iSharkFly-Open
/
python-peps
mirror of https://github.com/python/peps.git
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Typo

This commit is contained in:
Barry Warsaw 2018-10-24 10:21:09 -07:00
parent 0c55847f17
commit 19d46ea7b1
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 126EB563A74B06BF
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
pep-8010.rst
View File

@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ Why a singular leader?
Why this model rather than any other? It comes down to "vision".
`Design by committee`_ has many known downsides, leading to a language
that accretes new features based on the varied interests of the
contributors at the time. An famous aphorism is "a camel is a horse
contributors at the time. A famous aphorism is "a camel is a horse
designed by committee". Can a language that is designed by committee
"hang together"? Does it feel like a coherent, self-consistent
language where the rules make sense and are easily remembered?