python-peps/pep-0357.txt

94 lines
3.5 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

PEP: 357
Title: Allowing Any Object to be Used for Slicing
Version: $Revision$
Last Modified: $Date$
Author: Travis Oliphant <oliphant@ee.byu.edu>
Status: Draft
Type: Standards Track
Created: 09-Feb-2006
Python-Version: 2.5
Abstract
2006-02-10 12:46:20 -05:00
This PEP proposes adding an nb_index slot in PyNumberMethods and an
__index__ special method so that arbitrary objects can be used
whenever only integers are called for in Python, such as in slice
syntax (from which the slot gets its name).
Rationale
2006-02-10 12:46:20 -05:00
Currently integers and long integers play a special role in slice
notation in that they are the only objects allowed in slice
syntax. In other words, if X is an object implementing the sequence
protocol, then X[obj1:obj2] is only valid if obj1 and obj2 are both
integers or long integers. There is no way for obj1 and obj2 to
tell Python that they could be reasonably used as indexes into a
sequence. This is an unnecessary limitation.
In NumPy, for example, there are 8 different integer scalars
corresponding to unsigned and signed integers of 8, 16, 32, and 64
bits. These type-objects could reasonably be used as integers in
many places where Python expects true integers. There should be
some way to be able to tell Python that an object can behave like
an integer.
It is not possible to use the nb_int (and __int__ special method)
for this purpose because that method is used to *coerce* objects to
integers. It would be inappropriate to allow every object that can
be coerced to an integer to be used as an integer everywhere Python
expects a true integer.
Proposal
2006-02-10 12:46:20 -05:00
Add a nb_index slot to PyNumberMethods, and a corresponding
__index__ special method. Objects could define a function to place
in the nb_index slot that returns an appropriate C-integer for use
as ilow or ihigh in PySequence_GetSlice, PySequence_SetSlice, and
PySequence_DelSlice.
Implementation Plan
2006-02-10 12:46:20 -05:00
1) Add the nb_index slot in object.h and modify typeobject.c to
create the __index__ method.
2) Change the ISINT macro in ceval.c to ISINDEX and alter it to
accomodate objects with the index slot defined.
2006-02-10 12:46:20 -05:00
3) Change the _PyEval_SliceIndex function to accomodate objects
with the index slot defined.
2006-02-10 12:46:20 -05:00
4) Change all builtin objects that use the subscript form and
special-check for integers to check for the slot as well
5) Add PyNumber_Index C-API to return an integer from any
Python Object that has the nb_index slot.
6) Add an operator.index(x) function that calls x.__index__()
Possible Concerns
2006-02-10 12:46:20 -05:00
Speed:
2006-02-10 12:46:20 -05:00
Implementation should not slow down Python because integers and long
integers used as indexes will complete in the same number of
instructions. The only change will be that what used to generate
an error will now be acceptable.
2006-02-10 12:46:20 -05:00
Why not use nb_int which is already there?:
2006-02-10 12:46:20 -05:00
The nb_int method is used for coercion and so means something
fundamentally different than what is requested here. This PEP
proposes a method for something that *can* already be thought of as
an integer communicate that information to Python when it needs an
integer. The biggest example of why using nb_int would be a bad
thing is that float objects already define the nb_int method, but
float objects *should not* be used as indexes in a sequence.
Reference Implementation
2006-02-10 12:46:20 -05:00
Submitted as a patch to SourceForge.
Copyright
2006-02-10 12:46:20 -05:00
This document is placed in the public domain