2011-03-22 03:08:17 -04:00
|
|
|
|
PEP: 397
|
|
|
|
|
Title: Python launcher for Windows
|
|
|
|
|
Version: $Revision$
|
|
|
|
|
Last-Modified: $Date$
|
|
|
|
|
Author: Mark Hammond <mhammond@skippinet.com.au>
|
|
|
|
|
Status: Draft
|
2011-03-23 05:20:19 -04:00
|
|
|
|
Type: Standards Track
|
2011-03-22 03:08:17 -04:00
|
|
|
|
Content-Type: text/x-rst
|
|
|
|
|
Created: 15-Mar-2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This PEP describes a Python launcher for the Windows platform. A
|
|
|
|
|
Python launcher is a single executable which uses a number of
|
|
|
|
|
heuristics to locate a Python executable and launch it with a
|
|
|
|
|
specified command line.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rationale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Windows provides "file associations" so an executable can be associated
|
|
|
|
|
with an extension, allowing for scripts to be executed directly in some
|
|
|
|
|
contexts (eg., double-clicking the file in Windows Explorer.) Until now,
|
|
|
|
|
a strategy of "last installed Python wins" has been used and while not
|
|
|
|
|
ideal, has generally been workable due to the conservative changes in
|
|
|
|
|
Python 2.x releases. As Python 3.x scripts are often syntactically
|
|
|
|
|
incompatible with Python 2.x scripts, a different strategy must be used
|
|
|
|
|
to allow files with a '.py' extension to use a different executable based
|
|
|
|
|
on the Python version the script targets. This will be done by borrowing
|
|
|
|
|
the existing practices of another operating system - scripts will be able
|
|
|
|
|
to nominate the version of Python they need by way of a "shebang" line, as
|
|
|
|
|
described below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unix-like operating systems (referred to simply as "Unix" in this
|
|
|
|
|
PEP) allow scripts to be executed as if they were executable images
|
|
|
|
|
by examining the script for a "shebang" line which specifies the
|
|
|
|
|
actual executable to be used to run the script. This is described in
|
|
|
|
|
detail in the evecve(2) man page [1] and while user documentation will
|
|
|
|
|
be created for this feature, for the purposes of this PEP that man
|
|
|
|
|
page describes a valid shebang line.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additionally, these operating systems provide symbolic-links to
|
|
|
|
|
Python executables in well-known directories. For example, many
|
|
|
|
|
systems will have a link /usr/bin/python which references a
|
|
|
|
|
particular version of Python installed under the operating-system.
|
|
|
|
|
These symbolic links allow Python to be executed without regard for
|
|
|
|
|
where Python it actually installed on the machine (eg., without
|
|
|
|
|
requiring the path where Python is actually installed to be
|
|
|
|
|
referenced in the shebang line or in the PATH.) PEP 394 'The "python"
|
|
|
|
|
command on Unix-Like Systems' [2] describes additional conventions
|
|
|
|
|
for more fine-grained specification of a particular Python version.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
These 2 facilities combined allow for a portable and somewhat
|
|
|
|
|
predictable way of both starting Python interactively and for allowing
|
|
|
|
|
Python scripts to execute. This PEP describes an implementation of a
|
|
|
|
|
launcher which can offer the same benefits for Python on the Windows
|
|
|
|
|
platform and therefore allows the launcher to be the executable
|
|
|
|
|
associated with '.py' files to support multiple Python versions
|
|
|
|
|
concurrently.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
While this PEP offers the ability to use a shebang line which should
|
|
|
|
|
work on both Windows and Unix, this is not the primary motivation for
|
|
|
|
|
this PEP - the primary motivation is to allow a specific version to be
|
|
|
|
|
specified without inventing new syntax or conventions to describe it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
An overview of the launcher.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This PEP outlines the general functionality and key guidelines of a
|
|
|
|
|
launcher for Windows. It is accompanied by reference implementation,
|
|
|
|
|
written in Python, which defines the detailed implementation. Over
|
|
|
|
|
time, changes to the implementation may be desired - if the changes
|
|
|
|
|
adhere to the guidelines in this PEP and have been made following
|
|
|
|
|
the standard Python development model this PEP need not change.
|
|
|
|
|
In other words, this PEP makes no attempt to describe in detail every
|
|
|
|
|
feature offered by the launcher but instead to offer guidelines the
|
|
|
|
|
launcher should adhere to.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The actual implementation of the launcher will be written in C and
|
|
|
|
|
will not link directly or indirectly with Python, but the Python
|
|
|
|
|
based reference implementation should always remain the canonical
|
|
|
|
|
description of the functionality. Any changes proposed to the
|
|
|
|
|
launcher functionality should first be made and agreed to in the
|
|
|
|
|
Python implementation, after which time the C implementation can be
|
|
|
|
|
changed to reflect the new reference. Any deviations between the
|
|
|
|
|
functionality of the reference implementation versus the C
|
|
|
|
|
implementation due should imply the C implementation is in error
|
|
|
|
|
(although some exceptions will need to be made due to the nature of the
|
|
|
|
|
reference implementation being in Python)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is expected that 2 versions of the launcher will be needed - one
|
|
|
|
|
which is a console program and one which is a "windows" (ie., GUI)
|
|
|
|
|
program. These 2 launchers correspond to the 'python.exe' and
|
|
|
|
|
'pythonw.exe' executables which currently ship with Python. The
|
|
|
|
|
console launcher will be named 'py.exe' and the Windows one named
|
|
|
|
|
'pyw.exe'. The "windows" (ie., GUI) version of the launcher will attempt
|
|
|
|
|
to locate and launch pythonw.exe even if a virtual shebang line nominates
|
|
|
|
|
simply "python" - infact, the trailing 'w' notation will not be supported
|
|
|
|
|
in the virtual shebang line at all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The launcher will be distributed with all future versions of Python
|
|
|
|
|
and if possible, should be installed somewhere likely to already be
|
|
|
|
|
on the system PATH (eg., the Windows System32) directory. If installed,
|
|
|
|
|
the "console" version of the launcher should be associated with .py files
|
|
|
|
|
and the "windows" version associated with .pyw files.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The launcher will not be tied to a specific version of Python - eg., a
|
|
|
|
|
launcher distributed with Python 3.3 should be capable of locating and
|
|
|
|
|
executing any Python 2.x and Python 3.x version. Future versions of the
|
|
|
|
|
launcher should remain backwards compatible with older versions, so later
|
|
|
|
|
versions of Python can install an updated version of the launcher without
|
|
|
|
|
impacting how the previously installed version of the launcher is used.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The launcher will offer some conveniences for Python developers working
|
|
|
|
|
interactively - for example, starting the launcher with no command-line
|
|
|
|
|
arguments will launch the default Python with no command-line arguments.
|
|
|
|
|
Further, command-line arguments will be supported to allow a specific
|
|
|
|
|
Python version to be launched interactively - however, these conveniences
|
|
|
|
|
will not detract from the primary purpose of launching scripts and will
|
|
|
|
|
be easy to avoid if desired.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guidelines for a Python launcher.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Python launcher described in this PEP will intentionally be
|
|
|
|
|
constrained to the use-cases described in the Rationale section
|
|
|
|
|
above. It will not attempt to be a general purpose script launcher
|
|
|
|
|
or shebang processor.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The launcher should support for format of shebang lines as described
|
|
|
|
|
in [1], including all restrictions listed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The launcher should support shebang lines commonly found on Unix.
|
|
|
|
|
For example, a shebang line of '!# /usr/bin/python' should work even
|
|
|
|
|
though there is unlikely to be an executable in the relative Windows
|
|
|
|
|
directory "\usr\bin". This means that many scripts can use a single
|
|
|
|
|
shebang line and be likely to work on both Unix and Windows without
|
|
|
|
|
modification.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The launcher will support fully-qualified paths to executables.
|
|
|
|
|
While this will make the script inherently non-portable, it is a
|
|
|
|
|
feature offered by Unix and would be useful for Windows users in
|
|
|
|
|
some cases.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The launcher should be capable of supporting implementations other
|
|
|
|
|
than CPython, such as jython and IronPython. In particular, if there
|
|
|
|
|
are common symbolic links used on Unix to specify such an
|
|
|
|
|
implementation (such as "/usr/bin/jython"), the launcher need not
|
|
|
|
|
support such references on Windows. However, if there is strong desire
|
|
|
|
|
from the community to support these other implementations in a Windows
|
|
|
|
|
specific way, any such proposals will be judged on their merit. Even
|
|
|
|
|
without specialized support for these alternate implementations, the
|
|
|
|
|
ability to specify the fully-qualified path to an executable could be
|
|
|
|
|
used as a fallback.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Unix, the user can control which specific version of Python is used
|
|
|
|
|
by adjusting the links in /usr/bin to point to the desired version. As
|
|
|
|
|
the launcher on Windows will not use Windows links, environment variables
|
|
|
|
|
will be used to override the semantics for determining exactly what
|
|
|
|
|
version of Python will be used. For example, while a shebang line of
|
|
|
|
|
"/usr/bin/python2" will automatically locate a Python 2.x implementation,
|
|
|
|
|
an environment variable can override exactly which Python 2.x
|
|
|
|
|
implementation will be chosen. Similarly for "/usr/bin/python" and
|
|
|
|
|
"/usr/bin/python3".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
While the guidelines above are general, the launcher should make
|
|
|
|
|
concessions for any Windows specific issues which increase the
|
|
|
|
|
usefulness of the launcher on Windows. In other words, the
|
|
|
|
|
guidelines above will not prevent Windows specific functionality
|
|
|
|
|
which makes the launcher significantly more useful for Windows
|
|
|
|
|
users.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shebang line parsing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the first command-line argument does not start with a dash ('-')
|
|
|
|
|
character, an attempt will be made to open that argument as a file
|
|
|
|
|
and parsed for a shebang line according to the rules in [1]. Once
|
|
|
|
|
parsed, the command will be examined to see if it is a "virtual
|
|
|
|
|
command". A virtual command starts with either of the strings
|
|
|
|
|
'/usr/bin/python', '/usr/bin/env python' or 'python' - while the
|
|
|
|
|
latter will not work on Unix, it will be offered as a convenience
|
|
|
|
|
for Windows users not familiar with the Unix conventions and with no
|
|
|
|
|
desire to have the shebang line work on Unix.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commands which are virtual are not treated as containing a file-system
|
|
|
|
|
path, but instead are treated as references to an installed Python.
|
|
|
|
|
Optionally, the virtual command may include a specific version, such
|
|
|
|
|
as '/usr/bin/python2' or '/usr/bin/python3.2'. If only a "major version"
|
|
|
|
|
qualifier is found, the launcher will enumerate the installed Python
|
|
|
|
|
versions and use the latest minor release found for the major version,
|
|
|
|
|
which is likely, although not guaranteed, to be the most recently
|
|
|
|
|
installed version in that family. If major and minor version qualifiers
|
|
|
|
|
are found, that specific version will be located and used.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If a virtual command has no version specifier, or if no shebang line
|
|
|
|
|
is found, the launcher will attempt to locate a Python 2.x
|
|
|
|
|
installation and use the latest found. If none are found, it will
|
|
|
|
|
attempt to use the latest Python 3.x implementation found.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The use of 'virtual' shebang lines will be encouraged as this should
|
|
|
|
|
allow for portable shebang lines to be specified which work on
|
|
|
|
|
multiple operating systems.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the shebang line is not a virtual one as described above, it is
|
|
|
|
|
assumed to be a path to an executable - presumably a Python
|
|
|
|
|
executable, but this will not be checked. No version qualifiers are
|
|
|
|
|
parsed - if a specific version is required, then the path should
|
|
|
|
|
reflect that. Relative path specifications will be considered
|
|
|
|
|
relative to the directory of the launcher. Thus, a shebang line of
|
|
|
|
|
'#! python' will look for a python executable in the same directory
|
|
|
|
|
as the launcher.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-virtual shebang lines should be discouraged as they make the
|
|
|
|
|
script specific to a specific Windows installation. However, they
|
|
|
|
|
are supported for maximum flexibility.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the first argument can not be opened as a file or if no valid
|
|
|
|
|
shebang line can be found, a default Python interpreter will be
|
|
|
|
|
located and the arguments passed to that. However, if a valid
|
|
|
|
|
shebang line is found but the process specified by that line can not
|
|
|
|
|
be started, the default interpreter will not be started - the error
|
|
|
|
|
to create the specified child process will be considered fatal and
|
|
|
|
|
the launcher will display an appropriate message and terminate with
|
|
|
|
|
a specific exit code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On 64bit Windows with both 32bit and 64bit implementations of the
|
|
|
|
|
same (major.minor) Python version installed, the 64bit version will
|
|
|
|
|
always be preferred. This will be true for both 32bit and 64bit
|
|
|
|
|
implementations of the launcher - a 32bit launcher will prefer to
|
|
|
|
|
execute a 64bit Python installation of the same version if
|
|
|
|
|
available. This is so the behavior of the launcher can be predicted
|
|
|
|
|
knowing only what versions are installed on the PC and without
|
|
|
|
|
regard to the order in which they were installed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Command-line handling
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Only the first command-line argument will be checked for a shebang line
|
|
|
|
|
and only if that argument does not start with a '-'.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the only command-line argument is "-h" or "--help", the launcher will
|
|
|
|
|
print a small banner and command-line usage, then pass the argument to
|
|
|
|
|
the default Python. This will have the effect of help for the launcher
|
|
|
|
|
being printed followed by help for Python itself. The output from the
|
|
|
|
|
launcher will attempt to clearly indicate the extended help information
|
|
|
|
|
is coming from the launcher and not Python.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a concession to interactively launching Python, the launcher will
|
|
|
|
|
support the first command-line argument optionally being a version
|
|
|
|
|
specifier in the form "-n[.n][:bits]" (where n is a single integer and
|
|
|
|
|
bits is either '32' or '64') to nominate a specific version be used. For
|
|
|
|
|
example, while "py.exe" may locate and launch the latest Python 2.x
|
|
|
|
|
implementation installed, a command-line such as "py.exe -3" could specify
|
|
|
|
|
the latest Python 3.x implementation be launched, while "py.exe -2.6:32"
|
|
|
|
|
could specify a 32bit implementation Python 2.6 be located and launched.
|
|
|
|
|
If a Python 2.x implementation is desired to be launched with the -3 flag,
|
|
|
|
|
the command-line would need to be similar to "py.exe -2 -3" (or the
|
|
|
|
|
specific version of Python could obviously be launched manually without
|
|
|
|
|
use of this launcher.) Note that this feature can not be used with shebang
|
|
|
|
|
processing as the file scanned for a shebang line and this argument must
|
|
|
|
|
both be the first argument and therefore are mutually exclusive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other arguments will be passed untouched to the child Python process.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Process Launching
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ideally, the launcher process would execute Python directly inside
|
|
|
|
|
the same process, primarily so the parent of the launcher process could
|
|
|
|
|
terminate the launcher and have the Python interpreter terminate. If the
|
|
|
|
|
launcher executes Python as a sub-process and the parent of the launcher
|
|
|
|
|
terminates the launcher, the Python process will be unaffected.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
However, there are a number of practical problems associated with this
|
|
|
|
|
approach. Windows does not support the execv* family of Unix functions,
|
|
|
|
|
so this could only be done by the launcher dynamically loading the Python
|
|
|
|
|
DLL, but this would have a number of side-effects. The most serious
|
|
|
|
|
side effect of this is that the value of sys.executable would refer to the
|
|
|
|
|
launcher instead of the Python implementation. Many Python scripts use the
|
|
|
|
|
value of sys.executable to launch child processes, and these scripts may
|
|
|
|
|
fail to work as expected if the launcher is used - consider a "parent"
|
|
|
|
|
script with a shebang line of '#! /usr/bin/python3' which attempts to
|
|
|
|
|
launch a child script with no shebang line at all. Currently that
|
|
|
|
|
child script would be launched using the exact same version running
|
|
|
|
|
the parent script, but if sys.executable referred to the launcher the
|
|
|
|
|
child would be likely executed using a Python 2.x version and would be
|
|
|
|
|
likely to fail with a SyntaxError. A solution for this would need to be
|
|
|
|
|
found before this could be considered.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The rules mentioned above regarding 64bit and 32bit programs would also be
|
|
|
|
|
rendered impossible with this 'in-process' model - a 32bit launcher would
|
|
|
|
|
be unable to load the 64bit version of Python and vice-versa.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Given the impossibility of supporting the 64bit and 32bit requirements
|
|
|
|
|
above, the launcher will execute Python in a child process, remaining
|
|
|
|
|
alive while the child process is executing, then terminate with the same
|
|
|
|
|
exit code as returned by the child.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To address the concerns regarding the termination of the launcher not
|
|
|
|
|
killing the child, the Win32 Job API will be used to arrange so that the
|
|
|
|
|
child process is automatically killed when the parent is terminated
|
|
|
|
|
(although children of that child process will continue as is the case
|
|
|
|
|
now.) However, that functionality only works on Windows XP and later, so
|
|
|
|
|
the launcher running on the Windows 2000 platform will not have this
|
|
|
|
|
feature - killing the launcher on that platform will keep the child
|
|
|
|
|
process alive. This feature has been implemented in the reference
|
|
|
|
|
implementation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alternative implementations and distributions of Python.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
While this PEP is primarily concerned with the python.org distributions of
|
|
|
|
|
CPython, it does not preclude future enhancements to support both
|
|
|
|
|
different distributions of CPython (eg. ActivePython, Enthought), nor
|
|
|
|
|
different implementations of Python (eg. jython, IronPython.)
|
|
|
|
|
Enhancements to support these alternatives should be proposed by
|
|
|
|
|
(community or corporate) representatives of these alternatives and
|
|
|
|
|
addressed via the normal Python development process and after relevant
|
|
|
|
|
patches have been submitted for the reference implementation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
References
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] http://linux.die.net/man/2/execve
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[2] http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0394/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copyright
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This document has been placed in the public domain.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Local Variables:
|
|
|
|
|
mode: indented-text
|
|
|
|
|
indent-tabs-mode: nil
|
|
|
|
|
sentence-end-double-space: t
|
|
|
|
|
fill-column: 70
|
|
|
|
|
coding: utf-8
|
|
|
|
|
End:
|