opensearch-docs-cn/_query-dsl/compound/function-score.md

829 lines
25 KiB
Markdown
Raw Normal View History

---
layout: default
Add score normalization and combination documentation (#4985) * Add search phase results processor Signed-off-by: Fanit Kolchina <kolchfa@amazon.com> * Add hybrid query Signed-off-by: Fanit Kolchina <kolchfa@amazon.com> * Normalization processor additions Signed-off-by: Fanit Kolchina <kolchfa@amazon.com> * Add more details Signed-off-by: Fanit Kolchina <kolchfa@amazon.com> * Continue writing Signed-off-by: Fanit Kolchina <kolchfa@amazon.com> * Add more query then fetch details and diagram Signed-off-by: Fanit Kolchina <kolchfa@amazon.com> * Small rewording Signed-off-by: Fanit Kolchina <kolchfa@amazon.com> * Leaner left nav headers Signed-off-by: Fanit Kolchina <kolchfa@amazon.com> * Tech review feedback Signed-off-by: Fanit Kolchina <kolchfa@amazon.com> * Add semantic search tutorial Signed-off-by: Fanit Kolchina <kolchfa@amazon.com> * Reworded prerequisites Signed-off-by: Fanit Kolchina <kolchfa@amazon.com> * Removed comma Signed-off-by: Fanit Kolchina <kolchfa@amazon.com> * Rewording advanced prerequisites Signed-off-by: Fanit Kolchina <kolchfa@amazon.com> * Changed searching for ML model to shorter request Signed-off-by: Fanit Kolchina <kolchfa@amazon.com> * Update task type in register model response Signed-off-by: Fanit Kolchina <kolchfa@amazon.com> * Changing example Signed-off-by: Fanit Kolchina <kolchfa@amazon.com> * Added huggingface prefix to model names Signed-off-by: Fanit Kolchina <kolchfa@amazon.com> * Change example responses Signed-off-by: Fanit Kolchina <kolchfa@amazon.com> * Added note about huggingface prefix Signed-off-by: Fanit Kolchina <kolchfa@amazon.com> * Update _ml-commons-plugin/semantic-search.md Co-authored-by: Naarcha-AWS <97990722+Naarcha-AWS@users.noreply.github.com> Signed-off-by: kolchfa-aws <105444904+kolchfa-aws@users.noreply.github.com> * Implemented doc review comments Signed-off-by: Fanit Kolchina <kolchfa@amazon.com> * List weights under parameters Signed-off-by: Fanit Kolchina <kolchfa@amazon.com> * Remove one-shard warning for normalization processor Signed-off-by: Fanit Kolchina <kolchfa@amazon.com> * Apply suggestions from code review Co-authored-by: Nathan Bower <nbower@amazon.com> Signed-off-by: kolchfa-aws <105444904+kolchfa-aws@users.noreply.github.com> * Implemented editorial comments Signed-off-by: Fanit Kolchina <kolchfa@amazon.com> * Change links Signed-off-by: Fanit Kolchina <kolchfa@amazon.com> * More editorial feedback Signed-off-by: Fanit Kolchina <kolchfa@amazon.com> * Change model-serving framework to ML framework Signed-off-by: Fanit Kolchina <kolchfa@amazon.com> * Use get model API to check model status Signed-off-by: Fanit Kolchina <kolchfa@amazon.com> * Implemented tech review comments Signed-off-by: Fanit Kolchina <kolchfa@amazon.com> * Added neural search description and diagram Signed-off-by: Fanit Kolchina <kolchfa@amazon.com> * More editorial comments Signed-off-by: Fanit Kolchina <kolchfa@amazon.com> * Add link to profile API Signed-off-by: Fanit Kolchina <kolchfa@amazon.com> * Addressed more tech review comments Signed-off-by: Fanit Kolchina <kolchfa@amazon.com> * Implemented editorial comments on changes Signed-off-by: Fanit Kolchina <kolchfa@amazon.com> --------- Signed-off-by: Fanit Kolchina <kolchfa@amazon.com> Signed-off-by: kolchfa-aws <105444904+kolchfa-aws@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Naarcha-AWS <97990722+Naarcha-AWS@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Nathan Bower <nbower@amazon.com>
2023-09-22 17:29:58 -04:00
title: Function score
parent: Compound queries
grand_parent: Query DSL
nav_order: 60
has_math: true
redirect_from:
- /query-dsl/query-dsl/compound/function-score/
---
Add full-text query documentation (#5428) * Refactor full-text query documentation Signed-off-by: Fanit Kolchina <kolchfa@amazon.com> * Add examples and parameter descriptions Signed-off-by: Fanit Kolchina <kolchfa@amazon.com> * Add multi-match query Signed-off-by: Fanit Kolchina <kolchfa@amazon.com> * Add query string field format Signed-off-by: Fanit Kolchina <kolchfa@amazon.com> * Query string examples Signed-off-by: Fanit Kolchina <kolchfa@amazon.com> * Add regular expressions and fuzziness Signed-off-by: Fanit Kolchina <kolchfa@amazon.com> * Add wildcard and regex warning Signed-off-by: Fanit Kolchina <kolchfa@amazon.com> * Added more query string format Signed-off-by: Fanit Kolchina <kolchfa@amazon.com> * Added multi-field sections Signed-off-by: Fanit Kolchina <kolchfa@amazon.com> * Rewrite minimum should match section Signed-off-by: Fanit Kolchina <kolchfa@amazon.com> * Added allow expensive queries section Signed-off-by: Fanit Kolchina <kolchfa@amazon.com> * Add simple query string query Signed-off-by: Fanit Kolchina <kolchfa@amazon.com> * Small rewrites Signed-off-by: Fanit Kolchina <kolchfa@amazon.com> * Add intervals query Signed-off-by: Fanit Kolchina <kolchfa@amazon.com> * Include discover in query string syntax Signed-off-by: Fanit Kolchina <kolchfa@amazon.com> * Link and index page fix Signed-off-by: Fanit Kolchina <kolchfa@amazon.com> * Apply suggestions from code review Co-authored-by: Melissa Vagi <vagimeli@amazon.com> Signed-off-by: kolchfa-aws <105444904+kolchfa-aws@users.noreply.github.com> * Implemented editorial comments Signed-off-by: Fanit Kolchina <kolchfa@amazon.com> --------- Signed-off-by: Fanit Kolchina <kolchfa@amazon.com> Signed-off-by: kolchfa-aws <105444904+kolchfa-aws@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Melissa Vagi <vagimeli@amazon.com>
2023-11-01 09:29:13 -04:00
# Function score query
Use a `function_score` query if you need to alter the relevance scores of documents returned in the results. A `function_score` query defines a query and one or more functions that can be applied to all results or subsets of the results to recalculate their relevance scores.
## Using one scoring function
The most basic example of a `function_score` query uses one function to recalculate the score. The following query uses a `weight` function to double all relevance scores. This function applies to all documents in the results because there is no `query` parameter specified within `function_score`:
```json
GET shakespeare/_search
{
"query": {
"function_score": {
"weight": "2"
}
}
}
```
{% include copy-curl.html %}
## Applying the scoring function to a subset of documents
To apply the scoring function to a subset of documents, provide a query within the function:
```json
GET shakespeare/_search
{
"query": {
"function_score": {
"query": {
"match": {
"play_name": "Hamlet"
}
},
"weight": "2"
}
}
}
```
{% include copy-curl.html %}
## Supported functions
The `function_score` query type supports the following functions:
- Built-in:
- `weight`: Multiplies a document score by a predefined boost factor.
- `random_score`: Provides a random score that is consistent for a single user but different between users.
- `field_value_factor`: Uses the value of the specified document field to recalculate the score.
- Decay functions (`gauss`, `exp`, and `linear`): Recalculates the score using a specified decay function.
- Custom:
- `script_score`: Uses a script to score documents.
## The weight function
When you use the `weight` function, the original relevance score is multiplied by the floating-point value of `weight`:
```json
GET shakespeare/_search
{
"query": {
"function_score": {
"weight": "2"
}
}
}
```
{% include copy-curl.html %}
Unlike the `boost` value, the `weight` function is not normalized.
## The random score function
The `random_score` function provides a random score that is consistent for a single user but different between users. The score is a floating-point number in the [0, 1) range. By default, the `random_score` function uses internal Lucene document IDs as seed values, making random values irreproducible because documents can be renumbered after merges. To achieve consistency in generating random values, you can provide `seed` and `field` parameters. The `field` must be a field for which `fielddata` is enabled (commonly, a numeric field). The score is calculated using the `seed`, the `fielddata` values for the `field`, and a salt calculated using the index name and shard ID. Because the index name and shard ID are the same for documents that reside in the same shard, documents with the same `field` values will be assigned the same score. To ensure different scores for all documents in the same shard, use a `field` that has unique values for all documents. One option is to use the `_seq_no` field. However, if you choose this field, the scores can change if the document is updated because of the corresponding `_seq_no` update.
The following query uses the `random_score` function with a `seed` and `field`:
```json
GET blogs/_search
{
"query": {
"function_score": {
"random_score": {
"seed": 20,
"field": "_seq_no"
}
}
}
}
```
{% include copy-curl.html %}
## The field value factor function
The `field_value_factor` function recalculates the score using the value of the specified document field. If the field is a multi-valued field, only its first value is used for calculations, and the others are not considered.
The `field_value_factor` function supports the following options:
- `field`: The field to use in score calculations.
- `factor`: An optional factor by which the field value is multiplied. Default is 1.
- `modifier`: One of the modifiers to apply to the field value $$v$$. The following table lists all supported modifiers.
Modifier | Formula | Description
:--- | :--- | :---
`log`| $$\log v$$ | Take the base-10 logarithm of the value. Taking a logarithm of a non-positive number is an illegal operation and will result in an error. For values between 0 (exclusive) and 1 (inclusive), this function returns non-negative values that will result in an error. We recommend using `log1p` or `log2p` instead of `log`.
`log1p`| $$\log (1 + v)$$ | Take the base-10 logarithm of the sum of 1 and the value.
`log2p`| $$\log (2 + v)$$ | Take the base-10 logarithm of the sum of 2 and the value.
`ln`| $$\ln v$$ | Take the natural logarithm of the value. Taking a logarithm of a non-positive number is an illegal operation and will result in an error. For values between 0 (exclusive) and 1 (inclusive), this function returns non-negative values that will result in an error. We recommend using `ln1p` or `ln2p` instead of `ln`.
`ln1p`| $$\ln (1 + v)$$ | Take the natural logarithm of the sum of 1 and the value.
`ln2p`| $$\ln (2 + v)$$ | Take the natural logarithm of the sum of 2 and the value.
`reciprocal`| $$\frac {1}{v}$$ | Take the reciprocal of the value.
`square`| $$v^2$$ | Square the value.
`sqrt`| $$\sqrt v$$ | Take the square root of the value. Taking a square root of a negative number is an illegal operation and will result in an error. Ensure that $$v$$ is non-negative.
`none`| N/A | Do not apply any modifier.
- `missing`: The value to use if the field is missing from the document. The `factor` and `modifier` are applied to this value instead of the missing field value.
For example, the following query uses the `field_value_factor` function to give more weight to the `views` field:
```json
GET blogs/_search
{
"query": {
"function_score": {
"field_value_factor": {
"field": "views",
"factor": 1.5,
"modifier": "log1p",
"missing": 1
}
}
}
}
```
{% include copy-curl.html %}
The preceding query calculates the relevance score using the following formula:
$$ \text{score} = \text{original score} \cdot \log(1 + 1.5 \cdot \text{views}) $$
## The script score function
Using the `script_score` function, you can write a custom script for scoring documents, optionally incorporating values of fields in the document. The original relevance score is accessible in the `_score` variable.
The calculated score cannot be negative. A negative score will result in an error. Document scores have positive 32-bit floating-point values. A score with greater precision is converted to the nearest 32-bit floating-point number.
{: .important}
For example, the following query uses the `script_score` function to calculate the score based on the original score and the number of views and likes for the blog post. To give the number of views and likes a lesser weight, this formula takes the logarithm of the sum of views and likes. To make the logarithm valid even if the number of views and likes is `0`, `1` is added to their sum:
```json
GET blogs/_search
{
"query": {
"function_score": {
"query": {"match": {"name": "opensearch"}},
"script_score": {
"script": "_score * Math.log(1 + doc['likes'].value + doc['views'].value)"
}
}
}
}
```
{% include copy-curl.html %}
Scripts are compiled and cached for faster performance. Thus, it's preferable to reuse the same script and pass any parameters that the script needs:
```json
GET blogs/_search
{
"query": {
"function_score": {
"query": {
"match": { "name": "opensearch" }
},
"script_score": {
"script": {
"params": {
"add": 1
},
"source": "_score * Math.log(params.add + doc['likes'].value + doc['views'].value)"
}
}
}
}
}
```
{% include copy-curl.html %}
## Decay functions
For many applications, you need to sort the results based on proximity or recency. You can do this with decay functions. Decay functions calculate a document score using one of three decay curves: Gaussian, exponential, or linear.
Decay functions operate only on [numeric]({{site.url}}{{site.baseurl}}/field-types/supported-field-types/numeric/), [date]({{site.url}}{{site.baseurl}}/field-types/supported-field-types/dates/), and [geopoint]({{site.url}}{{site.baseurl}}/field-types/supported-field-types/geo-point/) fields.
{: .important}
Decay functions calculate scores based on the `origin`, `scale`, `offset`, and `decay`, as shown in the following figure.
<img src="{{site.url}}{{site.baseurl}}/images/decay-functions.png" alt="Decay function curves" width="600">
### Example: Geopoint fields
Suppose you're looking for a hotel near your office. You create a `hotels` index that maps the `location` field as a geopoint:
```json
PUT hotels
{
"mappings": {
"properties": {
"location": {
"type": "geo_point"
}
}
}
}
```
{% include copy-curl.html %}
You index two documents that correspond to nearby hotels:
```json
PUT hotels/_doc/1
{
"name": "Hotel Within 200",
"location": {
"lat": 40.7105,
"lon": 74.00
}
}
```
{% include copy-curl.html %}
```json
PUT hotels/_doc/2
{
"name": "Hotel Outside 500",
"location": {
"lat": 40.7115,
"lon": 74.00
}
}
```
{% include copy-curl.html %}
The `origin` defines the point from which the distance is calculated (the office location). The `offset` specifies the distance from the origin within which documents are given a full score of 1. You can give hotels within 200 ft of the office the same highest score. The `scale` defines the decay rate of the graph, and the `decay` defines the score to assign to a document at the `scale` + `offset` distance from the origin. Once you are outside the 200 ft radius, you may decide that if you have to walk another 300 ft to get to a hotel (`scale` = 300 ft), you'll assign it one quarter of the original score (`decay` = 0.25).
You create the following query with the `origin` at (74.00, 40.71):
```json
GET hotels/_search
{
"query": {
"function_score": {
"functions": [
{
"exp": {
"location": {
"origin": "40.71,74.00",
"offset": "200ft",
"scale": "300ft",
"decay": 0.25
}
}
}
]
}
}
}
```
{% include copy-curl.html %}
The response contains both hotels. The hotel within 200 ft of the office has a score of 1, and the hotel outside of the 500 ft radius has a score 0.20, which is less than the `decay` parameter 0.25:
<details open markdown="block">
<summary>
Response
</summary>
{: .text-delta}
```json
{
"took": 854,
"timed_out": false,
"_shards": {
"total": 1,
"successful": 1,
"skipped": 0,
"failed": 0
},
"hits": {
"total": {
"value": 2,
"relation": "eq"
},
"max_score": 1,
"hits": [
{
"_index": "hotels",
"_id": "1",
"_score": 1,
"_source": {
"name": "Hotel Within 200",
"location": {
"lat": 40.7105,
"lon": 74
}
}
},
{
"_index": "hotels",
"_id": "2",
"_score": 0.20099315,
"_source": {
"name": "Hotel Outside 500",
"location": {
"lat": 40.7115,
"lon": 74
}
}
}
]
}
}
```
</details>
### Parameters
The following table lists all parameters supported by the `gauss`, `exp`, and `linear` functions.
Parameter | Description
:--- | :---
`origin` | The point from which to calculate the distance. Must be provided as a number for numeric fields, a date for date fields, or a geopoint for geopoint fields. Required for geopoint and numeric fields. Optional for date fields (defaults to `now`). For date fields, date math is supported (for example, `now-2d`).
`offset` | Defines the distance from the origin within which documents are given a score of 1. Optional. Default is 0.
`scale` | Documents at the distance of `scale` + `offset` from the `origin` are assigned a score of `decay`. Required. <br>For numeric fields, `scale` can be any number. <br>For date fields, `scale` can be defined as a number with [units]({{site.url}}{{site.baseurl}}/api-reference/units/) (`5h`, `1d`). If units are not provided, `scale` defaults to milliseconds. <br>For geopoint fields, `scale` can be defined as a number with [units]({{site.url}}{{site.baseurl}}/api-reference/units/) (`1mi`, `5km`). If units are not provided, `scale` defaults to meters.
`decay` | Defines the score of a document at the distance of `scale` + `offset` from the `origin`. Optional. Default is 0.5.
For fields that are missing from the document, decay functions return a score of 1.
{: .note}
### Example: Numeric fields
The following query uses the exponential decay function to prioritize blog posts by the number of comments:
```json
GET blogs/_search
{
"query": {
"function_score": {
"functions": [
{
"exp": {
"comments": {
"origin": "20",
"offset": "5",
"scale": "10"
}
}
}
]
}
}
}
```
{% include copy-curl.html %}
The first two blog posts in the results have a score of 1 because one is at the origin (20) and the other is at a distance of 16, which is within the offset (the range within which documents receive a full score is calculated as 20 $$\pm$$ 5 and is [15, 25]). The third blog post is at a distance of `scale` + `offset` from the `origin` (20 &minus; (5 + 10) = 15), so it's given the default `decay` score (0.5):
<details open markdown="block">
<summary>
Response
</summary>
{: .text-delta}
```json
{
"took": 3,
"timed_out": false,
"_shards": {
"total": 1,
"successful": 1,
"skipped": 0,
"failed": 0
},
"hits": {
"total": {
"value": 4,
"relation": "eq"
},
"max_score": 1,
"hits": [
{
"_index": "blogs",
"_id": "1",
"_score": 1,
"_source": {
"name": "Semantic search in OpenSearch",
"views": 1200,
"likes": 150,
"comments": 16,
"date_posted": "2022-04-17"
}
},
{
"_index": "blogs",
"_id": "2",
"_score": 1,
"_source": {
"name": "Get started with OpenSearch 2.7",
"views": 1400,
"likes": 100,
"comments": 20,
"date_posted": "2022-05-02"
}
},
{
"_index": "blogs",
"_id": "3",
"_score": 0.5,
"_source": {
"name": "Distributed tracing with Data Prepper",
"views": 800,
"likes": 50,
"comments": 5,
"date_posted": "2022-04-25"
}
},
{
"_index": "blogs",
"_id": "4",
"_score": 0.4352753,
"_source": {
"name": "A very old blog",
"views": 100,
"likes": 20,
"comments": 3,
"date_posted": "2000-04-25"
}
}
]
}
}
```
</details>
### Example: Date fields
The following query uses the Gaussian decay function to prioritize blog posts published around 04/24/2002:
```json
GET blogs/_search
{
"query": {
"function_score": {
"functions": [
{
"gauss": {
"date_posted": {
"origin": "2022-04-24",
"offset": "1d",
"scale": "6d",
"decay": 0.25
}
}
}
]
}
}
}
```
{% include copy-curl.html %}
In the results, the first blog post was published within one day of 04/24/2022, so it has the highest score of 1. The second blog post was published on 04/17/2022, which is within `offset` + `scale` (`1d` + `6d`) and therefore has a score equal to `decay` (0.25). The third blog post was published more than 7 days after 04/24/2022, so it has a lower score. The last blog post has a score of 0 because it was published years ago:
<details open markdown="block">
<summary>
Response
</summary>
{: .text-delta}
```json
{
"took": 2,
"timed_out": false,
"_shards": {
"total": 1,
"successful": 1,
"skipped": 0,
"failed": 0
},
"hits": {
"total": {
"value": 4,
"relation": "eq"
},
"max_score": 1,
"hits": [
{
"_index": "blogs",
"_id": "3",
"_score": 1,
"_source": {
"name": "Distributed tracing with Data Prepper",
"views": 800,
"likes": 50,
"comments": 5,
"date_posted": "2022-04-25"
}
},
{
"_index": "blogs",
"_id": "1",
"_score": 0.25,
"_source": {
"name": "Semantic search in OpenSearch",
"views": 1200,
"likes": 150,
"comments": 16,
"date_posted": "2022-04-17"
}
},
{
"_index": "blogs",
"_id": "2",
"_score": 0.15154076,
"_source": {
"name": "Get started with OpenSearch 2.7",
"views": 1400,
"likes": 100,
"comments": 20,
"date_posted": "2022-05-02"
}
},
{
"_index": "blogs",
"_id": "4",
"_score": 0,
"_source": {
"name": "A very old blog",
"views": 100,
"likes": 20,
"comments": 3,
"date_posted": "2000-04-25"
}
}
]
}
}
```
</details>
### Multi-valued fields
If the field that you specify for decay calculation contains multiple values, you can use the `multi_value_mode` parameter. This parameter specifies one of the following functions to determine the field value that is used for calculations:
- `min`: (Default) The minimum distance from the `origin`.
- `max`: The maximum distance from the `origin`.
- `avg`: The average distance from the `origin`.
- `sum`: The sum of all distances from the `origin`.
For example, you index a document with an array of distances:
```json
PUT testindex/_doc/1
{
"distances": [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
}
```
The following query uses the `max` distance of a multi-valued field `distances` to calculate decay:
```json
GET testindex/_search
{
"query": {
"function_score": {
"functions": [
{
"exp": {
"distances": {
"origin": "6",
"offset": "5",
"scale": "1"
},
"multi_value_mode": "max"
}
}
]
}
}
}
```
{% include copy-curl.html %}
The document is given a score of 1 because the maximum distance from the origin (1) is within the `offset` from the `origin`:
```json
{
"took": 3,
"timed_out": false,
"_shards": {
"total": 1,
"successful": 1,
"skipped": 0,
"failed": 0
},
"hits": {
"total": {
"value": 1,
"relation": "eq"
},
"max_score": 1,
"hits": [
{
"_index": "testindex",
"_id": "1",
"_score": 1,
"_source": {
"distances": [
1,
2,
3,
4,
5
]
}
}
]
}
}
```
### Decay curve calculation
The following formulas define score computation for various decay functions ($$v$$ denotes the document field value).
**Gaussian**
$$ \text{score} = \exp \left(-\frac {(\max(0, \lvert v - \text{origin} \rvert - \text{offset}))^2} {2\sigma^2} \right), $$
where $$\sigma$$ is calculated to ensure that the score is equal to `decay` at the distance `offset` + `scale` from the `origin`:
$$ \sigma^2 = - \frac {\text{scale}^2} {2 \ln(\text{decay})} $$
**Exponential**
$$ \text{score} = \exp (\lambda \cdot \max(0, \lvert v - \text{origin} \rvert - \text{offset})),$$
where $$\lambda$$ is calculated to ensure that the score is equal to `decay` at the distance `offset` + `scale` from the `origin`:
$$\lambda = \frac {\ln(\text{decay})} {\text{scale}} $$
**Linear**
$$ \text{score} = \max \left(\frac {s - \max(0, \lvert v - \text{origin} \rvert - \text{offset})} {s} \right), $$
where $$s$$ is calculated to ensure that the score is equal to `decay` at the distance `offset` + `scale` from the `origin`:
$$s = \frac {\text{scale}} {1 - \text{decay}}$$
## Using multiple scoring functions
You can specify multiple scoring functions in a function score query by listing them in the `functions` array.
### Combining scores from multiple functions
Different functions can use different scales for scoring. For example, the `random_score` function provides a score between 0 and 1, but the `field_value_factor` does not have a specific scale for the score. Additionally, you may want to weigh scores given by different functions differently. To adjust scores for different functions, you can specify the `weight` parameter for each function. The score given by each function is then multiplied by the `weight` to produce the final score for that function. The `weight` parameter must be provided in the `functions` array in order to differentiate it from the [weight function](#the-weight-function),
The scores given by each function are combined using the `score_mode` parameter, which takes one of the following values:
- `multiply`: (Default) Scores are multiplied.
- `sum`: Scores are added.
- `avg`: Scores are averaged. If `weight` is specified, this is a [weighted average](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weighted_arithmetic_mean). For example, if the first function with the weight $$1$$ returns the score $$10$$, and the second function with the weight $$4$$ returns the score $$20$$, the average is calculated as $$\frac {10 \cdot 1 + 20 \cdot 4}{1 + 4} = 18$$.
- `first`: The score from the first function that has a matching filter is taken.
- `max`: The maximum score is taken.
- `min`: The minimum score is taken.
### Specifying an upper limit for a score
You can specify an upper limit for a function score in the `max_boost` parameter. The default upper limit is the maximum magnitude for a `float` value: (2 &minus; 2<sup>&minus;23</sup>) &middot; 2<sup>127</sup>.
### Combining the score for all functions with the query score
You can specify how the score computed using all functions is combined with the query score in the `boost_mode` parameter, which takes one of the following values:
- `multiply`: (Default) Multiply the query score by the function score.
- `replace`: Ignore the query score and use the function score.
- `sum`: Add the query score and the function score.
- `avg`: Average the query score and the function score.
- `max`: Take the greater of the query score and the function score.
- `min`: Take the lesser of the query score and the function score.
### Filtering documents that don't meet a threshold
Changing the relevance score does not change the list of matching documents. To exclude some documents that don't meet a threshold, specify the threshold value in the `min_score` parameter. All documents returned by the query are then scored and filtered using the threshold value.
### Example
The following request searches for blog posts that include the words "OpenSearch Data Prepper", preferring the posts published around 04/24/2022. Additionally, the number of views and likes are taken into consideration. Finally, the cutoff threshold is set at the score of 10:
```json
GET blogs/_search
{
"query": {
"function_score": {
"boost": "5",
"functions": [
{
"gauss": {
"date_posted": {
"origin": "2022-04-24",
"offset": "1d",
"scale": "6d"
}
},
"weight": 1
},
{
"gauss": {
"likes": {
"origin": 200,
"scale": 200
}
},
"weight": 4
},
{
"gauss": {
"views": {
"origin": 1000,
"scale": 800
}
},
"weight": 2
}
],
"query": {
"match": {
"name": "opensearch data prepper"
}
},
"max_boost": 10,
"score_mode": "max",
"boost_mode": "multiply",
"min_score": 10
}
}
}
```
{% include copy-curl.html %}
The results contain the three matching blog posts:
<details open markdown="block">
<summary>
Response
</summary>
{: .text-delta}
```json
{
"took": 14,
"timed_out": false,
"_shards": {
"total": 1,
"successful": 1,
"skipped": 0,
"failed": 0
},
"hits": {
"total": {
"value": 3,
"relation": "eq"
},
"max_score": 31.191923,
"hits": [
{
"_index": "blogs",
"_id": "3",
"_score": 31.191923,
"_source": {
"name": "Distributed tracing with Data Prepper",
"views": 800,
"likes": 50,
"comments": 5,
"date_posted": "2022-04-25"
}
},
{
"_index": "blogs",
"_id": "1",
"_score": 13.907352,
"_source": {
"name": "Semantic search in OpenSearch",
"views": 1200,
"likes": 150,
"comments": 16,
"date_posted": "2022-04-17"
}
},
{
"_index": "blogs",
"_id": "2",
"_score": 11.150461,
"_source": {
"name": "Get started with OpenSearch 2.7",
"views": 1400,
"likes": 100,
"comments": 20,
"date_posted": "2022-05-02"
}
}
]
}
}
```
</details>