PEP 259 rejected by user community with record unanimity.

This commit is contained in:
Guido van Rossum 2001-06-13 16:22:05 +00:00
parent 559c1c1ad4
commit 137a35ac05
2 changed files with 17 additions and 5 deletions

View File

@ -60,7 +60,6 @@ Index by Category
S 256 pep-0256.txt Docstring Processing System Framework Goodger
S 257 pep-0257.txt Docstring Conventions Goodger
S 258 pep-0258.txt DPS Generic Implementation Details Goodger
S 259 pep-0259.txt Omit printing newline after newline van Rossum
Py-in-the-sky PEPs (not ready; may become active yet)
@ -108,7 +107,8 @@ Index by Category
SR 204 pep-0204.txt Range Literals Wouters
SR 224 pep-0224.txt Attribute Docstrings Lemburg
SR 231 pep-0231.txt __findattr__() Warsaw
S 233 pep-0233.txt Python Online Help Prescod
SD 233 pep-0233.txt Python Online Help Prescod
SR 259 pep-0259.txt Omit printing newline after newline van Rossum
Numerical Index
@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ Numerical Index
S 230 pep-0230.txt Warning Framework van Rossum
SR 231 pep-0231.txt __findattr__() Warsaw
SF 232 pep-0232.txt Function Attributes Warsaw
S 233 pep-0233.txt Python Online Help Prescod
SD 233 pep-0233.txt Python Online Help Prescod
S 234 pep-0234.txt Iterators Yee, van Rossum
SF 235 pep-0235.txt Import on Case-Insensitive Platforms Peters
SF 236 pep-0236.txt Back to the __future__ Peters
@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ Numerical Index
S 256 pep-0256.txt Docstring Processing System Framework Goodger
S 257 pep-0257.txt Docstring Conventions Goodger
S 258 pep-0258.txt DPS Generic Implementation Details Goodger
S 259 pep-0259.txt Omit printing newline after newline van Rossum
SR 259 pep-0259.txt Omit printing newline after newline van Rossum
Key

View File

@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ PEP: 259
Title: Omit printing newline after newline
Version: $Revision$
Author: guido@python.org (Guido van Rossum)
Status: Draft
Status: Rejected
Type: Standards Track
Python-Version: 2.2
Created: 11-Jun-2001
@ -109,6 +109,18 @@ Implementation
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=432183&group_id=5470&atid=305470
Rejected
The user community unanimously rejected this, so I won't pursue
this idea any further. Frequently heard arguments against
included:
- It it likely to break thousands of CGI scripts.
- Enough magic already (also: no more tinkering with 'print'
please).
Copyright
This document has been placed in the public domain.