Currently the `useJit` option from `TestBed.configureCompiler` isn't supported. These changes rework the existing test suites not to pass in `useJit` when running with Ivy.
PR Close#27067
This option means guards and resolvers will ignore changes to optional
parameters such as query and matrix params. When the path or any path
params change, guards and resolvers will be run
Related to discussion in #18253
FW-560 #resolve
PR Close#26861
Make a copy of the ts.SourceFile before modifying it in the ivy_switch
transform. It's suspected that the Bazel tsc_wrapped host's SourceFile
cache has issues when the ts.SourceFiles are mutated.
PR Close#27032
In a more specific scenario: Considering people use a custom TypeScript compiler host with `NGC`, they _could_ expect only posix paths in methods like `writeFile`. This at first glance sounds like a trivial issue that should be just fixed by the actual compiler host, but usually TypeScript internal API's just pass around posix normalized paths, and therefore it would be good to follow the same standards when passing JSON genfiles to the `CompilerHost`.
For normal TypeScript files (and TS genfiles), this is already consistent because those will be handled by the actual TypeScript `Program` (see `emitCallback`).
PR Close#27062
Adds support for the `providers` that are passed in through `TestBed.configureCompiler` and scopes the error only if the consumer has passed in `useJit`.
PR Close#27066
This fixes an issue where packages would be skipped if they contained
e.g. RxJS 5 style imports such as
```
import { observeOn } from 'rxjs/operators/observeOn';
```
Given that no package.json file can be found at the imported path, the
dependency would be reported missing, causing the package to be skipped.
PR Close#27031
This API is part of our public api surface and needs to be monitored by the public_api_guard.
I also had to go back and mark all of the exported functions with @publicApi jsdoc tag.
PR Close#27008
Make the error messages thrown when instantiating downgraded components,
injectables and modules more descriptive and actionable, also taking
into account incorrect use of the `downgradedModule` field.
PR Close#26217
Currently, calling `downgradeModule()` more than once is not supported.
If one wants to downgrade multiple Angular modules, they can create a
"super-module" that imports all the rest and downgrade that.
This commit adds support for downgrading multiple Angular modules. If
multiple modules are downgraded, then one must explicitly specify the
downgraded module that each downgraded component or injectable belongs
to, when calling `downgradeComponent()` and `downgradeInjectable()`
respectively.
No modification is needed (i.e. there is no need to specify a module for
downgraded components and injectables), if an app is not using
`downgradeModule()` or if there is only one downgraded Angular module.
Fixes#26062
PR Close#26217
crisbeto
Kara Erickson
Olivier Combe
Pawel Kozlowski
Marc Laval
Jason Aden
Greg Magolan
Miško Hevery
Sarun Intaralawan
Alex Rickabaugh
Charles Lyding
Judy Bogart
Paul Gschwendtner
cexbrayat
Matias Niemelä
JoostK
Brandon Roberts
Deltatiger
Andrew Lobban
Igor Minar
Andrew Kushnir
George Kalpakas