2009-08-18 15:26:37 -04:00
|
|
|
PEP: 3144
|
|
|
|
Title: IP Address Manipulation Library for the Python Standard Library
|
|
|
|
Version: $Revision$
|
|
|
|
Last-Modified: $Date$
|
|
|
|
Author: Peter Moody <peter@hda3.com>
|
|
|
|
Discussions-To: ipaddr-py-dev@googlegroups.com
|
|
|
|
Status: Draft
|
|
|
|
Type: Standards Track
|
|
|
|
Content-Type: text/plain
|
|
|
|
Created: 13-Aug-2009
|
|
|
|
Python-Version: 3.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This PEP proposes a design for a lightweight ip address manipulation module
|
|
|
|
for python.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Motivation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Many network administrators use python in their day to day jobs. Finding a
|
|
|
|
library to assist with the common ip address manipulation tasks is easy.
|
|
|
|
Finding a good library for performing those tasks can be somewhat more
|
|
|
|
difficult. For this reason, I (like many before me) scratched an itch and
|
|
|
|
wrote my own with an emphasis on being easy to understand and fast for the
|
|
|
|
most common operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For context, a previous version of this library was up for inclusion in
|
|
|
|
python 3.1, see issue 3959 [1] for more information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rationale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ipaddr was designed with the goal of abstracting out as much of the common
|
|
|
|
functionality as possible. As mentioned earlier, the similarities between
|
|
|
|
addresses and networks, IPV6 and IPV4 allows much code to be reused since
|
|
|
|
python allows for easy (and clean) multiple inheritance. Methods which are
|
|
|
|
specific to IPV4 or IPV6, addresses or networks are inherited from
|
|
|
|
appropriately named classes (Basev4, Basev6, BaseNet, BaseIP, etc) to
|
|
|
|
provide the full functionality of IPv4Address, IPv4Network, IPv6Address and
|
|
|
|
IPv6Network.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Distinct IPV4 and IPV6 objects.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
While there are many similarities, IPV4 and IPV6 objects are fundamentally
|
|
|
|
different. The similarities allow for easy abstraction of certain
|
|
|
|
operations which affect the bits from both in the same manner, but their
|
|
|
|
differences mean attempts to combine them into one object would be like
|
|
|
|
trying to force a round peg into a square hole (or visa versa).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Distinct network and address objects.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Many people think of IP addresses and IP networks as synonymous, while they
|
|
|
|
are however, distinct. An IPV4 address is a single 32 bit number while the
|
|
|
|
IPV4 address assigned to a networked computer is a 32 bit address and
|
|
|
|
associated network. Similarly, an IPV6 address is a 128 bit number while
|
|
|
|
an IPV6 address assigned to a networked computer is a 128 bit number and
|
|
|
|
associated network information. The similarities leads to easy abstraction
|
|
|
|
of some methods and properties, but there are obviously a number of
|
|
|
|
address/network specific properties which require they be distinct. For
|
|
|
|
instance, IP networks contain network address (the base address of the
|
|
|
|
network), broadcast addresses (the upper end of the network, also the
|
|
|
|
address to which every machine on a given network is supposed listen, hence
|
|
|
|
the name broadcast), supernetworks and subnetworks, etc. The individual
|
|
|
|
property addresses in an IP network obviously don't have the same
|
|
|
|
properties, they're simply 32 or 128 bit numbers.
|
|
|
|
|
2009-08-20 15:56:05 -04:00
|
|
|
- Treat network elements as lists (in so far as it's possible).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treating IP networks as lists is a natural extension from viewing the
|
|
|
|
network as a series of individual ip addresses. Most of the standard list
|
|
|
|
methods should be implemented and should behave in a manner that would be
|
|
|
|
consistent if the IP network object were actually a list of strings or
|
|
|
|
integers. The methods which actually modify a lists contents don't extend
|
|
|
|
as well to this model (__add__, __iadd__, __sub__, __isub__, etc) but
|
|
|
|
others (__contains__, __iter__, etc) work quite nicely. It should be noted
|
|
|
|
that __len__ doesn't work as expected since python internals has this
|
|
|
|
limited to a 32 bit integer and it would need to be at least 128 bits to
|
|
|
|
work with IPV6.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Lightweight.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
While some network programmers will undoubtedly want more than this library
|
|
|
|
provides, keeping the functionality to strictly what's required from a IP
|
|
|
|
address manipulation module is critical to keeping the code fast, easily
|
2009-08-27 18:51:15 -04:00
|
|
|
comprehensible and extensible. I've tried to provide enough options in
|
|
|
|
terms of functionality to allow the developer to easily do their work
|
|
|
|
without needlessly cluttering the library. Finally, It's important to note
|
|
|
|
that this design doesn't prevent subclassing or otherwise extending to meet
|
|
|
|
the unforeseen needs.
|
2009-08-20 15:56:05 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specification:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A slightly more detailed look at the library follows.
|
|
|
|
|
2009-08-27 18:51:15 -04:00
|
|
|
- Design
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ipaddr has four main classes most people will use:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. IPv4Address. (eg, '192.168.1.1')
|
|
|
|
2. IPv4Network (eg, '192.168.0.0/16')
|
|
|
|
3. IPv6Address (eg, '::1')
|
|
|
|
4. IPv6Network (eg, '2001::/32')
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Most of the operations a network administrator performs on networks are
|
|
|
|
similar for both IPv4 and IPv6 networks. Ie. finding subnets, supernets,
|
|
|
|
determining if an address is contained in a given network, etc. Similarly,
|
|
|
|
both addresses and networks (of the same ip version!) have much in common;
|
|
|
|
the process for turning a given 32 or 128 bit number into a human readable
|
|
|
|
string notation, determining if the ip is within the valid specified range,
|
|
|
|
etc. Finally, there are some pythonic abstractions which are valid for all
|
|
|
|
addresses and networks, both IPv4 and IPv6. In short, there is common
|
|
|
|
functionality shared between (ipaddr class names in parentheses):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. all IP addresses and networks, both IPv4 and IPv6. (IPAddrBase)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. all IP addresses of both versions. (BaseIP)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. all IP networks of both version. (BaseNet)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. all IPv4 objects, both addresses and networks. (BaseV4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. all IPv6 objects, both addresses and networks. (BaseV6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Seeing this as a clear hierarchy is important for recognizing how much
|
|
|
|
code is common between the four main classes. For this reason, ipaddr uses
|
|
|
|
class inheritance to abstract out as much common code is possible and
|
|
|
|
appropriate. This lack of duplication and very clean layout also makes
|
|
|
|
the job of the developer much easier should they need to debug code (either
|
|
|
|
theirs or mine).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knowing that there might be cases where the developer doesn't so much care
|
|
|
|
as to the types of IP they might be receiving, ipaddr comes with two
|
|
|
|
important helper functions, IPAddress() and IPNetwork(). These, as you
|
|
|
|
might guess, return the appropriately typed address or network objects for
|
|
|
|
the given argument.
|
|
|
|
|
2009-08-31 15:02:02 -04:00
|
|
|
Finally, there is no meaningful natural ordering between IPv4 and IPv6
|
|
|
|
addresses ("these protocols are ships-in-the-night"), so rather than invent
|
|
|
|
a standard, ipaddr follows Ordering Comparisons [2] and returns a TypeError
|
|
|
|
when asked to compare objects of differing IP versions. In practice, there
|
|
|
|
are many ways a programmer may wish to order the addresses, so this this
|
|
|
|
shouldn't pose a problem for the developer who can easily write:
|
2009-08-27 18:51:15 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
v4 = [x for x in mixed_list if x._version == 4]
|
|
|
|
v6 = [x for x in mixed_list if x._version == 6]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# perform operations on v4 and v6 here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return v4_return + v6_return
|
|
|
|
|
2009-08-20 15:56:05 -04:00
|
|
|
- Multiple ways of displaying an IP Address.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not everyone will want to display the same information in the same format;
|
|
|
|
IP addresses in cisco syntax are represented by network/hostmask, junipers
|
|
|
|
are (network/IP)/prefixlength and IPTables are (network/IP)/(prefixlength/
|
2009-08-27 18:51:15 -04:00
|
|
|
netmask). The ipaddr library provides multiple ways to display an address.
|
2009-08-20 15:56:05 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2009-08-27 18:51:15 -04:00
|
|
|
In [1]: IPNetwork('1.1.1.1').with_prefixlen
|
2009-08-20 15:56:05 -04:00
|
|
|
Out[1]: '1.1.1.1/32'
|
|
|
|
|
2009-08-27 18:51:15 -04:00
|
|
|
In [1]: IPNetwork('1.1.1.1').with_netmask
|
2009-08-20 15:56:05 -04:00
|
|
|
Out[1]: '1.1.1.1/255.255.255.255'
|
|
|
|
|
2009-08-27 18:51:15 -04:00
|
|
|
In [1]: IPNetwork('1.1.1.1').with_hostmask
|
2009-08-20 15:56:05 -04:00
|
|
|
Out[1]: '1.1.1.1/0.0.0.0'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the same applies to IPv6
|
|
|
|
|
2009-08-18 15:26:37 -04:00
|
|
|
- Lazy evaluation combined with aggressive caching of network elements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(the following example is for IPv6Network objects but the exact same
|
|
|
|
properties apply to IPv6Network objects).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As mentioned, an IP network object is defined by a number of properties.
|
|
|
|
The object
|
|
|
|
|
2009-08-20 15:56:05 -04:00
|
|
|
In [1]: IPv4Network('1.1.1.0/24')
|
2009-08-18 15:26:37 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
has a number of IPv4Address properties
|
|
|
|
|
2009-08-27 18:51:15 -04:00
|
|
|
In [1]: o = IPv4Network('1.1.1.0/24')
|
2009-08-18 15:26:37 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2009-08-20 15:56:05 -04:00
|
|
|
In [2]: o.network
|
|
|
|
Out[2]: IPv4Address('1.1.1.0')
|
2009-08-18 15:26:37 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2009-08-20 15:56:05 -04:00
|
|
|
In [3]: o.broadcast
|
|
|
|
Out[3]: IPv4Address('1.1.1.255')
|
2009-08-18 15:26:37 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2009-08-20 15:56:05 -04:00
|
|
|
In [4]: o.hostmask
|
|
|
|
Out[4]: IPv4Address('0.0.0.255')
|
2009-08-18 15:26:37 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If we were to compute them all at object creation time, we would incur a
|
|
|
|
non-negligible performance hit. Since these properties are required to
|
|
|
|
define the object completely but their values aren't always of interest to
|
|
|
|
the programmer, their computation should be done only when requested.
|
|
|
|
However, in order to avoid the performance hit in the case where one
|
|
|
|
attribute for a particular object is requested repeatedly (and continuously
|
2009-08-20 15:56:05 -04:00
|
|
|
recomputed), the results of the computation should be cached.
|
2009-08-18 15:26:37 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2009-08-20 15:56:05 -04:00
|
|
|
- Address list summarization.
|
2009-08-18 15:26:37 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2009-08-27 18:51:15 -04:00
|
|
|
ipaddr supports easy summarization of lists of possibly contiguous
|
2009-08-20 15:56:05 -04:00
|
|
|
addresses, as this is something network administrators constantly find
|
|
|
|
themselves doing. This currently works in a number of ways.
|
2009-08-18 15:26:37 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2009-08-20 15:56:05 -04:00
|
|
|
1. collapse_address_list([list]):
|
2009-08-18 15:26:37 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2009-08-20 15:56:05 -04:00
|
|
|
Given a list of networks, ipaddr will collapse the list into the smallest
|
|
|
|
possible list of networks that wholey contain the addresses supplied.
|
|
|
|
|
2009-08-27 18:51:15 -04:00
|
|
|
In [1]: collapse_address_list([IPNetwork('1.1.0.0/24'),
|
|
|
|
...: IPNetwork('1.1.1.0/24')])
|
2009-08-20 15:56:05 -04:00
|
|
|
Out[1]: [IPv4Network('1.1.0.0/23')]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
more elaborately:
|
|
|
|
|
2009-08-27 18:51:15 -04:00
|
|
|
In [1]: collapse_address_list([IPNetwork(x) for x in
|
|
|
|
...: IPNetwork('1.1.0.0/23')])
|
2009-08-20 15:56:05 -04:00
|
|
|
Out[1]: [IPv4Network('1.1.0.0/23')]
|
|
|
|
|
2009-08-27 18:51:15 -04:00
|
|
|
2. summarize_address_range(first, last).
|
2009-08-20 15:56:05 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Given a start and end address, ipaddr will provide the smallest number of
|
|
|
|
networks to cover the given range.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-08-27 18:51:15 -04:00
|
|
|
In [1]: summarize_address_range(IPv4Address('1.1.1.0'),
|
|
|
|
...: IPv4Address('2.2.2.0'))
|
2009-08-20 15:56:05 -04:00
|
|
|
Out[1]:
|
|
|
|
[IPv4Network('1.1.1.0/24'),
|
|
|
|
IPv4Network('1.1.2.0/23'),
|
|
|
|
IPv4Network('1.1.4.0/22'),
|
|
|
|
IPv4Network('1.1.8.0/21'),
|
|
|
|
IPv4Network('1.1.16.0/20'),
|
|
|
|
IPv4Network('1.1.32.0/19'),
|
|
|
|
IPv4Network('1.1.64.0/18'),
|
|
|
|
IPv4Network('1.1.128.0/17'),
|
|
|
|
IPv4Network('1.2.0.0/15'),
|
|
|
|
IPv4Network('1.4.0.0/14'),
|
|
|
|
IPv4Network('1.8.0.0/13'),
|
|
|
|
IPv4Network('1.16.0.0/12'),
|
|
|
|
IPv4Network('1.32.0.0/11'),
|
|
|
|
IPv4Network('1.64.0.0/10'),
|
|
|
|
IPv4Network('1.128.0.0/9'),
|
|
|
|
IPv4Network('2.0.0.0/15'),
|
|
|
|
IPv4Network('2.2.0.0/23'),
|
|
|
|
IPv4Network('2.2.2.0/32')]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Address Exclusion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Used somewhat less often, but all the more annoying, is the case where an
|
|
|
|
programmer would want "all of the addresses in a newtork *except* these".
|
|
|
|
ipaddr performs this exclusion equally well for IPv4 and IPv6 networks
|
|
|
|
and collapses the resulting address list.
|
|
|
|
|
2009-08-27 18:51:15 -04:00
|
|
|
In [1]: IPNetwork('1.1.0.0/15').address_exclude(IPNetwork('1.1.1.0/24'))
|
2009-08-20 15:56:05 -04:00
|
|
|
Out[1]:
|
|
|
|
[IPv4Network('1.0.0.0/16'),
|
|
|
|
IPv4Network('1.1.0.0/24'),
|
|
|
|
IPv4Network('1.1.2.0/23'),
|
|
|
|
IPv4Network('1.1.4.0/22'),
|
|
|
|
IPv4Network('1.1.8.0/21'),
|
|
|
|
IPv4Network('1.1.16.0/20'),
|
|
|
|
IPv4Network('1.1.32.0/19'),
|
|
|
|
IPv4Network('1.1.64.0/18'),
|
|
|
|
IPv4Network('1.1.128.0/17')]
|
|
|
|
|
2009-08-27 18:51:15 -04:00
|
|
|
In [1]: IPNewtork('::1/96').address_exclude(IPNetwork('::1/112'))
|
2009-08-20 15:56:05 -04:00
|
|
|
Out[1]:
|
|
|
|
[IPv6Network('::1:0/112'),
|
|
|
|
IPv6Network('::2:0/111'),
|
|
|
|
IPv6Network('::4:0/110'),
|
|
|
|
IPv6Network('::8:0/109'),
|
|
|
|
IPv6Network('::10:0/108'),
|
|
|
|
IPv6Network('::20:0/107'),
|
|
|
|
IPv6Network('::40:0/106'),
|
|
|
|
IPv6Network('::80:0/105'),
|
|
|
|
IPv6Network('::100:0/104'),
|
|
|
|
IPv6Network('::200:0/103'),
|
|
|
|
IPv6Network('::400:0/102'),
|
|
|
|
IPv6Network('::800:0/101'),
|
|
|
|
IPv6Network('::1000:0/100'),
|
|
|
|
IPv6Network('::2000:0/99'),
|
|
|
|
IPv6Network('::4000:0/98'),
|
|
|
|
IPv6Network('::8000:0/97')]
|
|
|
|
|
2009-08-31 15:02:02 -04:00
|
|
|
- IPv6 address compression.
|
2009-08-20 15:56:05 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By default, IPv6 addresses are compressed internally (see the method
|
|
|
|
BaseV6._compress_hextets), but ipaddr makes both the compressed and the
|
|
|
|
exploded representations available.
|
|
|
|
|
2009-08-27 18:51:15 -04:00
|
|
|
In [1]: IPNetwork('::1').compressed
|
2009-08-20 15:56:05 -04:00
|
|
|
Out[1]: '::1/128'
|
|
|
|
|
2009-08-27 18:51:15 -04:00
|
|
|
In [2]: IPNetwork('::1').exploded
|
2009-08-20 15:56:05 -04:00
|
|
|
Out[2]: '0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:1/128'
|
|
|
|
|
2009-08-27 18:51:15 -04:00
|
|
|
In [3]: IPv6Address('::1').exploded
|
2009-08-20 15:56:05 -04:00
|
|
|
Out[3]: '0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0001'
|
|
|
|
|
2009-08-27 18:51:15 -04:00
|
|
|
In [4]: IPv6Address('::1').compressed
|
2009-08-20 15:56:05 -04:00
|
|
|
Out[4]: '::1'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(the same methods exist for IPv4 networks and addresses, but they're
|
|
|
|
just stubs for returning the normal __str__ representation).
|
2009-08-18 15:26:37 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reference Implementation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A reference implementation is available at:
|
|
|
|
http://ipaddr-py.googlecode.com/svn/branches/2.0.x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
References:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] http://bugs.python.org/issue3959
|
2009-08-27 18:51:15 -04:00
|
|
|
[2] http://docs.python.org/dev/3.0/whatsnew/3.0.html#ordering-comparisons
|
2009-08-18 15:26:37 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copyright:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This document has been placed in the public domain.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Local Variables:
|
|
|
|
mode: indented-text
|
|
|
|
indent-tabs-mode: nil
|
|
|
|
sentence-end-double-space: t
|
|
|
|
fill-column: 70
|
|
|
|
coding: utf-8
|
|
|
|
End:
|