136 lines
7.2 KiB
Mathematica
136 lines
7.2 KiB
Mathematica
|
DVBCWPG2 ;ALB/RLC - REVIEW EXAM PTSD WORKSHEET TEXT ; 05/18/2006 12:00pm
|
||
|
;;2.7;AMIE;**87**;Apr 10, 1995;Build 6
|
||
|
;Per VHA Directive 10-92-142, this routine should not be modified
|
||
|
;
|
||
|
TXT ;
|
||
|
;;TOF
|
||
|
;;E. Assessment of PTSD
|
||
|
;;
|
||
|
;; - identify behavioral, cognitive, social, affective, or somatic symptoms
|
||
|
;; veteran attributes to PTSD
|
||
|
;; - describe specific PTSD symptoms present (symptoms of trauma
|
||
|
;; re-experiencing, avoidance/numbing, heightened physiological arousal,
|
||
|
;; and associated features [e.g., disillusionment and demoralization])
|
||
|
;; - specify typical frequency, and severity of symptoms
|
||
|
;;
|
||
|
;;F. Psychometric Testing Results
|
||
|
;;
|
||
|
;; - provide psychological testing if deemed necessary
|
||
|
;; - provide specific evaluation information required by the rating board or
|
||
|
;; on a BVA Remand
|
||
|
;; - comment on validity of psychological test results
|
||
|
;; - provide scores for PTSD psychometric assessments administered
|
||
|
;; - state whether PTSD psychometric measures are consistent or inconsistent
|
||
|
;; with a diagnosis of PTSD, based on normative data and established
|
||
|
;; "cutting scores" (cutting scores that are consistent with or supportive
|
||
|
;; of a PTSD diagnosis are as follows: PCL - not less than 50;
|
||
|
;; Mississippi Scale - not less than 107; MMPI PTSD subscale a score
|
||
|
;; greater than 28; MMPI code type: 2-8 or 2-7-8)
|
||
|
;; - state degree of severity of PTSD symptoms based on psychometric data
|
||
|
;; (mild, moderate, or severe)
|
||
|
;; - describe findings from psychological tests measuring other than
|
||
|
;; PTSD (MMPI, etc.)
|
||
|
;;
|
||
|
;;G. Diagnosis:
|
||
|
;;
|
||
|
;; 1. The Diagnosis must conform to DSM-IV and be supported by the findings
|
||
|
;; on the examination report.
|
||
|
;; 2. If there are multiple mental disorders, discuss the relationship with
|
||
|
;; PTSD.
|
||
|
;; 3. The evaluation is based on the effects of the signs and symptoms on
|
||
|
;; occupational and social functioning.
|
||
|
;;
|
||
|
;; NOTE: VA is prohibited by statute, 38 U.S.C. 1110, from paying
|
||
|
;; compensation for a disability that is a result of the veteran's own
|
||
|
;; ALCOHOL OR DRUG ABUSE. However, when a veteran's alcohol or drug abuse
|
||
|
;; disability is secondary to or is caused or aggravated by a primary
|
||
|
;; service-connected disorder, the veteran may be entitled to compensation.
|
||
|
;; See Allen v. Principi, 237 F.3d 1368, 1381 (Fed. Cir. 2001). Therefore,
|
||
|
;; it is important to determine the relationship, if any, between a
|
||
|
;; service-connected disorder and a disability resulting from the veteran's
|
||
|
;; alcohol or drug abuse. Unless alcohol or drug abuse is secondary to or
|
||
|
;; is caused or aggravated by another mental disorder, you should separate,
|
||
|
;; to the extent possible, the effects of the alcohol or drug abuse from
|
||
|
;; the effects of the other mental disorder(s). If it is not possible
|
||
|
;; to separate the effects in such cases, please explain why.
|
||
|
;;TOF
|
||
|
;;H. Diagnostic Status
|
||
|
;;
|
||
|
;; - Axis I disorders
|
||
|
;; - Axis II disorders
|
||
|
;; - Axis III disorders
|
||
|
;; - Axis IV (psychosocial and environmental problems)
|
||
|
;; - Axis V (GAF score - current)
|
||
|
;;
|
||
|
;;I. Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF):
|
||
|
;;
|
||
|
;; NOTE: The complete multi-axial format as specified by DSM-IV may be required
|
||
|
;; by BVA REMAND or specifically requested by the rating specialist. If so,
|
||
|
;; include the GAF score and note whether it refers to current functioning.
|
||
|
;; A BVA REMAND may also request, in addition to an overall GAF score,
|
||
|
;; that a separate GAF score be provided for each mental disorder present when
|
||
|
;; there are multiple Axis I or Axis II diagnoses and not all are service-
|
||
|
;; connected. If separate GAF scores can be given, an explanation and
|
||
|
;; discussion of the rationale is needed. If it is not possible, an
|
||
|
;; explanation as to why not is needed. (See the above note pertaining to
|
||
|
;; alcohol or drug abuse.)
|
||
|
;;
|
||
|
;;J. Capacity to Manage Financial Affairs
|
||
|
;;
|
||
|
;; Mental competency, for VA benefits purposes, refers only to the ability
|
||
|
;; of the veteran to manage VA benefit payments in his or her own best
|
||
|
;; interest, and not to any other subject. Mental incompetency,
|
||
|
;; for VA benefits purposes, means that the veteran, because of injury
|
||
|
;; or disease, is not capable of managing benefit payments in his or her
|
||
|
;; best interest. In order to assist raters in making a legal determination
|
||
|
;; as to competency, please address the following:
|
||
|
;;
|
||
|
;; What is the impact of injury or disease on the veteran's ability
|
||
|
;; to manage his or her financial affairs, including consideration
|
||
|
;; of such things as knowing the amount of his or her VA benefit
|
||
|
;; payment, knowing the amounts and types of bills owed monthly,
|
||
|
;; and handling the payment prudently? Does the veteran handle
|
||
|
;; his or her money and pay the bills?
|
||
|
;;
|
||
|
;; Based on your examination, do you believe that the veteran is
|
||
|
;; capable of managing his or her financial affairs?
|
||
|
;; Please provide examples to support your conclusion.
|
||
|
;;
|
||
|
;; If you believe a Social Work Service assessment is needed before
|
||
|
;; you can give your opinion on the veteran's ability to manage his
|
||
|
;; or her financial affairs, please explain why.
|
||
|
;;
|
||
|
;;K. Other Opinion:
|
||
|
;;
|
||
|
;; Furnish any other specific opinion requested by the rating
|
||
|
;; board or BVA remand (i.e., furnish the complete rationale and citation of
|
||
|
;;TOF
|
||
|
;; medical texts or treatise supporting opinion, if medical literature review
|
||
|
;; was undertaken). If the requested opinion is medically not ascertainable
|
||
|
;; on exam or testing please state why. If the requested opinion can not be
|
||
|
;; expressed without resorting to speculation or making improbable assumptions
|
||
|
;; say so, and explain why. If the opinion asks "... is it at least as likely
|
||
|
;; as not..", fully explain the clinical findings and rationale for the
|
||
|
;; opinion.
|
||
|
;;
|
||
|
;;L. Integrated Summary and Conclusions
|
||
|
;;
|
||
|
;; 1. Describe changes in psychosocial functional status and quality of life
|
||
|
;; since the last exam (performance in employment or schooling, routine
|
||
|
;; responsibilities of self care, family role functioning, physical health,
|
||
|
;; social/interpersonal relationships, recreation/leisure pursuits)
|
||
|
;; 2. Describe linkage between PTSD symptoms and aforementioned changes in
|
||
|
;; impairment in functional status and quality of life.
|
||
|
;; Particularly in cases where a veteran is unemployed, specific details
|
||
|
;; about the effects of PTSD and its symptoms on employment are especially
|
||
|
;; important.
|
||
|
;; 3. If possible, describe extent to which disorders other than PTSD
|
||
|
;; (e.g., substance use disorders) are independently responsible for
|
||
|
;; impairment in psychosocial adjustment and quality of life. If this is
|
||
|
;; not possible, explain why (e.g., substance use had onset after PTSD
|
||
|
;; and clearly is a means of coping with PTSD symptoms).
|
||
|
;; 4. If possible, state prognosis for improvement of psychiatric condition
|
||
|
;; and impairments in functional status.
|
||
|
;; 5. Comment on whether the veteran is capable of managing his/her
|
||
|
;; benefit payments in his/her own best interest.
|