Add link to survey by Steven D, and summarize the two responses so far.

This commit is contained in:
Guido van Rossum 2014-11-17 16:12:26 -08:00
parent 4e41b5e146
commit 1a09d6b62b
1 changed files with 8 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@ -174,6 +174,11 @@ ever, a problem. [4]_ Code does exist which relies on the current
behaviour (e.g. [2]_, [5]_, [6]_), and there is the concern that this behaviour (e.g. [2]_, [5]_, [6]_), and there is the concern that this
would be unnecessary code churn to achieve little or no gain. would be unnecessary code churn to achieve little or no gain.
Steven D'Aprano started an informal survey on comp.lang.python [9]_;
at the time of writing only two responses have been received: one was
in favor of changing list comprehensions to match generator
expressions (!), the other was in favor of this PEP's main proposal.
References References
========== ==========
@ -202,6 +207,9 @@ References
.. [8] Coroutines in asyncio .. [8] Coroutines in asyncio
(https://docs.python.org/3/library/asyncio-task.html#coroutines) (https://docs.python.org/3/library/asyncio-task.html#coroutines)
.. [9] Thread on comp.lang.python started by Steven D'Aprano
(https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2014-November/680757.html)
Copyright Copyright
========= =========