This API is part of our public api surface and needs to be monitored by the public_api_guard.
I also had to go back and mark all of the exported functions with @publicApi jsdoc tag.
PR Close#27008
Make the error messages thrown when instantiating downgraded components,
injectables and modules more descriptive and actionable, also taking
into account incorrect use of the `downgradedModule` field.
PR Close#26217
Currently, calling `downgradeModule()` more than once is not supported.
If one wants to downgrade multiple Angular modules, they can create a
"super-module" that imports all the rest and downgrade that.
This commit adds support for downgrading multiple Angular modules. If
multiple modules are downgraded, then one must explicitly specify the
downgraded module that each downgraded component or injectable belongs
to, when calling `downgradeComponent()` and `downgradeInjectable()`
respectively.
No modification is needed (i.e. there is no need to specify a module for
downgraded components and injectables), if an app is not using
`downgradeModule()` or if there is only one downgraded Angular module.
Fixes#26062
PR Close#26217
Previously the ivy definition calls we going directly after the
class constructor function But this meant that the lifecycle
hooks attached to the prototype were ignored by the ngtsc
compiler.
Now the definitions are written to the end of the IIFE block,
just before the return statement.
Closes#26849
PR Close#26856
- Format JSDoc for notificationClicks
- Add comment on why handleClick does not use hasOwnProperty
- Add additional test that uses handleClick without action
PR Close#25860
- Serialize notification object before using postMessage
- Close notification on click
- Focus browser if it is not already focused on click
PR Close#25860
The previous version did not support the 'notificationclick' event.
Add event handler for the event and provide an observable of
clicked notifications in the SwPush service.
Closes#20956, #22311
PR Close#25860
When compiling the flat-file version of the `@angular/core` we need to be aware
that we cannot rely upon imported names to access the ivy definition functions.
The compiler is already clever enough to use local function calls rather than
trying to add a namespaced import, but there is a problem if the local name of the
function is different to the exported name. This is the case for functions that
are not part of the public API, and so are exported under a barred-O private alias.
In `@angular/core` the only decorations in use are `@NgModule` and `@Injectable`.
There are no directives, components, pipes, etc.
Since `defineInjectable` is part of the public API of `@angular/core`, the compiler
is able to generate code that references the original non-barred-O version of the
function.
But the `defineNgModule` is not part of the public API and so the compiler must
generate code that refers to it by the private barred-O version of the function.
This commit imports and then re-exports this barred-O version of `defineModule` to
ensure that the symbol is available in the local scope of the flat-file versions of
the `@angular/core` library.
PR Close#26403
For each package entry-point there is only one format that
is used to compile the typings files (.d.ts). This will be
either esm2015 or fesm2015 (preferred). So we would not run
any dts processing in the renderer if we are not compiling
the appropriate format.
PR Close#26403
1) The `DecorationAnalyzer now analyzes all source files, rather than just
the entry-point files, which fixes#26183.
2) The `DecoratorAnalyzer` now runs all the `handler.analyze()` calls
across the whole entry-point *before* running `handler.compile()`. This
ensures that dependencies between the decorated classes *within* an
entry-point are known to the handlers when running the compile process.
3) The `Renderer` now does the transformation of the typings (.d.ts) files
which allows us to support packages that only have flat format
entry-points better, and is faster, since we won't parse `.d.ts` files twice.
PR Close#26403
The rendering of typings is not specific to the package
format, so it doesn't make sense to put it in a specific
renderer.
As a result there is no real difference between esm5 and esm2015
renderers, so there is no point in having separate classes.
PR Close#26403
Previously we always used the non-flat format because we thought
that this was the one that would always be available.
It turns out that this is not the case and that only one of the flat and
non-flat formats may be available.
Therefore we should use whichever is available, defaulting to the flat
format if that exists, since that will be faster to parse.
PR Close#26403
