From 1d09abe70138f530d7dd3307e5cbc053a929b923 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sam Gross <colesbury@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2023 19:23:10 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] PEP 703: Mark as Accepted (#3512)

---
 peps/pep-0703.rst | 10 +++++++++-
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/peps/pep-0703.rst b/peps/pep-0703.rst
index 2d7f921fa..ec4bc8710 100644
--- a/peps/pep-0703.rst
+++ b/peps/pep-0703.rst
@@ -3,13 +3,21 @@ Title: Making the Global Interpreter Lock Optional in CPython
 Author: Sam Gross <colesbury at gmail.com>
 Sponsor: Łukasz Langa <lukasz at python.org>
 Discussions-To: https://discuss.python.org/t/22606
-Status: Draft
+Status: Accepted
 Type: Standards Track
 Content-Type: text/x-rst
 Created: 09-Jan-2023
 Python-Version: 3.13
 Post-History: `09-Jan-2023 <https://discuss.python.org/t/22606>`__,
               `04-May-2023 <https://discuss.python.org/t/26503>`__
+Resolution: https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-703-making-the-global-interpreter-lock-optional-in-cpython-acceptance/37075
+
+.. note::
+   The Steering Council accepts PEP 703, but with clear provisio: that
+   the rollout be gradual and break as little as possible, and that we can roll
+   back any changes that turn out to be too disruptive – which includes
+   potentially rolling back all of PEP 703 entirely if necessary
+   (however unlikely or undesirable we expect that to be).
 
 
 Abstract