There are cases where we should check an element injector but don't go
into the associated module injector if a token is not found. In both the
view engine and ngIvy this is acheived by passing the
`NOT_FOUND_CHECK_ONLY_ELEMENT_INJECTOR` as the `notFoundValue`.
Before this fix the view engine and ngIvy were using different objects to
represent `NOT_FOUND_CHECK_ONLY_ELEMENT_INJECTOR`. This was causing problems
as ngUpgrade is using `NOT_FOUND_CHECK_ONLY_ELEMENT_INJECTOR` const in its
`NgAdapterInjector` to prevent searching of module injectors.
This commit makes sure that ngIvy is using the same object to represent
`NOT_FOUND_CHECK_ONLY_ELEMENT_INJECTOR` as the view engine.
PR Close#28313
Before this commit we were creating a "fake" TNode for each and every
projectable node passed during dynamic component creation. This approach
had several problems:
- the existing TView structure had to be mutated to accomodate new TNodes and
it was very easy to "corrupt" TView / TNode data structures;
- TNodes are not really needed to fully support projectable nodes so we were
creating objects and updating existing data structures for nothing.
This commit changes the approach so we don't create "fake" TNodes for projectable
nodes but instead we process projectable nodes directly in the projection instruction.
As a result we've got less code, less object allocation and - as a bonus - we fix few
bugs where TView / TNode data structures were corrupted when using projectable nodes.
PR Close#28275
Destroys the module's injector when an `NgModule` is destroyed which in turn calls the `ngOnDestroy` methods on the instantiated providers.
This PR resolves FW-739.
PR Close#27793
Libraries that create components dynamically using component factories,
such as `@angular/upgrade` need to pass blocks of projected content
through to the `ComponentFactory.create()` method. These blocks
are extracted from the content by matching CSS selectors defined in
`<ng-content select="..">` tags found in the component's template.
The Angular compiler collects these CSS selectors when compiling a component's
template, and exposes them via the `ComponentFactory.ngContentSelectors`
property.
This change ensures that this property is filled correctly when the
component factory is created by compiling a component with the Ivy engine.
PR Close#27867
This commit adds tests that verify the current behavior wrt injector
tree traversal for downgraded components, so that it is easier to
contrast with changed behavior is future commits (should we decide
to actually change it).
PR Close#27217
Previously, nested downgraded components would not be created/destroyed
inside the Angular zone (as they should) and they would not be wired up
correctly for change detection.
This commit ensures that ngUpgrade correctly detects whether this is an
ngUpgradeLite app (i.e. one using `downgradeModule()` instead of
`UpgradeModule`) and appropriately handles components, even if they are
nested inside other downgraded components.
Fixes#22581Closes#22869Closes#27083
PR Close#27217
* We should try loading Angular.JS for the upgrade tests in their minfied output. There seems to be a lot flakiness in regards to loading `AngularJS` within Travis, and the `onerror` messages aren't really too helpful. In order to reduce the payload that will be passed through the Saucelabs tunnel, we should try to load the minfied output files.
PR Close#27711
Currently whenever the upgrade test helper fails to load a given AngularJS version, the error that will be rejected is technically not an error because the `onerror` callback is not returning an error, but an "ErrorEvent".
Since that `ErrorEvent` is basically just rejected, browsers will print
the error as followed:
```
Failed: [object Event]
```
This is not helpful at all and also implies that there _might_ be more
information hidden within the `Event` instance. Unfortunately that's not
the case (at least on browsers we test against) and the logic to extract
the data from the event would be not worth the effort, we just return a
simple custom `Error` that won't imply that there is more information
hidden.
PR Close#27706
In ngUpgrade (dynamic) we create a dynamic Angular `Directive` that wraps AngularJS components
that are being upgraded. The constructor of this `Directive` class returns a different instance
than `this`. It is this instance that actually contains the life-cycle hook handlers.
This would break in ivy, since the methods on the prototype of the original class are wired up,
rather than the instance methods. This results in hooks like `ngOnInit` not being called.
This commit refactors the code to extend the inner class that was being returned so that the
prototype chain is correct for both ViewEngine and ivy.
This change resolves a number of failing ivy tests, but also exposes other failures that were
masked by this issue. The tests have been updated accordingly.
(FW-812)
PR Close#27660
`NgModule` requires that `Component`s/`Directive`s/`Pipe`s are listed in
declarations, and that each `Component`s/`Directive`s/`Pipe` is declared
in exactly one `NgModule`. This change adds runtime checks to ensure
that these sementics are true at runtime.
There will need to be seperate set of checks for the AoT path of the
codebase to verify that same set of semantics hold. Due to current
design there does not seem to be an easy way to share the two checks
because JIT deal with references where as AoT deals with AST nodes.
PR Close#27604
Previously, if the two injectors are not the same, jasmine tried to
display an error message, but it got stuck in an infinite loop trying
to render the injectors that were different.
PR Close#27454
The way that `UpgradeAdapter` needs to be setup, you often find that
you must pass a `forwardRef` for an `NgModule.import`. Pre-ivy, this
gets resolved at runtime, but until this is implemented in ivy, we can
workaround it by resolving it in the `UpgradeAdapter` upfront.
This should be backward-compatible since by the time we actually
create the dynamic `NgModule` that has the import, the imported
class should be defined.
PR Close#27132
Make the error messages thrown when instantiating downgraded components,
injectables and modules more descriptive and actionable, also taking
into account incorrect use of the `downgradedModule` field.
PR Close#26217
Currently, calling `downgradeModule()` more than once is not supported.
If one wants to downgrade multiple Angular modules, they can create a
"super-module" that imports all the rest and downgrade that.
This commit adds support for downgrading multiple Angular modules. If
multiple modules are downgraded, then one must explicitly specify the
downgraded module that each downgraded component or injectable belongs
to, when calling `downgradeComponent()` and `downgradeInjectable()`
respectively.
No modification is needed (i.e. there is no need to specify a module for
downgraded components and injectables), if an app is not using
`downgradeModule()` or if there is only one downgraded Angular module.
Fixes#26062
PR Close#26217
We are close enough to blacklist a few test targets, rather than whitelist targets to run...
Because bazel rules can be composed of other rules that don't inherit tags automatically,
I had to explicitly mark all of our ts_library and ng_module targes with "ivy-local" and
"ivy-jit" tags so that we can create a query that excludes all fixme- tagged targets even
if those targets are composed of other targets that don't inherit this tag.
This is the updated overview of ivy related bazel tags:
- ivy-only: target that builds or runs only under ivy
- fixme-ivy-jit: target that doesn't yet build or run under ivy with --compile=jit
- fixme-ivy-local: target that doesn't yet build or run under ivy with --compile=local
- no-ivy-jit: target that is not intended to build or run under ivy with --compile=jit
- no-ivy-local: target that is not intended to build or run under ivy with --compile=local
PR Close#26471
Pawel Kozlowski
Ben Lesh
Alex Eagle
Kristiyan Kostadinov
George Kalpakas
Kara Erickson
Pete Bacon Darwin
Miško Hevery
Alan Agius
Paul Gschwendtner
Alex Eagle
Andy Blatecky
Igor Minar
Greg Magolan