Fix typo. Revert my previous diff that removed another example breaking before "and".

This commit is contained in:
Guido van Rossum 2016-04-15 09:54:42 -07:00
parent c59c4376ad
commit 21bdcd2e9b
1 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions

View File

@ -147,8 +147,8 @@ Acceptable options in this situation include, but are not limited to::
do_something()
# Add some extra indentation on the conditional continuation line.
if (this_is_one_thing and
that_is_another_thing):
if (this_is_one_thing
and that_is_another_thing):
do_something()
(Also see the discussion of whether to break before or after binary
@ -260,7 +260,7 @@ typesetting [3]_. Therefore it is permissible to break before or
after a binary operator, as long as the convention is consistent
locally. For new code Knuth's style is suggested.
Some examples of code beaking before binary Boolean operators::
Some examples of code breaking before binary Boolean operators::
class Rectangle(Blob):