python-peps/pep-0299.txt

107 lines
3.0 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

PEP: 299
Title: Special __main__() function in modules
Version: $Revision$
Last-Modified: $Date$
Author: Jeff Epler <jepler@unpythonic.net>
Status: Rejected
Type: Standards Track
Created: 12-Aug-2002
Python-version: 2.3
Post-History:
Abstract
Many Python modules are also intended to be callable as standalone
scripts. This PEP proposes that a special function called
__main__() should serve this purpose.
Motivation
There should be one simple and universal idiom for invoking a
module as a standalone script.
The semi-standard idiom
if __name__ == '__main__':
perform "standalone" functionality
is unclear to programmers of languages like C and C++. It also
does not permit invocation of the standalone function when the
module is imported. The variant
if __name__ == '__main__':
main_function()
is sometimes seen, but there exists no standard name for the
function, and because arguments are taken from sys.argv it is not
possible to pass specific arguments without changing the argument
list seen by all other modules. (Imagine a threaded Python
program, with two threads wishing to invoke the standalone
functionality of different modules with different argument lists)
Proposal
The standard name of the 'main function' should be '__main__'.
When a module is invoked on the command line, such as
python mymodule.py
then the module behaves as though the following lines existed at
the end of the module (except that the attribute __sys may not be
used or assumed to exist elsewhere in the script):
if globals().has_key("__main__"):
import sys as __sys
__sys.exit(__main__(__sys.argv))
Other modules may execute
import mymodule
mymodule.__main__(['mymodule', ...])
It is up to mymodule to document thread-safety issues or other
issues which might restrict use of __main__. (Other issues might
include use of mutually exclusive GUI modules, non-sharable
resources like hardware devices, reassignment of sys.stdin/stdout,
etc)
Implementation
In modules/main.c, the block near line 385 (after the
PyRun_AnyFileExFlags call) will be changed so that the above code
(or its C equivalent) is executed.
Open Issues
- Should the return value from __main__ be treated as the exit value?
Yes. Many __main__ will naturally return None, which sys.exit
translates into a "success" return code. In those that return a
numeric result, it behaves just like the argument to sys.exit()
or the return value from C's main().
- Should the argument list to __main__ include argv[0], or just the
"real" arguments argv[1:]?
argv[0] is included for symmetry with sys.argv and easy
transition to the new standard idiom.
Copyright
This document has been placed in the public domain.
Local Variables:
mode: indented-text
indent-tabs-mode: nil
sentence-end-double-space: t
fill-column: 70
End: