python-peps/peps/pep-0559.rst

104 lines
2.7 KiB
ReStructuredText
Raw Normal View History

2017-09-08 19:12:51 -04:00
PEP: 559
Title: Built-in noop()
Author: Barry Warsaw <barry@python.org>
2017-09-10 13:18:53 -04:00
Status: Rejected
2017-09-08 19:12:51 -04:00
Type: Standards Track
Content-Type: text/x-rst
Created: 08-Sep-2017
2017-09-08 19:12:51 -04:00
Python-Version: 3.7
Post-History: 09-Sep-2017
2017-09-10 14:29:01 -04:00
Resolution: https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2017-September/149438.html
2017-09-08 19:12:51 -04:00
Abstract
========
This PEP proposes adding a new built-in function called ``noop()`` which does
nothing but return ``None``.
Rationale
=========
It is trivial to implement a no-op function in Python. It's so easy in fact
that many people do it many times over and over again. It would be useful in
many cases to have a common built-in function that does nothing.
One use case would be for :pep:`553`, where you could set the breakpoint
2017-09-08 19:12:51 -04:00
environment variable to the following in order to effectively disable it::
$ setenv PYTHONBREAKPOINT=noop
Implementation
==============
The Python equivalent of the ``noop()`` function is exactly::
def noop(*args, **kws):
return None
2017-09-10 13:02:56 -04:00
The C built-in implementation is available as a pull request [1]_.
2017-09-08 19:12:51 -04:00
Rejected alternatives
=====================
``noop()`` returns something
----------------------------
YAGNI.
This is rejected because it complicates the semantics. For example, if you
always return both ``*args`` and ``**kws``, what do you return when none of
those are given? Returning a tuple of ``((), {})`` is kind of ugly, but
provides consistency. But you might also want to just return ``None`` since
that's also conceptually what the function was passed.
Or, what if you pass in exactly one positional argument, e.g. ``noop(7)``. Do
you return ``7`` or ``((7,), {})``? And so on.
The author claims that you won't ever need the return value of ``noop()`` so
it will always return ``None``.
2017-09-10 23:04:07 -04:00
Coghlan's Dialogs (edited for formatting):
2017-09-09 14:41:41 -04:00
My counterargument to this would be ``map(noop, iterable)``,
``sorted(iterable, key=noop)``, etc. (``filter``, ``max``, and
``min`` all accept callables that accept a single argument, as do
many of the itertools operations).
Making ``noop()`` a useful default function in those cases just
needs the definition to be::
def noop(*args, **kwds):
return args[0] if args else None
The counterargument to the counterargument is that using ``None``
as the default in all these cases is going to be faster, since it
lets the algorithm skip the callback entirely, rather than calling
it and having it do nothing useful.
2017-09-08 19:12:51 -04:00
2017-09-10 13:02:56 -04:00
References
==========
.. [1] https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/3480
2017-09-08 19:12:51 -04:00
Copyright
=========
This document has been placed in the public domain.
..
Local Variables:
mode: indented-text
indent-tabs-mode: nil
sentence-end-double-space: t
fill-column: 70
coding: utf-8
End: