iSharkFly-Docs
/
angular-docs-cn
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
angular-docs-cn/integration/ngcc/package.json

32 lines
1.2 KiB
JSON
Raw Normal View History

test(ivy): add an integration test for ngcc (#25406) This commit adds an integration test for ngcc, which runs ngcc against most @angular packages. It does not yet make any assertions on the result. PR Close #25406
2018-08-09 09:23:56 -04:00
{
"name": "angular-integration",
"version": "0.0.0",
"license": "MIT",
"dependencies": {
"@angular/animations": "file:../../dist/packages-dist/animations",
fix(ivy): ngcc should process undecorated base classes (#30821) Currently undecorated classes are intentionally not processed with ngcc. This is causing unexpected behavior because decorator handlers such as `base_def.ts` are specifically interested in class definitions without top-level decorators, so that the base definition can be generated if there are Angular-specific class members. In order to ensure that undecorated base-classes work as expected with Ivy, we need to run the decorator handlers for all top-level class declarations (not only for those with decorators). This is similar to when `ngtsc` runs decorator handlers when analyzing source-files. Resolves FW-1355. Fixes https://github.com/angular/components/issues/16178 PR Close #30821
2019-06-03 12:41:47 -04:00
"@angular/cdk": "^8.0.0",
test(ivy): add an integration test for ngcc (#25406) This commit adds an integration test for ngcc, which runs ngcc against most @angular packages. It does not yet make any assertions on the result. PR Close #25406
2018-08-09 09:23:56 -04:00
"@angular/common": "file:../../dist/packages-dist/common",
"@angular/compiler": "file:../../dist/packages-dist/compiler",
"@angular/compiler-cli": "file:../../dist/packages-dist/compiler-cli",
"@angular/core": "file:../../dist/packages-dist/core",
"@angular/forms": "file:../../dist/packages-dist/forms",
fix(ivy): ngcc should process undecorated base classes (#30821) Currently undecorated classes are intentionally not processed with ngcc. This is causing unexpected behavior because decorator handlers such as `base_def.ts` are specifically interested in class definitions without top-level decorators, so that the base definition can be generated if there are Angular-specific class members. In order to ensure that undecorated base-classes work as expected with Ivy, we need to run the decorator handlers for all top-level class declarations (not only for those with decorators). This is similar to when `ngtsc` runs decorator handlers when analyzing source-files. Resolves FW-1355. Fixes https://github.com/angular/components/issues/16178 PR Close #30821
2019-06-03 12:41:47 -04:00
"@angular/material": "8.0.0",
test(ivy): add an integration test for ngcc (#25406) This commit adds an integration test for ngcc, which runs ngcc against most @angular packages. It does not yet make any assertions on the result. PR Close #25406
2018-08-09 09:23:56 -04:00
"@angular/platform-browser": "file:../../dist/packages-dist/platform-browser",
"@angular/platform-browser-dynamic": "file:../../dist/packages-dist/platform-browser-dynamic",
"@angular/router": "file:../../dist/packages-dist/router",
test: use @types/node compatible with TS 3.6 (#32946) PR Close #32946
2019-10-17 07:18:19 -04:00
"@types/node": "file:../../node_modules/@types/node",
test(ivy): add an integration test for ngcc (#25406) This commit adds an integration test for ngcc, which runs ngcc against most @angular packages. It does not yet make any assertions on the result. PR Close #25406
2018-08-09 09:23:56 -04:00
"rxjs": "file:../../node_modules/rxjs",
"typescript": "file:../../node_modules/typescript",
"zone.js": "file:../../node_modules/zone.js"
},
"devDependencies": {
"@types/jasmine": "2.5.41",
"concurrently": "3.4.0",
"lite-server": "2.2.2",
"protractor": "file:../../node_modules/protractor"
},
"scripts": {
"test": "./test.sh"
}
}