PR #27404 introduced additional test case to make sure we generate `elementStyling` instructions with proper set of arguments (first argument was missing in some cases). It looks like that PR was created before we updated host vars count calculation and the `allocHostVars` becomes unnecessary in the test cases introduced in PR #27404. This commit actualizes this test to get rid of unnecessary `allocHostVars` instruction.
PR Close#27473
(FW-777)
When an Injector is provided, R3Injector instantiates it by calling its
constructor instead of its factory, not resolving dependencies.
With this fix, the ngInjectorDef is checked and the factory is correctly
used if it is found.
PR Close#27456
Previously, if the two injectors are not the same, jasmine tried to
display an error message, but it got stuck in an infinite loop trying
to render the injectors that were different.
PR Close#27454
When detaching a view by its index via `ViewContainerRef.detach(index)`, in `ViewEngine` we used to return a new `ViewRef` ([for reference](https://github.com/angular/angular/blob/master/packages/core/src/view/refs.ts#L227)), however in Ivy we return the same `ViewRef` which means that its internal `_viewContainerRef` is never reset and we'll throw an error if the consumer tried to attach it to the `ApplicationRef`. These changes return a new `ViewRef` in order to match the original behavior.
These changes also add the same errors as `ViewEngine` when attempting to attach a view that is attached already. This was the original goal of this PR, however it ended up uncovering the issues with the `ViewRef`.
PR Close#27437
The logic that generates first argument for the `elementStyling` instruction was missing the check that directive expression is specified. As a result, in some cases first argument was not added, thus making function invocation incorrect. Now the presence of directive expression is taken into account and the `null` expression is generated as needed.
PR Close#27404
In some applications, developers define a `ts_library` that just consists of `d.ts` files (e.g. to type `module.id`; see: https://github.com/angular/material2/blob/master/src/module-typings.d.ts), and expect the `esm5.bzl` file to not throw an error like:
```
target.typescript.replay_params.outputs
struct' object has no attribute 'outputs'
```
The "replay_parameters" property will exist in that case, but is set to "None" because there is no action that should be replayed in favor of producing ES5 outputs. See: https://github.com/bazelbuild/rules_typescript/pull/326. Notice that this right now breaks similarly because an empty `struct()` is returned that does not have a property called `outputs`. [#326](https://github.com/bazelbuild/rules_typescript/pull/326) fixes that by being explicit that there is no _action_ at all.
PR Close#27401
Prior to this change `projectDef` instructions were placed to root templates only, thus the necessary information (selectors) in nested templates was missing. This update adds the logic to insert `projectDef` instructions to all templates where <ng-content> is present.
PR Close#27384
Previously ngtsc assumed resource files (templateUrl, styleUrls) would be
physically present in the file system relative to the .ts file which
referenced them. However, ngc previously resolved such references in the
context of ts.CompilerOptions.rootDirs. Material depends on this
functionality in its build.
This commit introduces resolution of resources by leveraging the TypeScript
module resolver, ts.resolveModuleName(). This resolver is used in a way
which will never succeed, but on failure will return a list of locations
checked. This list is then filtered to obtain the correct potential
locations of the resource.
PR Close#27357
This commit adds support for resolution of styleUrls to ngtsc. Previously
this field was never read, and so components with styleUrls would appear
unstyled after compilation.
PR Close#27357
When a single resource is preloaded twice in ngtsc, the second request
would be recognized as in-flight in which case `undefined` would
be returned, which signals to the compilation that is can resume
synchronously. The compilation would then proceed immediately and call
`load`, only to find out that the request is still in-flight which is
not allowed.
This commit caches the Promise of the in-flight fetch requests, such
that subsequent preload requests can return the corresponding Promise
instance.
PR Close#27357
* Currently when building a `ng_module` with Bazel and having the flat module id option set, the flat module files are not being generated because `@angular/compiler-cli` does not properly determine the entry-point file.
Note that this logic is not necessarily specific to Bazel and the same problem can happen without Bazel if multiple TypeScript input files are specified while the `flatModuleIndex` option has been enabled.
PR Close#27200
Currently when building the `ng_package` multiple times, the old `ng_package` output will be copied over to the new `ng_package` content. Resulting in packages like `src/cdk/npm_package/npm_package/npm_package/AND_MORE`.
This happens because currently all TypeScript definition files are resolved from within the `binDir`. This is just wrong because it could then take up the `d.ts` files from the previous `ng_package` output. All typescript definitions that belong to the target package, should be resolved through Bazel and copied based on that computation.
Also fixes that `esm` files aren't written to the `ng_package` on Windows. This is because we try to flatten paths using the `path.delimiter` while the path is always using Posix delimiters (causing the paths to be incorrect)
PR Close#27200
* Currently when building the ES5 and ES2015 output, `ngc_wrapped` will fail because it tries to write the `fs.openSync` the tsickle output file at the same time. This causes a runtime exception in Windows and can be fixed by just writing the externs for ES5 mode to the proper ES5 "output root".
PR Close#27200
* Fixes that `ng_package` does not work generate UMD bundles on Windows because the `esm5/` files are not written to the output directory. This is because `rootDirs` and `rootDir` are posix paths and cause invalid relative paths when mixed with Windows backslash paths.
PR Close#27200
For ngcc's processing of ES5 bundles, the spread syntax has been
downleveled from `[...ARRAY]` to become `ARRAY.slice()`. This commit
adds basic support for static resolution of such call.
PR Close#27158
Prior to this change, the number of host vars stored for directives with `hostBindings` in expando block was incorrect for inherited directives (in case both parent and child directive have `hostBindings` defined). Now if we identify that we already added a `hostBinding` into expando block, we just increase the corresponding number of host binding vars
PR Close#27392
Also build releases into a dedicated output_base so you can't
accidentally publish with outdated version stamp.
Bump the version of rules_nodejs so we don't need to create the
symlink_prefixes for the .publish command to work.
PR Close#27362
The problem was caused by missing `allocateBindingSlots` that led to incorrect # of vars defined for components and as a result, causing errors at runtime. Now all `bind` operation are accounted for and the number of `vars` is correct.
PR Close#27338
The problem was caused by the self-closing i18n instruction that was generated in case we have styling instructions defined for a component. As a result, that caused problems at runtime. This update adds extra check to avoid creating self-closing i18n instructions (create i18nStart and i18nEnd instructions instead) when styling instructions are present.
PR Close#27330
Ngcc will now render additional exports for classes that are referenced in
`NgModule` decorated classes, but which were not publicly exported
from an entry-point of the package.
This is important because when ngtsc compiles libraries processed by ngcc
it needs to be able to publcly access decorated classes that are referenced
by `NgModule` decorated classes in order to build templates that use these
classes.
Doing this re-exporting is not without its risks. There are chances that
the class is not exported correctly: there may already be similarly named
exports from the entry-point or the class may be being aliased. But there
is not much more we can do from the point of view of ngcc to workaround
such scenarios. Generally, packages should have been built so that this
approach works.
PR Close#26906