website: document keep_input_artifact
This commit is contained in:
parent
439cfb4ded
commit
ee5fad3769
|
@ -89,3 +89,39 @@ compressed then uploaded, but the compressed result is not kept.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
As you may be able to imagine, the **simple** and **detailed** definitions
|
As you may be able to imagine, the **simple** and **detailed** definitions
|
||||||
are simply shortcuts for a **sequence** definition of only one element.
|
are simply shortcuts for a **sequence** definition of only one element.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Input Artifacts
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
When using post-processors, the input artifact (coming from a builder or
|
||||||
|
another post-proccessor) is discarded by default after the post-processor runs.
|
||||||
|
This is because generally, you don't want the intermediary artifacts on the
|
||||||
|
way to the final artifact created.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
In some cases, however, you may want to keep the intermediary artifacts.
|
||||||
|
You can tell Packer to keep these artifacts by setting the
|
||||||
|
`keep_input_artifact` configuration to `true`. An example is shown below:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
<pre class="prettyprint">
|
||||||
|
{
|
||||||
|
"post-processors": [
|
||||||
|
{
|
||||||
|
"type": "compress",
|
||||||
|
"keep_input_artifact": true
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
]
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
</pre>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
This setting will only keep the input artifact to _that specific_
|
||||||
|
post-processor. If you're specifying a sequence of post-processors, then
|
||||||
|
all intermediaries are discarded by default except for the input artifacts
|
||||||
|
to post-processors that explicitly state to keep the input artifact.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
<div class="alert alert-info alert-block">
|
||||||
|
<strong>Note:</strong> The intuitive reader may be wondering what happens
|
||||||
|
if multiple post-processors are specified (not in a sequence). Does Packer require the
|
||||||
|
configuration to keep the input artifact on all the post-processors?
|
||||||
|
The answer is no, of course not. Packer is smart enough to figure out
|
||||||
|
that at least one post-processor requested that the input be kept, so it will keep
|
||||||
|
it around.
|
||||||
|
</div>
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue