsModule] }); ``` -OR- ```ts import {FormsModule} from @angular/forms; bootstrap(App, {modules: [FormsModule] }); ``` -OR- ```ts import {ReactiveFormsModule} from @angular/forms; bootstrap(App, {modules: [ReactiveFormsModule] }); ``` You can also choose not to provide any forms module and run your app without forms. Or you can choose not to provide any forms module *and* provide form directives at will. This will allow you to use the deprecatedForms API for some components and not others. ``` import {FORM_DIRECTIVES, FORM_PROVIDERS} from @angular/forms; @Component({ selector: some-comp, directives: [FORM_DIRECTIVES], providers: [FORM_PROVIDERS] }) class SomeComp ```
2016-07-07 14:32:51 -04:00
}
export declare class MaxLengthValidator implements Validator, OnChanges {
maxlength: string;
ngOnChanges(changes: SimpleChanges): void;
registerOnValidatorChange(fn: () => void): void;
validate(c: AbstractControl): ValidationErrors | null;
}
export declare class MinLengthValidator implements Validator, OnChanges {
minlength: string;
ngOnChanges(changes: SimpleChanges): void;
registerOnValidatorChange(fn: () => void): void;
validate(c: AbstractControl): ValidationErrors | null;
}
feat(core): Add type information to injector.get() (#13785) - Introduce `InjectionToken<T>` which is a parameterized and type-safe version of `OpaqueToken`. DEPRECATION: - `OpaqueToken` is now deprecated, use `InjectionToken<T>` instead. - `Injector.get(token: any, notFoundValue?: any): any` is now deprecated use the same method which is now overloaded as `Injector.get<T>(token: Type<T>|InjectionToken<T>, notFoundValue?: T): T;`. Migration - Replace `OpaqueToken` with `InjectionToken<?>` and parameterize it. - Migrate your code to only use `Type<?>` or `InjectionToken<?>` as injection tokens. Using other tokens will not be supported in the future. BREAKING CHANGE: - Because `injector.get()` is now parameterize it is possible that code which used to work no longer type checks. Example would be if one injects `Foo` but configures it as `{provide: Foo, useClass: MockFoo}`. The injection instance will be that of `MockFoo` but the type will be `Foo` instead of `any` as in the past. This means that it was possible to call a method on `MockFoo` in the past which now will fail type check. See this example: ``` class Foo {} class MockFoo extends Foo { setupMock(); } var PROVIDERS = [ {provide: Foo, useClass: MockFoo} ]; ... function myTest(injector: Injector) { var foo = injector.get(Foo); // This line used to work since `foo` used to be `any` before this // change, it will now be `Foo`, and `Foo` does not have `setUpMock()`. // The fix is to downcast: `injector.get(Foo) as MockFoo`. foo.setUpMock(); } ``` PR Close #13785
2017-01-03 19:54:46 -05:00
export declare const NG_ASYNC_VALIDATORS: InjectionToken<(Function | Validator)[]>;
feat(core): Add type information to injector.get() (#13785) - Introduce `InjectionToken<T>` which is a parameterized and type-safe version of `OpaqueToken`. DEPRECATION: - `OpaqueToken` is now deprecated, use `InjectionToken<T>` instead. - `Injector.get(token: any, notFoundValue?: any): any` is now deprecated use the same method which is now overloaded as `Injector.get<T>(token: Type<T>|InjectionToken<T>, notFoundValue?: T): T;`. Migration - Replace `OpaqueToken` with `InjectionToken<?>` and parameterize it. - Migrate your code to only use `Type<?>` or `InjectionToken<?>` as injection tokens. Using other tokens will not be supported in the future. BREAKING CHANGE: - Because `injector.get()` is now parameterize it is possible that code which used to work no longer type checks. Example would be if one injects `Foo` but configures it as `{provide: Foo, useClass: MockFoo}`. The injection instance will be that of `MockFoo` but the type will be `Foo` instead of `any` as in the past. This means that it was possible to call a method on `MockFoo` in the past which now will fail type check. See this example: ``` class Foo {} class MockFoo extends Foo { setupMock(); } var PROVIDERS = [ {provide: Foo, useClass: MockFoo} ]; ... function myTest(injector: Injector) { var foo = injector.get(Foo); // This line used to work since `foo` used to be `any` before this // change, it will now be `Foo`, and `Foo` does not have `setUpMock()`. // The fix is to downcast: `injector.get(Foo) as MockFoo`. foo.setUpMock(); } ``` PR Close #13785
2017-01-03 19:54:46 -05:00
export declare const NG_VALIDATORS: InjectionToken<(Function | Validator)[]>;
feat(core): Add type information to injector.get() (#13785) - Introduce `InjectionToken<T>` which is a parameterized and type-safe version of `OpaqueToken`. DEPRECATION: - `OpaqueToken` is now deprecated, use `InjectionToken<T>` instead. - `Injector.get(token: any, notFoundValue?: any): any` is now deprecated use the same method which is now overloaded as `Injector.get<T>(token: Type<T>|InjectionToken<T>, notFoundValue?: T): T;`. Migration - Replace `OpaqueToken` with `InjectionToken<?>` and parameterize it. - Migrate your code to only use `Type<?>` or `InjectionToken<?>` as injection tokens. Using other tokens will not be supported in the future. BREAKING CHANGE: - Because `injector.get()` is now parameterize it is possible that code which used to work no longer type checks. Example would be if one injects `Foo` but configures it as `{provide: Foo, useClass: MockFoo}`. The injection instance will be that of `MockFoo` but the type will be `Foo` instead of `any` as in the past. This means that it was possible to call a method on `MockFoo` in the past which now will fail type check. See this example: ``` class Foo {} class MockFoo extends Foo { setupMock(); } var PROVIDERS = [ {provide: Foo, useClass: MockFoo} ]; ... function myTest(injector: Injector) { var foo = injector.get(Foo); // This line used to work since `foo` used to be `any` before this // change, it will now be `Foo`, and `Foo` does not have `setUpMock()`. // The fix is to downcast: `injector.get(Foo) as MockFoo`. foo.setUpMock(); } ``` PR Close #13785
2017-01-03 19:54:46 -05:00
export declare const NG_VALUE_ACCESSOR: InjectionToken<ControlValueAccessor>;
export declare abstract class NgControl extends AbstractControlDirective {
readonly asyncValidator: AsyncValidatorFn | null;
name: string | null;
readonly validator: ValidatorFn | null;
valueAccessor: ControlValueAccessor | null;
abstract viewToModelUpdate(newValue: any): void;
}
export declare class NgControlStatus extends AbstractControlStatus {
constructor(cd: NgControl);
}
export declare class NgControlStatusGroup extends AbstractControlStatus {
constructor(cd: ControlContainer);
}
export declare class NgForm extends ControlContainer implements Form, AfterViewInit {
readonly control: FormGroup;
readonly controls: {
[key: string]: AbstractControl;
};
form: FormGroup;
readonly formDirective: Form;
ngSubmit: EventEmitter<{}>;
options: {
updateOn?: FormHooks;
};
readonly path: string[];
readonly submitted: boolean;
constructor(validators: any[], asyncValidators: any[]);
addControl(dir: NgModel): void;
addFormGroup(dir: NgModelGroup): void;
getControl(dir: NgModel): FormControl;
getFormGroup(dir: NgModelGroup): FormGroup;
ngAfterViewInit(): void;
onReset(): void;
onSubmit($event: Event): boolean;
removeControl(dir: NgModel): void;
removeFormGroup(dir: NgModelGroup): void;
resetForm(value?: any): void;
setValue(value: {
[key: string]: any;
}): void;
updateModel(dir: NgControl, value: any): void;
}
/** @deprecated */
export declare class NgFormSelectorWarning {
constructor(ngFormWarning: string | null);
}
export declare class NgModel extends NgControl implements OnChanges, OnDestroy {
readonly asyncValidator: AsyncValidatorFn | null;
readonly control: FormControl;
readonly formDirective: any;
isDisabled: boolean;
model: any;
name: string;
options: {
name?: string;
standalone?: boolean;
updateOn?: FormHooks;
};
readonly path: string[];
update: EventEmitter<{}>;
readonly validator: ValidatorFn | null;
viewModel: any;
constructor(parent: ControlContainer, validators: Array<Validator | ValidatorFn>, asyncValidators: Array<AsyncValidator | AsyncValidatorFn>, valueAccessors: ControlValueAccessor[]);
ngOnChanges(changes: SimpleChanges): void;
ngOnDestroy(): void;
viewToModelUpdate(newValue: any): void;
}
export declare class NgModelGroup extends AbstractFormGroupDirective implements OnInit, OnDestroy {
name: string;
constructor(parent: ControlContainer, validators: any[], asyncValidators: any[]);
}
export declare class NgSelectOption implements OnDestroy {
id: string;
ngValue: any;
value: any;
constructor(_element: ElementRef, _renderer: Renderer2, _select: SelectControlValueAccessor);
ngOnDestroy(): void;
}
export declare class PatternValidator implements Validator, OnChanges {
pattern: string | RegExp;
ngOnChanges(changes: SimpleChanges): void;
registerOnValidatorChange(fn: () => void): void;
validate(c: AbstractControl): ValidationErrors | null;
}
export declare class RadioControlValueAccessor implements ControlValueAccessor, OnDestroy, OnInit {
formControlName: string;
name: string;
onChange: () => void;
onTouched: () => void;
value: any;
constructor(_renderer: Renderer2, _elementRef: ElementRef, _registry: RadioControlRegistry, _injector: Injector);
fireUncheck(value: any): void;
ngOnDestroy(): void;
ngOnInit(): void;
registerOnChange(fn: (_: any) => {}): void;
registerOnTouched(fn: () => {}): void;
setDisabledState(isDisabled: boolean): void;
writeValue(value: any): void;
}
feat(forms): add modules for forms and deprecatedForms (#9859) Closes #9732 BREAKING CHANGE: We have removed the deprecated form directives from the built-in platform directive list, so apps are not required to package forms with their app. This also makes forms friendly to offline compilation. Instead, we have exposed three modules: OLD API: - `DeprecatedFormsModule` NEW API: - `FormsModule` - `ReactiveFormsModule` If you provide one of these modules, the default forms directives and providers from that module will be available to you app-wide. Note: You can provide both the `FormsModule` and the `ReactiveFormsModule` together if you like, but they are fully-functional separately. **Before:** ```ts import {disableDeprecatedForms, provideForms} from @angular/forms; bootstrap(App, [ disableDeprecatedForms(), provideForms() ]); ``` **After:** ```ts import {DeprecatedFormsModule} from @angular/common; bootstrap(App, {modules: [DeprecatedFormsModule] }); ``` -OR- ```ts import {FormsModule} from @angular/forms; bootstrap(App, {modules: [FormsModule] }); ``` -OR- ```ts import {ReactiveFormsModule} from @angular/forms; bootstrap(App, {modules: [ReactiveFormsModule] }); ``` You can also choose not to provide any forms module and run your app without forms. Or you can choose not to provide any forms module *and* provide form directives at will. This will allow you to use the deprecatedForms API for some components and not others. ``` import {FORM_DIRECTIVES, FORM_PROVIDERS} from @angular/forms; @Component({ selector: some-comp, directives: [FORM_DIRECTIVES], providers: [FORM_PROVIDERS] }) class SomeComp ```
2016-07-07 14:32:51 -04:00
export declare class ReactiveFormsModule {
refactor(forms): deprecate ngModel usage on same field as formControl (#22633) Support for using the `ngModel` input property and `ngModelChange` event with reactive form directives has been deprecated in Angular v6 and will be removed in Angular v7. Now deprecated: ```html <input [formControl]="control" [(ngModel)]="value"> ``` ```ts this.value = 'some value'; ``` This has been deprecated for a few reasons. First, developers have found this pattern confusing. It seems like the actual `ngModel` directive is being used, but in fact it's an input/output property named `ngModel` on the reactive form directive that simply approximates (some of) its behavior. Specifically, it allows getting/setting the value and intercepting value events. However, some of `ngModel`'s other features - like delaying updates with`ngModelOptions` or exporting the directive - simply don't work, which has understandably caused some confusion. In addition, this pattern mixes template-driven and reactive forms strategies, which we generally don't recommend because it doesn't take advantage of the full benefits of either strategy. Setting the value in the template violates the template-agnostic principles behind reactive forms, whereas adding a FormControl/FormGroup layer in the class removes the convenience of defining forms in the template. To update your code before v7, you'll want to decide whether to stick with reactive form directives (and get/set values using reactive forms patterns) or switch over to template-driven directives. After (choice 1 - use reactive forms): ```html <input [formControl]="control"> ``` ```ts this.control.setValue('some value'); ``` After (choice 2 - use template-driven forms): ```html <input [(ngModel)]="value"> ``` ```ts this.value = 'some value'; ``` You can also choose to silence this warning by providing a config for `ReactiveFormsModule` at import time: ```ts imports: [ ReactiveFormsModule.withConfig({warnOnNgModelWithFormControl: 'never'}); ] ``` Alternatively, you can choose to surface a separate warning for each instance of this pattern with a config value of `"always"`. This may help to track down where in the code the pattern is being used as the code is being updated. Note: `warnOnNgModelWithFormControl` is set up as deprecated so that it can be removed in v7 when it is no longer needed. This will not display properly in API docs yet because dgeni doesn't yet support deprecating properties in object literals, but we have an open issue to resolve the discrepancy here: https://github.com/angular/angular/issues/22640. PR Close #22633
2018-03-07 12:46:10 -05:00
static withConfig(opts: { warnOnNgModelWithFormControl: 'never' | 'once' | 'always';
}): ModuleWithProviders<ReactiveFormsModule>;
feat(forms): add modules for forms and deprecatedForms (#9859) Closes #9732 BREAKING CHANGE: We have removed the deprecated form directives from the built-in platform directive list, so apps are not required to package forms with their app. This also makes forms friendly to offline compilation. Instead, we have exposed three modules: OLD API: - `DeprecatedFormsModule` NEW API: - `FormsModule` - `ReactiveFormsModule` If you provide one of these modules, the default forms directives and providers from that module will be available to you app-wide. Note: You can provide both the `FormsModule` and the `ReactiveFormsModule` together if you like, but they are fully-functional separately. **Before:** ```ts import {disableDeprecatedForms, provideForms} from @angular/forms; bootstrap(App, [ disableDeprecatedForms(), provideForms() ]); ``` **After:** ```ts import {DeprecatedFormsModule} from @angular/common; bootstrap(App, {modules: [DeprecatedFormsModule] }); ``` -OR- ```ts import {FormsModule} from @angular/forms; bootstrap(App, {modules: [FormsModule] }); ``` -OR- ```ts import {ReactiveFormsModule} from @angular/forms; bootstrap(App, {modules: [ReactiveFormsModule] }); ``` You can also choose not to provide any forms module and run your app without forms. Or you can choose not to provide any forms module *and* provide form directives at will. This will allow you to use the deprecatedForms API for some components and not others. ``` import {FORM_DIRECTIVES, FORM_PROVIDERS} from @angular/forms; @Component({ selector: some-comp, directives: [FORM_DIRECTIVES], providers: [FORM_PROVIDERS] }) class SomeComp ```
2016-07-07 14:32:51 -04:00
}
export declare class RequiredValidator implements Validator {
required: boolean | string;
registerOnValidatorChange(fn: () => void): void;
validate(c: AbstractControl): ValidationErrors | null;
}
export declare class SelectControlValueAccessor implements ControlValueAccessor {
compareWith: (o1: any, o2: any) => boolean;
onChange: (_: any) => void;
onTouched: () => void;
value: any;
constructor(_renderer: Renderer2, _elementRef: ElementRef);
registerOnChange(fn: (value: any) => any): void;
registerOnTouched(fn: () => any): void;
setDisabledState(isDisabled: boolean): void;
writeValue(value: any): void;
}
export declare class SelectMultipleControlValueAccessor implements ControlValueAccessor {
compareWith: (o1: any, o2: any) => boolean;
onChange: (_: any) => void;
onTouched: () => void;
value: any;
constructor(_renderer: Renderer2, _elementRef: ElementRef);
registerOnChange(fn: (value: any) => any): void;
registerOnTouched(fn: () => any): void;
setDisabledState(isDisabled: boolean): void;
writeValue(value: any): void;
}
/** @experimental */
export declare type ValidationErrors = {
[key: string]: any;
};
export interface Validator {
registerOnValidatorChange?(fn: () => void): void;
validate(c: AbstractControl): ValidationErrors | null;
}
export interface ValidatorFn {
(c: AbstractControl): ValidationErrors | null;
}
export declare class Validators {
static compose(validators: (ValidatorFn | null | undefined)[]): ValidatorFn | null;
2017-04-28 12:48:15 -04:00
static compose(validators: null): null;
static composeAsync(validators: (AsyncValidatorFn | null)[]): AsyncValidatorFn | null;
static email(control: AbstractControl): ValidationErrors | null;
static max(max: number): ValidatorFn;
static maxLength(maxLength: number): ValidatorFn;
static min(min: number): ValidatorFn;
static minLength(minLength: number): ValidatorFn;
static nullValidator(c: AbstractControl): ValidationErrors | null;
static pattern(pattern: string | RegExp): ValidatorFn;
static required(control: AbstractControl): ValidationErrors | null;
static requiredTrue(control: AbstractControl): ValidationErrors | null;
}
export declare const VERSION: Version;