2009-03-07 22:52:41 -05:00
|
|
|
PEP: 377
|
|
|
|
Title: Allow __enter__() methods to skip the statement body
|
|
|
|
Version: $Revision$
|
|
|
|
Last-Modified: $Date$
|
|
|
|
Author: Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
Status: Draft
|
|
|
|
Type: Standards Track
|
|
|
|
Content-Type: text/x-rst
|
|
|
|
Created: 8-Mar-2009
|
|
|
|
Python-Version: 2.7, 3.1
|
|
|
|
Post-History: 8-Mar-2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
========
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This PEP proposes a backwards compatible mechanism that allows ``__enter__()``
|
|
|
|
methods to skip the body of the associated ``with`` statment. The lack of
|
|
|
|
this ability currently means the ``contextlib.nested`` context manager
|
|
|
|
is unable to fulfil its specification of being equivalent to writing out
|
|
|
|
multiple nested ``with`` statements [1].
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The proposed change is to introduce a new flow control exception
|
|
|
|
``SkipStatement``, and skip the execution of the ``with``
|
|
|
|
statement body if ``__enter__()`` raises this exception.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proposed Change
|
|
|
|
===============
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The semantics of the ``with`` statement will be changed to include a
|
|
|
|
new ``try``/``except``/``else`` block around the call to ``__enter__()``.
|
|
|
|
If ``SkipStatement`` is raised by the ``__enter__()`` method, then
|
|
|
|
the main section of the ``with`` statement (now located in the ``else``
|
|
|
|
clause) will not be executed. To avoid leaving the names in any ``as``
|
|
|
|
clause unbound in this case, a new ``StatementSkipped`` singleton
|
|
|
|
(similar to the existing ``NotImplemented`` singleton) will be
|
|
|
|
assigned to all names that appear in the ``as`` clause.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The components of the ``with`` statement remain as described in PEP 343 [2]::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
with EXPR as VAR:
|
|
|
|
BLOCK
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After the modification, the ``with`` statement semantics would
|
|
|
|
be as follows::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mgr = (EXPR)
|
|
|
|
exit = mgr.__exit__ # Not calling it yet
|
|
|
|
try:
|
|
|
|
value = mgr.__enter__()
|
|
|
|
except SkipStatement:
|
|
|
|
VAR = StatementSkipped
|
|
|
|
# Only if "as VAR" is present and
|
|
|
|
# VAR is a single name
|
|
|
|
# If VAR is a tuple of names, then StatementSkipped
|
|
|
|
# will be assigned to each name in the tuple
|
|
|
|
else:
|
|
|
|
exc = True
|
|
|
|
try:
|
|
|
|
try:
|
|
|
|
VAR = value # Only if "as VAR" is present
|
|
|
|
BLOCK
|
|
|
|
except:
|
|
|
|
# The exceptional case is handled here
|
|
|
|
exc = False
|
|
|
|
if not exit(*sys.exc_info()):
|
|
|
|
raise
|
|
|
|
# The exception is swallowed if exit() returns true
|
|
|
|
finally:
|
|
|
|
# The normal and non-local-goto cases are handled here
|
|
|
|
if exc:
|
|
|
|
exit(None, None, None)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With the above change in place for the ``with`` statement semantics,
|
|
|
|
``contextlib.contextmanager()`` will then be modified to raise
|
|
|
|
``SkipStatement`` instead of ``RuntimeError`` when the underlying
|
|
|
|
generator doesn't yield.
|
|
|
|
|
2009-03-07 23:14:01 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2009-03-07 22:52:41 -05:00
|
|
|
Rationale for Change
|
|
|
|
====================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currently, some apparently innocuous context managers may raise
|
|
|
|
``RuntimeError`` when executed. This occurs when the context
|
|
|
|
manager's ``__enter__()`` method encounters a situation where
|
|
|
|
the written out version of the code corresponding to the
|
|
|
|
context manager would skip the code that is now the body
|
|
|
|
of the ``with`` statement. Since the ``__enter__()`` method
|
|
|
|
has no mechanism available to signal this to the interpreter,
|
|
|
|
it is instead forced to raise an exception that not only
|
|
|
|
skips the body of the ``with`` statement, but also jumps over
|
|
|
|
all code until the nearest exception handler. This goes against
|
|
|
|
one of the design goals of the ``with`` statement, which was to
|
|
|
|
be able to factor out arbitrary common exception handling code
|
|
|
|
into a single context manager by putting into a generator
|
|
|
|
function and replacing the variant part of the code with a
|
|
|
|
``yield`` statement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specifically, the following examples behave differently if
|
|
|
|
``cmB().__enter__()`` raises an exception which ``cmA().__exit__()``
|
|
|
|
then handles and suppresses::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
with cmA():
|
|
|
|
with cmB():
|
|
|
|
do_stuff()
|
|
|
|
# This will resume here without executing "do_stuff()"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@contextlib.contextmanager
|
|
|
|
def combined():
|
|
|
|
with cmA():
|
|
|
|
with cmB():
|
|
|
|
yield
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
with combined():
|
|
|
|
do_stuff()
|
|
|
|
# This will raise a RuntimeError complaining that the context
|
|
|
|
# manager's underlying generator didn't yield
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
with contextlib.nested(cmA(), cmB()):
|
|
|
|
do_stuff()
|
|
|
|
# This will raise the same RuntimeError as the contextmanager()
|
|
|
|
# example (unsurprising, given that the nested() implementation
|
|
|
|
# uses contextmanager())
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# The following class based version shows that the issue isn't
|
|
|
|
# specific to contextlib.contextmanager() (it also shows how
|
|
|
|
# much simpler it is to write context managers as generators
|
|
|
|
# instead of as classes!)
|
|
|
|
class CM(object):
|
|
|
|
def __init__(self):
|
|
|
|
self.cmA = None
|
|
|
|
self.cmB = None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def __enter__(self):
|
|
|
|
if self.cmA is not None:
|
|
|
|
raise RuntimeError("Can't re-use this CM")
|
|
|
|
self.cmA = cmA()
|
|
|
|
self.cmA.__enter__()
|
|
|
|
try:
|
|
|
|
self.cmB = cmB()
|
|
|
|
self.cmB.__enter__()
|
|
|
|
except:
|
|
|
|
self.cmA.__exit__(*sys.exc_info())
|
|
|
|
# Can't suppress in __enter__(), so must raise
|
|
|
|
raise
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def __exit__(self, *args):
|
|
|
|
suppress = False
|
|
|
|
try:
|
|
|
|
if self.cmB is not None:
|
|
|
|
suppress = self.cmB.__exit__(*args)
|
|
|
|
except:
|
|
|
|
suppress = self.cmA.__exit__(*sys.exc_info()):
|
|
|
|
if not suppress:
|
|
|
|
# Exception has changed, so reraise explicitly
|
|
|
|
raise
|
|
|
|
else:
|
|
|
|
if suppress:
|
|
|
|
# cmB already suppressed the exception,
|
|
|
|
# so don't pass it to cmA
|
|
|
|
suppress = self.cmA.__exit__(None, None, None):
|
|
|
|
else:
|
|
|
|
suppress = self.cmA.__exit__(*args):
|
|
|
|
return suppress
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reference Implementation
|
|
|
|
========================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In work.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acknowledgements
|
|
|
|
================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James William Pye both raised the issue and suggested the solution
|
|
|
|
described in this PEP.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
References
|
|
|
|
==========
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. [1] Issue 5251: contextlib.nested inconsistent with nested with statements
|
|
|
|
(http://bugs.python.org/issue5251)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. [2] PEP 343: The "with" Statement
|
|
|
|
(http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0343/)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copyright
|
|
|
|
=========
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This document has been placed in the public domain.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
..
|
|
|
|
Local Variables:
|
|
|
|
mode: indented-text
|
|
|
|
indent-tabs-mode: nil
|
|
|
|
sentence-end-double-space: t
|
|
|
|
fill-column: 70
|
|
|
|
End:
|