The compiler considers template diagnostics to "belong" to the source file
of the component using the template. This means that when diagnostics for
a source file are reported, it returns diagnostics of TS structures in the
actual source file, diagnostics for any inline templates, and diagnostics of
any external templates.
The Language Service uses a different model, and wants to show template
diagnostics in the actual .html file. Thus, it's not necessary (and in fact
incorrect) to include such diagnostics for the actual .ts file as well.
Doing this currently causes a bug where external diagnostics appear in the
TS file with "random" source spans.
This commit changes the Language Service to filter the set of diagnostics
returned by the compiler and only include those diagnostics with spans
actually within the .ts file itself.
Fixes#41032
PR Close#41070
This commit updates compiler_spec.ts in the Ivy LS suite to utilize the new
testing environment which was introduced in the previous commit. Eventually
all specs should be converted, but converting one right now helps ensure
that the new testing env is working properly and able to support real tests.
PR Close#40966
This commit updates compiler_spec.ts in the Ivy LS suite to utilize the new
testing environment which was introduced in the previous commit. Eventually
all specs should be converted, but converting one right now helps ensure
that the new testing env is working properly and able to support real tests.
PR Close#40679
This commit changes the Language Service's "compiler factory" mechanism to
leverage the new resource-only update path for `NgCompiler`. When an
incoming change only affects a resource file like a component template or
stylesheet, going through the new API allows the Language Service to avoid
unnecessary incremental steps of the `NgCompiler` and return answers more
efficiently.
PR Close#40585
Report non-template diagnotics when calling `getDiagnotics` function of
the language service we only returned template diagnotics. This change
causes it to return all diagnotics, not just diagnostics from the
template type checker.
PR Close#40331
Projects opened in the LS are often larger in scope than the compilation
units seen by the compiler when actually building. For example, in the LS
it's not uncommon for the project to include both application as well as
test files. This can create issues when the combination of files results
in errors that are not otherwise present - for example, if test files
have inline NgModules that re-declare components (a common Angular pattern).
Such code is valid when compiling the app only (test files are excluded, so
only one declaration is seen by the compiler) or when compiling tests only
(since tests run in JIT mode and are not seen by the AOT compiler), but when
both sets of files are mixed into a single compilation unit, the compiler
sees the double declaration as an error.
This commit attempts to mitigate the problem by forcing the compiler flag
`compileNonExportedClasses` to `false` in a LS context. When tests contain
duplicate declarations, often such declarations are inline in specs and not
exported from the top level, so this flag can be used to greatly improve the
IDE experience.
PR Close#40092
When the compiler is invoked via ngc or the Angular CLI, its APIs are used
under the assumption that Angular analysis/diagnostics are only requested if
the program has no TypeScript-level errors. A result of this assumption is
that the incremental engine has not needed to resolve changes via its
dependency graph when the program contained broken imports, since broken
imports are a TypeScript error.
The Angular Language Service for Ivy is using the compiler as a backend, and
exercising its incremental compilation APIs without enforcing this
assumption. As a result, the Language Service has run into issues where
broken imports cause incremental compilation to fail and produce incorrect
results.
This commit introduces a mechanism within the compiler to keep track of
files for which dependency analysis has failed, and to always treat such
files as potentially affected by future incremental steps. This is tested
via the Language Service infrastructure to ensure that the compiler is doing
the right thing in the case of invalid imports.
PR Close#39923
To avoid overwhelming a user with secondary diagnostics that derive from a
"root cause" error, the compiler has the notion of a "poisoned" NgModule.
An NgModule becomes poisoned when its declaration contains semantic errors:
declarations which are not components or pipes, imports which are not other
NgModules, etc. An NgModule also becomes poisoned if it imports or exports
another poisoned NgModule.
Previously, the compiler tracked this poisoned status as an alternate state
for each scope. Either a correct scope could be produced, or the entire
scope would be set to a sentinel error value. This meant that the compiler
would not track any information about a scope that was determined to be in
error.
This method presents several issues:
1. The compiler is unable to support the language service and return results
when a component or its module scope is poisoned.
This is fine for compilation, since diagnostics will be produced showing the
error(s), but the language service needs to still work for incorrect code.
2. `getComponentScopes()` does not return components with a poisoned scope,
which interferes with resource tracking of incremental builds.
If the component isn't included in that list, then the NgModule for it will
not have its dependencies properly tracked, and this can cause future
incremental build steps to produce incorrect results.
This commit changes the tracking of poisoned module scopes to use a flag on
the scope itself, rather than a sentinel value that replaces the scope. This
means that the scope itself will still be tracked, even if it contains
semantic errors. A test is added to the language service which verifies that
poisoned scopes can still be used in template type-checking.
PR Close#39923
Keen Yee Liau
Alex Rickabaugh
Alexey Elin
Zach Arend