Somehow this rejection wasn't checked in.

pep-0245.txt

@@ -4,13 +4,22 @@ Version: $Revision$
 Last-Modified: $Date$
 Author: Michel Pelletier <michel@users.sourceforge.net>
 Discussions-To: http://www.zope.org/Wikis/Interfaces
-Status: Draft 
+Status: Rejected
 Type: Standards Track
 Created: 11-Jan-2001
 Python-Version: 2.2
 Post-History: 21-Mar-2001
 
 
+Rejection Notice
+
+    I'm rejecting this PEP.  It's been five years now.  While at some
+    point I expect that Python will have interfaces, it would be naive
+    to expect it to resemble the syntax in this PEP.  Also, PEP 246 is
+    being rejected in favor of something completely different; interfaces
+    won't play a role in adaptation or whatever will replace it.  GvR.
+
+
 Introduction
 
     This PEP describes a proposed syntax for creating interface

pep-0246.txt

@@ -4,13 +4,21 @@ Version: $Revision$
 Last-Modified: $Date$
 Author: aleax@aleax.it (Alex Martelli),
     cce@clarkevans.com (Clark C. Evans)
-Status: Draft
+Status: Rejected
 Type: Standards Track
 Created: 21-Mar-2001
 Python-Version: 2.5
 Post-History: 29-Mar-2001, 10-Jan-2005
 
 
+Rejection Notice
+
+    I'm rejecting this PEP.  Something much better is about to happen;
+    it's too early to say exactly what, but it's not going to resemble
+    the proposal in this PEP too closely so it's better to start a new
+    PEP.  GvR.
+
+
 Abstract
 
     This proposal puts forth an extensible cooperative mechanism for