2006-04-05 16:06:03 -04:00
|
|
|
|
PEP: 3000
|
|
|
|
|
Title: Python 3000
|
|
|
|
|
Version: $Revision$
|
|
|
|
|
Last-Modified: $Date$
|
|
|
|
|
Author: Guido van Rossum <guido@python.org>
|
|
|
|
|
Status: Active
|
|
|
|
|
Type: Process
|
|
|
|
|
Content-Type: text/x-rst
|
|
|
|
|
Created: 05-Apr-2006
|
|
|
|
|
Post-History:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
========
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This PEP sets guidelines for Python 3000 development. Ideally, we
|
|
|
|
|
first agree on the process, and start discussing features only after
|
|
|
|
|
the process has been decided and specified. In practice, we'll be
|
|
|
|
|
discussing features and process simultaneously; often the debate about
|
|
|
|
|
a particular feature will prompt a process discussion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Naming
|
|
|
|
|
======
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Python 3000, Python 3.0 and Py3K are all names for the same thing.
|
2006-04-06 13:44:04 -04:00
|
|
|
|
The project is called Python 3000, or abbreviated to Py3k. The actual
|
2006-04-06 14:46:53 -04:00
|
|
|
|
Python release will be referred to as Python 3.0, and that's
|
2006-04-06 13:44:04 -04:00
|
|
|
|
what "python3.0 -V" will print; the actual file names will use the
|
|
|
|
|
same naming convention we use for Python 2.x. I don't want to pick a
|
|
|
|
|
new name for the executable or change the suffix for Python source
|
|
|
|
|
files.
|
2006-04-05 16:06:03 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
2006-04-06 14:46:53 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
2006-04-05 16:06:03 -04:00
|
|
|
|
PEP Numbering
|
|
|
|
|
=============
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Python 3000 PEPs are numbered starting at PEP 3000. PEPs 3000-3099
|
|
|
|
|
are meta-PEPs -- these can be either process or informational PEPs.
|
2006-04-05 16:14:12 -04:00
|
|
|
|
PEPs 3100-3999 are feature PEPs. PEP 3000 itself (this PEP) is
|
2006-04-05 16:06:03 -04:00
|
|
|
|
special; it is the meta-PEP for Python 3000 meta-PEPs (IOW it describe
|
|
|
|
|
the process to define processes). PEP 3100 is also special; it's a
|
|
|
|
|
laundry list of features that were selected for (hopeful) inclusion in
|
|
|
|
|
Python 3000 before we started the Python 3000 process for real. PEP
|
|
|
|
|
3099, finally, is a list of features that will *not* change.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timeline
|
|
|
|
|
========
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-06-18 20:24:07 -04:00
|
|
|
|
Past deadlines:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* April 2007: feature PEPs submitted (except library reform proposals).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hopeful future deadlines:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* August 2007: release 3.0a1.
|
|
|
|
|
* December 2007: release 2.6a1.
|
|
|
|
|
* April 2008: full feature freeze.
|
|
|
|
|
* June 2008: release 2.6 (final).
|
|
|
|
|
* August 2008: release 3.0 (final).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See PEP 361 for more details on the Python 2.6 release schedule.
|
2006-04-05 16:06:03 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
2007-04-10 14:55:02 -04:00
|
|
|
|
Note: standard library development is expected to ramp up after 3.0a1
|
|
|
|
|
is released; it is exempt from the April 2007 PEP deadline.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-04-05 16:06:03 -04:00
|
|
|
|
I expect that there will be parallel Python 2.x and 3.x releases for
|
|
|
|
|
some time; the Python 2.x releases will continue for a longer time
|
|
|
|
|
than the traditional 2.x.y bugfix releases. Typically, we stop
|
|
|
|
|
releasing bugfix versions for 2.x once version 2.(x+1) has been
|
|
|
|
|
released. But I expect there to be at least one or two new 2.x
|
|
|
|
|
releases even after 3.0 (final) has been released, probably well into
|
2007-08-25 14:34:09 -04:00
|
|
|
|
3.1 or 3.2. This will to some extent depend on community demand for
|
2006-04-05 16:06:03 -04:00
|
|
|
|
continued 2.x support, acceptance and stability of 3.0, and volunteer
|
|
|
|
|
stamina.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-12-19 16:17:06 -05:00
|
|
|
|
I expect that Python 3.1 and 3.2 will be released much sooner after
|
|
|
|
|
3.0 than has been customary for the 2.x series. The 3.x release
|
|
|
|
|
pattern will stabilize once the community is happy with 3.x.
|
2006-04-05 16:06:03 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compatibility and Transition
|
|
|
|
|
============================
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-06-18 20:24:07 -04:00
|
|
|
|
Python 3.0 will break backwards compatibility with Python 2.x.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**There is no requirement that Python 2.6 code will run unmodified on
|
|
|
|
|
Python 3.0.** Not even a subset. (Of course there will be a *tiny*
|
|
|
|
|
subset, but it will be missing major functionality.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Python 2.6 will support forward compatibility in the following two
|
|
|
|
|
ways:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* It will support a "Py3k warnings mode" which will warn dynamically
|
|
|
|
|
(i.e. at runtime) about features that will stop working in Python
|
|
|
|
|
3.0, e.g. assuming that range() returns a list.
|
|
|
|
|
* It will contain backported versions of many Py3k features, either
|
|
|
|
|
enabled through __future__ statements or simply by allowing old and
|
|
|
|
|
new syntax to be used side-by-side (if the new syntax would be a
|
|
|
|
|
syntax error in 2.x).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Instead, and complementary to the forward compatibility features in
|
|
|
|
|
2.6, there will be a separate source code conversion tool [1]_. This
|
|
|
|
|
tool can do a context-free source-to-source translation. For example,
|
|
|
|
|
it can translate ``apply(f, args)`` into ``f(*args)``. However, the
|
|
|
|
|
tool cannot do data flow analysis or type inferencing, so it simply
|
|
|
|
|
assumes that ``apply`` in this example refers to the old built-in
|
|
|
|
|
function.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The recommended development model for a project that needs to support
|
2007-06-18 21:05:14 -04:00
|
|
|
|
Python 2.6 and 3.0 simultaneously is as follows:
|
2007-06-18 20:24:07 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0. You should have excellent unit tests with close to full coverage.
|
|
|
|
|
1. Port your project to Python 2.6.
|
|
|
|
|
2. Turn on the Py3k warnings mode.
|
|
|
|
|
3. Test and edit until no warnings remain.
|
|
|
|
|
4. Use the 2to3 tool to convert this source code to 3.0 syntax.
|
|
|
|
|
**Do not manually edit the output!**
|
|
|
|
|
5. Test the converted source code under 3.0.
|
|
|
|
|
6. If problems are found, make corrections to the **2.6** version
|
|
|
|
|
of the source code and go back to step 3.
|
|
|
|
|
7. When it's time to release, release separate 2.6 and 3.0 tarballs
|
|
|
|
|
(or whatever archive form you use for releases).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is recommended not to edit the 3.0 source code until you are ready
|
|
|
|
|
to reduce 2.6 support to pure maintenance (i.e. the moment when you
|
|
|
|
|
would normally move the 2.6 code to a maintenance branch anyway).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PS. We need a meta-PEP to describe the transitional issues in detail.
|
2006-04-06 14:03:49 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
2006-04-05 16:06:03 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
2006-08-18 12:17:21 -04:00
|
|
|
|
Implementation Language
|
|
|
|
|
=======================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Python 3000 will be implemented in C, and the implementation will be
|
|
|
|
|
derived as an evolution of the Python 2 code base. This reflects my
|
2007-06-18 20:24:07 -04:00
|
|
|
|
views (which I share with Joel Spolsky [2]_) on the dangers of complete
|
2006-08-18 12:17:21 -04:00
|
|
|
|
rewrites. Since Python 3000 as a language is a relatively mild
|
|
|
|
|
improvement on Python 2, we can gain a lot by not attempting to
|
|
|
|
|
reimplement the language from scratch. I am not against parallel
|
|
|
|
|
from-scratch implementation efforts, but my own efforts will be
|
|
|
|
|
directed at the language and implementation that I know best.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-04-05 16:06:03 -04:00
|
|
|
|
Meta-Contributions
|
|
|
|
|
==================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suggestions for additional text for this PEP are gracefully accepted
|
|
|
|
|
by the author. Draft meta-PEPs for the topics above and additional
|
|
|
|
|
topics are even more welcome!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-06-18 20:24:07 -04:00
|
|
|
|
References
|
|
|
|
|
==========
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. [1] The 2to3 tool, in the subversion sandbox
|
|
|
|
|
http://svn.python.org/view/sandbox/trunk/2to3/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. [2] Joel on Software: Things You Should Never Do, Part I
|
|
|
|
|
http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/fog0000000069.html
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-04-05 16:06:03 -04:00
|
|
|
|
Copyright
|
|
|
|
|
=========
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This document has been placed in the public domain.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
..
|
|
|
|
|
Local Variables:
|
|
|
|
|
mode: indented-text
|
|
|
|
|
indent-tabs-mode: nil
|
|
|
|
|
sentence-end-double-space: t
|
|
|
|
|
fill-column: 70
|
|
|
|
|
coding: utf-8
|
|
|
|
|
End:
|