python-peps/pep-0539.txt

PEP: 539
Title: A New C-API for Thread-Local Storage in CPython
Version: $Revision$
Last-Modified: $Date$
Author: Erik M. Bray, Masayuki Yamamoto
BDFL-Delegate: Nick Coghlan
Status: Draft
Type: Informational
Content-Type: text/x-rst
Created: 20-Dec-2016
Post-History: 16-Dec-2016


Abstract
========

The proposal is to add a new Thread Local Storage (TLS) API to CPython which
would supersede use of the existing TLS API within the CPython interpreter,
while deprecating the existing API.

Because the existing TLS API is only used internally (it is not mentioned in
the documentation, and the header that defines it, ``pythread.h``, is not
included in ``Python.h`` either directly or indirectly), this proposal probably
only affects CPython, but might also affect other interpreter implementations
(PyPy?) that implement parts of the CPython API.

This is motivated primarily by the fact that the old API uses ``int`` to
represent TLS keys across all platforms, which is neither POSIX-compliant,
nor portable in any practical sense [1]_.

.. note::

    Throughout this document the acronym "TLS" refers to Thread Local
    Storage and should not be confused with "Transportation Layer Security"
    protocols.


Specification
=============

The current API for TLS used inside the CPython interpreter consists of 6
functions::

    PyAPI_FUNC(int) PyThread_create_key(void)
    PyAPI_FUNC(void) PyThread_delete_key(int key)
    PyAPI_FUNC(int) PyThread_set_key_value(int key, void *value)
    PyAPI_FUNC(void *) PyThread_get_key_value(int key)
    PyAPI_FUNC(void) PyThread_delete_key_value(int key)
    PyAPI_FUNC(void) PyThread_ReInitTLS(void)

These would be superseded by a new set of analogous functions::

    PyAPI_FUNC(int) PyThread_tss_create(Py_tss_t *key)
    PyAPI_FUNC(void) PyThread_tss_delete(Py_tss_t *key)
    PyAPI_FUNC(int) PyThread_tss_set(Py_tss_t key, void *value)
    PyAPI_FUNC(void *) PyThread_tss_get(Py_tss_t key)
    PyAPI_FUNC(void) PyThread_tss_delete_value(Py_tss_t key)
    PyAPI_FUNC(void) PyThread_ReInitTSS(void)

The specification also adds three new features:

* A new type ``Py_tss_t``--an opaque type the definition of which may
  depend on the underlying TLS implementation.  It is defined::

      typedef struct {
          bool _is_initialized;
          NATIVE_TLS_KEY_T _key;
      } Py_tss_t;

  where ``NATIVE_TLS_KEY_T`` is a macro whose value depends on the
  underlying native TLS implementation (e.g. ``pthread_key_t``).

* A constant default value for ``Py_tss_t`` variables,
  ``Py_tss_NEEDS_INIT``.

* A new inline function::

      static inline bool PyThread_tss_is_created(Py_tss_t key)

  which returns ``true`` if the given ``Py_tss_t`` has been initialized
  (i.e. by ``PyThread_tss_create``).

The new ``PyThread_tss_`` functions are almost exactly analogous to their
original counterparts with a minor difference:  Whereas
``PyThread_create_key`` takes no arguments and returns a TLS key as an
``int``, ``PyThread_tss_create`` takes a ``Py_tss_t*`` as an argument and
returns an ``int`` status code. The behavior of ``PyThread_tss_create`` is
undefined if the value pointed to by the ``key`` argument is not initialized
by ``Py_tss_NEEDS_INIT``. The returned status status code is zero on success
and non-zero on failure.  The meanings of non-zero status codes are not
otherwise defined by this specification.

Similarly ``PyThread_tss_delete`` is passed a ``Py_tss_t*`` whereas
previouly the key was passed to ``PyThread_delete_key`` by value.

The old ``PyThread_*_key*`` functions will be marked as deprecated in the
documentation, but will not generate runtime deprecation warnings.

Additionally, on platforms where ``sizeof(pthread_key_t) != sizeof(int)``,
``PyThread_create_key`` will return immediately with a failure status, and
the other TLS functions will all be no-ops on such platforms.

Example
-------

With the proposed changes, a TSS key is initialized like::

    static Py_tss_t tss_key = Py_tss_NEEDS_INIT;
    if (PyThread_tss_create(&tss_key)) {
        /* ... handle key creation failure ... */
    }

The initialization state of the key can then be checked like::

    assert(PyThread_tss_is_created(tss_key));

The rest of the API is used analogously to the old API::

    int the_value = 1;
    if (PyThread_tss_get(tss_key) == NULL) {
        PyThread_tss_set(tss_key, (void *)&the_value);
        assert(PyThread_tss_get(tss_key) != NULL);
    }
    /* ... once done with the key ... */
    PyThread_tss_delete(&tss_key);
    assert(!PyThread_tss_is_created(tss_key));


Motivation
==========

The primary problem at issue here is the type of the keys (``int``) used for
TLS values, as defined by the original PyThread TLS API.

The original TLS API was added to Python by GvR back in 1997, and at the
time the key used to represent a TLS value was an ``int``, and so it has
been to the time of writing.  This used CPython's own TLS implementation,
the current generation of which can still be found, largely unchanged, in
Python/thread.c.  Support for implementation of the API on top of native
thread implementations (NT and pthreads) was added much later, and the
built-in implementation may still be used on other platforms.

The problem with the choice of ``int`` to represent a TLS key, is that while
it was fine for CPython's internal TLS implementation, and happens to be
compatible with NT (which uses ``DWORD`` for the analogous data), it is not
compatible with the POSIX standard for the pthreads API, which defines
``pthread_key_t`` as an opaque type not further defined by the standard (as
with ``Py_tss_t`` described above).  This leaves it up to the underlying
implementation how a ``pthread_key_t`` value is used to look up
thread-specific data.

This has not generally been a problem for Python's API, as it just happens
that on Linux ``pthread_key_t`` is defined as an ``unsigned int``, and so is
fully compatible with Python's TLS API--``pthread_key_t``'s created by
``pthread_create_key`` can be freely cast to ``int`` and back (well, not
exactly, even this has some limitations as pointed out by issue #22206).

However, as issue #25658 points out, there are at least some platforms
(namely Cygwin, CloudABI, but likely others as well) which have otherwise
modern and POSIX-compliant pthreads implementations, but are not compatible
with Python's API because their ``pthread_key_t`` is defined in a way that
cannot be safely cast to ``int``.  In fact, the possibility of running into
this problem was raised by MvL at the time pthreads TLS was added [2]_.

It could be argued that PEP-11 makes specific requirements for supporting a
new, not otherwise officially-support platform (such as CloudABI), and that
the status of Cygwin support is currently dubious.  However, this creates a
very high barrier to supporting platforms that are otherwise Linux- and/or
POSIX-compatible and where CPython might otherwise "just work" except for
this one hurdle.  CPython itself imposes this implementation barrier by way
of an API that is not compatible with POSIX (and in fact makes invalid
assumptions about pthreads).


Rationale for Proposed Solution
===============================

The use of an opaque type (``Py_tss_t``) to key TLS values allows the API to
be compatible, at least in this regard, with CPython's internal TLS
implementation, as well as all present (NT and posix) and future (C11?)
native TLS implementations supported by CPython, as it allows the definition
of ``Py_tss_t`` to depend on the underlying implementation.

A new API must be introduced, rather than changing the function signatures of
the current API, in order to maintain backwards compatibility.  The new API
also more clearly groups together these related functions under a single name
prefix, ``PyThread_tss_``.  The "tss" in the name stands for "thread-specific
storage", and was influenced by the naming and design of the "tss" API that is
part of the C11 threads API.  However, this is in no way meant to imply
compatibility with or support for the C11 threads API, or signal any future
intention of supporting C11--it's just the influence for the naming and design.

The inclusion of the special default value ``Py_tss_NEEDS_INIT`` is required
by the fact that not all native TLS implementations define a sentinel value
for uninitialized TLS keys.  For example, on Windows a TLS key is
represented by a ``DWORD`` (``unsigned int``) and its value must be treated
as opaque [3]_.  So there is no unsigned integer value that can be safely
used to represent an uninititalized TLS key on Windows.  Likewise, POSIX
does not specify a sentintel for an uninitialized ``pthread_key_t``, instead
relying on the ``pthread_once`` interface to ensure that a given TLS key is
initialized only once per-process.  Therefore, the ``Py_tss_t`` type
contains an explicit ``._is_initialized`` that can indicate the key's
initialization state independent of the underlying implementation.

Changing ``PyThread_create_key`` to immediately return a failure status on
systems using pthreads where ``sizeof(int) != sizeof(pthread_key_t)`` is
intended as a sanity check:  Currently, ``PyThread_create_key`` may report
initial success on such systems, but attempts to use the returned key are
likely to fail.  Although in practice this failure occurs earlier in the
interpreter initialization, it's better to fail immediately at the source of
problem (``PyThread_create_key``) rather than sometime later when use of an
invalid key is attempted.  In other words, this indicates clearly that the
old API is not supported on platforms where it cannot be used reliably, and
that no effort will be made to add such support.


Rejected Ideas
==============

* Do nothing: The status quo is fine because it works on Linux, and platforms
  wishing to be supported by CPython should follow the requirements of
  PEP-11.  As explained above, while this would be a fair argument if
  CPython were being to asked to make changes to support particular quirks
  or features of a specific platform, in this case it is quirk of CPython
  that prevents it from being used to its full potential on otherwise
  POSIX-compliant platforms.  The fact that the current implementation
  happens to work on Linux is a happy accident, and there's no guarantee
  that this will never change.

* Affected platforms should just configure Python ``--without-threads``:
  This is a possible temporary workaround to the issue, but only that.
  Python should not be hobbled on affected platforms despite them being
  otherwise perfectly capable of running multi-threaded Python.

* Affected platforms should not define ``Py_HAVE_NATIVE_TLS``: This is a more
  acceptable alternative to the previous idea, and in fact there is a patch to
  do just that [4]_.  However, CPython's internal TLS implementation being
  "slower and clunkier" in general than native implementations still needlessly
  hobbles performance on affected platforms.  At least one other module
  (``tracemalloc``) is also broken if Python is built without
  ``Py_HAVE_NATIVE_TLS``.

* Keep the existing API, but work around the issue by providing a mapping from
  ``pthread_key_t`` values to ``int`` values.  A couple attempts were made at
  this ([5]_, [6]_), but this only injects needless complexity and overhead
  into performance-critical code on platforms that are not currently affected
  by this issue (such as Linux).  Even if use of this workaround were made
  conditional on platform compatibility, it introduces platform-specific code
  to maintain, and still has the problem of the previous rejected ideas of
  needlessly hobbling performance on affected platforms.


Implementation
==============

An initial version of a patch [7]_ is available on the bug tracker for this
issue.


Copyright
=========

This document has been placed in the public domain.


References and Footnotes
========================

.. [1] http://bugs.python.org/issue25658
.. [2] https://bugs.python.org/msg116292
.. [3] https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms686801(v=vs.85).aspx
.. [4] http://bugs.python.org/file45548/configure-pthread_key_t.patch
.. [5] http://bugs.python.org/file44269/issue25658-1.patch
.. [6] http://bugs.python.org/file44303/key-constant-time.diff
.. [7] http://bugs.python.org/file46379/pythread-tss-3.patch