` tags,
first without a value (yielding the default color) and then with an assigned color value.
` tag.
{@a providers}
## Define dependencies with providers
This section demonstrates how to write providers that deliver dependent services.
In order to get a service from a dependency injector, you have to give it a [token](guide/glossary#token).
Angular usually handles this transaction by specifying a constructor parameter and its type.
The parameter type serves as the injector lookup token.
Angular passes this token to the injector and assigns the result to the parameter.
The following is a typical example.
Angular asks the injector for the service associated with `LoggerService`
and assigns the returned value to the `logger` parameter.
If the injector has already cached an instance of the service associated with the token,
it provides that instance.
If it doesn't, it needs to make one using the provider associated with the token.
If the injector doesn't have a provider for a requested token, it delegates the request
to its parent injector, where the process repeats until there are no more injectors.
If the search fails, the injector throws an error—unless the request was [optional](guide/dependency-injection-in-action#optional).
A new injector has no providers.
Angular initializes the injectors it creates with a set of preferred providers.
You have to configure providers for your own app-specific dependencies.
{@a defining-providers}
### Defining providers
A dependency can't always be created by the default method of instantiating a class.
You learned about some other methods in [Dependency Providers](guide/dependency-injection-providers).
The following `HeroOfTheMonthComponent` example demonstrates many of the alternatives and why you need them.
It's visually simple: a few properties and the logs produced by a logger.
The code behind it customizes how and where the DI framework provides dependencies.
The use cases illustrate different ways to use the [*provide* object literal](guide/dependency-injection-providers#provide) to associate a definition object with a DI token.
The `providers` array shows how you might use the different provider-definition keys;
`useValue`, `useClass`, `useExisting`, or `useFactory`.
{@a usevalue}
#### Value providers: `useValue`
The `useValue` key lets you associate a fixed value with a DI token.
Use this technique to provide *runtime configuration constants* such as website base addresses and feature flags.
You can also use a value provider in a unit test to provide mock data in place of a production data service.
The `HeroOfTheMonthComponent` example has two value providers.
* The first provides an existing instance of the `Hero` class to use for the `Hero` token, rather than
requiring the injector to create a new instance with `new` or use its own cached instance.
Here, the token is the class itself.
* The second specifies a literal string resource to use for the `TITLE` token.
The `TITLE` provider token is *not* a class, but is instead a
special kind of provider lookup key called an [injection token](guide/dependency-injection-in-action#injection-token), represented by
an `InjectionToken` instance.
You can use an injection token for any kind of provider but it's particularly
helpful when the dependency is a simple value like a string, a number, or a function.
The value of a *value provider* must be defined before you specify it here.
The title string literal is immediately available.
The `someHero` variable in this example was set earlier in the file as shown below.
You can't use a variable whose value will be defined later.
Other types of providers can create their values *lazily*; that is, when they're needed for injection.
{@a useclass}
#### Class providers: `useClass`
The `useClass` provider key lets you create and return a new instance of the specified class.
You can use this type of provider to substitute an *alternative implementation*
for a common or default class.
The alternative implementation could, for example, implement a different strategy,
extend the default class, or emulate the behavior of the real class in a test case.
The following code shows two examples in `HeroOfTheMonthComponent`.
The first provider is the *de-sugared*, expanded form of the most typical case in which the
class to be created (`HeroService`) is also the provider's dependency injection token.
The short form is generally preferred; this long form makes the details explicit.
The second provider substitutes `DateLoggerService` for `LoggerService`.
`LoggerService` is already registered at the `AppComponent` level.
When this child component requests `LoggerService`, it receives a `DateLoggerService` instance instead.
This component and its tree of child components receive `DateLoggerService` instance.
Components outside the tree continue to receive the original `LoggerService` instance.
`DateLoggerService` inherits from `LoggerService`; it appends the current date/time to each message:
{@a useexisting}
#### Alias providers: `useExisting`
The `useExisting` provider key lets you map one token to another.
In effect, the first token is an *alias* for the service associated with the second token,
creating two ways to access the same service object.
You can use this technique to narrow an API through an aliasing interface.
The following example shows an alias introduced for that purpose.
Imagine that `LoggerService` had a large API, much larger than the actual three methods and a property.
You might want to shrink that API surface to just the members you actually need.
In this example, the `MinimalLogger` [class-interface](#class-interface) reduces the API to two members:
The following example puts `MinimalLogger` to use in a simplified version of `HeroOfTheMonthComponent`.
The `HeroOfTheMonthComponent` constructor's `logger` parameter is typed as `MinimalLogger`, so only the `logs` and `logInfo` members are visible in a TypeScript-aware editor.
Behind the scenes, Angular sets the `logger` parameter to the full service registered under the `LoggingService` token, which happens to be the `DateLoggerService` instance that was [provided above](guide/dependency-injection-in-action#useclass).
This is illustrated in the following image, which displays the logging date.
{@a usefactory}
#### Factory providers: `useFactory`
The `useFactory` provider key lets you create a dependency object by calling a factory function,
as in the following example.
The injector provides the dependency value by invoking a factory function,
that you provide as the value of the `useFactory` key.
Notice that this form of provider has a third key, `deps`, which specifies
dependencies for the `useFactory` function.
Use this technique to create a dependency object with a factory function
whose inputs are a combination of *injected services* and *local state*.
The dependency object (returned by the factory function) is typically a class instance,
but can be other things as well.
In this example, the dependency object is a string of the names of the runners up
to the "Hero of the Month" contest.
In the example, the local state is the number `2`, the number of runners up that the component should show.
The state value is passed as an argument to `runnersUpFactory()`.
The `runnersUpFactory()` returns the *provider factory function*, which can use both
the passed-in state value and the injected services `Hero` and `HeroService`.
The provider factory function (returned by `runnersUpFactory()`) returns the actual dependency object,
the string of names.
* The function takes a winning `Hero` and a `HeroService` as arguments.
Angular supplies these arguments from injected values identified by
the two *tokens* in the `deps` array.
* The function returns the string of names, which Angular than injects into
the `runnersUp` parameter of `HeroOfTheMonthComponent`.
The function retrieves candidate heroes from the `HeroService`,
takes `2` of them to be the runners-up, and returns their concatenated names.
Look at the
for the full source code.
{@a tokens}
## Provider token alternatives: class interface and 'InjectionToken'
Angular dependency injection is easiest when the provider token is a class
that is also the type of the returned dependency object, or service.
However, a token doesn't have to be a class and even when it is a class,
it doesn't have to be the same type as the returned object.
That's the subject of the next section.
{@a class-interface}
### Class interface
The previous *Hero of the Month* example used the `MinimalLogger` class
as the token for a provider of `LoggerService`.
`MinimalLogger` is an abstract class.
An abstract class is usually a base class that you can extend.
In this app, however there is no class that inherits from `MinimalLogger`.
The `LoggerService` and the `DateLoggerService` could have inherited from `MinimalLogger`,
or they could have implemented it instead, in the manner of an interface.
But they did neither.
`MinimalLogger` is used only as a dependency injection token.
When you use a class this way, it's called a *class interface*.
As mentioned in [DI Providers](guide/dependency-injection-providers#interface-not-valid-token),
an interface is not a valid DI token because it is a TypeScript artifact that doesn't exist at run time.
Use this abstract class interface to get the strong typing of an interface,
and also use it as a provider token in the way you would a normal class.
A class interface should define *only* the members that its consumers are allowed to call.
Such a narrowing interface helps decouple the concrete class from its consumers.
Using a class as an interface gives you the characteristics of an interface in a real JavaScript object.
To minimize memory cost, however, the class should have *no implementation*.
The `MinimalLogger` transpiles to this unoptimized, pre-minified JavaScript for a constructor function.
Notice that it doesn't have any members. It never grows no matter how many members you add to the class,
as long as those members are typed but not implemented.
Look again at the TypeScript `MinimalLogger` class to confirm that it has no implementation.
{@a injection-token}
### 'InjectionToken' objects
Dependency objects can be simple values like dates, numbers and strings, or
shapeless objects like arrays and functions.
Such objects don't have application interfaces and therefore aren't well represented by a class.
They're better represented by a token that is both unique and symbolic,
a JavaScript object that has a friendly name but won't conflict with
another token that happens to have the same name.
`InjectionToken` has these characteristics.
You encountered them twice in the *Hero of the Month* example,
in the *title* value provider and in the *runnersUp* factory provider.
You created the `TITLE` token like this:
The type parameter, while optional, conveys the dependency's type to developers and tooling.
The token description is another developer aid.
{@a di-inheritance}
## Inject into a derived class
Take care when writing a component that inherits from another component.
If the base component has injected dependencies,
you must re-provide and re-inject them in the derived class
and then pass them down to the base class through the constructor.
In this contrived example, `SortedHeroesComponent` inherits from `HeroesBaseComponent`
to display a *sorted* list of heroes.
The `HeroesBaseComponent` can stand on its own.
It demands its own instance of `HeroService` to get heroes
and displays them in the order they arrive from the database.
### Keep constructors simple
Constructors should do little more than initialize variables.
This rule makes the component safe to construct under test without fear that it will do something dramatic like talk to the server.
That's why you call the `HeroService` from within the `ngOnInit` rather than the constructor.
Users want to see the heroes in alphabetical order.
Rather than modify the original component, sub-class it and create a
`SortedHeroesComponent` that sorts the heroes before presenting them.
The `SortedHeroesComponent` lets the base class fetch the heroes.
Unfortunately, Angular cannot inject the `HeroService` directly into the base class.
You must provide the `HeroService` again for *this* component,
then pass it down to the base class inside the constructor.
Now take note of the `afterGetHeroes()` method.
Your first instinct might have been to create an `ngOnInit` method in `SortedHeroesComponent` and do the sorting there.
But Angular calls the *derived* class's `ngOnInit` *before* calling the base class's `ngOnInit`
so you'd be sorting the heroes array *before they arrived*. That produces a nasty error.
Overriding the base class's `afterGetHeroes()` method solves the problem.
These complications argue for *avoiding component inheritance*.
{@a forwardref}
## Break circularities with a forward class reference (*forwardRef*)
The order of class declaration matters in TypeScript.
You can't refer directly to a class until it's been defined.
This isn't usually a problem, especially if you adhere to the recommended *one class per file* rule.
But sometimes circular references are unavoidable.
You're in a bind when class 'A' refers to class 'B' and 'B' refers to 'A'.
One of them has to be defined first.
The Angular `forwardRef()` function creates an *indirect* reference that Angular can resolve later.
The *Parent Finder* sample is full of circular class references that are impossible to break.
You face this dilemma when a class makes *a reference to itself*
as does `AlexComponent` in its `providers` array.
The `providers` array is a property of the `@Component()` decorator function which must
appear *above* the class definition.
Break the circularity with `forwardRef`.