python-peps/pep-0240.txt

76 lines
2.0 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

PEP: 240
Title: Adding a Rational Literal to Python
Version: $Revision$
Author: pep@zadka.site.co.il (Moshe Zadka)
Status: Draft
Type: Standards Track
Created: 11-Mar-2001
Python-Version: 2.2
Post-History: 16-Mar-2001
Abstract
A different PEP[1] suggests adding a builtin rational type to
Python. This PEP suggests changing the ddd.ddd float literal to a
rational in Python, and modifying non-integer division to return
it.
Rationale
Rational numbers are useful, and are much harder to use without
literals. Making the "obvious" non-integer type one with more
predictable semantics will surprise new programmers less then
using floating point numbers.
Proposal
Literals conforming to the regular expression '\d*.\d*' will be
rational numbers.
Backwards Compatibility
The only backwards compatible issue is the type of literals
mentioned above. The following migration is suggested:
1. "from __future__ import rational_literals" will cause all such
literals to be treated as rational numbers.
2. Python 2.2 will have a warning, turned off by default, about
such literals in the absence of a __future__ statement. The
warning message will contain information about the __future__
statement, and indicate that to get floating point literals,
they should be suffixed with "e0".
3. Python 2.3 will have the warning turned on by default. This
warning will stay in place for 24 months, at which time the
literals will be rationals and the warning will be removed.
Common Objections
Rationals are slow and memory intensive!
(Relax, I'm not taking floats away, I'm just adding two more characters.
1e0 will still be a float)
References
[1] PEP 239, Adding a Rational Type to Python, Zadka,
http://python.sourceforge.net/peps/pep-0239.html
Copyright
This document has been placed in the public domain.
Local Variables:
mode: indented-text
indent-tabs-mode: nil
End: