Create PEP 460 "Add bytes % args and bytes.format(args) to Python 3.5"

This commit is contained in:
Victor Stinner 2014-01-06 14:01:09 +01:00
parent c77d38b4d2
commit 1a7d7a09c8
1 changed files with 175 additions and 0 deletions

175
pep-0460.txt Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,175 @@
PEP: 460
Title: Add bytes % args and bytes.format(args) to Python 3.5
Version: $Revision$
Last-Modified: $Date$
Author: Victor Stinner <victor.stinner@gmail.com>
Status: Draft
Type: Standards Track
Content-Type: text/x-rst
Created: 6-Jan-2014
Python-Version: 3.5
Abstract
========
Add ``bytes % args`` operator and ``bytes.format(args)`` method to
Python 3.5.
Rationale
=========
``bytes % args`` and ``bytes.format(args)`` have been removed in Python
2. This operator and this method are requested by Mercurial and Twisted
developers to ease porting their project on Python 3.
Python 3 suggests to format text first and then encode to bytes. In
some cases, it does not make sense because arguments are bytes strings.
Typical usage is a network protocol which is binary, since data are
send to and received from sockets. For example, SMTP, SIP, HTTP, IMAP,
POP, FTP are ASCII commands interspersed with binary data.
Using multiple ``bytes + bytes`` instructions is inefficient because it
requires temporary buffers and copies which are slow and waste memory.
Python 3.3 optimizes ``str2 += str2`` but not ``bytes2 += bytes1``.
``bytes % args`` and ``bytes.format(args)`` were asked since 2008, even
before the first release of Python 3.0 (see issue #3982).
``struct.pack()`` is incomplete. For example, a number cannot be
formatted as decimal and it does not support padding bytes string.
Mercurial 2.8 still supports Python 2.4.
Needed and excluded features
============================
Needed features
* Bytes strings: bytes, bytearray and memoryview types
* Format integer numbers as decimal
* Padding with spaces and null bytes
* "%s" should use the buffer protocol, not str()
The feature set is minimal to keep the implementation as simple as
possible to limit the cost of the implementation. ``str % args`` and
``str.format(args)`` are already complex and difficult to maintain, the
code is heavily optimized.
Excluded features:
* no implicit conversion from Unicode to bytes (ex: encode to ASCII or
to Latin1)
* Locale support (``{!n}`` format for numbers). Locales are related to
text and usually to an encoding.
* ``repr()``, ``ascii()``: ``%r``, ``{!r}``, ``%a`` and ``{!a}``
formats. ``repr()`` and ``ascii()`` are used to debug, the output is
displayed a terminal or a graphical widget. They are more related to
text.
* Attribute access: ``{obj.attr}``
* Indexing: ``{dict[key]}``
* Features of struct.pack(). For example, format a number as 32 bit unsigned
integer in network endian. The ``struct.pack()`` can be used to prepare
arguments, the implementation should be kept simple.
* Features of int.to_bytes().
* Features of ctypes.
* New format protocol like a new ``__bformat__()`` method. Since the
* list of
supported types is short, there is no need to add a new protocol.
Other types must be explicitly casted.
* Alternate format for integer. For example, ``'{|#x}'.format(0x123)``
to get ``0x123``. It is more related to debug, and the prefix can be
easily be written in the format string (ex: ``0x%x``).
* Relation with format() and the __format__() protocol. bytes.format()
and str.format() are unrelated.
Unknown:
* Format integer to hexadecimal? ``%x`` and ``%X``
* Format integer to octal? ``%o``
* Format integer to binary? ``{!b}``
* Alignment?
* Truncating? Truncate or raise an error?
* format keywords? ``b'{arg}'.format(arg=5)``
* ``str % dict`` ? ``b'%(arg)s' % {'arg': 5)``
* Floating point number?
* ``%i``, ``%u`` and ``%d`` formats for integer numbers?
* Signed number? ``%+i`` and ``%-i``
bytes % args
============
Formatters:
* ``"%c"``: one byte
* ``"%s"``: integer or bytes strings
* ``"%20s"`` pads to 20 bytes with spaces (``b' '``)
* ``"%020s"`` pads to 20 bytes with zeros (``b'0'``)
* ``"%\020s"`` pads to 20 bytes with null bytes (``b'\0'``)
bytes.format(args)
==================
Formatters:
* ``"{!c}"``: one byte
* ``"{!s}"``: integer or bytes strings
* ``"{!.20s}"`` pads to 20 bytes with spaces (``b' '``)
* ``"{!.020s}"`` pads to 20 bytes with zeros (``b'0'``)
* ``"{!\020s}"`` pads to 20 bytes with null bytes (``b'\0'``)
Examples
========
* ``b'a%sc%s' % (b'b', 4)`` gives ``b'abc4'``
* ``b'a{}c{}'.format(b'b', 4)`` gives ``b'abc4'``
* ``b'%c'`` % 88`` gives ``b'X``'
* ``b'%%'`` gives ``b'%'``
Criticisms
==========
* The development cost and maintenance cost.
* In 3.3 encoding to ascii or latin1 is as fast as memcpy
* Developers must work around the lack of bytes%args and
bytes.format(args) anyway to support Python 3.0-3.4
* bytes.join() is consistently faster than format to join bytes strings.
* Formatting functions can be implemented in a third party module
References
==========
* `Issue #3982: support .format for bytes
<http://bugs.python.org/issue3982>`_
* `Mercurial project
<http://mercurial.selenic.com/>`_
* `Twisted project
<http://twistedmatrix.com/trac/>`_
* `Documentation of Python 2 formatting (str % args)
<http://docs.python.org/2/library/stdtypes.html#string-formatting>`_
* `Documentation of Python 2 formatting (str.format)
<http://docs.python.org/2/library/string.html#formatstrings>`_
Copyright
=========
This document has been placed in the public domain.
..
Local Variables:
mode: indented-text
indent-tabs-mode: nil
sentence-end-double-space: t
fill-column: 70
coding: utf-8
End: