If the template parse option `leadingTriviaChars` is configured to
consider whitespace as trivia, any trailing whitespace of an element
would be considered as leading trivia of the subsequent element, such
that its `start` span would start _after_ the whitespace. This means
that the start span cannot be used to mark the end of the current
element, as its trailing whitespace would then be included in its span.
Instead, the full start of the subsequent element should be used.
To harden the tests that for the Ivy parser, the test utility `parseR3`
has been adjusted to use the same configuration for `leadingTriviaChars`
as would be the case in its production counterpart `parseTemplate`. This
uncovered another bug in offset handling of the interpolation parser,
where the absolute offset was computed from the start source span
(which excludes leading trivia) whereas the interpolation expression
would include the leading trivia. As such, the absolute offset now also
uses the full start span.
Fixes#39148
PR Close#40513
We should provide the completion when the cursor is in the attribute
name after the `@` and `animate-`, but now the `KeySpan` starts from the
`@` or `animate-`. For example, the animation event `(@name.done)="v"`,
we can know where the cursor is by the `KeySpan` of `name.done` exactly,
it's in the event name or in the phase name.
PR Close#40347
Similar to #39613, #39609, and #38898, we should store the `keySpan` for
Reference nodes so that we can accurately map from a template node to a
span in the original file. This is most notably an issue at the moment
for directive references `#ref="exportAs"`. The current behavior for the
language service when requesting information for the reference
is that it will return a text span that results in
highlighting the entire source when it should only highlight "ref" (test
added for this case as well).
PR Close#39616
Though we currently have the knowledge of where the `key` for an
event binding appears during parsing, we do not propagate this
information to the output AST. This means that once we produce the
template AST, we have no way of mapping a template position to the key
span alone. The best we can currently do is map back to the
`sourceSpan`. This presents problems downstream, specifically for the
language service, where we cannot provide correct information about a
position in a template because the AST is not granular enough.
This is essentially identical to the change from #38898, but for event
bindings rather than input bindings.
PR Close#39609
Similar to #39609 and #38898, though we currently have the knowledge of where the key for an
attribute appears during parsing, we do not propagate this
information to the output AST. This means that once we produce the
template AST, we have no way of mapping a template position to the key
span alone. The best we can currently do is map back to the
sourceSpan. This presents problems downstream, specifically for the
language service, where we cannot provide correct information about a
position in a template because the AST is not granular enough.
PR Close#39613
Prior to this change, expressions within ICUs would have a source span
corresponding with the whole ICU. This commit narrows down the source
spans of these expressions to the exact location in the source file, as
a prerequisite for reporting type check errors within these expressions.
PR Close#39072
Currently it is impossible to determine the source of a binding that
generates `BoundAttribute` because all bound attributes generated from a
microsyntax expression share the same source span.
For example, in
```html
<div *ngFor="let item of items; trackBy: trackByFn"></div>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
source span for all `BoundAttribute`s generated from microsyntax
```
the `BoundAttribute` for both `ngForOf` and `ngForTrackBy`
share the same source span.
A lot of hacks were necessary in View Engine language service to work
around this limitation. It was done by inspecting the whole source span
then figuring out the relative position of the cursor.
With this change, we introduce a flag to set the binding span as the
source span of the `ParsedProperty` in Ivy AST.
This flag is needed so that we don't have to change VE ASTs.
Note that in the binding parser, we already set `bindingSpan` as the
source span for a `ParsedVariable`, and `keySpan` as the source span for
a literal attribute. This change makes the Ivy AST more consistent by
propagating the binding span to `ParsedProperty` as well.
PR Close#39036
Now that we have `keySpan` for `BoundAttribute` (implemented in
https://github.com/angular/angular/pull/38898) we could do the same
for `Variable`.
This would allow us to distinguish the LHS and RHS from the whole source
span.
PR Close#38965
Though we currently have the knowledge of where the `key` for an
attribute binding appears during parsing, we do not propagate this
information to the output AST. This means that once we produce the
template AST, we have no way of mapping a template position to the key
span alone. The best we can currently do is map back to the
`sourceSpan`. This presents problems downstream, specifically for the
language service, where we cannot provide correct information about a
position in a template because the AST is not granular enough.
PR Close#38898
The current tests print out the span numbers, which are really difficult to verify
since it requires manually going to the template string and looking at what
characters appear within those indexes. The better humanization would be
to use the toString method of the spans, which prints the span text itself
PR Close#38902
In a microsyntax expressions, some attributes are not bound after
desugaring. For example,
```html
<div *ngFor="let item of items">
</div>
```
gets desugared to
```html
<ng-template ngFor let-items [ngForOf]="items">
</ngtemplate>
```
In this case, `ngFor` should be a literal attribute with no RHS value.
Therefore, its source span should be just the `keySpan` and not the
source span of the original template node.
This allows language service to precisely pinpoint different spans in a
microsyntax to provide accurate information.
PR Close#38766
Previously, the `sourceSpan` and `startSourceSpan` were the same
object, which meant that you had the following situation:
```
element = <div>some content</div>
sourceSpan = <div>
startSourceSpan = <div>
endSourceSpan = </div>
```
This made `sourceSpan` redundant and meant that if you
wanted a span for the whole element including its content
and closing tag, it had to be computed.
Now `sourceSpan` is separated from `startSourceSpan`
resulting in:
```
element = <div>some content</div>
sourceSpan = <div>some content</div>
startSourceSpan = <div>
endSourceSpan = </div>
```
PR Close#38581
This commit propagates the correct value span in an ExpressionBinding of
a microsyntax expression to ParsedProperty, which in turn porpagates the
span to the template ASTs (both VE and Ivy).
PR Close#36133
This commit propagates the `sourceSpan` and `valueSpan` of a `VariableBinding`
in a microsyntax expression to `ParsedVariable`, and subsequently to
View Engine Variable AST and Ivy Variable AST.
Note that this commit does not propagate the `keySpan`, because it involves
significant changes to the template AST.
PR Close#36047
The only test case for `ngFor` exercises an incorrect usage which causes
two bound attributes to be generated . This commit adds a canonical and
correct usage to show the difference between the two.
PR Close#35671
Template AST nodes for (bound) attributes, variables and references will
now retain a reference to the source span of their value, which allows
for more accurate type check diagnostics.
PR Close#30181
JoostK
ivanwonder
Andrew Scott
Keen Yee Liau
Keen Yee Liau
Pete Bacon Darwin
Joey Perrott
Alex Rickabaugh