python-peps/peps/pep-0351.rst

181 lines
5.0 KiB
ReStructuredText
Raw Permalink Normal View History

2005-10-23 18:39:17 -04:00
PEP: 351
Title: The freeze protocol
Version: 2.5
Last-Modified: $Date$
2007-06-28 15:53:41 -04:00
Author: Barry Warsaw <barry@python.org>
2006-02-13 16:09:25 -05:00
Status: Rejected
2005-10-23 18:39:17 -04:00
Type: Standards Track
Content-Type: text/x-rst
Created: 14-Apr-2005
Post-History:
2005-10-23 18:39:17 -04:00
Abstract
========
This PEP describes a simple protocol for requesting a frozen,
immutable copy of a mutable object. It also defines a new built-in
function which uses this protocol to provide an immutable copy on any
cooperating object.
2006-02-13 16:09:25 -05:00
Rejection Notice
================
This PEP was rejected. For a rationale, see `this thread on python-dev`_.
2017-06-11 15:02:39 -04:00
.. _this thread on python-dev: https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-February/060793.html
2006-02-13 16:09:25 -05:00
2005-10-23 18:39:17 -04:00
Rationale
=========
Built-in objects such dictionaries and sets accept only immutable
objects as keys. This means that mutable objects like lists cannot be
used as keys to a dictionary. However, a Python programmer can
convert a list to a tuple; the two objects are similar, but the latter
is immutable, and can be used as a dictionary key.
It is conceivable that third party objects also have similar mutable
and immutable counterparts, and it would be useful to have a standard
protocol for conversion of such objects.
sets.Set objects expose a "protocol for automatic conversion to
immutable" so that you can create sets.Sets of sets.Sets. :pep:`218`
2005-10-23 18:39:17 -04:00
deliberately dropped this feature from built-in sets. This PEP
advances that the feature is still useful and proposes a standard
mechanism for its support.
Proposal
========
It is proposed that a new built-in function called freeze() is added.
If freeze() is passed an immutable object, as determined by hash() on
that object not raising a TypeError, then the object is returned
directly.
If freeze() is passed a mutable object (i.e. hash() of that object
raises a TypeError), then freeze() will call that object's
__freeze__() method to get an immutable copy. If the object does not
have a __freeze__() method, then a TypeError is raised.
Sample implementations
======================
Here is a Python implementation of the freeze() built-in::
def freeze(obj):
try:
hash(obj)
return obj
except TypeError:
freezer = getattr(obj, '__freeze__', None)
if freezer:
return freezer()
raise TypeError('object is not freezable')``
Here are some code samples which show the intended semantics::
class xset(set):
def __freeze__(self):
return frozenset(self)
class xlist(list):
def __freeze__(self):
return tuple(self)
class imdict(dict):
def __hash__(self):
return id(self)
def _immutable(self, *args, **kws):
raise TypeError('object is immutable')
__setitem__ = _immutable
__delitem__ = _immutable
clear = _immutable
update = _immutable
setdefault = _immutable
pop = _immutable
popitem = _immutable
class xdict(dict):
def __freeze__(self):
return imdict(self)
>>> s = set([1, 2, 3])
>>> {s: 4}
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in ?
TypeError: set objects are unhashable
>>> t = freeze(s)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in ?
File "/usr/tmp/python-lWCjBK.py", line 9, in freeze
TypeError: object is not freezable
>>> t = xset(s)
>>> u = freeze(t)
>>> {u: 4}
{frozenset([1, 2, 3]): 4}
>>> x = 'hello'
>>> freeze(x) is x
True
>>> d = xdict(a=7, b=8, c=9)
>>> hash(d)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in ?
TypeError: dict objects are unhashable
>>> hash(freeze(d))
-1210776116
>>> {d: 4}
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in ?
TypeError: dict objects are unhashable
>>> {freeze(d): 4}
{{'a': 7, 'c': 9, 'b': 8}: 4}
Reference implementation
========================
Patch 1335812_ provides the C implementation of this feature. It adds the
freeze() built-in, along with implementations of the __freeze__()
method for lists and sets. Dictionaries are not easily freezable in
current Python, so an implementation of dict.__freeze__() is not
provided yet.
.. _1335812: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1335812&group_id=5470&atid=305470
Open issues
===========
- Should we define a similar protocol for thawing frozen objects?
- Should dicts and sets automatically freeze their mutable keys?
- Should we support "temporary freezing" (perhaps with a method called
__congeal__()) a la __as_temporarily_immutable__() in sets.Set?
- For backward compatibility with sets.Set, should we support
__as_immutable__()? Or should __freeze__() just be renamed to
__as_immutable__()?
Copyright
=========
This document has been placed in the public domain.
..
Local Variables:
mode: indented-text
indent-tabs-mode: nil
sentence-end-double-space: t
fill-column: 70
End: