From 1c8c3aff5975f653c244675025537d884c0a7a33 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dimitri Papadopoulos Orfanos
 <3234522+DimitriPapadopoulos@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2021 16:17:41 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] PEP 649: repeated words (#2149)

---
 pep-0649.rst | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/pep-0649.rst b/pep-0649.rst
index c5a0a2d28..61ff52f6b 100644
--- a/pep-0649.rst
+++ b/pep-0649.rst
@@ -520,7 +520,7 @@ If there are any annotations, they create the scope for
 the annotations function on demand, and
 ``compiler_visit_annotations()`` assembles it.
 
-The code object is passed in in place of the annotations dict
+The code object is passed in place of the annotations dict
 for the ``MAKE_FUNCTION`` bytecode instruction.
 ``MAKE_FUNCTION`` supports a new bit in its oparg
 bitfield, ``0x10``, which tells it to expect a
@@ -887,9 +887,9 @@ here:
   ``NameError`` when an unknown name is evaluated,
   but instead create some sort of proxy "reference" object.
 * Of course, even if we do deprecate PEP 563, it will be
-  several releases before the before the functionality
-  is removed, giving us several years in which to to
-  research and innovate new solutions for this problem.
+  several releases before the functionality is removed,
+  giving us several years in which to research and innovate
+  new solutions for this problem.
 
 In any case, the participants of the discussion agree that
 this PEP should still move forward, even as this issue remains