2009-11-03 12:26:45 -05:00
|
|
|
|
PEP: 3003
|
|
|
|
|
Title: Python Language Moratorium
|
|
|
|
|
Version: $Revision$
|
|
|
|
|
Last-Modified: $Date$
|
|
|
|
|
Author: Brett Cannon, Jesse Noller, Guido van Rossum
|
2009-11-09 12:54:51 -05:00
|
|
|
|
Status: Accepted
|
2009-11-03 12:26:45 -05:00
|
|
|
|
Type: Process
|
|
|
|
|
Content-Type: text/x-rst
|
|
|
|
|
Created: 21-Oct-2009
|
2009-11-09 12:54:51 -05:00
|
|
|
|
Post-History: 03-Nov-2009
|
2009-11-03 12:26:45 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
========
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This PEP proposes a temporary moratorium (suspension) of all changes
|
|
|
|
|
to the Python language syntax, semantics, and built-ins for a period
|
2009-11-09 12:53:38 -05:00
|
|
|
|
of at least two years from the release of Python 3.1. In particular, the
|
|
|
|
|
moratorium would include Python 3.2 (to be released 18-24 months after
|
|
|
|
|
3.1) but allow Python 3.3 (assuming it is not released prematurely) to
|
|
|
|
|
once again include language changes.
|
2009-11-03 12:26:45 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This suspension of features is designed to allow non-CPython implementations
|
|
|
|
|
to "catch up" to the core implementation of the language, help ease adoption
|
|
|
|
|
of Python 3.x, and provide a more stable base for the community.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rationale
|
|
|
|
|
=========
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This idea was proposed by Guido van Rossum on the python-ideas [1]_ mailing
|
|
|
|
|
list. The premise of his email was to slow the alteration of the Python core
|
|
|
|
|
syntax, builtins and semantics to allow non-CPython implementations to catch
|
|
|
|
|
up to the current state of Python, both 2.x and 3.x.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Python, as a language is more than the core implementation --
|
|
|
|
|
CPython -- with a rich, mature and vibrant community of implementations, such
|
|
|
|
|
as Jython [2]_, IronPython [3]_ and PyPy [4]_ that are a benefit not only to
|
|
|
|
|
the community, but to the language itself.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Still others, such as Unladen Swallow [5]_ (a branch of CPython) seek not to
|
|
|
|
|
create an alternative implementation, but rather they seek to enhance the
|
|
|
|
|
performance and implementation of CPython itself.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Python 3.x was a large part of the last several years of Python's
|
|
|
|
|
development. Its release, as well as a bevy of changes to the language
|
2009-11-08 11:31:29 -05:00
|
|
|
|
introduced by it and the previous 2.6.x releases, puts alternative
|
2009-11-03 12:26:45 -05:00
|
|
|
|
implementations at a severe disadvantage in "keeping pace" with core python
|
|
|
|
|
development.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additionally, many of the changes put into the recent releases of the language
|
2009-11-08 11:31:29 -05:00
|
|
|
|
as implemented by CPython have not yet seen widespread usage by the
|
|
|
|
|
general user population. For example, most users are limited to the version
|
2009-11-03 12:26:45 -05:00
|
|
|
|
of the interpreter (typically CPython) which comes pre-installed with their
|
|
|
|
|
operating system. Most OS vendors are just barely beginning to ship Python 2.6
|
|
|
|
|
-- even fewer are shipping Python 3.x.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As it is expected that Python 2.7 be the effective "end of life" of the Python
|
|
|
|
|
2.x code line, with Python 3.x being the future, it is in the best interest of
|
|
|
|
|
Python core development to temporarily suspend the alteration of the language
|
|
|
|
|
itself to allow all of these external entities to catch up and to assist in
|
|
|
|
|
the adoption of, and migration to, Python 3.x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finally, the moratorium is intended to free up cycles within core development
|
|
|
|
|
to focus on other issues, such as the CPython interpreter and improvements
|
|
|
|
|
therein, the standard library, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This moratorium does not allow for exceptions -- once accepted, any pending
|
|
|
|
|
changes to the syntax or semantics of the language will be postponed until the
|
|
|
|
|
moratorium is lifted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This moratorium does not attempt to apply to any other Python implementation
|
|
|
|
|
meaning that if desired other implementations may add features which deviate
|
|
|
|
|
from the standard implementation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Details
|
|
|
|
|
=======
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cannot Change
|
|
|
|
|
-------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* New built-ins
|
|
|
|
|
* Language syntax
|
|
|
|
|
The grammar file essentially becomes immutable apart from ambiguity
|
|
|
|
|
fixes.
|
|
|
|
|
* General language semantics
|
|
|
|
|
The language operates as-is with only specific exemptions (see
|
|
|
|
|
below).
|
2009-11-05 18:22:00 -05:00
|
|
|
|
* New __future__ imports
|
|
|
|
|
These are explicitly forbidden, as they effectively change the language
|
|
|
|
|
syntax and/or semantics (albeit using a compiler directive).
|
2009-11-03 12:26:45 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Case-by-Case Exemptions
|
|
|
|
|
-----------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* New methods on built-ins
|
|
|
|
|
The case for adding a method to a built-in object can be made.
|
|
|
|
|
* Incorrect language semantics
|
|
|
|
|
If the language semantics turn out to be ambiguous or improperly
|
|
|
|
|
implemented based on the intention of the original design then the
|
|
|
|
|
semantics may change.
|
|
|
|
|
* Language semantics that are difficult to implement
|
|
|
|
|
Because other VMs have not begun implementing Python 3.x semantics
|
|
|
|
|
there is a possibility that certain semantics are too difficult to
|
|
|
|
|
replicate. In those cases they can be changed to ease adoption of
|
|
|
|
|
Python 3.x by the other VMs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowed to Change
|
|
|
|
|
-----------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* C API
|
|
|
|
|
It is entirely acceptable to change the underlying C code of
|
|
|
|
|
CPython as long as other restrictions of this moratorium are not
|
|
|
|
|
broken. E.g. removing the GIL would be fine assuming certain
|
|
|
|
|
operations that are currently atomic remain atomic.
|
|
|
|
|
* The standard library
|
|
|
|
|
As the standard library is not directly tied to the language
|
|
|
|
|
definition it is not covered by this moratorium.
|
2009-11-08 11:31:29 -05:00
|
|
|
|
* Backports of 3.x features to 2.x
|
2009-11-03 12:26:45 -05:00
|
|
|
|
The moratorium only affects features that would be new in 3.x.
|
2009-11-03 13:45:47 -05:00
|
|
|
|
* Import semantics
|
|
|
|
|
For example, PEP 382. After all, import semantics vary between
|
|
|
|
|
Python implementations anyway.
|
2009-11-03 12:26:45 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retroactive
|
|
|
|
|
===========
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is important to note that the moratorium covers all changes since the
|
|
|
|
|
release of Python 3.1. This rule is intended to avoid features being rushed or
|
|
|
|
|
smuggled into the CPython source tree while the moratorium is being discussed.
|
2009-11-04 16:39:10 -05:00
|
|
|
|
A review of the NEWS file for the py3k development branch showed no
|
|
|
|
|
commits would need to be rolled back in order to meet this goal.
|
2009-11-03 12:26:45 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-11-09 12:53:38 -05:00
|
|
|
|
Extensions
|
|
|
|
|
==========
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The time period of the moratorium can only be extended through a new PEP.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-11-03 12:26:45 -05:00
|
|
|
|
Copyright
|
|
|
|
|
=========
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This document has been placed in the public domain.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
References
|
|
|
|
|
==========
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. [1] http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/2009-October/006305.html
|
|
|
|
|
.. [2] http://www.jython.org/
|
|
|
|
|
.. [3] http://www.codeplex.com/IronPython
|
|
|
|
|
.. [4] http://codespeak.net/pypy/
|
|
|
|
|
.. [5] http://code.google.com/p/unladen-swallow/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
..
|
|
|
|
|
Local Variables:
|
|
|
|
|
mode: indented-text
|
|
|
|
|
indent-tabs-mode: nil
|
|
|
|
|
sentence-end-double-space: t
|
|
|
|
|
fill-column: 80
|
|
|
|
|
coding: utf-8
|
|
|
|
|
End:
|