packer-cn/website/pages/docs/from-1.5/syntax-json.mdx

311 lines
11 KiB
Plaintext

---
layout: docs
page_title: JSON Configuration Syntax - Configuration Language
sidebar_title: JSON Syntax
description: |-
In addition to the native syntax that is most commonly used with Packer,
the HCL language can also be expressed in a JSON-compatible syntax.
---
# JSON Configuration Syntax
`@include 'from-1.5/beta-hcl2-note.mdx'`
Most Packer configurations are written in [the native HCL
syntax](/docs/from-1.5/syntax), which is designed to be easy for humans to read and
update.
Packer also supports an alternative syntax that is JSON-compatible. This
syntax is useful when generating portions of a configuration programmatically,
since existing JSON libraries can be used to prepare the generated
configuration files.
This syntax is not to be confused with the pre-version-1.5 "legacy" Packer
templates, which were exclusively JSON and follow a different format.
The JSON syntax is defined in terms of the native syntax. Everything that can
be expressed in native syntax can also be expressed in JSON syntax, but some
constructs are more complex to represent in JSON due to limitations of the
JSON grammar.
Packer expects native syntax for files named with a `.pkr.hcl` suffix, and JSON
syntax for files named with a `.pkr.json` suffix. If you leave out the `.pkr`
portion of suffix, Packer will try to read your json file as a legacy Packer
template.
The low-level JSON syntax, just as with the native syntax, is defined in terms
of a specification called _HCL_. It is not necessary to know all of the details
of HCL syntax or its JSON mapping in order to use Packer, and so this page
summarizes the most important differences between native and JSON syntax. If
you are interested, you can find a full definition of HCL's JSON syntax in [its
specification](https://github.com/hashicorp/hcl/blob/hcl2/hclsyntax/spec.md).
## JSON File Structure
At the root of any JSON-based Packer configuration is a JSON object. The
properties of this object correspond to the top-level block types of the
Packer language. For example:
```json
{
"variables": {
"example": "value"
}
}
```
Each top-level object property must match the name of one of the expected
top-level block types. Block types that expect labels, such as `variable` shown
above, are represented by one nested object value for each level of label.
`source` blocks expect two labels, so two levels of nesting are required:
```json
{
"source": {
"amazon-ebs": {
"example": {
"instance_type": "t2.micro",
"ami_name": "ami-abc123"
}
}
}
}
```
After any nested objects representing the labels, finally one more nested
object represents the body of the block itself. In the above example the
`instance_type` and `ami_name` arguments for `source "amazon-ebs" "example"`
are specified.
Taken together, the above two configuration files are equivalent to the
following blocks in the native syntax:
```hcl
variables {
example = "value"
}
source "amazon-ebs" "example" {
instance_type = "t2.micro"
ami_name = "ami-abc123"
}
```
Within each top-level block type the rules for mapping to JSON are slightly
different (see [block-type-specific exceptions](#block-type-specific-exceptions) below), but the following general rules apply in most cases:
- The JSON object representing the block body contains properties that
correspond either to argument names or to nested block type names.
- Where a property corresponds to an argument that accepts
[arbitrary expressions](/docs/from-1.5/expressions) in the native syntax, the
property value is mapped to an expression as described under
[_Expression Mapping_](#expression-mapping) below. For arguments that
do _not_ accept arbitrary expressions, the interpretation of the property
value depends on the argument, as described in the
[block-type-specific exceptions](#block-type-specific-exceptions)
given later in this page.
- Where a property name corresponds to an expected nested block type name,
the value is interpreted as described under
[_Nested Block Mapping_](#nested-block-mapping) below, unless otherwise
stated in [the block-type-specific exceptions](#block-type-specific-exceptions)
given later in this page.
## Expression Mapping
Since JSON grammar is not able to represent all of the Packer language
[expression syntax](/docs/from-1.5/expressions), JSON values interpreted as expressions
are mapped as follows:
| JSON | Packer Language Interpretation |
| ------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| Boolean | A literal `bool` value. |
| Number | A literal `number` value. |
| String | Parsed as a [string template](/docs/from-1.5/expressions#string-templates) and then evaluated as described below. |
| Object | Each property value is mapped per this table, producing an `object(...)` value with suitable attribute types. |
| Array | Each element is mapped per this table, producing a `tuple(...)` value with suitable element types. |
| Null | A literal `null`. |
When a JSON string is encountered in a location where arbitrary expressions are
expected, its value is first parsed as a [string template](/docs/from-1.5/expressions#string-templates)
and then it is evaluated to produce the final result.
If the given template consists _only_ of a single interpolation sequence,
the result of its expression is taken directly, without first converting it
to a string. This allows non-string expressions to be used within the
JSON syntax.
## Nested Block Mapping
When a JSON object property is named after a nested block type, the value
of this property represents one or more blocks of that type. The value of
the property must be either a JSON object or a JSON array.
The simplest situation is representing only a single block of the given type
when that type expects no labels, as with the `tags` nested block used
within `source` blocks:
```json
{
"source": {
"amazon-ebs": {
"example": {
"tags": {
"key": "value"
}
}
}
}
}
```
The above is equivalent to the following native syntax configuration:
```hcl
source "amazon-ebs" "example" {
tags = {
key = "value"
}
}
```
When the nested block type requires one or more labels, or when multiple
blocks of the same type can be given, the mapping gets a little more
complicated. For example, the `provisioner` nested block type used
within `build` blocks expects a label giving the provisioner to use,
and the ordering of provisioner blocks is significant to decide the order
of operations.
The following native syntax example shows a `build` block with a number
of provisioners of different types:
```hcl
build {
# (source configuration omitted for brevity)
provisioner "shell-local" {
inline = ["echo 'Hello World' >example.txt"]
}
provisioner "file" {
source = "example.txt"
destination = "/tmp/example.txt"
}
provisioner "shell" {
inline = [
"sudo install-something -f /tmp/example.txt",
]
}
}
```
In order to preserve the order of these blocks, you must use a JSON array
as the direct value of the property representing this block type, as in
this JSON equivalent of the above:
```json
{
"build": {
"//": "(source configuration omitted for brevity)",
"provisioner": [
{
"shell-local": {
"inline": ["echo 'Hello World' >example.txt"]
}
},
{
"file": {
"source": "example.txt",
"destination": "/tmp/example.txt"
}
},
{
"shell": {
"inline": ["sudo install-something -f /tmp/example.txt"]
}
}
]
}
}
```
Each element of the `provisioner` array is an object with a single property
whose name represents the label for each `provisioner` block. For block types
that expect multiple labels, this pattern of alternating array and object
nesting can be used for each additional level.
If a nested block type requires labels but the order does _not_ matter, you
may omit the array and provide just a single object whose property names
correspond to unique block labels. This is allowed as a shorthand for the above
for simple cases, but the alternating array and object approach is the most
general. We recommend using the most general form if systematically converting
from native syntax to JSON, to ensure that the meaning of the configuration is
preserved exactly.
### Comment Properties
Although we do not recommend hand-editing of JSON syntax configuration files
-- this format is primarily intended for programmatic generation and consumption --
a limited form of _comments_ are allowed inside JSON objects that represent
block bodies using a special property name:
```json
{
"source": {
"amazon-ebs": {
"example": {
"//": "This instance runs the scheduled tasks for backup",
"instance_type": "t2.micro",
"ami_name": "ami-abc123"
}
}
}
}
```
In any object that represents a block body, properties named `"//"` are
ignored by Packer entirely. This exception does _not_ apply to objects
that are being [interpreted as expressions](#expression-mapping), where this
would be interpreted as an object type attribute named `"//"`.
This special property name can also be used at the root of a JSON-based
configuration file. This can be useful to note which program created the file.
```json
{
"//": "This file is generated by generate-outputs.py. DO NOT HAND-EDIT!"
}
```
## Block-type-specific Exceptions
[inpage-block]: #block-type-specific-exceptions
Certain arguments within specific block types are processed in a special way,
and so their mapping to the JSON syntax does not follow the general rules
described above. The following sub-sections describe the special mapping rules
that apply to each top-level block type.
### `variable` blocks
All arguments inside `variable` blocks have non-standard mappings to JSON:
- `type`: a string containing a type expression, like `"string"` or `"list(string)"`.
- `default`: a literal JSON value that can be converted to the given type.
Strings within this value are taken literally and _not_ interpreted as
string templates.
- `description`: a literal JSON string, _not_ interpreted as a template.
```json
{
"variable": {
"example": {
"type": "string",
"default": "hello"
}
}
}
```