Backed out changeset 54c62ebb0501

This commit is contained in:
Nick Coghlan 2013-08-02 23:08:54 +10:00
parent 8c54950c0e
commit 12b49b6a86
2 changed files with 12 additions and 146 deletions

View File

@ -86,24 +86,6 @@ identification scheme.
"rationale" section at the end of the document, as it would otherwise be
an irrelevant distraction for future readers.
A Note on Time Frames
=====================
There's a lot of work going on in the Python packaging space at the moment.
In the near term (up until the release of Python 3.4), those efforts will be
focused on the existing metadata standards, both those defined in Python
Enhancement Proposals, and the de facto standards defined by the setuptools
project.
This PEP is about setting out a longer term goal for the ecosystem that
captures those existing capabilities in a format that is easier to work
with. There are still a number of key open questions (mostly related to
source based distribution), and those won't be able to receive proper
attention from the development community until the other near term
concerns have been resolved.
Purpose
=======
@ -241,16 +223,12 @@ or consumes distribution version and dependency metadata.
along with the supporting metadata file formats defined by the
``setuptools`` project.
"Distro" is used as the preferred term for Linux distributions, to help
avoid confusion with the Python-specific meaning of the term "distribution".
"Entry points" are a scheme for identifying Python callables or other
objects as strings consisting of a Python module name and a module
attribute name, separated by a colon. For example: ``"test.regrtest:main"``.
"Dist" is the preferred abbreviation for "distributions" in the sense defined
in this PEP.
"Qualified name" comes from PEP 3155, and refers to the name of an
object relative to its containing module. This is useful for referring
to method definitions on classes, as well as any other attributes of
top level module objects.
"Distros" is used as the preferred term for Linux distributions, to help
avoid confusion with the Python-specific meaning of the term.
Integration and deployment of distributions
@ -277,10 +255,7 @@ Integration and deployment can in turn be broken down into further substeps.
These three steps may all occur directly on the target system. Alternatively
the build step may be separated out by using binary archives provided by the
publisher of the distribution, or by creating the binary archives on a
separate system prior to deployment. The advantage of the latter approach
is that it minimizes the dependencies that need to be installed on
deployment targets (as the build dependencies will be needed only on the
build systems).
separate system prior to deployment.
The published metadata for distributions SHOULD allow integrators, with the
aid of build and integration tools, to:
@ -324,25 +299,6 @@ and publishers, with the aid of build and publication tools, to:
Standard build system
---------------------
.. note::
The standard build system currently described in the PEP is a draft based
on existing practices for projects using distutils or setuptools as their
build system (or other projects, like ``d2to1``, that expose a setup.py
file for backwards compatibility with existing tools)
The specification doesn't currently cover expected argument support for
the commands, which is a limitation that needs to be addressed before the
PEP can be considered ready for acceptance.
It is also possible that the "meta build system" will be separated out
into a distinct PEP in the coming months (similar to the separation of
the versioning and requirement specification standard out to PEP 440).
If a `suitable API can be worked out <Metabuild system>`__, then it may
even be possible to switch to a more declarative API for build system
specification.
Both development and integration of distributions relies on the ability to
build extension modules and perform other operations in a distribution
independent manner.
@ -362,6 +318,10 @@ development and integration activities:
* ``python setup.py bdist_wheel``: create a binary archive from an sdist,
source archive or VCS checkout
Future iterations of the metadata and associated PEPs may aim to replace
these ``distutils``/``setuptools`` dependent commands with build system
independent entry points.
Metadata format
===============
@ -476,48 +436,6 @@ When serialised to a file, the name used for this metadata set SHOULD
be ``pydist-dependencies.json``.
Export metadata
---------------
Distributions may define components that are intended for use by other
distributions (such as plugins). As it can be beneficial to know whether or
not a distribution defines any such exports without needing to parse any
metadata, a suitable subset is defined for serialisation to a separate file
in the ``dist-info`` metadata directory.
The external command metadata consists of the following fields:
* ``metadata_version``
* ``generator``
* ``name``
* ``version``
* ``exports``
When serialised to a file, the name used for this metadata set SHOULD
be ``pydist-exports.json``.
External command metadata
-------------------------
Distributions may define commands that will be available from the command
line following installation. As it can be beneficial to know whether or not
a distribution has external commands without needing to parse any metadata,
a suitable subset is defined for serialisation to a separate file in the
``dist-info`` metadata directory.
The external command metadata consists of the following fields:
* ``metadata_version``
* ``generator``
* ``name``
* ``version``
* ``commands``
When serialised to a file, the name used for this metadata set SHOULD
be ``pydist-commands.json``.
Included documents
------------------
@ -1564,33 +1482,6 @@ extension when creating an sdist, and use those when creating the wheel
files later.
Exported interfaces
===================
Most Python distributions expose packages and modules for import through
the Python module namespace.
Extensions to the metadata may be present in a mapping under the
'extensions' key. The keys must meet the same restrictions as
distribution names, while the values may be any type natively supported
in JSON::
"extensions" : {
"chili" : { "type" : "Poblano", "heat" : "Mild" },
"languages" : [ "French", "Italian", "Hebrew" ]
}
To avoid name conflicts, it is RECOMMENDED that distribution names be used
to identify metadata extensions. This practice will also make it easier to
find authoritative documentation for metadata extensions.
Metadata extensions allow development tools to record information in the
metadata that may be useful during later phases of distribution. For
example, a build tool could include default build options in a metadata
extension when creating an sdist, and use those when creating the wheel
files later.
Extras (optional dependencies)
==============================

View File

@ -3,11 +3,11 @@ Title: Simplifying the CPython startup sequence
Version: $Revision$
Last-Modified: $Date$
Author: Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan@gmail.com>
Status: Deferred
Status: Draft
Type: Standards Track
Content-Type: text/x-rst
Created: 28-Dec-2012
Python-Version: 3.5
Python-Version: 3.4
Post-History: 28-Dec-2012, 2-Jan-2013
@ -25,31 +25,6 @@ resolution for most of these should become clearer as the reference
implementation is developed.
PEP Deferral
============
Python 3.4 is nearing its first alpha, and already includes a couple of
significant low level changes in PEP 445 (memory allocator customisation)
and PEP 442 (safe object finalization). As a result of the latter PEP,
the shutdown procedure of CPython has also been changed to be more heavily
reliant on the cyclic garbage collector, significantly reducing the
number of modules that will experience the "module globals set to None"
behaviour that is used to deliberate break cycles and attempt to releases
more external resources cleanly.
Furthermore, I am heavily involved in the current round of updates to the
Python packaging ecosystem (as both the lead author of PEP 426 and
BDFL-delegate for several other PEPs), leaving little to spare to work on
this proposal. The other developers I would trust to lead this effort are
also working on other things.
So, due to those practical resource constraints, the proximity of Python
3.4 deadlines, and recognition that making too many significant changes to
the low level CPython infrastructure in one release is likely to be unwise,
further work on this PEP has been deferred to the Python 3.5 development
cycle.
Proposal
========