iSharkFly-Open
/
python-peps
mirror of https://github.com/python/peps.git
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

PEP-0467: include reference to current iter-bytes thread (GH-3608)

This commit is contained in:
Ethan Furman 2023-12-27 11:51:37 -08:00 committed by GitHub
parent d119fc4129
commit 1f196ea6c3
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
1 changed files with 9 additions and 2 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

11
peps/pep-0467.rst
View File

@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ Content-Type: text/x-rst
Created: 30-Mar-2014
Python-Version: 3.12
Post-History: 30-Mar-2014, 15-Aug-2014, 16-Aug-2014, 07-Jun-2016, 01-Sep-2016,
13-Apr-2021, 03-Nov-2021
13-Apr-2021, 03-Nov-2021, 27-Dec-2023
Abstract
@ -177,6 +177,13 @@ that ``bytes(x)`` (where ``x`` is an integer) should behave like the
``bytes.fromint(x)`` proposal in this PEP. Providing both behaviors as separate
class methods avoids that ambiguity.
Current Workarounds
-------------------
After nearly a decade, there's seems to be no consensus on the best workarounds
for byte iteration, as demonstrated by
`Get single-byte bytes objects from bytes objects`_.
Omitting the originally proposed builtin function
-------------------------------------------------
@ -211,7 +218,7 @@ References
* `Issue proposing to use calloc() for zero-initialised binary sequences <https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/65843>`_
* `August 2014 discussion thread on python-dev <https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/2014-March/027295.html>`_
* `June 2016 discussion thread on python-dev <https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2016-June/144875.html>`_
* `Get single-byte bytes objects from bytes objects <https://discuss.python.org/t/get-single-byte-bytes-objects-from-a-bytes-object/41709>`_
Copyright
=========