There were some examples for 'DoCheck' in the lifeCycle hooks guide. Added a link to the relevant section of the guide in the 'DoCheck()' api docs.
Fixes#35596
PR Close#36574
In v7 of Angular we removed `tsickle` from the default `ngc` pipeline.
This had the negative potential of breaking ES2015 output and SSR due
to a limitation in TypeScript.
TypeScript by default preserves type information for decorated constructor
parameters when `emitDecoratorMetadata` is enabled. For example,
consider this snippet below:
```
@Directive()
export class MyDirective {
constructor(button: MyButton) {}
}
export class MyButton {}
```
TypeScript would generate metadata for the `MyDirective` class it has
a decorator applied. This metadata would be needed in JIT mode, or
for libraries that provide `MyDirective` through NPM. The metadata would
look as followed:
```
let MyDirective = class MyDir {}
MyDirective = __decorate([
Directive(),
__metadata("design:paramtypes", [MyButton]),
], MyDirective);
let MyButton = class MyButton {}
```
Notice that TypeScript generated calls to `__decorate` and
`__metadata`. These calls are needed so that the Angular compiler
is able to determine whether `MyDirective` is actually an directive,
and what types are needed for dependency injection.
The limitation surfaces in this concrete example because `MyButton`
is declared after the `__metadata(..)` call, while `__metadata`
actually directly references `MyButton`. This is illegal though because
`MyButton` has not been declared at this point. This is due to the
so-called temporal dead zone in JavaScript. Errors like followed will
be reported at runtime when such file/code evaluates:
```
Uncaught ReferenceError: Cannot access 'MyButton' before initialization
```
As noted, this is a TypeScript limitation because ideally TypeScript
shouldn't evaluate `__metadata`/reference `MyButton` immediately.
Instead, it should defer the reference until `MyButton` is actually
declared. This limitation will not be fixed by the TypeScript team
though because it's a limitation as per current design and they will
only revisit this once the tc39 decorator proposal is finalized
(currently stage-2 at time of writing).
Given this wontfix on the TypeScript side, and our heavy reliance on
this metadata in libraries (and for JIT mode), we intend to fix this
from within the Angular compiler by downleveling decorators to static
properties that don't need to evaluate directly. For example:
```
MyDirective.ctorParameters = () => [MyButton];
```
With this snippet above, `MyButton` is not referenced directly. Only
lazily when the Angular runtime needs it. This mitigates the temporal
dead zone issue caused by a limitation in TypeScript's decorator
metadata output. See: https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript/issues/27519.
In the past (as noted; before version 7), the Angular compiler by
default used tsickle that already performed this transformation. We
moved the transformation to the CLI for JIT and `ng-packager`, but now
we realize that we can move this all to a single place in the compiler
so that standalone ngc consumers can benefit too, and that we can
disable tsickle in our Bazel `ngc-wrapped` pipeline (that currently
still relies on tsickle to perform this decorator processing).
This transformation also has another positive side-effect of making
Angular application/library code more compatible with server-side
rendering. In principle, TypeScript would also preserve type information
for decorated class members (similar to how it did that for constructor
parameters) at runtime. This becomes an issue when your application
relies on native DOM globals for decorated class member types. e.g.
```
@Input() panelElement: HTMLElement;
```
Your application code would then reference `HTMLElement` directly
whenever the source file is loaded in NodeJS for SSR. `HTMLElement`
does not exist on the server though, so that will become an invalid
reference. One could work around this by providing global mocks for
these DOM symbols, but that doesn't match up with other places where
dependency injection is used for mocking DOM/browser specific symbols.
More context in this issue: #30586. The TL;DR here is that the Angular
compiler does not care about types for these class members, so it won't
ever reference `HTMLElement` at runtime.
Fixes#30106. Fixes#30586. Fixes#30141.
Resolves FW-2196. Resolves FW-2199.
PR Close#37382
In #29083 a call to `getCompilerFacade` was added to `ApplicationRef` which pulls in a bit of JIT-specific code. Since the code path that calls the function can't be hit for an AOT-compiled app, these changes add an `ngJitMode` guard which will allow for dead code elimination to drop it completely. Testing it out against a new CLI project showed a difference of ~1.2kb.
PR Close#37372
lifecycle hooks api detailed documentation contained links which were pointing to onChanges hook only which is removed, made each hook point towards its deafult page link
PR Close#36557
Previously the comments for these files referenced a path to "packages/core/src/render3/jit/compiler_facade_interface.ts" that does not exist in the current codebase.
This PR corrects the path in these comments.
PR Close#37370
This PR provides a more helpful error than the one currently present:
`el.setAttribute is not a function`. It is not valid to have directives with host bindings
on `ng-template` or `ng-container` nodes. VE would silently ignore this, while Ivy
attempts to set the attribute and throws an error because these are comment nodes
and do not have `setAttribute` functionality.
It is better to throw a helpful error than to silently ignore this because
putting a directive with host binding on an `ng-template` or `ng-container` is most often a mistake.
Developers should be made aware that the host binding will have no effect in these cases.
Note that an error is already thrown in Ivy, as mentioned above, so this
is not a breaking change and can be merged to both master and patch.
Resolves#35994
PR Close#37111
If we detect that an injectable class is inheriting from another injectable, we generate code that looks something like this:
```
const baseFactory = ɵɵgetInheritedFactory(Child);
@Injectable()
class Parent {}
@Injectable()
class Child extends Parent {
static ɵfac = (t) => baseFactory(t || Child)
}
```
This usually works fine, because the `ɵɵgetInheritedFactory` resolves to the factory of `Parent`, but the logic can break down if the `Child` class has a custom decorator. Custom decorators can return a new class that extends the original once, which means that the `ɵɵgetInheritedFactory` call will now resolve to the factory of the `Child`, causing an infinite loop.
These changes fix the issue by changing the inherited factory resolution logic so that it walks up the prototype chain class-by-class, while skipping classes that have the same factory as the class that was passed in.
Fixes#35733.
PR Close#37022
In v9, we started showing a console warning when
instantiating a token that inherited its @Injectable
decorator rather than providing its own. This warning
said that the pattern would become an error in v10.
However, we have decided to wait until at least v11
to throw in this case, so this commit updates the
warning to be less prescriptive about the exact
version when the pattern will no longer be supported.
PR Close#37383
Remove `looseIdentical` implementation and instead use the ES2015 `Object.is` in its place.
They behave exactly the same way except for `+0`/`-0`.
`looseIdentical(+0, -0)` => `true`
`Object.is(+0, -0)` => `false`
Other than the difference noted above, this is not be a breaking change because:
1. `looseIdentical` is a private API
2. ES2015 is listed as a mandatory polyfill in the [browser support
guide](https://angular.io/guide/browser-support#mandatory-polyfills)
3. Also note that `Ivy` already uses `Object.is` in `bindingUpdated`.
PR Close#37191
Previously there was a typo in a comment within the PropDecorator function relating to and justifying the use of Object.defineProperty. This PR clears up the wording that comment
PR Close#37369
Due to an outage with the proxy we rely on for publishing, we need
to temporarily directly publish to NPM using our own angular
credentials again.
PR Close#37378
As of TypeScript 3.9, the tsc emit is not compatible with Closure
Compiler due to
https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript/pull/32011.
There is some hope that this will be fixed by a solution like the one
proposed in
https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript/issues/38374 but currently it's
unclear if / when that will
happen.
Since the Closure support has been somewhat already broken, and the
tsickle pass has been a source
of headaches for some time for Angular packages, we are removing it for
now while we rethink our
strategy to make Angular Closure compatible outside of Google.
This change has no effect on our Closure compatibility within Google
which work well because all the
code is compiled from sources and passed through tsickle.
This change only disables the tsickle pass but doesn't remove it.
A follow up PR should either remove all the traces of tscikle or
re-enable the fixed version.
BREAKING CHANGE: Angular npm packages no longer contain jsdoc comments
to support Closure Compiler's advanced optimizations
The support for Closure compiler in Angular packages has been
experimental and broken for quite some
time.
As of TS3.9 Closure is unusable with the JavaScript emit. Please follow
https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript/issues/38374 for more
information and updates.
If you used Closure compiler with Angular in the past, you will likely
be better off consuming
Angular packages built from sources directly rather than consuming the
version we publish on npm
which is primarily optimized for Webpack/Rollup + Terser build pipeline.
As a temporary workaround you might consider using your current build
pipeline with Closure flag
`--compilation_level=SIMPLE`. This flag will ensure that your build
pipeline produces buildable and
runnable artifacts, at the cost of increased payload size due to
advanced optimizations being disabled.
If you were affected by this change, please help us understand your
needs by leaving a comment on https://github.com/angular/angular/issues/37234.
PR Close#37221
Update docs in the micro benchmarks to include:
* How to run with no turbo inlining
* Where to find the profiles in the DevTools
* Best way to debug benchmarks (using the profile_in_browser rather than --inspect-brk)
PR Close#37140
Tslib version is bound to the TypeScript version used to compile the library. Thus, we shouldn't list `tslib` as a `peerDependencies`. This is because, a user can install libraries which have been compiled with older versions of TypeScript and thus require multiple `tslib` versions to be installed.
Reference: TOOL-1374 and TOOL-1375
Closes: #37188
PR Close#37198
Previously all static styling information (including the ones from component/directive host bindings) would get merged into a single value before it would be written into the `@Input('class'/'style')`. The new behavior specifically excludes host values from the `@Input` bindings.
Fix#35383
PR Close#35889
Dynamic embedded views were conceptually different from inline embedded views, but we have since
removed the inline embedded views so we now only have "embedded views".
See related refactoring work to remove inline embedded views in #34715
and #37073.
PR Close#37117
If one component Parent inherit another component Base like the following:
@Component(...)
class Base {
constructor(@Inject(InjectionToken) injector: Injector) { }
}
@Component(...)
class Parent extends Base {
// no constructor
}
When creating Component Parent, the dependency injection should work on delegating ctors like above.
The code Parent code above will be compiled into something like:
class Parent extends Base {
constructor() {
super(...arguments);
}
}
The angular core isDelegateCtor function will identify the delegation ctor to the base class.
But when the code above is minified (using terser), the minified code will compress the spaces, resulting in something like:
class Parent extends Base{constructor(){super(...arguments)}}
The regex will stop working, since it wasn't aware of this case. So this fix will allow this to work in minified code cases.
PR Close#36962
The _tViewNode field (that was marked as internal) on the ViewRef is not
necessery as a reference to a relevant TView is available as a local
variable.
PR Close#36814
TypeScript 3.9 introduced a breaking change where extends `any` no longer acts as `any`, instead it acts as `unknown`.
With this change we retain the behavior we had with TS 3.8 which is;
When using the `EventEmitter` as a type you must always provide a type;
```ts
let emitter: EventEmitter<string>
```
and when initializing the `EventEmitter` class you can either provide a type or or use the fallback type which is `any`
```ts
const emitter = new EventEmitter(); // EventEmitter<any>
const emitter = new EventEmitte<string>(); // EventEmitter<string>
``
PR Close#36989
The ActiveIndexFlag is no longer needed because we no longer have "inline embedded views".
There is only one type of embedded view so we do not need complex tracking for
inline embedded views.
HAS_TRANSPLANTED_VIEWS now takes the place of the ACTIVE_INDEX slot as a
simple boolean rather than being a shifted flag inside the ACTIVE_INDEX bits.
PR Close#37073
In 420b9be1c1 all style-based sanitization code was
disabled because modern browsers no longer allow for javascript expressions within
CSS. This patch is a follow-up patch which removes all traces of style sanitization
code (both instructions and runtime logic) for the `[style]` and `[style.prop]` bindings.
PR Close#36965
The message can be improved by removing the unneeded ‘the’ (x2).
Before:
Angular is running in the development mode. Call enableProdMode() to enable the production mode.
After:
Angular is running in development mode. Call enableProdMode() to enable production mode.
Closes#36570
PR Close#36571
Prior to this change, the `template` instruction logic was located in the `instructions/container.ts` file alongside embedded view instructions. Since unused embedded view instructions are removed in a previous commit, this commit renames `container.ts` -> `template.ts`, since only template-related instructions were retained.
PR Close#34715
Enables the `ng update` migrations for v10. Status for individual
migrations:
**undecorated-classes-with-di**.
This migration dealt exlusively with inherited constructors and
cases where a derived component was undecorated. In those cases,
the migration added `@Directive()` or copied the inherited decorator
to the derived class.
We don't need to run this migration again because ngtsc throws if
constructor is inherited from an undecorated class. Also ngtsc will
throw if a NgModule references an undecorated class in the declarations.
***undecorated-classes-with-decorated-fields***
This migration exclusively deals with undecorated classes that use
Angular features but are not decorated. Angular features include
the use of lifecycle hooks or class fields with Angular decorators,
such as `@Input()`.
We want to re-run this migration in v10 as we will disable the
compatibility code in ngtsc that detects such undecorated classes
as `@Directive`.
**module-with-providers**:
This migration adds an explicit generic type to `ModuleWithProviders`.
As of v10, the generic type is required, so we need to re-run the
migration again.
**renderer-to-renderer2**:
We don't need to re-run that migration again as the
renderer has been already removed in v9.
**missing-injectable**:
This migration is exclusively concerned with undecorated
providers referenced in an `NgModule`. We should re-run
that migration again as we don't have proper backsliding
prevention for this yet. We can consider adding an error
in ngtsc for v10, or v11. In either way, we should re-run
the migration.
**dynamic-queries**:
We ran this one in v9 to reduce code complexity in projects. Instead
of explicitly passing `static: false`, not passing any object literal
has the same semantics. We don't need to re-run the migration again
since there is no good way to prevent backsliding and we cannot always
run this migration for future versions (as some apps might actually
intentionally use the explicit `static: false` option).
PR Close#36921
As of v10, undecorated classes using Angular features are no longer
supported. In v10, we plan on removing the undecorated classes
compatibility code in ngtsc. This means that old patterns for
undecorated classes will result in compilation errors.
We had a migration for this in v9 already, but it looks like
the migration does not handle cases where classes uses lifecycle
hooks. This is handled in the ngtsc compatibility code, and we
should handle it similarly in migrations too.
This has not been outlined in the migration plan initially,
but an appendix has been added for v10 to the plan document.
https://hackmd.io/vuQfavzfRG6KUCtU7oK_EA?both.
Note: The migration is unable to determine whether a given undecorated
class that only defines `ngOnDestroy` is a directive or an actual
service. This means that in some cases the migration cannot do
more than adding a TODO and printing an failure.
Certainly there are more ways to determine the type of such classes,
but it would involve metadata and NgModule analysis. This is out of
scope for this migration.
PR Close#36921
In v9, we deprecated the use of ModuleWithProviders
without a generic. In v10, we will be requiring the
generic when using ModuleWithProviders. You can read
more about the reasoning behind this change in the
migration guide:
http://v9.angular.io/guide/migration-module-with-providers
PR Close#36892
This patch is the first of many commits to disable sanitization for
[stlye.prop] and [style] bindings in Angular.
Historically, style-based sanitization has only been required for old
IE browsers (IE6 and IE7). Since Angular does not support these old
browsers at all, there is no reason for the framework to support
style-based sanitization.
PR Close#35621
We can remove all of the entry point resolution configuration from the package.json
in our source code as ng_package rule adds the properties automatically and correctly
configures them.
This change simplifies our code base but doesn't have any impact on the package.json
in the distributed npm_packages.
PR Close#36944
The purpose of the `WrappedValue` is to allow same object instance to be treated as different for the purposes of change detection. It is currently used with `async` pipe and only with `Observables`. The use case which it covers is if the `Observable` produces the same instance of the value but it is desirable to still try to mark it as changed for the purposes of change detection.
We believe tha the above use case is too rare to warrant special handling in the framework. (Having special handling causes application slowdown for the users and mental load for the developers.) No replacement is planned for this deprecation.
PR Close#36819
This commit fixes 2 separate issues related to root nodes retrieval from
embedded views with `<ng-content>`:
1) we did not account for the case where there were no projectable nodes
for a given `<ng-content>`;
2) we did not account for the case where projectable nodes for a given
`<ng-content>` were represented as an array of native nodes (happens in
the case of dynamically created components with projectable nodes);
Fixes#35967
PR Close#36051
Previously we were passing a string form of the value to pluralize
to the `getLocalePluralCase()` function that is extracted from the
locale data. But some locales have functions that rely upon this
value being a number not a string.
Now we convert the value to a number before passing it to the
locale data function.
Fixes#36888
PR Close#36901
Changes the Ivy unknown element/property messages from being logged with `console.warn` to `console.error`. This should make them a bit more visible without breaking existing apps. Furthermore, a lot of folks filter out warning messages in the dev tools' console, whereas errors are usually still shown.
BREAKING CHANGE:
Warnings about unknown elements are now logged as errors. This won't break your app, but it may trip up tools that expect nothing to be logged via `console.error`.
Fixes#35699.
PR Close#36399
Only refresh transplanted views at the insertion location in Ivy.
Previously, Ivy would check transplanted views at both the insertion and
declaration points. This is achieved by adding a marker to the insertion
tree when we encounter a transplanted view that needs to be refreshed at
its declaration. We use this marker as an extra indication that we still
need to descend and refresh those transplanted views at their insertion
locations even if the insertion view and/or its parents are not dirty.
This change fixes several issues:
* Transplanted views refreshed twice if both insertion and declaration
are dirty. This could be an error if the insertion component changes
result in data not being available to the transplanted view because it
is slated to be removed.
* CheckAlways transplanted views not refreshed if shielded by
non-dirty OnPush (fixes#35400)
* Transplanted views still refreshed when insertion tree is detached
(fixes#21324)
PR Close#35968
If there's an error during the first creation pass of a `TView`, the data structure may be corrupted which will cause framework assertion failures downstream which can mask the user's error. These changes add a new flag to the `TView` that indicates whether the first creation pass was successful, and if it wasn't we try re-create the `TView`.
Fixes#31221.
PR Close#36381
Prior to this change, animations-related runtime logic assumed that the @HostBinding and @HostListener with synthetic (animations) props are used for Components only. However having @HostBinding and @HostListener with synthetic props on Directives is also supported by View Engine. This commit updates the logic to select correct renderer to execute instructions (current renderer for Directives and sub-component renderer for Components).
This PR resolves#35501.
PR Close#35568
When module overrides (via `TestBed.overrideModule`) are present, it might affect all modules that import (even transitively) an overridden one. For all affected modules we need to recalculate their scopes for a given test run and restore original scopes at the end. Prior to this change, we were recalculating module scopes only for components that are used in a test, without taking into account module hierarchy. This commit updates Ivy TestBed logic to calculate all potentially affected modules are reset cached scopes information for them (so that scopes are recalculated as needed).
Resolves#36619.
PR Close#36649
Prior to this commit unbound attributes were treated as possible inputs to structural directives. Since structural directives can only accepts inputs defined using microsyntax expression (e.g. `<div *dir="exp">`), such unbound attributes should not be considered as inputs. This commit aligns Ivy and View Engine behavior and avoids using unbound attributes as inputs to structural directives.
PR Close#36441
Based on the migration guide, provided classes which don't have
either `@Injectable`, `@Directive`, `@Component` or `@Pipe` need
to be migrated.
This is not correct as provided classes with an `@NgModule` also
have a factory function that can be read by the r3 injector. It's
unclear in which cases the `@NgModule` decorator is used for
provided classes, but this scenario has been reported.
Either we fix this in the migration, or we make sure to report
this as unsupported in the Ivy compiler.
Fixes#35700.
PR Close#36369
The flag that determines whether something should be able to inject from `viewProviders` is opt-out and the pipes weren't opted out, resulting in them being able to see the viewProviders if they're placed on a component host node.
Fixes#36146.
PR Close#36512
Prior to this commit, the unknown property check was unnecessarily invoked for AOT-compiled components (for these components, the check happens at compile time). This commit updates the code to avoid unknown property verification for AOT-compiled components by checking whether schemas information is present (as a way to detect whether this is JIT or AOT compiled component).
Resolves#35945.
PR Close#36072
Prior to this change, there was a problem while matching template attributes, which mistakenly took i18n attributes (that might be present in attrs array after template ones) into account. This commit updates the logic to avoid template attribute matching logic from entering the i18n section and as a result this also allows generating proper i18n attributes sections instead of keeping these attribute in plain form (with their values) in attribute arrays.
PR Close#36422
In certain use-cases it's useful to have an ability to use empty strings as translations. Currently Ivy fails at runtime if empty string is used as a translation, since some parts of internal data structures are not created properly. This commit updates runtime i18n logic to handle empty translations and avoid unnecessary extra processing for such cases.
Fixes#36476.
PR Close#36499
The undecorated-classes-with-decorated-fields migration relies on
the type checker to resolve base classes of individual classes.
It could happen that resolved base classes have no value declaration.
e.g. if they are declared through an interface in the default types.
Currently the migration will throw in such situations because it assumes
that `ts.Symbol#valueDeclaration` is always present. This is not the
case, but we don't get good type-checking here due to a bug in the
TypeScript types. See:
https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript/issues/24706.
Fixes#36522.
PR Close#36543
ajitsinghkaler
Paul Gschwendtner
Joey Perrott
crisbeto
AleksanderBodurri
Andrew Scott
Kara Erickson
Igor Minar
Alan Agius
Miško Hevery
Daniel Seibel Silva
pkozlowski-opensource
Andrew Kushnir
Matias Niemelä
Michiel Kikkert
Pete Bacon Darwin
JiaLiPassion