The start of a Python 2.4 schedule PEP (I'm claiming the next free PEP

number)
This commit is contained in:
Barry Warsaw 2003-07-29 04:35:27 +00:00
parent fe4914eda3
commit 1b569d92e5
1 changed files with 184 additions and 0 deletions

184
pep-0320.txt Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,184 @@
PEP: 320
Title: Python 2.4 Release Schedule
Version: $Revision$
Author: Barry Warsaw
Status: Incomplete
Type: Informational
Created: 29-Jul-2003
Python-Version: 2.4
Post-History:
Abstract
This document describes the development and release schedule for
Python 2.4. The schedule primarily concerns itself with PEP-sized
items. Small features may be added up to and including the first
beta release. Bugs may be fixed until the final release.
There will be at least two alpha releases, two beta releases, and
one release candidate. Other than that, no claims are made on
release plans, nor what will actually be in Python 2.4 at this
early date. There were 19 months between the Python 2.2 final and
Python 2.3 final releases. If that schedule holds true for Python
2.4, you can expect it some time around February 2005.
Release Manager
TBD
Completed features for 2.4
None
Planned features for 2.4
Too early for anything more to get done here.
Ongoing tasks
The following are ongoing TO-DO items which we should attempt to
work on without hoping for completion by any particular date.
- Documentation: complete the distribution and installation
manuals.
- Documentation: complete the documentation for new-style
classes.
- Look over the Demos/ directory and update where required (Andrew
Kuchling has done a lot of this)
- New tests.
- Fix doc bugs on SF.
- Remove use of deprecated features in the core.
- Document deprecated features appropriately.
- Mark deprecated C APIs with Py_DEPRECATED.
- Deprecate modules which are unmaintained, or perhaps make a new
category for modules 'Unmaintained'
- In general, lots of cleanup so it is easier to move forward.
Open issues
None at this time.
Carryover features from Python 2.3
- The import lock could use some redesign. (SF 683658.)
- Set API issues; is the sets module perfect?
I expect it's good enough to stop polishing it until we've had
more widespread user experience.
- A nicer API to open text files, replacing the ugly (in some
people's eyes) "U" mode flag. There's a proposal out there to
have a new built-in type textfile(filename, mode, encoding).
(Shouldn't it have a bufsize argument too?)
Ditto.
- New widgets for Tkinter???
Has anyone gotten the time for this? *Are* there any new
widgets in Tk 8.4? Note that we've got better Tix support
already (though not on Windows yet).
- Fredrik Lundh's basetime proposal:
http://effbot.org/ideas/time-type.htm
I believe this is dead now.
- PEP 304 (Controlling Generation of Bytecode Files by Montanaro)
seems to have lost steam.
- For a class defined inside another class, the __name__ should be
"outer.inner", and pickling should work. (SF 633930. I'm no
longer certain this is easy or even right.)
- reST is going to be used a lot in Zope3. Maybe it could become
a standard library module? (Since reST's author thinks it's too
instable, I'm inclined not to do this.)
- Decide on a clearer deprecation policy (especially for modules)
and act on it. For a start, see this message from Neil Norwitz:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-April/023165.html
There seems insufficient interest in moving this further in an
organized fashion, and it's not particularly important.
- Provide alternatives for common uses of the types module;
Skip Montanaro has posted a proto-PEP for this idea:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-May/024346.html
There hasn't been any progress on this, AFAICT.
- Use pending deprecation for the types and string modules. This
requires providing alternatives for the parts that aren't
covered yet (e.g. string.whitespace and types.TracebackType).
It seems we can't get consensus on this.
- Deprecate the buffer object.
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-July/026388.html
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-July/026408.html
It seems that this is never going to be resolved.
- PEP 269 Pgen Module for Python Riehl
(Some necessary changes are in; the pgen module itself needs to
mature more.)
- Add support for the long-awaited Python catalog. Kapil
Thangavelu has a Zope-based implementation that he demoed at
OSCON 2002. Now all we need is a place to host it and a person
to champion it. (Some changes to distutils to support this are
in, at least.)
- PEP 266 Optimizing Global Variable/Attribute Access Montanaro
PEP 267 Optimized Access to Module Namespaces Hylton
PEP 280 Optimizing access to globals van Rossum
These are basically three friendly competing proposals. Jeremy
has made a little progress with a new compiler, but it's going
slow and the compiler is only the first step. Maybe we'll be
able to refactor the compiler in this release. I'm tempted to
say we won't hold our breath. In the mean time, Oren Tirosh has
a much simpler idea that may give a serious boost to the
performance of accessing globals and built-ins, by optimizing
and inlining the dict access:
http://tothink.com/python/fastnames/
- Lazily tracking tuples?
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-May/023926.html
http://www.python.org/sf/558745
Not much enthusiasm I believe.
- PEP 286 Enhanced Argument Tuples von Loewis
I haven't had the time to review this thoroughly. It seems a
deep optimization hack (also makes better correctness guarantees
though).
- Make 'as' a keyword. It has been a pseudo-keyword long enough.
Too much effort to bother.
Copyright
This document has been placed in the public domain.
Local Variables:
mode: indented-text
indent-tabs-mode: nil
End: