In the past, @Injectable had no side effects and existing Angular code is
therefore littered with @Injectable usage on classes which are not intended
to be injected.
A common example is:
@Injectable()
class Foo {
constructor(private notInjectable: string) {}
}
and somewhere else:
providers: [{provide: Foo, useFactory: ...})
Here, there is no need for Foo to be injectable - indeed, it's impossible
for the DI system to create an instance of it, as it has a non-injectable
constructor. The provider configures a factory for the DI system to be
able to create instances of Foo.
Adding @Injectable in Ivy signifies that the class's own constructor, and
not a provider, determines how the class will be created.
This commit adds logic to compile classes which are marked with @Injectable
but are otherwise not injectable, and create an ngInjectableDef field with
a factory function that throws an error. This way, existing code in the wild
continues to compile, but if someone attempts to use the injectable it will
fail with a useful error message.
In the case where strictInjectionParameters is set to true, a compile-time
error is thrown instead of the runtime error, as ngtsc has enough
information to determine when injection couldn't possibly be valid.
PR Close#28523
While marking a given views tree as dirty we should go all the way to the
root of the views tree and cross boundaries of dynamically inserted views.
In other words the markForCheck functionality should consider parents of
dynamically inserted views.
PR Close#28687
Prior to this change we used current injector implementation for module injector, which was causing problems and produces circular dependencies in case the same token is referenced (with @SkipSelf flag) in the `deps` array. The origin of the problem was that once `directiveInject` implementation becomes active, it was used for module injector as well, thus searching deps in Component/Directive DI scope. This fix sets `injectInjectorOnly` implementation for module injector to resolve the problem.
PR Close#28667
Prior to this update we had separate contentQueries and contentQueriesRefresh functions to handle creation and update phases. This approach was inconsistent with View Queries, Host Bindings and Template functions that we generate for Component/Directive defs. Now the mentioned 2 functions are combines into one (contentQueries), creation and update logic is separated with RenderFlags (similar to what we have in other generated functions).
PR Close#28503
For TypeScript compilation units that have the "strictFunctionTypes"
option enabled, an error would be produced for Ivy's definition fields
in declaration files in the case of inheritance across directives or
pipes.
This change loosens the definition types to allow for subtypes of the
defined type where necessary.
A test package that has the "strict" option enabled verifies that we
won't regress in environments where strict type checking is enabled.
Fixes#28079
PR Close#28634
Previously, using a pipe in an input binding on an ng-template would
evaluate the pipe in the context of node that was processed before the
template. This caused the retrieval of e.g. ChangeDetectorRef to be
incorrect, resulting in one of the following bugs depending on the
template's structure:
1. If the template was at the root of a view, the previously processed
node would be the component's host node outside of the current view.
Accessing that node in the context of the current view results in a crash.
2. For templates not at the root, the ChangeDetectorRef injected into the
pipe would correspond with the previously processed node. If that node
hosts a component, the ChangeDetectorRef would not correspond with the
view that the ng-template is part of.
The solution to the above problem is two-fold:
1. Template compilation is adjusted such that the template instruction
is emitted before any instructions produced by input bindings, such as
pipes. This ensures that pipes are evaluated in the context of the
template's container node.
2. A ChangeDetectorRef can be requested for container nodes.
Fixes#28587
PR Close#27565
There are some differences in how ivy maps template source
compared to View Engine. In this commit we recreate the View Engine
tests for ivy.
PR Close#28055
When we resolve a component `templateUrl` we copy the contents of the
resolved template file into the `template` property.
Previously we would then remove the `templateUrl` to indicate that
the component has been resolved. But this meant that we no longer had
access to the URL of the original template file. This is essential for
diagnostics messages about the template compilation.
Now the existence of the `template` property overrides the existence of
`templateUrl`, which allows us to keep the `templateUrl` property.
PR Close#28055
Due to the fact that host nodes no longer match in ContentChild queries in Ivy, we disable test that was enabled previously in other commit.
PR Close#28660
Up until now, `[style]` and `[class]` bindings (the map-based ones) have only
worked as template bindings and have not been supported at all inside of host
bindings. This patch ensures that multiple host binding sources (components and
directives) all properly assign style values and merge them correctly in terms
of priority.
Jira: FW-882
PR Close#28246
Before this fix our ViewRef implementation assumed that checkNoChanges can be
only called on component views. In reality checkNoChanges can be also called on
embedded views (ex.: when an embedded view is attached to ApplicationRef).
PR Close#28644
Previously, it wasn't possible to compile template that contains pipe in context of ternary operator `{{ 1 ? 2 : 0 | myPipe }}` due to the error `Error: Illegal state: Pipes should have been converted into functions. Pipe: async`.
This PR fixes a typo in expression parser so that pipes are correctly converted into functions.
PR Close#28635
Prior to this change in Ivy we had strict check that disabled non-unique #localRefs usage within a given template. While this limitation was technically present in View Engine, in many cases View Engine neglected this restriction and as a result, some apps relied on a fact that multiple non-unique #localRefs can be defined and utilized to query elements via @ViewChild(ren) and @ContentChild(ren). In order to provide better compatibility with View Engine, this commit removes existing restriction.
As a part of this commit, are few tests were added to verify VE and Ivy compatibility in most common use-cases where multiple non-unique #localRefs were used.
PR Close#28627
We need to support rendering in contexts like web workers where
nodes are emulated and properties may not be set directly. This
commit gates property validation checks to environments that have
real Node objects.
FW-1043 #resolve
PR Close#28610
There is nothing browser specific in those tests and fakeAsync is supported on node.
Testing / debugging on node is often faster than on Karma.
PR Close#28593
This commit adds a devMode-only check which will throw if a user
attempts to bind a property that does not match a directive
input or a known HTML property.
Example:
```
<div [unknownProp]="someValue"></div>
```
The above will throw because "unknownProp" is not a known
property of HTMLDivElement.
This check is similar to the check executed in View Engine during
template parsing, but occurs at runtime instead of compile-time.
Note: This change uncovered an existing bug with host binding
inheritance, so some Material tests had to be turned off. They
will be fixed in an upcoming PR.
PR Close#28537
Prior to this change we only checked whether current lView has a next pointer while traversing tNode tree. However in some cases this pointer can be undefined and we need to look up parents chain to find suitable next pointer. This commit adds the logic of searching for the next pointer taking parents chain into account.
PR Close#28533
`LView` `HOST` was set in most cases right after creating `LView`.
This makes the API cleaner by explicitly passing it ont `createLView`.
PR Close#28461
When we first started writing tests for Ivy, we did not yet have a
compatible compiler. For this reason, we set up the Ivy runtime tests
to run with generated code that we wrote by hand (instead of real code
generated by the compiler).
Now that we have a working Ivy compiler and TestBed infrastructure
that is compatible with Ivy, we should start writing integration
tests that leverage them (no more handwritten generated code!). This
will prevent bugs where the compiler code and runtime code become
out of sync (which is easy if they are tested separately). And
eventually, we should migrate all the existing runtime tests in
"core/test/render3" to TestBed and ngtsc.
To kick off this effort, this commit migrates some existing tests
from "core/test/render3/exports_spec.ts" and saves them in a new file
with the same name in the "core/test/acceptance" folder.
PR Close#28534
i18n instructions create text nodes dynamically and save them between bindings and the expando block in `LView`. e.g., they try to create the following order in `LView`.
```
| -- elements -- | -- bindings -- | -- dynamic i18n text -- | -- expando (dirs, injectors) -- |
```
Each time a new text node is created, it is pushed to the end of the array and the `expandoStartIndex` marker is incremented, so the section begins slightly later. This happens in `allocExpando`.
This is fine if no directives have been created yet. The end of the array will be in the "dynamic text node" section.
| -- elements -- | -- bindings -- | -- dynamic i18n text -- |
However, this approach doesn't work if dynamic text nodes are created after directives are matched (for example when the directive uses host bindings). In that case, there are already directives and injectors saved in the "expando" section. So pushing to the end of `LView` actually pushes after the expando section. What we get is this:
```
| -- elements -- | -- bindings -- | -- dynamic i18n text -- | -- expando -- | -- dynamic i18n text-- |
```
In this case, the `expandoStartIndex` shouldn't be incremented because we are not inserting anything before the expando section (it's now after the expando section). But because it is incremented in the code right now, it's now pointing to an index in the middle of the expando section.
This PR fixes that so that we only increment the `expandoStartIndex` if nothing was pushed into the expando section.
FW-978 #resolve
PR Close#28424
Currently, DOM node removal called `removeChild` on the saved parent
node when destroying a component. However, this will fail if the
component has been manually moved in the DOM. This change makes the
removal always use the node's real `parentNode` and ignore the provided
`parent`.
PR Close#28455
Ivy allows Components to extend Directives (but not the other way around) and as a result we may have Component and Directive annotations present at the same time. The logic that resolves annotations to pick the necessary one didn't take this into account and as a result Components were recognized as Directives (and vice versa) in case of inheritance. This change updates the resolution logic by picking known annotation that is the nearest one (in inheritance tree) and compares it with expected type. That should help avoid mis-classification of Components/Directives during resolution.
PR Close#28439
Improve the stacktrace for `R3Injector` errors by adding the source component (or module) that tried to inject the missing provider, as well as the name of the injector which triggered the error (`R3Injector`).
e.g.:
```
R3InjectorError(SomeModule)[car -> SportsCar]:
NullInjectorError: No provider for SportsCar!
```
FW-807 #resolve
FW-875 #resolve
PR Close#28207
createInjector() is an Ivy-only API that should not have
been exported as part of the public API. This commit removes
the export. It will be re-exported when Ivy is released.
PR Close#28509
Fixes Ivy not passing thrown errors along to the `ErrorHandler`.
**Note:** the failing test had to be reworked a little bit, because it has some assertions that depend on an error context being logged, however Ivy doesn't keep track of the error context.
This PR resolves FW-840.
PR Close#28447
In Ivy, we support a new manual mode that allows for stricter control
over change detection in OnPush components. Specifically, in this mode,
events do not automatically mark OnPush views as dirty. Only changed
inputs and manual calls to `markDirty()` actually mark a view dirty.
However, this mode cannot be the default for OnPush components if we
want to be backwards compatible with View Engine. This commit re-adds
the legacy logic for OnPush components where events always mark views
dirty and makes it the default behavior.
Note: It is still TODO to add a public API for manual change detection.
PR Close#28474
Due to the fact that the test in 'ng_module_integration_spec.ts' relied on internal VE data structures (the '_def' field) to verify the state and the structure has changed in Ivy, this commit adds an Ivy version of the same test.
PR Close#28477
Pawel Kozlowski
Marc Laval
Alex Rickabaugh
Trotyl Yu
Andrew Kushnir
Judy Bogart
JoostK
cexbrayat
Pete Bacon Darwin
Matias Niemelä
Alexey Zuev
Kara Erickson
Olivier Combe
Miško Hevery
Jeremy Elbourn
Kristiyan Kostadinov